Notes on the Future of Globalization Under the Influence of COVID-19

Abstract

Societies have shown resistance and reflexes to overcome the difficult times they have encountered throughout history and have often been successful. The "New Deal" policies that emerged in the USA after the Great Depression in 1929 pioneered the socio-economic models of the century. Similarly, after the Second World War, new norms and institutional structures were built. Post-war states have had to implement socio-economic programs to adapt themselves to the new situation. It has been inevitable that globalization has led to intellectual and institutional changes due to its multiplier effect. Despite serious concerns about the globalization process, it can be seen as a rational approach to consider its contribution to the formation of democratic, transparent, auditable, effective, citizen-oriented, etc. institutions. The COVID-19 Pandemic seems to have given communities the opportunity to remind and review at multiple points. The first of these is that the reality of the epidemic is not a surprise to the human beings of the millennium age, on the contrary, there have been similar experiences in the past. The commitments made by globalization in dealing with the consequences of the pandemic have forced states to act together to overcome the same problems. Global policies and their consequences have started to be discussed more strongly with the pandemic. However, the pandemic alone is not the element that opens globalization to discussion. The main motivation of our work; societies' showing globalization as a common response to their criticism of the problems arising with the pandemic. In this context, our article tries to analyze the globalization debates that have become more visible with the pandemic and the future of the global world in the main context of economic and democratic processes. 

Keywords

• COVID-19
• pandemic
• globalization
• economy
• democracy

COVID-19 Etkisi Altında Küreselleşmenin Geleceği Üzerine Notlar

Abstract

Toplumlar tarih boyunca karşılaştıkları zor dönemleri aşmak için direnç ve refleks göstermiş ve çoğu zaman başarılı olmuştur. 1929-Büyük Buhran sonrasında ABD’de ortaya çıkan “New Deal” politikaları yüzyılın sosyo-ekonomik modellerine öncülük etmiştir. Benzer şekilde İkinci Dünya Savaşı sonrasında yeni normlar ve kurumsal yapılar inşa edilmiştir. Savaş sonrası devletler kendilerini yeni duruma uyarlamaya yönelik sosyo-ekonomik programları uygulamak zorunda kalmışlardır. Küreselleşmenin çarpan etkisi nedeniyle düşünsel ve kurumsal değişikliklere yol açması kaçınılmaz olmuştur. Küreselleşme sürecine ilişkin ciddi endişelere rağmen sürecin demokratik, saydam, denetlenebilir, etkin, vatandaş odaklı vb. kurumların oluşumuna yönelik katkılarını dikkate almak rasyonel bir yaklaşım olarak görülebilir. COVID-19 Pandemisi toplumlara birden fazla noktada hatırlatma ve gözden geçirme imkanı tanımış görünmektedir. Bunlardan birincisi salgın gerçeğinin milenyum çağının insanoğluna bir sürprizi olmadığı tam tersine geçmiş dönemlerde de benzer deneyimlerin bulunduğudur. Pandeminin sonuçlarıyla baş etmek konusunda küreselleşme ile sağlanan bağlılıklar devletleri aynı sorunları aşmak için birlikte hareket etmeye zorlamıştır. Küresel politikalar ve sonuçları pandemi ile daha güçlü şekilde tartışılmaya başlanmıştır. Ancak tek başına pandemi küreselleşmeyi tartışmaya açan unsur değildir. Çalışmamızın temel motivasyonunu; toplumların pandemi ile ortaya çıkan sorunlara yönelik eleştirilerine ortak bir cevap olarak küreselleşmeyi göstermeleri oluşturmaktadır. Bu çerçevede makalemizde pandemi ile daha görünür hale gelen küreselleşme tartışmaları ve küresel dünyanın geleceği ekonomik ve demokratik süreçler ana bağlamında analiz edilmeye çalışılmaktadır. 

Keywords

• COVID-19
• pandemi
• küreselleşme
• ekonomi
• demokrasi

References

1. Akkaş, H.H. (2010). İdeolojiler açısından küreselleşmenin yorumlanması. O. Tekir, Ş. Öner (Ed) Tartışılan boyutlarıyla küreselleşme içinde (ss.1-24). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
2. Akkaş, H.H. (2020), Covid-19 sonrası dünya sistemi ve hegemonya. Ed. S. Thakur ve A. Yadav International Conference on Covid-19 Studies Full Texts Book içinde (ss. 566-597). Ankara: by Iksad Publishing House.
3. Appelbaum, B. (2020). The coming eviction crisis: ıt’s hard to pay the bills on nothing. Aug 9. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/09/opinion/evictions-foreclosures-covid-economy.html (Erişim tarihi: 23.08.2020)
4. Bayram, A.K. (2010). Küreselleşme ve kozmopolitanizmin imkanı. O. Tekir, Ş. Öner (Ed) Tartışılan boyutlarıyla küreselleşme içinde (ss.53-74). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
5. Beck, U. (1999). What is Globalization?. Cambridge Polity Press.
6. Bashevkin, D. (2020). Is NCSY’s new normal even new?. Apr 29, https://ncsy.org/newnormal/ (Erişim tarihi: 22.06.2020)
7. Benedictow, O. J. (2005). The back death: the greatest catastrophe ever. History Today, https://www.historytoday.com/archive/black-death-greatest-catastrophe-ever (Erişim tarihi: 10.02.2020)
8. Black, W. (2019). What was the black death?. December 12, https://www.livescience.com/what-was-the-black-death.html, (Erişim tarihi: 23.06.2020)

9. Black death: how can we learn from the spread of disease along the silk roads?. (2020). 31 March, https://en.unesco.org/news/black-death-how-can-we-learn-spread-disease-along-silk-roads (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
10. Blair, T. (2020). Tony blair: ı’ve always been an optimist. but for the first time ever ı’m troubled about the future. Oct 22, https://time.com/collection/great-reset/5900762/tony-blair-concerned-future/ (Erişim tarihi: 27.10.2020)
11. Boone, L. (2020). We may have to prepare for a longer coronavirus crisis. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=126_126997-ai0ybp7gh0&title=We-may-have-to-prepare-for-a-longer-coronavirus-crisis (Erişim tarihi: 06.02.2020)
12. Chatzky, A., & McBride, J. (2020). China’s massive belt and road initiative. Council On Foreign Relations, January 28, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-massive-belt-and-roadinitiative (Erişim tarihi: 24.10.2020)
13. China's belt and road initiative in the global trade investment and finance landscape (2018). OECD Business and Finance Outlook, 1-46, https://www.oecd.org/finance/Chinas-Belt-and-Road-Initiative-in-theglobal-trade-investment-and-finance-landscape.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 23.10.2020)
14. Edward, W. (2020a). Why romans grew nostalgıc for the deadly plague of 165 A.D. https://www.zocalopublicsquare.org/2020/04/26/roman-empire-smallpox-plague-lessons-covid 19/ideas/essay/?xid=ps_smithsonian (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
15. Edward, W. (2020b). What rome learned. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-rome-learned-deadly-antonine-plague-165-d-180974758/ (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
16. Foster, J.B., & Suwandi, I. (2020). Covid-19 and catastrophe capitalism. Jun 1, https://monthlyreview.org/2020/06/01/covid-19-and-catastrophe-capitalism/ (Erişim tarihi: 04.10.2020)
17. Fukuyama, F. (2020). The pandemic and political order. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/world/2020-06-09/pandemic-and-political-order, (Erişim tarihi: 04.07.2020)
18. Gao, X., & Yu, J. (2020). Public governance mechanism in the prevention and control of the covid-19: information, decision-making and execution. Journal of Chinese Governance, 5 (2), 178-197, 14 Apr, https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rgov20, (Erişim tarihi: 05.06.2020)
19. Glenn, J. (2020). COVID-19 brief: impact on democracy around the world. July 7, https://www.usglc.org/coronavirus/democracy/ (Erişim tarihi: 25.10.2020)
20. Giddens, A. (2000). Elimizden kaçıp giden dünya (Akınhay, O. Çev.) İstanbul: Alfa.
21. Gong, X. (2018). The belt & road ınitiative and china’s influence in southeast asia. The Pacific Review, 32, 4, 635-665 (Erişim tarihi: 23.10.2020)
22. Haas, C. (2006). The antonine plague, National Institutes of Health, Apr-May, 190 (4-5), (pp.1093-1098), https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17195627/ (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
23. Habib, B., & Faulknor, V. (2017). The belt and road ınitiative: china’s vision for globalisation, Beijing-style. May 16, https://theconversation.com/the-belt-and-road-initiative-chinas-vision-for-globalisation-beijing-style-77705 (Erişim tarihi:24.10.2020)
24. Harari, Y.N. (2020a). The world after coronavirus free to read. Mar 20, https://www.ft.com/content/19d90308-6858-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75 (Erişim tarihi: 22.04.2020)
25. Harari, Y.N. (2020b). Every crisis is also an opportunity. https://en.unesco.org/courier/2020-3/yuval-noah-harari-every-crisis-also-opportunity (Erişim tarihi: 24.07.2020)
26. Horgan, J. (2016). The plague at athens, 430-427 BCE. 24 Aug, https://www.ancient.eu/article/939/the-plague-at-athens-430-427-bce/ (Erişim tarihi: 10.02.2020)
27. Horgan, J. (2019). Antonine plague. 2 May, https://www.ancient.eu/Antonine_Plague/ (Erişim tarihi: 26.06.2020)
28. Jarus, O. (2020). 20 of the worst epidemics and pandemics in history. March 20, www.livescience.com/worst-epidemics-and- (Erişim tarihi: 23.06.2020)
29. Kavanagh, M. M., & Singh, R. (2020). Democracy, capacity, and coercion in pandemic response-COVID 19 in comparative political perspective. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, Published by Duke University Press., https://read.dukeupress.edu/jhppl/article/doi/10.1215/03616878-8641530/165294/ (Erişim tarihi: 24.08.2020)
30. Khi, V.T., Rahm, D., & Coggburn. J.D., (2007), Globalization and the environment: an introduction. Khi V.T., Rahm, T., & Coggburn, J. D. (Ed) Handbook of Globalization and The Environment, CRS Press, Taylor Francis Group, 1-572. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/globalization-environment-introduction-khi-thai-dianne-rahm-jerrell-coggburn/e/10.4324/9781315093253-1 (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
31. Kissenger, H. (2020). The coronavirus pandemic will forever alter the world order. Apr, www.henryakissinger.com/articles/ (Erişim tarihi: 12.05.2020)
32. Jaıshankar, D. (2020). A global pandemic and globalisation. Apr 12, https://www.orfonline.org/research/a-global-pandemic-and-globalisation-64468/ (Erişim tarihi: 24.06.2020)
33. Johnson, B. (2017). The spanish flu pandemic of 1918. https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofBritain/The-Spanish-Flu-pandemic-of-1918/ (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
34. Legrain, P. (2020). The coronavirus is killing Globalization as we know it. March 12 https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/03/12/coronavirus-killing-globalization-nationalism-protectionism-trump/ (Erişim tarihi: 12.05.2020)
35. Leonard, J. (2020). What we know about the plague of ancient athens. March 23, https://www.greece-is.com/what-we-know-about-the-plague-of-ancient-athens/ (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
36. Lu, H., Rohr, C., Hafner, M., & Knack, A. (2018). China belt and road ınitiative. Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., and Cambridge, UK, 1-73. January, https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB10029.html, (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
37. McBride, J., & Chatzky, A. (2019). Is made in china 2025 a threat to global trade?. Council on Foreign Relations, May 13, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/made-china-2025-threat-global-trade, (Erişim tarihi: 24.10.2020)
38. Major epidemics of the modern era. (2020). https://www.cfr.org/timeline/major-epidemics-modern-era, (Erişim tarihi: 23.06.2020)
39. Marzocchi, O. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 measures on democracy the rule of law and fundemental rights in the EU. Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs 23 April, 1-10, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2020/651343/IPOL_BRI(2020)651343_EN.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 25.10.2020)
40. Miller, K. (2020). 6 of the worst pandemics in history. www.health.com/condition/infectious-diseases/worst-pandemics-in-history, (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
41. Moein, S., Seyed, M., Hashemian, R., Mansourafshar, B., Ali Khorram-Tousi, A., Tabarsi, P., & Doty R. (2020). Smell dysfunction: a biomarker for COVID-19. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, 10 (8), 944-950, Aug, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/alr.22587 (Erişim tarihi: 03.10.2020)
42. Monck, A. A. (2020). The great reset: a unique twin summit to begin 2021. 3 Jun, https://www.weforum.org/press/2020/06/the-great-reset-a-unique-twin-summit-to-begin-2021/, (Erişim tarihi: 24.09.2020)
43. Muttarak, R. (2020). Moving along the belt and road: implications of china’s ‘one belt, one road’ strategies on chinese migration, http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/14858/1/6_Muttarak_Moving%20along%20the%20Belt%20and%20Road.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 23.10.2020)
44. Robertson, R., (1999). Küreselleşme: toplum kuramı ve küresel kültür (Yolsal, Ü.H. Çev.) Ankara: Bilim ve Sanay
45. Repucci, S., & Slipowitz, A. (2020). New report: democracy under lockdown-the impact of COVID-19 on global freedom. Freedom House, October 2, https://freedomhouse.org/report/special-report/2020/democracy-under-lockdown (Erişim tarihi: 25.10.2020)
46. Riedel, S. (2005). Plague: from natural disease to bioterrorism, Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings. Dec, 18(2), 116-124, DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2005.11928049, 11 https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ubmc20 (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
47. Sabbatani, S., & Fiorino, S. (2009). The antonine plague and the decline of the roman empire. National Institutes of Health, Dec, 17 (4), 261-75, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sars-cov-2/ (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
48. SARS basics fact sheet, (2020). https://www.cdc.gov/sars/about/fs-sars.html, (Erişim tarihi: 23.06.2020)
49. Samal, J. (2014). A historical exploration of pandemics of some selected diseases in the World. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 4 (2), 165-169. www.ijhsr.org, ISSN: 2249-9571, (Erişim 22.06.2020)
50. Savage, M., Bagnall, G., & Longhurst, B. (2005). Globalization and belonging, Sage Publications. 1-233, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28579720_Globalisation_and_Belonging, (Erişim tarihi: 04.10.2020)
51. Schat, M. (2020). Justinian’s foreign policy and the plague: did justinian create the first pandemic?. https://www.montana.edu/historybug/yersiniaessays/schat.html (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
52. Schwab, K. (2020). A better economy ıs possible but we need to reimagine capitalism to do it. Oct 22, https://Time.Com/Collection/Great-Reset/5900748/Klaus-Schwab Capitalism/ (Erişim tarihi: 27.10.2020)
53. Shenker, J. (2020). Cities after coronavirus: how Covid-19 could radically alter urban life. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/26/life-after-coronavirus-pandemic-change-world (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
54. Shereen, M.A., Khan, S., Kazmi, A., Bashir, N., & Siddique, R. (2020). COVID-19 infection: Origin, transmission, and characteristics of humancoronaviruses. Journal of Advanced Research, 24, 91–98, https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S2090123220300540?token= (Erişim tarihi: 03.10.2020)
55. Shıpman, P. L. (2014) (2020), The bright side of the black death. www.americanscientist.org/article/the-bright-side-of-the-black-death, (Erişim tarihi: 26.06.2020)
56. Sowards, W. (2020). What was the plague of justinian? how a single outbreak killed 10% of the world’s population. Aug, https://www.passporthealthusa.com/2020/08/what-was-the-justinian-plague/ (Erişim tarihi: 02.10.2020)
57. Taubenberger, K. J. (2006). The origin and virulence of the 1918 spanish influenza virus, HHS Public Access, Mar, 150 (1), 86-112,https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2720273/, (Erişim tarihi:02.10.2020)
58. The Potential of One Belt, One Road. (2015). GlobalCapital, December, 2-10, https://www.globalcapital.com/Media/documents/euroweek/pdfs/OBOR%20Low%20res%20with%20FW.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 23.10.2020)
59. Tekir, O. (2010). Küreselleşen sivil toplumun demokratikleşme sürecindeki işlevi, katkıları ve temel sorunlar, O. Tekir, Ş. Öner (Ed) Tartışılan boyutlarıyla küreselleşme içinde (ss. 87-103). Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
60. Thurow, L.C. (1997). A global economy. Foreign Policy Forum, N.1.
61. Tonchev, P. (2020). The belt and road after COVID-19. April 7, https://thediplomat.com/2020/04/the-belt-and-road-after-covid-19/ (Erişim tarihi: 24.10.2020)
62. Özden, K. ve Özmat M. (2014). Salgın ve kent: 1347 veba salgınının Avrupa’da sosyal, politik ve ekonomik sonuçları. İdealkent, 12, Nisan, 60-87, ISSN: 1307-9905
63. Youngs, R., & Panchulidze, E. (2020). Global democracy & COVID-19: upgrading international support. 1-41, https://www.democracyendowment.eu/en/news/1741-global-democracy-and-covid-19-upgrading-international-support.html (Erişim tarihi: 25.10.2020)
64. Wang, Y. (2016). Offensive for defensive: the belt and road initiative and china's new grand strategy. The Pacific Review, 29(3), 455-463, 9 Mar, DOI: 10.1080/09512748.2016.1154690, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09512748.2016.1154690?casa_token= (Erişim tarihi: 23.10.2020)
65. Watts, E. (2020a). Why romans grew nostalgıc for the deadly plague of 165 A.D. https://www.zocalopublicsquare.org/2020/04/26/roman-empire-smallpox-plague-lessons-covid 19/ideas/essay/?xid=ps_smithsonian (Erişim tarihi:02.10.2020)
66. Watts, E. (2020b). What rome learned. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/what-rome-learned-deadly-antonine-plague-165-d-180974758/ (Erişim tarihi:02.10.2020)
67. Weber, M.A., Lum, T., Blackwood, M.A., Mix, D.E., & Husted, T.F. (2020). Global democracy and human rights impacts of covid-19: in brief. Congressional Research Service Report, June 26, 1-15, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R46430.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 25.10.2020)
68. Wignaraja, K. (2020). The case for a universal basic income. July 10, https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/blog/2020/the-case-for-a-universal-basic-income.html (Erişim tarihi: 23.08.2020)
69. Wijeratne, D., Rathbone, M., & Wong G. (2018). A strategist’s guide to china’s belt and road initiative. Strategy+Business, Jan 22, https://www.strategy-business.com/feature/A-Strategists-Guide-to-Chinas-Belt-and-Road-Initiative?gko=8e9c5 (Erişim tarihi: 24.10.2020)
70. Xue, L., Xiao Y, & He B. (2016). A research on china’s process of globalization and the belt and road initiative. International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics, July-August, 5(4), 36-54, ISSN: 2278-3369, www.managementjournal.info (Erişim tarihi: 24.10.2020)
71. URL-1: https://www.who.int/topics/cholera/impact/en/
72. URL-2: http://www.msubillings.edu/lectures/ww1/pdf/Lewis
73. URL-3:https://en.unesco.org/news/black-death-how-can-we-learn-spread-disease-along-silk-roads
74. URL-4: https://www.who.int/gho/hiv/en/
75. URL-5: https://applications.emro.who.int/docs/
76. URL-6:https://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/history/outbreak/index.html
77. URL-7: https://en.unesco.org/courier/
78. URL-8: https://www.avim.org.tr/en/Analiz/
79. URL-9: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/tr/
80. URL-10: https://www.historythings.com/the-great-depression-part-1
81. URL-11:https://www.historylearning.com/modern-world-history/america-1918/new-deal-success/
82. URL-12: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/
83. URL-13: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/
84. URL-14: https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/
85. URL-15:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8925945/Economic-damage-cause-Covid-pandemic-means-WWIII-risk-warns-UKs-military-commander.html
86. URL-16:https://www.wbcsd.org/WBCSD-COVID-19-Response-Program/Return-to-New-Normal-Employee-Health-and-Business-Recovery
87. URL-17: www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature
88. URL-18: https://www.weforum.org/great-reset
89. URL-19: https://www.givedirectly.org/basic-income
90. URL-20: https://www.thebalance.com/universal-basic-income
91. URL-21: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-encyclical
92. URL-22: https://www.iea.org.uk/the-pope-just-called-private-property
93. URL-23: https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/politics-pandemics
94. URL-24: https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/politics-pandemics
95. URL-25: https://www.economist.com/leaders/
96. URL-26: https://www.weforum.org/great-reset