Research Article

Relationships of Pain Intensity, Kinesiophobia and Quality of Life in Chronic Subacromial Pain Syndrome

Volume: 19 Number: 2 June 28, 2019
EN TR

Relationships of Pain Intensity, Kinesiophobia and Quality of Life in Chronic Subacromial Pain Syndrome

Abstract

Objectives: Shoulder pain is an important and frequently reported biopsychosocial problem. In addition to physical problems, understanding of psychological problems that contribute to shoulder pain is important for the treatment process. Therefore, the purpose was to investigate the relationship between kinesiophobia, demographic characteristics, pain intensity and quality of life in patients seeking conservative treatment for chronic subacromial pain syndrome

Materials and Methods: Patients with chronic shoulder pain who applied to İzmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital were included in the study. Demographic data of the patients were recorded. The pain severity with Visual Analogue Scale, kinesiophobia with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), and quality of life with SF-36 quality of life index were assessed. In statistical analysis, Spearman and Kendall Correlation Analysis were used. Statistical significance level was set at p <0.05.

Results: Ninety-five patients, 32 male and 63 female, were included in the study. The median age was 51 (40-61) years, TSK score was 43(38-47), pain at rest was 3(0-5), pain during activity was 7 (5-8), SF-36 physical component (PC) and mental component (MC) scores were 36.50(29.3-42.1) and 42(34.9-49.6), respectively. While there was no difference between the pain (rest pain female/male= 3/2, p=0.054; activity pain female/male= 7/6, p=0.187) and kinesophobia scores (female/male=43/41, p=0,185) between genders, physical (female/male= 34.40 /41.40, p=0.001) and mental components (female/male=37.70/48.45, p=0.000) of quality of life was lower in women. Kinesiophobia score showed correlations with educational level, physical and mental components of quality of life (r= -0.163, p= 0.039; r= -0.499, p= 0.000; r= -0.279, p= 0.006).

Conclusion: Patients with subacromial pain syndrome had high kinesiophobia scores. Female and male participants showed similar pain and kinesiophobia, however, quality of life scores were better in male participants. Kinesiophobia showed negative correlations with the level of education, SF-36 scores. It is important to consider kinesiophobia, education level and quality of life integrations in chronic shoulder rehabilitation.

Keywords

References

  1. George SZ, Staud R, Borsa PA, et al. Biopsychosocial influence on shoulder pain: Rationale and protocol for a pre-clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2017;56:9-17.
  2. Diercks RL. Practice guideline 'Diagnosis and treatment of the subacromial pain syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2014;158:A6985.
  3. Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ, et al. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol 2004;33(2):73-81.
  4. Pribicevic M. The epidemiology of shoulder pain: A narrative review of the literature. In Pain in perspective. InTech. 2012.
  5. Steuri R, Sattelmayer M, Elsig S, et al. Effectiveness of conservative interventions including exercise, manual therapy and medical management in adults with shoulder impingement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Br J Sports Med 2017 Jun 19. pii: bjsports-2016-096515. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096515. [Epub ahead of print] Review.
  6. Lentz TA, Barabas JA, Day T, Bishop MD, George SZ. The relationship of pain intensity, physical impairment, and pain-related fear to function in patients with shoulder pathology. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(4):270-7
  7. Kibler WB, Ludewig PM, McClure PW, Michener LA, Bak K, Sciascia AD. Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: the 2013 consensus statement from the ‘Scapular Summit’. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47(14):877-885.
  8. Burwinkle T, Robinson JP, Turk DC. Fear of movement: factor structure of the tampa scale of kinesiophobia in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. J Pain 2005;6(6):384- 391.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

June 28, 2019

Submission Date

January 17, 2019

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 1970 Volume: 19 Number: 2

APA
Günay Uçurum, S. (2019). Relationships of Pain Intensity, Kinesiophobia and Quality of Life in Chronic Subacromial Pain Syndrome. Ankara Medical Journal, 19(2), 396-406. https://doi.org/10.17098/amj.581993
AMA
1.Günay Uçurum S. Relationships of Pain Intensity, Kinesiophobia and Quality of Life in Chronic Subacromial Pain Syndrome. Ankara Med J. 2019;19(2):396-406. doi:10.17098/amj.581993
Chicago
Günay Uçurum, Sevtap. 2019. “Relationships of Pain Intensity, Kinesiophobia and Quality of Life in Chronic Subacromial Pain Syndrome”. Ankara Medical Journal 19 (2): 396-406. https://doi.org/10.17098/amj.581993.
EndNote
Günay Uçurum S (June 1, 2019) Relationships of Pain Intensity, Kinesiophobia and Quality of Life in Chronic Subacromial Pain Syndrome. Ankara Medical Journal 19 2 396–406.
IEEE
[1]S. Günay Uçurum, “Relationships of Pain Intensity, Kinesiophobia and Quality of Life in Chronic Subacromial Pain Syndrome”, Ankara Med J, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 396–406, June 2019, doi: 10.17098/amj.581993.
ISNAD
Günay Uçurum, Sevtap. “Relationships of Pain Intensity, Kinesiophobia and Quality of Life in Chronic Subacromial Pain Syndrome”. Ankara Medical Journal 19/2 (June 1, 2019): 396-406. https://doi.org/10.17098/amj.581993.
JAMA
1.Günay Uçurum S. Relationships of Pain Intensity, Kinesiophobia and Quality of Life in Chronic Subacromial Pain Syndrome. Ankara Med J. 2019;19:396–406.
MLA
Günay Uçurum, Sevtap. “Relationships of Pain Intensity, Kinesiophobia and Quality of Life in Chronic Subacromial Pain Syndrome”. Ankara Medical Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, June 2019, pp. 396-0, doi:10.17098/amj.581993.
Vancouver
1.Sevtap Günay Uçurum. Relationships of Pain Intensity, Kinesiophobia and Quality of Life in Chronic Subacromial Pain Syndrome. Ankara Med J. 2019 Jun. 1;19(2):396-40. doi:10.17098/amj.581993