Sovyet Sonrası Rus Sinemasının Dönemleri

Year 2025, Issue: 31, 144 - 156

Bahadur Maharramov

https://doi.org/10.33404/anasay.1514484

Abstract

Sovyet sonrası Rus sineması, Sovyetler Birliği’nin 1991’de çöküşünden sonra hem içerik hem de biçim açısından büyük dönüşümler yaşamıştır. Bu dönemde sinema, devletin sıkı denetiminden ve ideolojik baskısından kurtularak daha özgür bir yapıya kavuşmuş, bireylerin ve toplumun yaşadığı değişimleri daha özgün ve eleştirel bir perspektiften ele almaya başlamıştır. Sovyetler Birliği’nin 1991’de dağılması, Rus sineması için hem sanatsal hem de endüstriyel anlamda büyük bir dönüm noktası olmuştur. Sinema üzerindeki merkezi kontrolün sona ermesiyle birlikte sanatsal özgürlükler artmış, bireysel ve toplumsal sorunlara yönelik daha özgün ve eleştirel yapımlar ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Sovyet sonrası Rus sinemasının farklı dönemlerini, toplumsal ve politik bağlamdaki değişimlerle birlikte incelemek, bu sinemanın tematik ve estetik dönüşümlerini ortaya koymaktır. Bu makale, Sovyet sonrası Rus sinemasını üç ana dönem altında ele almaktadır: 1990'lar, 2000'ler ve 2010 sonrası. 1990’lar Sovyetler Birliği'nin çöküşüyle birlikte toplumsal ve ekonomik krizlerin sinemaya yansıdığı bir zaman dilimidir. Devlet desteğinden yoksun kalan sinema sektörü, düşük bütçeli yapımlara yönelmiştir. Filmler, bireylerin kimlik arayışını ve toplumsal çözülmeyi sert bir dille ele almıştır. Filmler, bireylerin toplumla ve devletle olan mücadelesine odaklanarak modern Rusya'nın sorunlarına eleştirel bir bakış sunmaktadır. Bulgular, Sovyet sonrası Rus sinemasının her döneminin, toplumsal ve politik yapılarla paralel olarak geliştiğini ortaya koymaktadır. 1990’lar ekonomik ve toplumsal krizlerle bireysel arayışları işleyen bir dönem olurken, 2000’ler devlet desteğiyle büyük prodüksiyonlara ve tarihî konulara yönelmiştir. 2010 sonrası ise sanatsal derinliğin arttığı, birey-devlet çatışmasının keskinleştiği bir dönem olmuştur. Rus sineması, bu dönemlerde toplumsal dönüşümleri ve bireylerin bu dönüşümlerle mücadelesini yansıtarak hem sanatsal hem de ticari başarılar elde etmiştir.

Keywords

Rusya, Sinema, Yönetmenler

Period of Post-Soviet Russian Cinema

Abstract

Post-Soviet Russian cinema has undergone major transformations in terms of both content and form after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. During this period, cinema gained a freer structure by escaping the strict control and ideological oppression of the state, and began to address the changes experienced by individuals and society from a more original and critical perspective. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 was a major turning point for Russian cinema in both artistic and industrial terms. With the end of central control over cinema, artistic freedoms increased, and more original and critical productions focused on individual and social problems emerged. The aim of this study is to examine the different periods of post-Soviet Russian cinema together with the changes in the social and political context, and to reveal the thematic and aesthetic transformations of this cinema. This article examines post-Soviet Russian cinema under three main periods: the 1990s, 2000s, and after 2010. The 1990s is a period in which social and economic crises were reflected in cinema following the collapse of the Soviet Union. Deprived of state support, the cinema sector turned to low-budget productions. The films dealt with individuals’ search for identity and social disintegration in a harsh manner. The films focus on individuals’ struggle with society and the state, offering a critical view of the problems of modern Russia. The findings reveal that every period of post-Soviet Russian cinema developed in parallel with social and political structures. While the 1990s were a period of economic and social crises and individual searches, the 2000s turned to large productions and historical subjects with state support. After 2010, there was a period in which artistic depth increased and the conflict between the individual and the state became more acute. Russian cinema achieved both artistic and commercial success by reflecting social transformations and individuals’ struggles with these transformations during these periods.

Keywords

Russia, Cinema, Directors

References

• Akdağ, M. (2022). 2000-2020 Yılları Arasında Rus Sineması ve Milliyetçilik 1612 Adlı Film Örneği Üzerinden Analitik Bir İnceleme. Sakarya İletişim, 2(2), 52-72.
• Bayraktar, N. (2017). Sovyet Sonrası Rus Sineması. Sekans Sinema Kültürü Dergisi, Nisan 2017 | Sayı 4, 116-125.
• Beumers, B. (2009). A History of Russian Cinema. Berg.
• Beumers, B. (2017). Russian Cinema: Contemporary Film and Society. Routledge.
• Bird, R. (2010). Andrei Rublev to Andrei Zvyagintsev: A History of Russian Cinema. Reaktion Books.
• Bradshaw, P. (2017). Loveless review: Eerie thriller of hypnotic, mysterious intensity from Leviathan director. The Guardian, 5-9.
• Bukareva, V. (2020). Değişen Siyasal Yapı Bağlamında Sovyet Sinemasında Komedi Türünün Dönüşümü. Mersin Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 4 (1), 8-28..
• Chang, J. (2017). Andrey Zvyagintsev’s missing-child drama Loveless is a shattering portrait of Russian social malaise. Los Angeles Times. Archived from https://www.latimes.com
• Chelysheva, I., ve Mikhaleva, G. (2022). Prospects for contemporary media education in Russia based on feature films in the focus of family education: A theoretical review of the problem. Media Education, 4, 546-551. Chelysheva, I., ve Mikhaleva, G. (2024). Portrayals of families and family upbringing in Russian films: Prospects for film and media education. Media Education, 20(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.13187/me.2024.1.25
• Dolin, A., (2017). Empty space. Loveless, directed by Andrey Zvyagintsev. Iskusstvo Kino, 4-9.
• Dunlap, B. (2024). Prisoner of the Mountains (film screening and discussion summary). Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, 1-5.
• Eng, R. Y. (2018). Chinggis Khan on film: Globalization, nationalism, and historical revisionism. The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus, 16-22, https://doi.org/10.31216/ajf.5214
• Fedorov, A. (2015). Film criticism. Moscow: ICO “Information for All.” 1-376.
• Fedorov, A. (2024). Rus sineması: Çok kısa bir tarihçe [Russian cinema: A very short story]. Etkileşim, 13, 364-390.
• Fedorov, A. V. (2021). 100 most popular Soviet television movies and TV series: Opinions of film critics and viewers. Moscow: Information for All.
• Fedorov, A., ve Levitskaya, A. (2022). Theoretical concepts of film studies in Cinema Art journal in the first post-Soviet years: 1992–2000. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 7(2), 355-397.
• Fomin, V., ve Deryabin, A. (2016). Chronicle of Russian cinema: 1965-1991 (Vols. 1-5). Rehabilitation.
• Güleroğlu, C. (2024). Yakın dönem Rus sanat filmlerine postmodernizm ve muhalif melodram çerçevesinde bir bakış: Leviathan (2014) ve Sevgisiz (2017). Türkiye Film Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 72-90.
• Hosseini, S., ve Rajabi, E. (2019). Subjectivity construction through familial discourse represented in film: A case study of Alyosha’s identity in Andrey Zvyagintsev’s Loveless. Critical Literary Studies, 1-5, 2019.
• Hutchings, S. (2016). Russian Film: A Reader. Academic Studies Press.
• Hutchings, S. (2018). The Russian cinema renaissance in the global era. In Russian Review, 77(3), 315-330.
• Kosinova, M. I., ve Solgi, T. (2022). Comparative analysis of family values in Iranian and Russian cinema. Vestnik Universiteta, 5, 219-226. https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-5-219-226 [In Russian].
• Lagarias, A. (2021). Not interpreting Petrov’s Flu: Kirill Serebrennikov’s Petrov’s Flu (Petrovy v grippe, 2021). East European Film Bulletin, 118-128.
• Lagerberg, R., ve McGregor, A. (2021). Non-love in a non-place: Liminality and dislocation in Andrei Zvyagintsev’s Loveless. International Journal of Russian Studies, 10 (1), 1-11. Lane, A. (2018). Loveless and Permission. The New Yorker, February 12/19, 104-105. Lim, M. Z. (2013). Unstable identities in Prisoner of the Mountains. Major Seminar CLT 388-389.
• Malyshev, V. S. (2020). Give hope or plunge into depression? On trends in understanding life in modern Russian cinema. Vestnik VGIK, 12(2), 8-21. [In Russian].
• Maroshi, V. V. (2017). Mongolian Empire in modern Russian imperial projects: Science fiction, journalism, folkhistory. Imagologiya i komparativistika, 1-7. Marshall, H. (2018). Post-Soviet Identity and Cinema. Bloomsbury Academic.
• Meisel, E. (2019). советская кинокритика глазами американца: отечественная теори я и практика 60 лет назад. Film Quarterly, Güz 1960 (Cilt 14, No. 1), 20-58.
• Mikhaleva, G. (2024). The political and ideological contexts of the family image and family education in Russian post-Soviet and contemporary feature films. Media Education (Mediaobrazovanie), 20 (2), 251-260. 1 Mikhaleva, G. V. (2021). Teaching civic engagement and patriotism by means of film education: The training program for university students. Bulletin of the International Centre of Art and Education, 5, 267-275.
• Mikhaleva, G., ve Lozovitskaya, A. (2024). Research of the political and ideological contexts of family education in Soviet fiction cinematography. Bulletin of the International Centre of Art and Education, 2, 312-320. [In Russian].
• Nayman, A. (2018). Loveless takes a symbolic hammer to a family tragedy. Sight and Sound, 749-764
• Norris, S. M. (2012). Patriot games: The Ninth Company and Russian convergent cultures after communism. Digital Icons: Studies in Russian, Eurasian and Central European New Media, 8, 67-86.
• Obukhovski, V. A. (2021). The importance of modern Russian cinema as a factor in the formation of family values of young people. Skif, 1(53), 43-48.
• Posukhova, O., Klimenko, L., ve Chelyshev, S. (2021). Representation of working dynasties in Soviet cinema: Inertia or forcing. Media Education, 17(2), 362-377.
• Prokhorov, A. (2010). Russian Cinema and National Identity. UCL Press.
• Rosenstein, T. (2022). The curtain falls on Russian films in Europe: European festivals are banning most Russian films and filmmakers. The Moscow, 1-3.
• Sabirov, R. (2019). Perceptions of Chinggis Khan and the Mongol conquests in contemporary Russia. Bulletin of JAMS, (49), 1-11.
• Tyulyunova, V. V. (2020). The image of the family in modern Russian cinema according to experts. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Serija: Social'nye nauki, 2(58), 134-142. [In Russian].