Turkish Adaptation of the Implementation Leadership Scale Developed through the Framework of Evidence–Based Practices Model

Year 2018, , 255 - 262, 15.12.2018

Meltem Akca , Meltem Yavuz

https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.452617

Cited By: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to adapt the original version of Aarons et al.’s (2014) Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) which was based on Evidence-Based Practices Model to Turkish and examine its psychometric properties. According to the confirmatory factor analysis results (n = 412), factors were yielded four dimensions as in the original scale. While the item-total correlation coefficients of the Turkish ILS ranged from 0.29 to 0.83, the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for Turkish ILS was 0.91. Besides, convergent validity and discriminant validity were evaluated to strengthen construct validity of the Turkish ILS. Linguistic equivalence of the Turkish ILS was also tested. The findings proved that ILS had an adequate level of reliability and validity over Turkish sample.

Keywords

Implementation Leadership, Evidence–Based Practices, Turkish Implementation Leadership Scale

Kanıta Dayalı Uygulamalar Modeli Çerçevesinde Geliştirilen İcraatçı Liderlik Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Uyarlaması

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı Aarons ve arkadaşları (2014) tarafından Kanıta
Dayalı Uygulamalar Modeli çerçevesinde geliştirilen İcraatçı Liderlik Ölçeği’ni
Türkçe’ye uyarlamak ve ölçeğin psikometrik özelliklerini incelemektir. 412
katılımcıdan elde edilen verilere uygulanan doğrulayıcı faktör analizi
sonuçlarına göre, ölçeğin orijinal formundaki gibi dört boyutlu bir yapıda
olduğu saptanmıştır. Türkçe İcraatçı
Liderlik Ölçeği’nin madde-toplam korelasyon katsayılarının 0.29 ile 0.83
arasında olduğu gözlemlenmiş, iç tutarlık katsayısı α = 0.91 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Ayrıca,  ölçeğin yapı
geçerliliğini kuvvetlendirmek adına ölçeğin birleşim ve ayrışım geçerlilikleri
de değerlendirilmiştir. Türkçe İcraatçı Liderlik Ölçeği’nin dilsel
eşdeğerliliği de test edilmiş olup Türkçe ve İngilizce uygulamalar arasında
yüksek düzeyde pozitif ve anlamlı ilişkilere rastlanmıştır. Analiz bulguları,
İcraatçı Liderlik Ölçeği’nin Türkiye’deki örneklem üzerinde yeterli düzeyde
geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik değerlerine sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

Keywords

Kanıta Dayalı Uygulamalar, İcraatçı Liderlik, Türkçe İcraatçı Liderlik Ölçeği

References

• Aarons, G. A. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership: Association with attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychiatric services, 57(8), 1162-1169.
• Aarons, G. A., & Sommerfeld, D. H. (2012). Leadership, innovation climate, and attitudes toward evidence-based practice during a statewide implementation. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(4), 423-431.
• Aarons, G. A., Ehrhart, M. G., & Farahnak, L. R. (2014). The implementation leadership scale (ILS): development of a brief measure of unit level implementation leadership. Implementation Science, 9(1), 45.
• Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(1), 4-23.
• Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79-86.
• Barlett, J. E., Kotrlik, J. W., & Higgins, C. C. (2001). Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information technology, learning, and performance journal, 19(1), 43-50.
• Bartlett, D., & Francis-Smythe, J. (2016). Bridging the divide in work and organizational psychology: evidence from practice. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(5), 615-630.
• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1995). MLQ: Multifactor leadership questionnaire (Technical Report). Binghamton University, NY: Center for Leadership Studies.
• Bayık, M., & Gürbüz, S. (2016). Ölçek uyarlamada metodoloji sorunu: Yönetim ve örgüt alanında uyarlanan ölçekler üzerinden bir araştırma. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 3(1), 1-20.
• Bayın, G., & Akbulut, Y. (2012). Kanıta dayalı yaklaşım ve sağlık politikası. Ankara Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 1(2), 115-132.
• Brislin, R. W., Lonnen, W. J., & Thorndike, E. M. (1973). Cross-cultural research methods. New York, NY: Wiley.
• Çapık, C. (2014). Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 17(3), 196-205.
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309-319.
• Colyer, H., & Kamath, P. (1999). Evidence‐based practice. A philosophical and political analysis: some matters for consideration by professional practitioners. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(1), 188-193.
• Çopur, E. Ö., Kuru, N., & Seyman, Ç. C. (2015). Hemşirelikte kanıta dayalı uygulamalara genel bakış. Sağlık ve Hemşirelik Yönetimi Dergisi, 1(2), 51-55.
• Deliktaş A., & Kabukçuoğlu, K. (2017). Maternal bakımda kanıta dayalı uygulama kültürünün oluşturulması. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 130-138.
• DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications. California, USA: Sage Publications.
• DiCenso, A., Guyatt, G., & Ciliska, D. (2005). Evidence-based nursing e-book: A guide to clinical practice. USA: Elsevier Health Sciences.
• Fine, D. J., D'Aquila, R., & Kovner, A. (2009). Evidence-based management in healthcare. American College of Healthcare Executives.
• French, P. (1999). The development of evidence‐based nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 29(1), 72-78.
• Gerrish, K., Ashworth, P., Lacey, A., Bailey, J., Cooke, J., Kendall, S., & McNeilly, E. (2007). Factors influencing the development of evidence‐based practice: A research tool. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57(3), 328-338.
• Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: Felsefe-yöntem-analiz. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Harrington, D. (2009) Confirmatory factor analysis. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
• Hinkin, T. R. (2005). Scale development principles and practices. In: R. A. Swanson and E. F. Holton III (Eds.) Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry (pp.161-179). San Francisco, USA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
• Hoagwood, K. E. (2005). Family‐based services in children's mental health: A research review and synthesis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(7), 690-713.
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
• Hoyle, R. H. (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis. In: H. E. A. Tinsley and S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp.465-497). California, USA: Academic Press.
• Hurley, A. E., Scandura, T. A., Schriesheim, C. A., Brannick, M. T., Seers, A., Vandenberg, R. J., & Williams, L. J. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(6), 667-683.
• Jensen, P. S., Weersing, R., Hoagwood, K. E., & Goldman, E. (2005). What is the evidence for evidence-based treatments? A hard look at our soft underbelly. Mental Health Services Research, 7(1), 53-74.
• Kamasak R., Yavuz M., & Ozturk T. Y. (2017) Reducing Risk Through Strategic Flexibility and Implementation Leadership in High-Velocity Markets. İçinde: Hacioğlu Ü., Dinçer H., & Alayoğlu N. (Ed.) Global Business Strategies in Crisis (pp. 273-286). Cham: Springer.
• Kamaşak, R., Yozgat, U., & Yavuz, M. (2016). Government policies, implementation leadership and green management practices in an emerging economy. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 7(4), 97-101.
• Kara, M., & Babadağ, K. (2003). Kanıta dayalı hemşirelik. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 6(3), 96-104.
• Klein, K. J., Conn, A. B., Smith, D. B., & Sorra, J. S. (2001). Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 3-16.
• Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis. New York, USA: Routledge.
• Köktaş, Ö. F., & Köseoğlu, Ö. (2015). Kanıta dayalı kamu politikası yapımı: Sosyal bilim araştırması ve kamu politikaları ilişkisini yeniden dizayn etmek için bir fırsat mı?. Yasama Dergisi, 29, 32-57.
• Küçük, E. Ö., Çakmak, S., Kapucu, S., Koç, M., & Kahveci, R. (2017). Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin kanıta dayalı hemşirelik uygulamalarına ilişkin farkındalıklarının belirlenmesi. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing, 4(2). 1-12.
• Küçükkaya, P. G. (2010). Psikiyatri hemşireliğinde kanıta dayalı uygulama. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, 1(3), 128-132.
• Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
• LoBiondo-Wood, G., & J. Haber (2014). Reliability and validity. In: G. LoBiondo-Wood and J. Haber (Eds.), Nursing research. Methods and critical appraisal for evidence based practice (pp. 289-309). China: Elsevier.
• Marston, G., & Watts, R. (2003). Tampering with the evidence: a critical appraisal of evidence-based policy-making. The drawing board: An Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3(3), 143-163.
• Melnyk B. M. (2007). The evidence‐based practice mentor: A promising strategy for implementing and sustaining EBP in healthcare systems. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 4(3), 123-125.
• Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (Eds.). (2011). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
• Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Gallagher-Ford, L., & Kaplan, L. (2012). The state of evidence-based practice in US nurses: critical implications for nurse leaders and educators. Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(9), 410-417.
• Mills, J., Field, J., & Cant, R. (2009). The place of knowledge and evidence in the context of Australian general practice nursing. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 6(4), 219-228.
• Nunnally, J. C., & I. Bernstein, H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, USA: McGrawHill.
• Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Shackleton, V. J., Dawson, J. F., Lawthom, R., Maitlis, S., & Wallace, A. M. (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 379-408.
• Pipe, T. B., Cisar, N. S., Caruso, E., Wellik, K. E. (2008). Leadership strategies: Inspiring evidence‐based practice at the individual, unit, and organizational levels. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 23(3), 265-271.
• Rousseau, D. M., & Gunia, B. C. (2016). Evidence-based practice: The psychology of EBP implementation. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 667-692.
• Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E. S., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social work research, 27(2), 94-104.
• Sackett, D. L. (2000). Evidence‐based medicine. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online.
• Sandström, B., Borglin, G., Nilsson, R., & Willman, A. (2011). Promoting the implementation of evidence‐based practice: A literature review focusing on the role of nursing leadership. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 8(4), 212-223
• Sartori, R. (2010). Face validity in personality tests: Psychometric instruments and projective techniques in comparison. Quality & Quantity, 44(4), 749-759.
• Scott-Findlay, S., & Golden-Biddle, K. (2005). Understanding how organizational culture shapes research use. Journal of Nursing Administration, 35(7-8), 359-365.
• Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenirlik ve geçerlik. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Trammer, J., Squires, S., Brazil, K., Gerlach, J., Johnson, J., & Muisiner, D. (1998). Factors that influence evidence-based decision-making. Canadian Health Action: Building on the Legacy, 5, 3-92.
• Trinder, L. (2000). Introduction: the context of evidence‐based practice. Evidence‐based practice: A critical appraisal, 1-16.
• Vilagut, G. (2014). Test-retest reliability. In: Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6622-6625). Holland: Springer.
• Wallen, G. R., Mitchell, S. A., Melnyk, B., Fineout‐Overholt, E., Miller‐Davis, C., Yates, J., & Hastings, C. (2010). Implementing evidence‐based practice: effectiveness of a structured multifaceted mentorship programme. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(12), 2761-2771.
• Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4(1), 67.
• Wynd, C. A., Schmidt, B., & Schaefer, M. A. (2003). Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 25(5), 508-518.
• Yılmaz, M. (2005). Hemşirelik bakim hizmetinin kalitesini geliştirme yolu olarak kanıta dayalı uygulama. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 9, 41-48.