Örgütsel Adalet, Proaktiflik ve Yenilikçi Davranış Arasındaki İlişkiler: Kimya Sektörü Çalışanları İle Bir Araştırma

Year 2018, Volume: 6 Issue: ICEESS’ 18, 149 - 155, 15.12.2018

Saadet Ela Pelenk

https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.452589

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Örgütsel
adalet görev, işlem, süreç ve davranışlarda çalışanlara eşit davranabilmektir.
Birçok araştırma örgütsel adaletin sağlandığı bir işletmede, yenilikçi
davranışların arttığını vurgulamaktadır. Yenilikçi davranış, çalışanın rutin
görevi ilerletecek kadar farklı düşünebilmesidir. Radikal bir dönüşüm
gerektiren ve risk isteyen yenilikçi davranış ancak proaktif bir tutumla
beslenebilmektedir. Proaktiflik, bireyin kararlarının doğruluğunu, tahmin
yeteneğini, iletişiminin güçlülüğünü ve aktif bir zekâyı yansıtmaktadır.
Araştırmanın amacı, örgütsel adalet, proaktiflik ve yenilikçi davranış
arasındaki ilişkileri tespit etmektir. Bu amaçla Kocaeli’ndeki 3 kimya
işletmesinin 241 çalışanı ile anket yapılmıştır. Veriler, geçerlilik ve
güvenilirlik testlerine tabi tutulmuştur. Ardından adalet-proaktiflik; adalet-
yenilikçi davranış ve proaktiflik- yenilikçi davranış ilişkileri regresyon
analizleri ile test edilmiştir. Değişkenler arasında pozitif ve anlamlı ilişkiler
tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Örgütsel Adalet, Proaktiflik, Yenilikçi Davranış

Relations Among Organizational Justice, Proactivity and Innovative Behavior: A Research with Chemistry Sector’s Employees

Abstract

Organizational justice is the ability to behave
all employees equally in tasks, procedures, processes and behaviors. Many
researches emphasize that innovative behaviour increases in businesses where
organizational justice is provided. Innovative behaviour is that an employee
can think differently than to advance routine task. Innovative behaviour
requiring a radical transformation and risk, taking can only be fed by a
proactive attitude. Proactivity reflects the individual's judgment, the
predictive ability, the energetic of communication and the active intelligence.
The aim of the research is to determine the relationship among the
organizational justice, the proactivity and the innovative behavior. For this
aim, a survey was conducted with 241 employees of three chemistry businesses in
Kocaeli. The dates were subjected to validity and reliability tests. It was
followed that organizational justice- proactivity; organizational
justice-innovative behavior; proactivity- innovative behavioral relationships
were tested by regression analysis. A positive and meaning correlations were
found among the variables.

Keywords

Organizational Justice, Proactivity, Innovative Behavior

References

• Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations. Academy Of Management Review, 16, 586–612.
• Akın, A., Abacı, R., Kaya, M., & Arıcı, N. (2011). Kısaltılmış Proaktif Kişilik Ölçeği'nin (KPÖ) Türkçe Formunun Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliği. ICES’11 International Conference on Educational Science, Famagusta- Cyprus.
• Alpkan L., Ergün, E., Bulut, Ç., & Yılmaz, C. (2005). Şirket Girişimciliğinin Şirket Performansına Etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 6(2), 175-189.
• Altıntaş, F.Ç. (2002). Örgütsel Adalet Kavramı ve Örgüt Yapısının Çalışanların Adalet Algılamaları Üzerindeki Etkisi. İşletmelerde Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity Boulder. CO: Westview Press.
• Ashford, S. J., & Northcraft, G. B. (1992). Conveying More (Or Less) than We Realize: The Role of Impression-Management in Feedback Seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 310–334.
• Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., & Vandewalle, D. (2003). Reflections on The Looking Glass: A Review of Research on Feedback-Seeking Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, 29, 769–799.
• Atalay, C. G. (2010). Örgütsel Adalet, Örgütsel Davranışta Güncel Konular. Bursa: Ekin Basım Yayınları.
• Bateman, T.S., & Crant, J.M. (1993). The Proactive Component of Organizational Behavior: A Measure and Correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-118.
• Begley, T. M., Lee, C., & Hui, C. (2006). Organizational Level as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Justice Perceptions. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 705-721.
• Belschak, F.D., & Den Hartog, D.N.D. (2010). Pro-Self, Prosocial and Pro-Organizational Foci of Proactive Behaviour: Differential Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83 (2), 475-498.
• Berry, M. A., & Rondinelli, D. A. (1998). Proactive Corporate Environmental Management: A New Industrial Revolution, Academy of Management Executive, 12 (2), 38-50.
• Black, J.S., & Porter, L.W. (2000). Management: Meeting New Challenges. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Bunce, D., & West, M. A. (1995). Self Perceptions and Perceptions of Group Climate as Predictors of Individual Innovation at Work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44, 199–215.
• Butcher, D., & Clarke, M. (2002). Organizational Politics: The Cornerstone for Organizational Democracy. Organizational Dynamics, 31(1), 35-46.
• Bysted, R., & Jespersen, K. (2014). Exploring Managerial Mechanism that Influence Innovative Work Behaviour: Comparing Private and Public Employees, Public Management Review, 16 (2), 217-241.
• Chatman, J., O'reilly, C.A., & Caldwell, D.F. (1991). People and Organizational Culture: A Profıle Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-Organization Fit. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487-516.
• Cohen, J. (2004). The Importance of Philosophy: Reflections On Rawls. South African Journal of Philosophy, 23(2).
• Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86 (2), 278–321.
• Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2005). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. Handbook of organizational justice, 1, 3-58.
• Colquitt, J. A., Noe, R. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2002). Justice in teams: Antecedents and consequences of procedural justice climate. Personnel psychology, 55(1), 83-109.
• Crant, J.M. (2000). Proactive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management, 26 (3),435-462.
• De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and innovation management, 19(1), 23-36.
• Dilek, H. (2005). Liderlik Tarzlarının ve Adalet Algısının, Örgütsel ve Bağlılık, İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı Üzerine Etkilerine Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Doktora Tezi. Kocaeli: Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü.
• Folger, R., & Konovsky, M.A. (1989). Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions?. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 115-130.
• Gefen, D., Ragowsky, A., & Ridings, C. (2008). Leadership and Justice: Increasing Non Participating Users’ Assessment of an it Through Passive Participation. Journal of Information and Mangement, 45, 507-512.
• Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The Correspondence Bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.
• Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a Psychology of Dyadic Organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175-208.
• Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16, 399-432.
• Harrison, J.S., & Freeman, RE. (2004). Special Topic: Democracy and Around Organizations is Organizational Democracy Worth The Effort?. Academy of Management Executive, 18 (3), 49-53.
• Kanter, R. M. (1983). The Change Masters. New York: Simon and Schuster.
• Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective and Social Conditions For Innovation in Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169-211.
• Kör, B. (2015). Öz Liderlik, Örgütlerin Girişimcilik Yönelimi ve Çalışanların Yenilikçi İş Davranışları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Doktora Tezi. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi
• Lee, S. M., & Peterson, S. J. (2000). Culture, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Global Competitiveness. Journal of World Business, 35 (4), 401-416.
• Lumpkin, G.T., & Dess, G.G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance, Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.
• McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal Matters in Social Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• McLean, L.D. (2005). Organizational Culture’s Influence on Creativity and Innovation: A Review of the Literature and Implications for Human Resource Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7(2), 226-246.
• Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. Journal of applied psychology, 76(6), 845-855.
• Morrison, E. W. (1993). Newcomer Information Seeking: Exploring Types, Modes, Sources and Outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 557–589.
• Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607–634.
• Oxford English Dictionary (1989). (Erişim: 01.06.2018). hhttp://ets.umdl.umich.edu/o/oed
• Rawls, J. (1985). A Theory of Justice. London: Oxford University Press.
• Robbins, S.P., Judge, T.A., & Campbell, T.T. (2010). Organizational Behaviour. United Kingdom: Pearson Education.
• Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovation. New York: Free Press.
• Rollinson, D., Broadfıeld, A., & Edwards, D.J. (1998). Organisational Behaviour and Analysis:An Integrated Approach. Singapore: Prentice Hall.
• Saydkova, G.,& Tutar, H. (2014). Örgütsel Demokrasi ve Örgütsel Muhalefet Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine Bir İnceleme. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi, 2 (1), 1-16.
• Scott, S.G., & Bruce, R.A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A path Model Of Individual Innovation In The Workplace. The Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607.
• Shalley C.E., & Gilson L.L. (2004. What Leaders Need to Know: A Review Of Social and Contextual Factors That Can Foster Or Hinder Creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33–53.
• Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive Corporate Environmental Strategy and the Development of Competitively Valuable Organızatıonal Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 729–753.
• Staw, B. M. (1984). Organizational Behavior: A Review and Reformulation of the Field’s Outcome Variables. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 627– 666.
• Topakkaya, A. (2009). Aristoteles’te Adâlet Kavramı. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(6), 628-633.
• Van Dyne, L., Cummings, L. L., & McLean Parks, J. (1995). “Extra-Role Behaviors: In Pursuit of Construct and Definitional Clarity” , Cummings, L. L. and Staw, B. M. (Eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, 17, 215–285. Greenwich: CT: JAI Press.
• Verdorfer, A.P., Weber, W.G., Unterrainer, C., & Seyr, S. (2012). The Relationship Between Organizational Democracy and Socio-Moral Climate: Exploring Effects of the Ethical Context In Organizations. Economic and Industrial Democracy. (Erişim: 05.04.2018), http://Eid.SagePub.Com/Content/Early/2012/07/09/0143831X1245005.
• Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293–321.