Toprak Özelliklerinin Tahmininde Sayısallaştırılmış Renk Parametrelerinin Kullanımı

Abstract

Toprak biliminde toprağın doğal yapısını bozmadan, hızlı, güvenilir ve tekrarlanabilir analiz tekniklerinin geliştirilmesi sürdürülebilir tarım için gerekli olan güncel veri tabanlarının vakit kaybedilmeden oluşturulması için gereklidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı bozulmuş ve bozulmamış toprak örneklerinden kolorimetre ile elde edilen sayısallaştırılmış renk parametrelerinin toprak özelliklerini tahmin etme yeteneklerini araştırmak ve incelenen bozulmuş ve bozulmamış toprak örneklerindeki renk farklılıklarının nedenlerini ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaçla, koluviyal arazilerde gelişmiş dört farklı toprak profilinden horizon esasına göre alınmış yirmi dokuz toprak örneğinin bazı fiziksel ve kimyasal özellikleri laboratuarda belirlenmiş ve toprak profillerinin detaylı tanımlamaları arazide yapılmıştır. Her horizondan alınan bozulmuş ve bozulmamış agregat halindeki toprak örneklerinde kolorimetre yardımı ile renk okumaları yapılmış ve belirlenen L*, a* ve b* renk parametreleri yardımı ile kroma, hue ve renk farklılıkları hesaplanmıştır. Yapılan istatistiksel analizler bozulmuş ve bozulmamış örneklerin renklerinin birbirlerinden önemli derecede farklı olduklarını göstermiştir P

Keywords

• Toprak rengi
• kolorimetre
• CIELAB
• renk farklılığı
• hue
• kroma

Use of Quantified Color Parameters in Estimation of Soil Properties

Abstract

Development of fast, reliable, and repeatable soil analyses techniques that causes minimum disturbance soil materials are required to create soil data bases that are needed to achieve sustainable agriculture. The aims of this study were to; i. investigate the ability of soil color parameters obtained by chromameter measurement of disturbed and undisturbed soil samples to estimate soil characteristics, and ii. explain the reasons of color difference observed between disturbed and undisturbed soil samples. Thirty nine soil samples collected from each horizon of four soil profiles developed in colluviums. Physical and chemical properties of soil samples were analyzed in the laboratory, and detailed descriptions of soil profiles were performed in the field. Chroma, hue and color differences were calculated from chromameter measured soil color parameters for both disturbed and undisturbed soil samples of each soil horizon. Color of disturbed and undisturbed soil samples were significantly different from each other P

Keywords

• Soil color
• chromameter
• CIELAB
• color difference
• hue
• chroma

References

1. Anonymous 1978. Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE), Recommendations on Uniform Color Spaces, Color Differences, and Psychometric Color Terms. Calorimetry CIE, Paris Suppl. no. 2 to Publication no. 15. R2=0,35 P
2. Anonymous 1993. Soil Survey Division Staff..Soil survey manual. Agric. Handbook. 18. Washington, DC: USDA. pp. 437 . M ad de , ( M O , % )
3. Anonymous 1999. Soil Survey Staff, Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys, 2nd edition. Agriculture Handbook, v. 435.USDA, NRCS., US Government Printing Office, Washington DC.
4. Barron, V. and J. Torrent. 1986. Use of the Kubelka–Munk theory to study the influence of iron oxides on soil colour. Journal of Soil Science 37:499– 510.
5. Barret, L.R. 2002. Spectrophotometric color measurement in situ in well drained sandy soils. Geoderma. 108: 49-77.
6. Blavet, D., E. Mathe and J. C. Leprun. 2000. Relations between soil colour and waterlogging duration in a representative hillside of the West African granito- gneissic bedrock. Catena. 39:187- 210.
7. Evans, C. V. and D. P. Franzmeier. 1986. Saturation, aeration, and color patterns in a toposequence of soils in North central Indiana. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:975- 980.
8. Gee, G. W., and J. W. Bouder. 1986. Particle size analysis. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. A. Klute (Ed), Part 1, 2nd ed. Agronomy No. 9. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI, pp. 825-844.

9. Konen, M. E., C. L. Burras, J. A. Sandor. 2003. Organic Carbon, Texture, and Quantitative Color Measurement Relationships for Cultivated Soils in North Central Iowa. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 67, 1823-1830.
10. McLean, E. O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page, A.L. (Ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 199-224.
11. Mehra, O. P. and M. L. Jackson. 1960. Iron oxide removal from soils and clays by a dithionite-citrate system buffered with sodium bicarbonate. Clays Clay Miner. 7:317-327.
12. Melville, M. D. and G. Atkinson. 1985. Soil color: its measurement and its designation in models of uniform color space. J. Soil Sci. 36: 495- 512.
13. Munsell Color. 1994. Munsell Soil Color Charts, 1994 Revised Edition. Macbeth Division of Kollmorgen Instruments, New Windsor, NY.
14. Nelson, D. W. and L. E. Sommers. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Page, A.L. (Ed) Part 2, 2nd ed. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA. and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 539-579.
15. Post, D. F., S. J. Levine, R. B. Bryant, M. D. Mays, A. K. Batchily, R. Escadafal and A. R. Huete. 1993. Correlations between field and laboratory measurements of soil color. In: Bigham, J.M., Ciolkosz, E.J. (Eds.), Soil Color. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 35-50.
16. Sanchez-Maran˜on, M., G. Delgado, M. Melgosa, E. Hita and R. Delgado. 1997. CIELAB color parameters and their relationship to soil characteristics in Mediterranean red soils. Soil Sci. 162 : 833- 842.
17. Sanchez-Maran˜on, M., M. Soriano, M. Melgosa, G. Delgado and R. Delgado. 2004. Quantifying the effects of aggregation, particle size and components on the colour of Mediterranean soils. European Journal of Soil Science. 51: 551-565.
18. Scheinost, A. C. and U. Schwertmann. 1999. Color identification of iron oxides and hydroxysulfates: use and limitations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 1463- 1471.
19. Schoeneberger P. J., D. A Wysocki, E. C. Benham and W. D. Broderson. 2002. Field book for describing and sampling soils, Version 2.0. Natural Resource Conservation Service, USDA, National Soil Survey Center, Lincoln, NE
20. Schulze, D. G., J. L. Nagel, G. E. Van Scoyoc, T. L. Henderson and M. F. Baumgardner, D. E. Scott. 1993. Significance of organic matter in determining soil colors. In: Bigham, J.M., Ciolkosz, E.J. (Eds.), Soil Color. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am., Madison, WI, pp. 71-90.
21. Spielvogel S., H. Knicker and I. Kögel-Knabner. 2004. Soil organic matter composition and soil lightness. J. of Plant Nutr. and Soil Sci. 167: 545-555.
22. Schwertmann, U. 1993. Relations between iron oxides, soil color, and soil formation. In: Bigham, J.M., Ciolkosz, E.J. (Eds.), Soil Color. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am., Madison WI, pp. 51- 70.
23. Thomas, G. W. 1996. Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Sparks J.M. Bigham, (Ed) Part 3, Agron. Monogr. 5. ASA. and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 475-491.
24. Torrent, J. and V. Barron. 1993. Laboratory measurement of soil color: theory and practice. In: Bigham, J.M., Ciolkosz, E.J. (Eds.), Soil Color. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 21-34.
25. Rossel, R. A. V., D. J. J. Walvoort, A. B. McBratney, L. J. Janik and J. O. Skjemstad. 2006. Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties. Geoderma, 131 (1-2) 59-75.