Farklı Doz ve Zamanda Uygulanan Ethephon'un Arpa Hordeum vulgare L. Tane Verimine Etkisi

Abstract

1997-1999 y ı lları aras ı nda Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü deneme tarlas ı nda yürütülen bu çal ışmada, farkl ı doz ve zamanlarda arpaya uygulanan ethephonun tane verimine etkileri incelenmi ştir. Denemede Tokak 157/37 ve Bülbül 89 iki s ı ral ı arpa çeşitleri ile Yı ld ı r ı m ve Ergine1-90 alt ı sı ral ı arpa çeşitleri kullan ı lmışt ı r. Ethephon uygulamalar ı sapa kalkma, başaklanma öncesi ve çiçeklenme sonu dönemlerinde O, 15, 30, 45 ve 60 g/da dozlar ı nda uygulanm ıştir. Araşt ı rmada her iki deneme y ı l ı na ilişkin sonuçlar ayr ı ayr ı de'gerlendirilmi ştir. Araşt ı rma sonuçlar ı na göre; dört arpa çeşidine farkl ı doz ve zamanda ethephon uygulanmas ı yla tane verimi yönünden önemli farkl ı l ı klar saptanm ışt ı r Denemenin birinci y ı l ı nda en yüksek tane verimi Tokak 157/37 çe şidinden, ikinci y ı l ı nda ise Bülbül 89 çeşidinden elde edilmiştir. Her iki y ı lda başaklanma öncesinde 30 g/da ethephon uygulamas ı yla en yüksek tane verimleri elde edilmiştir.

Keywords

• İki sıralı arpa
• altı sıralı arpa
• ethephon
• tane verimi

Effects of Ethephon Applied at Various Doses and Time on Grain Yield of Barley Hordeum vulgare L.

Abstract

The effects of ethephon applied at various doses and time on grain yield of barley were examined in this study carried out at the Experimental Field of the Department of Field Crops, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ankara between 1997 and 1999. Tokak 157/37, Bülbül 89 cultivars of two-rowed barley, and six-rowed barley cultivars Yı ld ı rı m and Ergine1-90 were used in the experiment. O, 15, 30, 45 and 60 g/da ethephon doses were applied at shooting, booting and post-anthesis stages. The results regarding both years were evaluated separately for each growing season. According to the results of the research; significant differences were determined with the application of various doses and time of ethephon on four barley cultivars in regard to grain yield. The greatest grain yield was obtained from Tokak 157/37 cv. in the first year of experiment and the greatest grain yield was obtained from Bülbül 89 cv. in the second year of experiment. In both years, the greatest grain yields were obtained from the application of 30 g/da ethephon dose at before heading.

Keywords

• Two-rowed barley
• six-rowed barley
• ethephon
• grain yield

References

1. Alp, A. 1993. Mı s ı r bitkisinin verim ve verim d ğelerine ethephonun etkisi. Ankara Üniv. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 46 s.
2. Brown, C.M. and E.B. Earley, 1973. Response of one winter wheat and two spring oat varieties to foliar applications of 2- chloroethyl phosphonic acid (Ethrel). Agron. J., 65: 829- 832.
3. Bulman, P. and D.L. Smith, 1993. Yield and grain protein response of spring barley to ethephon and triadimefon. Crop Sci., 33: 798-803.
4. Caldwell, C.D., D.R. Mellish and J. Norrie, 1988. A comparison of ethephon alone and in combination with CCC or DPC applied to spring barley. Can. J. Plant Sci., 68: 941-946.
5. Cox, W.J. and D.J. Otis, 1989. Growth and yield of winter wheat as influenced by chlormequat chloride and ethephon. Agron. J., 81: 264-270.
6. Dahnous, K., G.T. Vigue, A.G. Law, C.F. Konzak and D.G. Miller, 1982. Height and yield response of selected wheat, barley, and triticale cultivars to ethephon. Agron. J., 74: 580-582.
7. Düzgüneş, O., T. Kesici, O. Kavuncu ve F. Gürbüz, 1987. Araştı rma ve Deneme Metodlar ı (Istatistik Metodlan II.). A.Ü. Ziraat Fak., Yay ı n No: 1021, Ankara, 295.
8. Foster, K. R. and J. S. Taylor, 1993. Response of barley to ethephon: Effects of rate, nitrogen,and irrigation. Crop Sci., 33: 123-131.

9. Ma, B. L. and D. L. Smith, 1992. Post-anthesis ethephon effects on yield of spring barley. Agron. J., 84:370-374.
10. Mohamed, M. A., J. J. Steiner, S. D. Wright, M. S. Bhangoo and D.E. Millhouse, 1990. Intensive crop management practices on wheat yield and quality. Agron. J., 82: 701-706.
11. Moes, J. and E. H. Stobbe, 1991. Barley treated with ethephon: I. Yield components and net grain yield. Agron. J., 83: 86-90.
12. Moss, J. and E. H. Stobbe, 1991. Barley treated with ethephon: III. Kernels per spike and kernel mass. Agron. J., 83: 95-98.
13. Nafziger, E. D., L. M. Wax and C. M. Brown, 1986a. Response of five winter wheat cultivars to growth regulators and increased nitrogen. Crop Sci., 26: 767-770.
14. ----------, 1986b. Response of five winter wheat cultivars to growth regulators and increased nitrogen. Crop Sci., 26: 767-770.
15. Norberg, O. S., S. C. Mason and S. R. Lowry, 1988. Ethephon influence on harvestable yield, grain quality, and lodging of corn. Agron. J., 80: 768-772.
16. Simmons, S. R., E. A. Oelke, J. V. Wiersma, W. E. Lueschen and D.D. Warnes, 1988. Spring wheat and barley responses to ethephon. Agron. J., 80: 829-834.
17. Stobbe, E. H., J. Moes, R. W. Bahry, R. Visser and A. Iverson, 1992. Environment, cultivar, and ethephon rate interactions in barley. Agron. J., 84: 789-794.
18. Tokes, G.and T. Bagyinka, 1996. The sensitivity to ethephonCCC regulators of cereal varieties grown in Hungary.
19. Winter barley, rye, triticale, oats. Plant Breeding Abstr., 66 (11): 1527.
20. Van Sanford, D. A., J. H. Grove, L J. Grabau and C. T. MacKown, 1989. Ethephon and nitrogen use in winter wheat. Agron. J., 81: 951-954. .
21. Wiersma, D. W., E. S. Oplinger and S. Ö. Guy, 1986. Environment and cultivar effects on winter wheat response to ethephon plant growth regulator. Agron. J.,78:761-764.