Genetic Diversity of Cherry Laurel (Laurocerasus officinalis Roemer) BY SSR Markers

Year 2023, Volume: 29 Issue: 1, 239 - 248, 31.01.2023

Ali İslam , Hale Orta Yıldız Aka Kaçar , Dicle Dönmez

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.930258

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Cherry laurel (Laurocerasus officinalis) belongs to the Rosacea family. The main distribution area for edible cherry laurels is the Blacksea shores in Turkey. In the study, it was aimed to reveal the differences among the various cherry laurel genotypes by using the SSR molecular marker technique. Cherry laurel genotypes were selected from the Black Sea Region of Turkey. A total of 15 SSR primer pairs were developed and used for Prunus species, and the phylogenetic relationship and polymorphism rates were also demonstrated. As a result, 13 SSR primers resulted in scorable DNA band profiles. UDAp-401 SSR primer was detected with a minimum of 3 alleles and BBCT001 primer with a maximum of 17 alleles. The average number of alleles was observed at 9 per locus. Whereas, the average number of polymorphic bands per SSR marker was calculated as 8.38. Additionally, 109 polymorphic DNA profiles were obtained from a total of 117, and the polymorphism rate was calculated as 93.5%. The band patterns resulting from SSR analysis showed multiple alleles, suggesting polyploidy in cherry laurel. In conclusion, we determined that the SSR molecular markers could be used to identify the different cherry laurel genotypes. Furthermore, these results depicted that among the different genotypes sampled there is significant genetic variability that can be useful for future research and breeding programs.

Keywords

Prunus laurocerasus L, DNA, Polymorphism, primer

Supporting Institution

TÜBİTAK

Project Number

115O564

Thanks

T

References

• Acunalp S (2012). Genetic Characterization of Domestic Sweet Cherry (P. avium L.) Germplasms Based on SSR’s. BSc Thesis, University of Ankara, Institute of Biotechnology, Ankara (in Turkish with an abstract in English)
• Aka-Kaçar Y (2001). DNA fingerprinting method for the classification of sour-cherry and cherry varieties and types grown in Turkey. PhD thesis. University of Çukurova, Department of Horticulture, Adana (in Turkish with an abstract in English)
• Aka Kaçar Y, Lezzoni AF, Çetiner S (2005). Sweet cherry cultivar identification by using SSR markers. Journal of Biological Sciences, 5 (5): 616-619.
• Aksu M, Sarısu HC, Kaymak S, Öztürk Y, Gür İ et al (2012). Molecular Characterization of Some Wild Sour Cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) Types by Using RAPD Technique. TABAD 5 (1): 78-81. (in Turkish with an abstract in English)
• Cantini C, Iezzoni AF, Lamboy W, Boritzki M, Struss D (2001). DNA fingerprinting of tetraploid cherry germplasm using simple sequence repeats. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 126: 205-209.
• Cipriani G, Lot G, Huang WG, Marrazzo MT, Peterlunger E, Testoline R (1999). AC/GT And AG/CT Microsatellite Repeats in Peach [Prunus Persica (L) Batsch] Isolation, Characterisation And Cross-Species Amplification in Prunus. Theoretical And Applied Genetics 99: 65-72.
• Çelikkol BP (2011). Genetic characterization of the important plum (Prunus sp.) Germplasm based on SSR markers, BSc thesis Ankara University Department of Biology, Ankara. (in Turkish with an abstract in English) doi: 10.1501/ankara-24450
• Downey SL, Lezzoni AF (2000). Polymophic DNA markers in black cherry (Prunus serotina) are identified using sequences from sweet cherry, peach and sour cherry. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 125(1): 76-80.
• Edwards K, Johnstone C, Thompson C (1991). A simple and rapid method for the preparation of plant genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Nucleic acids research 19(6): 1349.
• Ercisli S, Agar G, Yildirim N, Duralija B, Vokurka A et al (2011). Genetic diversity in wild sweet cherries (Prunus avium) in Turkey revealed by SSR markers. Genetic Molecular Research 10 (2): 1211-1219.
• Eser M, Şentürkoğlu S, Tunçdemir M, Öztürk Sezgin M, Balcı H et al. (2014). The Antidiabetic Effects of the Fruits of ‘Laurocerasus officinales’ on Pancreatic Islands of Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats. In: 18th International Microscopy Congress, Prag, pp.3398-3399
• Guilford P, Prakash S, Zhu JM, Rikkerink E, Gardiner S et al. (1997). Microsatellites in Malus domestica (apple): abundance, polymorphism and cultivar ıdentification. Theoretical Applied Genetics 94(2): 249-254.
• Hajyzadeh M, Cavusoglu A, Sulusoglu M, Unver T (2013). DNA SSR Fingerprinting Analysis Among Cherry Laurel (Prunus laurocerasus L.) Types. Journal of Food Agriculture And Enviroment 11(2): 630-638.
• Halilova H, Ercisli S (2010). Several physico chemical characteristics of cherry laurel (Laurocerasus officinalis Roem.) fruits. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 24(3):1970-1973 doi: 10.2478/V10133-010-0059-6
• Kaçar YA, Çetiner MS, Cantini C, Lezzoni AF (2006). Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers differentiate Turkish sour cherry germplasm, J. Am. Pomol. Soc. 60:136–143
• İslam A. (2002).“Kiraz” cherry laurel (Prunus laurocerasus). New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 30 (2002), pp. 301-302
• İslam A, Vardal E (2006). Pomological characteristics of cherry laurel (Prunus laurocerasus L.) Grown in Rize. Acta Horticulturae 818:133-136
• İslam A, Deligöz, H (2012). Selection of cherry laurel (Prunus laurocerasus L.) in Ordu Akademik Ziraat Dergisi 1(1): 37-44 (in Turkish with an abstract in English) doi: 10.29278/azd.132750
• İslam A, Çelik H, Aygün A, Kalkışım Ö (2010). Selection of native cherry laurels in the blacksea region. In: Proseeding on International Conference on Organic Agriculture in Scope of Environmental Problems, 1(1): 15-17
• İslam A, Karakaya O, Gün S, Karagöl S & Öztürk B (2020). Seçilmiş karayemiş genotiplerinin meyve özellikleri ile biyokimyasal bileşiklerin karakterizasyonu. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 57(1): 105-110.
• Köse Ö (2013). Genetıc characterizatıon of some plum and cherry genotypes based on SSRs. BSc thesis Ankara University Department of Biology, Ankara. (in Turkish with an abstract in English)
• Messina R, Lain O, Marrazzo MT, Cipriani G (2004). New set of microsatellite loci isolated in apricot. Molecular Ecology, Notes 4: 432-434.
• Meurman O (1929). Prunus laurocerasus L. A species showing high poliploidy. J.Genet, 21:85-94.
• Mnejja M, Garcia-Mas J, Howad W, Badenest L M, Arus P (2004). Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers of Japanese Plum (Prunus Salicina Lindl.) are Highly Polymorpich And Transferable to Peach and Almond. Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 163-166.
• Perrier X, Jacquemond-Collet JP (2006). DARwin software.
• Pınar H, Yaman M, Sarısu HC, Uzun A, Yiğit, MA (2018). Determination of genetic relationship of some cherry rootstocks via RAPD molecular markers. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Derg. 2018, 22(3): 326-334 doi: 10.29050/harranziraat.410847
• Sandallı C (2002). Molecular characterization in cherry laurel (Laurocerasus officinalis Roem.) by RAPD (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA). BSc thesis, KTU Department of Biology, Trabzon. (in Turkish with an abstract in English)
• Stanys V, Baniulis D, Morkunaite-Haimi S, Siksnianiene JB, Frercks B, et al. (2012). Characterising the genetic diversity of Lithuanian sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars using SSR markers. Scientia Horticulturae 142:136–142
• Struss D, Ahmad R, Southwıck SM, Borıtzkı M (2003). Analysis of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) cultivars using SSR and AFLP markers. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 128, 904–909
• Tarakci Z, Anil M, Koca I, Islam A, (2013). Effects of adding cherry laurel (Laurocerasus officinalis) on some physicochemical and functional properties and sensorial quality of tarhana. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods 5 (4), 347-355
• Temiz H, Tarakci Z, Islam A (2014). Effect of cherry laurel marmalade on physicochemical and sensorial characteristics of the stirred yogurt during storage time. GIDA 39: 1-8
• Testolin R, Marazzo T, Cipriani G, Quarta R, Verde I et al. (2000). Microsatellite DNA in peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) and its use in fingerprinting and testing the genetic origin of cultivars. Genome 43:512-520
• Turkoglu Z, Bilgener S, Ercisli S, Bakir M, Koc A et al. (2010). Simple sequence repeat-based assessment of genetic relationships among Prunus rootstocks. Genetics Molecular Research 9(4): 2156-2165.
• Yamamoto Y, Kobayash, Y, Matsumoto H (2001). Lipid peroxidation is an early symptom triggered by aluminum, but not the primary cause of elongation inhibition in pea roots. Plant Physiol, 125: 199–208.
• Yilmaz KU, Paydaş-Kargi S, Doğan Y, Kafkas S (2012). Genetic Diversity Analysis Based On Issr, Rapd And Ssr Among Turkish Apricot Germplasms In Iran Caucasian Eco-Geographical Group. Scientia Horticulturae, 138: 138-143.
• Weber JL, May PE (1989). Abundant class of human DNA polymorphisms which can be typed using the polymerase chain reaction. American Journal of Human Genetics, 44: 388-396.
• Wünsch A, Hormaza JI (2002). Molecular characterisation of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) genotypes using peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] SSR sequences. Heredity, 89(1): 56-63.
• Wünsch A (2009). Cross-transferable polymorphic SSR loci in Prunus species. Scientia Horticulturae, 120: 348–352.
• Zahra S, Cici H, Van Acker RC (2010). Gene flow in Prunus species in the context of novel trait risk assesment. Environ. Biosafety Res. 9:75-85.