1. Manuscripts sent to the Journal of Antaclogy are primarily reviewed by the Editorial Board.
2. The work whose preliminary examination is made is sent to two referees who are experts in the subject determined by the editorial board. If a positive report is received from both referees to whom the article was sent, it is decided to publish the article and the author of the study is informed in what issue it will be published. If the two referees give negative opinions, the article will not be published. If a positive or a negative opinion is expressed, the Editorial Board decides by sending the work to the 3rd referee or rejecting it, taking into account the content of the reports.
3. In the referee reports of the submitted articles;
a) If the "publishable" view is stated, the article is published in the number to be determined by the editorial board.
b) If the opinion "Can be published after revisions" is stated, the article is returned to its author for necessary corrections. The author makes the corrections in a different color. After the revisions, it is checked by the editorial board whether the referee warnings have been taken into account. Published if corrected, otherwise rejected.
c) If the "I want to see after corrections" view is stated, the work is sent back to the author. After the corrections, the article is submitted to the referees. After this process, the article is published considering the referee reports.
d) The author has the right to appeal to the referee report with justifications. The editorial board decides on whether the work should be published or not by examining the objection report with the referee.
e) If the "not published" opinion is stated, the article is not published.