Algoritmik Ontoloji ve Dijital Zihin-Beden Düalizmi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 34, 31 - 48, 29.01.2025

Ayhan Aksakallı

Öz

Bu makale, Descartes'ın klasik zihin-beden düalizminin dijital çağın yeni paradigmaları içinde yeniden bağlamsallaştırıldığı derin bir araştırmaya girişmektedir. Dijital varlıkların, sanal gerçekliklerin ve yapay zekanın geleneksel beden ve ruh anlayışımız üzerindeki felsefi etkilerini araştırmaktadır. Bu sorgulamanın merkezinde, gerçekliğin özünün evrensel bilgi işleme sistemleri ve kozmik algoritmalar tarafından yönetildiğini öne süren algoritmik ontoloji kavramı yer almaktadır. Bu çalışma, bilgi, madde ve enerji arasındaki temel etkileşimlerin derin bir felsefi incelemesini sunmakta ve varoluşun dokusunun bu dijital ipliklerden örüldüğünü öne sürmektedir. Disiplinler arası bir metodoloji kullanan makale, felsefe, bilgisayar bilimi, fizik ve matematiğin zengin dokusundan yararlanarak dijital ve fiziksel alanların yakınsamasının kapsamlı bir analizini oluşturmaktadır. Önerilen modern zihin-beden düalizmi modeli, dijital çağın sunduğu zorlukları ve fırsatları ele alarak çağdaş felsefi ve bilimsel diyaloglara yeni bakış açıları kazandırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Dijital varoluş ile fiziksel gerçeklik arasındaki sınırları yeniden tanımlayan bu çalışma, giderek sanallaşan dünyamızdaki karmaşık dinamikleri aydınlatmayı amaçlamaktadır. Sonuç olarak bu makale, dijital bedenlerin ve sanal kimliklerin incelikli bir şekilde anlaşılmasını savunarak gelecekteki araştırmalar için çeşitli yollar çizmektedir. Ortaya çıkan bu kavramların ontolojik ve epistemolojik çerçevelerimizi nasıl yeniden şekillendirebileceğinin daha fazla araştırılması ve nihayetinde dijital çağda gerçeklik kavrayışımızın zenginleştirilmesi çağrısında bulunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Algoritmik ontoloji, dijital varoluş, disiplinlerarası analiz, sanal gerçeklik, zihin-beden düalizmi.

Algorithmic Ontology and Digital Mind-Body Dualism

Öz

This article explores Descartes’ classical mind-body dualism within the paradigms of the digital age. It examines the philosophical implications of digital entities, virtual realities, and artificial intelligence on our traditional understanding of body and soul. Central to this inquiry is algorithmic ontology, which posits that reality is governed by universal information processing systems and cosmic algorithms. This work examines the fundamental interactions between information, matter, and energy, arguing that existence is woven from these digital threads. Using an interdisciplinary methodology, the study draws on philosophy, computer science, physics, and mathematics to analyze the convergence of digital and physical domains. The proposed modern model of mind-body dualism aims to bring new perspectives to contemporary philosophical and scientific dialogues by addressing the challenges and opportunities of the digital age. By redefining the boundaries between digital existence and physical reality, this work illuminates the complex dynamics in our increasingly virtualized world. Ultimately, this paper advocates for a nuanced understanding of digital bodies and virtual identities, charting avenues for future research. It calls for further exploration of how these concepts can reshape our ontological and epistemological frameworks, enriching our understanding of reality in the digital age.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Algorithmic ontology, digital existence, interdisciplinary analysis, mind-body dualism, virtual reality

Kaynakça

• ARENÈS, J., LOUIS-DIMITROV, D., & MURAIL, E. (2023). Introduction. In The Persistence of the Soul in Literature, Art and Politics (pp. 1-26). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
• BODEN, M. A. (2016). AI: Its Nature and Future. Oxford University Press.
• BOLTZMANN, L. (1877). Weitere Studien über das Wärmegleichgewicht unter Gasmolekülen. Sitzungsberichte der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
• BOSTROM, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.
• BREY, P. (1999). The ethics of representation and action in virtual reality. Ethics and Information Technology.
• CASTELLS, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Wiley-Blackwell.
• CHAITIN, G. (2005). Meta Math!: The Quest for Omega. Pantheon.
• CHALMERS, D. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies.
• CHALMERS, D. (1996). The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford University Press.
• CHALMERS, D. (2017). The virtual and the real. Disputatio.
• CHALMERS, D. J. (2022). Reality+: Virtual worlds and the problems of philosophy. Penguin UK.
• CHURCHLAND, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy: Toward a unified science of the mind-brain. MIT Press.
• CLARK, A. (2003). Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
• COOPER, J. W. (2009). The current body-soul debate: A case for dualistic holism. Southern Baptist Journal of Theology, 13(2), 32-50.
• COTTINGHAM, J. (1996). Descartes: Meditations on First Philosophy: With Selections from the Objections and Replies. Cambridge University Press.
• DAMASIO, A. (1994). Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Avon Books.
• DAMASIO, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. Harcourt Brace.
• DELANDA, M. (2011). Philosophy and Simulation: The Emergence of Synthetic Reason. Continuum.
• DELEUZE, G., & GUATTARI, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
• DESCARTES, R. (1641). Meditations on First Philosophy.
• DIATTA, B., BASSE, A., & NDIAYE, N. M. (2019). Framework and ontology for modeling and querying algorithms. In The Challenges of the Digital Transformation in Education: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL2018) - Volume 2 (pp. 536-544). Springer International Publishing.
• FLORIDI, L. (2013). The Ethics of Information. Oxford University Press.
• FLORIDI, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford University Press.
• FREDKIN, E. (1992). Digital mechanics. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena.
• FREUND, L. (2024). Beyond the physical self: Understanding the perversion of reality and the desire for digital transcendence via digital avatars in the context of Baudrillard’s theory. AI & Society, 1–17.
• GAZZANIGA, M. S. (2004). The Cognitive Neurosciences. MIT Press.
• GAZZANIGA, M. S. (2011). Who's in charge?: Free will and the science of the brain. Ecco/HarperCollins.
• HANSEN, M. B. N. (2006). Bodies in Code: Interfaces with Digital Media. Routledge.
• HARAWAY, D. (1985). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late 20th century. In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature.
• HARAWAY, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge.
• HAYLES, N. K. (1999). How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. University of Chicago Press.
• HEAD-MARSDEN, K., FLICK, J., CICCARINO, C. J., & NARANG, P. (2020). Quantum information and algorithms for correlated quantum matter. Chemical Reviews, 121(5), 3061-3120.
• HEISENBERG, W. (1958). Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. Harper & Row.
• HUANG, L., & PEISSL, W. (2023). Artificial intelligence—A new knowledge and decision-making paradigm? In Technology assessment in a globalized world: Facing the challenges of transnational technology governance (pp. 175–201). Springer International Publishing.
• ILIADIS, A. (2018). Algorithms, ontology, and social progress. Global Media and Communication, 14(2), 219-230.
• KAPLAN, E. R. (2003). Algorithmic ontology and the polyfurcation of self.
• KURZWEIL, R. (2005). The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking.
• LAMMARI, N., & MÉTAIS, E. (2004). Building and maintaining ontologies: A set of algorithms. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 48(2), 155-176.
• LANGMAN, D. (2014). The Art of Acting: Body-Soul-Spirit-Word: A Practical and Spiritual Guide (Vol. 1). Temple Lodge Publishing.
• LANIER, J. (2017). Dawn of the New Everything: Encounters with Reality and Virtual Reality. Henry Holt and Co.
• LARSON, D. A. (2010). Artificial intelligence: Robots, avatars, and the demise of the human mediator. Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol., 25, 105.
• LLOYD, S. (2006). Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes on the Cosmos. Knopf.
• LUCK, M., & AYLETT, R. (2000). Applying artificial intelligence to virtual reality: Intelligent virtual environments. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 14(1), 3-32.
• MASSUMI, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Duke University Press.
• METZINGER, T. (2009). The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind and the Myth of the Self. Basic Books.
• OUMAIMA, D., MOHAMED, L., HAMID, H., & MOHAMED, H. (2023, October). Application of artificial intelligence in virtual reality. In International Conference on Trends in Sustainable Computing and Machine Intelligence (pp. 67-85). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
• PETROVIĆ, V. M. (2018). Artificial intelligence and virtual worlds–toward human-level AI agents. IEEE Access, 6, 39976-39988.
• PRENSKY, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. McGraw-Hill.
• PRENSKY, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
• PUTNAM, H. (1975). Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press.
• RUSSELL, S., & NORVIG, P. (2020). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson.
• RYLE, G. (1970). The Concept of Mind. University of Chicago Press.
• SAVULESCU, J., & PERSSON, I. (2012). Unfit for the Future: The Need for Moral Enhancement. Oxford University Press.
• SAVULESCU, J., & PERSSON, I. (2012). Unfit for the future: The need for moral enhancement. Oxford University Press.
• SCHRÖDINGER, E. (1935). Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
• SEARLE, J. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
• SEARLE, J. (1992). The Rediscovery of the Mind. MIT Press.
• SHANNON, C. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal.
• SLATER, M. (2009). Place illusion and plausibility can lead to realistic behaviour in immersive virtual environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
• SLOMAN, A., & CHRISLEY, R. (2003). Virtual machines and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(4-5), 133-172.
• SUSSKIND, L. (1995). The world as a hologram. Journal of Mathematical Physics.
• SUSSKIND, L., & LINDESAY, J. (2004). An Introduction to Black Holes, Information and the String Theory Revolution: The Holographic Universe. World Scientific Publishing Company.
• 'T HOOFT, G. (1993). Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity. gr-qc/9310026.
• TEGMARK, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Knopf.
• TURING, A. (1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society.
• TURING, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind.
• TURKLE, S. (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. Simon & Schuster.
• TURKLE, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.
• WHEELER, J. A. (1990). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Foundations of Quantum Mechanics.
• WIENER, N. (1948). Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. MIT Press.