HALKLA İLİŞKİLER VE TANITIM ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN İLİŞKİ SÜRDÜRME STRATEJİLERİNE DAİR YETKİNLİK DÜZEYLERİNİN BELİRLENMESINE YÖNELİK UYGULAMALI BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Abstract

Günümüzde pek çok akademik çalışma alanında olduğu gibi halkla ilişkiler alanında da gelişmeler ve değişimler söz konusu olmuştur. Halkla ilişkilerin sadece iletişim odaklı bir kapsamdan değil örgütler ile kamuları arasındaki ilişkilerin stratejik bir şekilde yönetilmesi olarak değerlendirilebilecek ilişki odaklı daha geniş bir kapsama geçişini temsil eden ilişki yönetimi, halkla ilişkilerin değişen yapısının en temel göstergesidir. Bu çalışma, halkla ilişkiler ve tanıtım bölümünde eğitim gören lisans öğrencilerinin ilişki sürdürme stratejilerine dair yetkinlik düzeylerinin belirlenmesi ve değişen iş paradigmalarına karşı öğrencilerin hazır bulunuşluk düzeylerin ortaya çıkarılması amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında toplam 206 halkla ilişkiler ve tanıtım bölümü lisans öğrencisine “İlişki Sürdürme Stratejileri Ölçeği” revize edilerek yüz yüze olacak şekilde uygulanmıştır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda ilişki sürdürme stratejileri ölçeği alanyazına uygun şekilde faktörlere ayrılmış ve iç tutarlılık seviyelerinin yüksek olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Öğrencilerin demografik özelliklerine ilişkin fark testleri yapıldığında; cinsiyetleri ile ilişki sürdürme stratejileri arasında anlamlı farklar bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Kadın öğrencilerin ilişki boyutlarından olan güven, pozitiflik ve açıklık boyutlarında erkek öğrencilere oranla daha yüksek algı düzeyine sahip olduğu saptanmıştır. Değişen dünya ve halkla ilişkiler mesleği ile birlikte ilişki yönetimi kavramının önem kazanması, halkla ilişkiler ve tanıtım bölümü öğrencilerinin meslek hayatına hazır olup olmadıkları sorusunu akla getirmektedir. Bu sorunun cevabını ortaya çıkarmak amacıyla yapılan bu çalışmada halkla ilişkiler ve tanıtım bölümü lisans öğrencilerinin ilişki sürdürme stratejilerinin genel olarak ortalamanın üzerinde bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

• İlişki Yönetimi
• Halkla İlişkiler
• İlişki Stratejileri
• İş Paradigmaları
• Hazır Bulunuşluk

AN APPLIED RESEARCH ON DETERMINING THE COMPETENCY LEVELS OF PUBLIC RELATIONS AND PUBLICITY STUDENTS ON RELATIONSHIP SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGIES

Abstract

Today, there have been developments and changes in the field of public relations, as in many academic fields of study. Representing the transition of public relations from a communication-oriented scope to a wider relation-oriented scope that can be considered as the strategic management of relations between organizations and their publics, relation management is the most basic indicator of the changing structure of public relations. This study was carried out in order to determine the competence levels of undergraduate students studying in the department of public relations and publicity on relationship maintenance strategies and to reveal the readiness levels of students against changing business paradigms. Within the scope of the research, the "Relationship Maintenance Strategies Scale" was revised and applied face to face to a total of 206 public relations and publicity undergraduate students. As a result of the analysis, the scale of relationship maintenance strategies was divided into factors in accordance with the literature and it was revealed that the internal consistency levels were high. When the difference tests regarding the demographic characteristics of the students are made; It has been determined that there are significant differences between genders and strategies for maintaining a relationship. It was determined that female students had a higher perception level than male students in the dimensions of trust, positivity and openness, which are among the relationship dimensions. The changing world and the importance of the concept of relationship management with the profession of public relations raises the question of whether the students of the public relations and publicity department are ready for their professional life. In this study, which was carried out to reveal the answer to this question, it was determined that the relationship maintenance strategies of the undergraduate students of the public relations and publicity department were generally above the average.

Keywords

• Relationship Management
• Public Relations
• Relationship Strategies
• Business Paradigms Readiness

References

1. Aziz, A. (2008). Araştırma Yöntemleri-Teknikleri ve İletişim, Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
2. Boztepe, H. (2014). Halkla İlişkiler ve İlişki Yönetimi, İstanbul: Derin Yayınları.
3. Broom, G., Casey, S., & Ritchey, J. (1997). Toward a concept and theory of organisation-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9(2), 83-98.
4. Broom, G., Casey, S., & Ritchey, J. (2000). Concept and theory of organisation-public relationships. (Eds. Ledingham J.A. & Bruning S.D.), In Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (s. 3-22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
5. Bruning, S., D. (2000). Examining the Role that Personal, Professional, and Community Relationships Play in Respondent Relationship Recognition and Intended Behavior, Communication Quarterly, 48(4), 437-448.
6. Bruning, S., D. (2001). Axioms of Relationship Management: Applying Interpersonal Communication Principles to the Public Relations Context, Journal of Promotion Management, 7(1/2), 3-16.
7. Canary, D., J. & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59(3), 239–267.
8. Center, A., H. & Jackson, P. (2003). Public Relations Practices: Managerial Case Studies and Problems, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

9. Cho, S. & Huh, J. (2010). Content Analysis of Corporate Blogs as a Relationship Management Tool, Corporate Coomunications: An International Journal, 15 (1), 30-48.
10. Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H. & Broom, G. L. (1994). Effective Public Relations, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
11. Durmuş, B., Yurtkoru, E. S. & Çinko, M. (2013). Sosyal Bilimlerde SPPS’le Veri Analizi. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
12. Ehling, W. P. (1992). Estimating the value of public relations and communication to an organizatio. (Eds. Grunig, J.E., Dozier, D.M., Ehling, W.P., Grunig, L.A., Repper, F.C. and White, J.) In Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management, , Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Ferguson, M. A. (1984). Building theory in public relations: Interorganizational relationships. In annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Gainesville, FL.
14. Grunig, J. E. & Huang, Y. H. (2000). From organizational effectiveness to relationship indicators: Antecedents of relationships, public relations strategies, and relationship outcomes. (Eds. Ledingham, J. A. & Bruning, S. D.) In Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (s. 23-54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Grunig, J. E. & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing Public Relations, Belmont CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
16. Grunig, J. E. & White, J. (1992), The effect of worldviews on public relations theory and practice, (Ed. Grunig, J. E.). In Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Heath, R. L. (2001). Learning best practices from experience and research, (Ed. Heath, R. L.). In Handbook of Public Relations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
18. Hon, L. C. & Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for Measuring Relationships in Public Relations, Institute for Public Relations, 1-44. https://www.instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/Guidelines_Measuring_Relationships.pdf adresinden 01.01.2023 tarihinde erişildi.
19. İslamoğlu, A. H. (2009). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri, Kocaeli: Beta Yayınları.
20. Jung Ki, E. & Hon, L. C. (2006). Relationship Maintenance Strategies on Fortune 500 Company Web Sites, Journal of Communication Management, 10 (1), 27-43.
21. Jung, Ki. E. & Hon, C. L. (2008). A Measure of Relationship Cultivation Strategies. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(1), 1-24.
22. Kalender, A. & Fidan M. (2011). Halkla İlişkiler, Konya: Tablet Yayınları.
23. Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
24. Ledingham, J. & Bruning, S. (1998). Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organisation-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24(1), 55-65.
25. Ledingham, J. & Bruning, S. (2000). A longitudinal study of organisational public relationship dimensions: Defining the role of communication in the practice of relationship management. (Eds. Ledingham, J. & Bruning, S.) In Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (s. 55-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
26. Ledingham, J. & Bruning, S. (2000a). Introduction: Background and current trends in the study of relationship management. . (Eds. Ledingham, J. & Bruning, S.) In Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (s. 50-69). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
27. Ledingham, J. A. & Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship Management in Public Relations: Dimensions of an Organization-Public Relationship, Public Relations Review, 24(1), 52-66.
28. Ledingham, J. A. (2001) Goverment-Community Relationships: Extending The Relational Theory of Public Relations. Public Relations Review, 27(3), 285-295.
29. Ledingham, J. A., Bruning, S. D., Thomlison, T. D. & Lesko, C. (1997). The applicability of interpersonal relationship dimensions to an organizational context: Toward a Theory of Relational Loyalty a Qualitative Approach. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 1(1), 23-43.
30. Leichty, G. B. & Springston, J. (1993). Reconsidering public relations models. Public Relations Review, 19(4), 327-339.
31. TDK (2023). Türkçe Sözlük. https://sozluk.gov.tr/ 12.04.2023 tarihinde erişildi.
32. Thomlison, T. D. (2000). An interpersonal primer with implications for public relations. (Eds. Ledingham, J. & Bruning, S.) In Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (s. 177-204). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33. Toth, E. L. (2000). From personal influence to interpersonal influence: a model for relationship management, (Eds. Ledingham, J. & Bruning, S.) In Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations, (s. 46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Wilson, L. J. (2001). Relationships within communities: public relations for the new century. (Ed. Heath, R. L.). In Handbook of Public Relations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35. Wise, K. (2008). Why Public Health Needs Relationship Management. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 31 (3), 309-331.