-

Abstract

Although problems are a fundamental dynamics of tourism knowledge production, a systematic, exclusive, and in-depth study of tourism problems or tourism problemology has been overlooked. This study, which represents the first time to examine the nature of tourism problemology, aims to fill this gap. A theoretical model is developed and partially tested through a survey of 212 Chinese tourism researchers. Results show that researchers generally consider problems as difficulties or contradictions that require resolution. Moreover, personal/environmental factors influence the researchers’ understanding of problems, and such understanding further affects their evaluation and selection of problems at the early stage of research. The study highlights the significance of problems as an important, yet overlooked reflexivity of tourism knowledge production

Keywords

• Problemology, Knowledge production, Reflexivity, Research community, Theorizing

Turizm Problemolojisi: Bilgi Üretmenin Özdüşünümselliği

Abstract

Turizm bilgisi üretim sürecinin temelinde problemlerin yatıyor olmasına ragmen, turizm problemlerine ya da turizm problemolojisine münhasır, sistematik ve derinlemesine bir araştırma yapılmamıştır. Bu çalışma turizm problemolojisinin doğasını keşfetmeye ve bu boşluğu doldurmaya çalışması açısından bir ilktir. Çalışma kapsamında kuramsal model geliştirilmiş ve 212 Çinli turizm araştırmacısı üzerinde kısmen test edilmiştir. Sonuçlara göre araştırmacılar turizm problemlerini çözüm bekleyen zorluklar ya da çelişkiler olarak görmektedir. Dahası kişisel/çevresel faktörler araştırmacıların problemlere yönelik anlayışını etkilemektedir. Ayrıca etkilenen bu anlayış da, araştırmanın erken evresinde araştırmacıların problem seçimini ve değerlendirmesini etkilemektedir. Çalışma, turizm problemlerini, önemini ve henüz üzerinde durulmamış olan turizm bilgisi üretiminin özdüşünümselliğini öne çıkarmaktadır.

 

ABSTRACT
Although problems are a fundamental dynamics of tourism knowledge production, a systematic, exclusive, and in-depth study of tourism problems or tourism problemology has been overlooked. This study, which represents the first time to examine the nature of tourism problemology, aims to fill this gap. A theoretical model is developed and partially tested through a survey of 212 Chinese tourism researchers. Results show that researchers generally consider problems as difficulties or contradictions that require resolution. Moreover, personal/environmental factors influence the researchers’ understanding of problems, and such understanding further affects their evaluation and selection of problems at the early stage of research. The study highlights the significance of problems as an important, yet overlooked reflexivity of tourism knowledge production.

Keywords

• Problemoloji, Bilgi üretimi, Özdüşünümsellik, Araştırma topluluğu, Kuramsallaştırma

References

1. Ateljevic, I., Pritchard, A. ve Morgan, N. J. (Ed.). (2007). The Critical Turn in Tourism Studies. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
2. Benckendorff, P. ve Zehrer, A. (2013). A Network Analysis Of Tourism Research, Annals of Tourism Research, 42: 121–149.
3. Collingwood, R. G. (1948). The Idea Of History. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
4. Cooley, L., ve Lewkowicz, J. (2003). Dissertation writing in practice: Turning ideas into text. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
5. Cooper, C. (2006). Knowledge Management And Tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 33 (1): 47–64.
6. Copi, I. M. ve Cohen, C. (2005). Introduction to Logic (12. Bs.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
7. Davidson, J. E. ve Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2003). The Psychology Of Problem Solving. Cambridge. Büyük Britanya: Cambridge University Press.
8. Dewey, J. (1910). How We Think. Büyük Britanya, Londra: Heath. Dewey, J. (1965). Problems of Men. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press [Çince].

9. Einstein, A. ve Infeld, L. (1961). The Evolution Of Physics: The Growth Of Ideas From Early Concepts To Relativity And Quanta (2. Bs.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Franklin, A. ve Crang, M. (2001). The Trouble With Tourism And Travel Theory?, Tourist Studies, 1 (1): 5–22.
11. Gibbons, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics Of Science And Research in Contemporary Societies. Londra, UK: SAGE Publications.
12. Giere, R. N. (2004). How Models Are Used To Represent Reality. Philosophy of Science, 71 (5), Supplement, 742–752.
13. Guba, E. G. (Ed.). (1990). The Paradigm Dialogue. Londra, UK: Sage. Guba, E. G. ve Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, And Emerging Confluences. İçinde, N. K. Denzin ve Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research (3. Bs., 191–215). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
14. Habermas, J. (1978). Knowledge and Human Interests (2. Bs.). Londra, UK: Heinemann.
15. Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. ve Tatham, R. L. (Ed.). (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7. Bs.) Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson.
16. Hall, C. M. (2004). Reflexivity and Tourism Research. İçinde, J. Phillimore ve L. Goodson (Ed.), Qualitative Research in Tourism: Ontologies, Epistemologies And Methodologies (ss.137–155). Londra, UK: Routledge.
17. He, H. (1983). An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Beijing: Air Force Engineering Institution Press [Çince].
18. Hilbert, D. (2009). Mathmatical Problems (W. Li ve X. Yuan, Trans.). Dalian: Dalian University of Technology Press [Çince].
19. Hodges, W. (1993). Model Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Hurley, P. J. (2008). A Concise Introduction To Logic (10. Bs.). Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
21. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure Of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and Its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.
23. Liburd, J. (2012). Tourism Research 2.0, Annals of Tourism Research, 39 (2): 883–907.
24. Lin, D. (1990). The Study Of Problemology and Definition Of Problems, Philosophical Studies, (4): 92–101 [Çince].
25. Lin, D. (1991). On the Aim Model of Scientific Progress. Social Sciences in China, 12 (4): 29–38.
26. Lin, D. (2005). Problem and Scientific Research: A Study Of Problemology. Guangzhou: Sun Yat-sen University Press [Çince].
27. Liu, Y. (Ed.). (1987). Epistemology and Methodology in Sciences. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press [Çince].
28. Luger, G. F. (2009). Artificial Intelligence: Structures And Strategies For Complex Problem Solving (6. Bs.). Boston: Pearson Addison-Wesley.
29. Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report On Knowledge. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.
30. Meethan, K. (2001). Tourism in Global Society: Place, Culture And Consumption. Londra, UK: Palgrave.
31. Neuman, W. L. (2006). Social Research Methods: Qualitative And Quantitative Approaches (6. Bs.). Boston: Pearson.
32. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. ve Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge And The Public in An Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
33. Patterson, M. E. ve Williams, D. R. (1998). Paradigms and Problems: The Practice Of Social Science in Natural Resource Management, Society and Natural Resources, 11 (3): 279–295.
34. Patterson, M. E. ve Williams, D. R. (2005). Maintaining Research Traditions On Place: Diversity of Thought And Scientific Progress, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25 (4): 361–380.
35. Phillimore, J. ve Goodson, L. (Ed.). (2004). Qualitative Research in Tourism: Ontologies, Epistemologies And Methodologies. Londra, UK: Routledge.
36. Platenkamp, V. ve Botterill, D. (2013). Critical Realism, Rationality And Tourism Knowledge, Annals of Tourism Research, 41: 110–129.
37. Popper, K. R. S. (1959). The Logic Of Scientific Discovery. Londra, UK: Hutchinson.
38. Popper, K. R. S. (1972). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
39. Popper, K. R. S. (1999). All Life is Problem Solving (P. Camiller, Trans.). Londra, UK: Routledge.
40. Popper, K. R. S. (2001). Emancipation Through Knowledge II (J. Fan ve B. Li, Trans.). Langzhou: China Fine Art Academy Press [Çince].
41. Ritchie, B. W., Burns, P. M. ve Palmer, C. A. (Ed.). (2005). Tourism Research Methods: Integrating Theory With Practice. Oxfordshire, UK: CABI Publishing.
42. Rosenberg, A. (2005). Philosophy of Science: A Contemporary Introduction (2. Bs.). New York: Routledge.
43. Rosenberg, A. (2008). Philosophy of Social Science (3. Bs.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
44. Russell, B. (1922). The Problem of China. London, UK: Allen & Unwin.
45. Simon, H. A. (1981). The Sciences Of The Artificial (2. Bs.). Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.
46. Sternberg, R. J., ve Spear-Swerling, L. (1996). Teaching for Thinking (1. Bs.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47. Toulmin, S. E. (1972). Human Understanding. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press. Tribe, J. (Ed.). (2009). Philosophical Issues in Tourism. Bristol, UK: Channel View Publications.
48. Tribe, J. (2004). Knowing about Tourism: Epistemological İssues. İçinde, J. Phillimore ve L. Goodson (Ed.), Qualitative Research in Tourism (ss. 46–62). Londra, UK: Routledge.
49. Xiao, H., Jafari, J., Cloke, P. ve Tribe, J. (2013). Annals: 40–40 Vision, Annals of Tourism Research, 40: 352–385.
50. Xiao, H. ve Smith, S. L. J. (2006). The Making Of Tourism Research: Insights From A Social Sciences Journal, Annals of Tourism Research, 33 (2): 499–507.
51. Xiao, H. ve Smith, S. L. J. (2007). The Use Of Tourism Knowledge: Research Propositions, Annals of Tourism Research, 34 (2): 310–331.
52. Zhang, Z. (2005). The Philosophical Studies On ‘‘Problems’’. Beijing: Renmin University Press [Çince].