Dragon Festivali’nde Örgüt Kültürü, Takım Birlikteliği ve Takım Performansı

Year 2020, Volume: 31 Issue: 2, 138 - 148, 06.08.2020

Ceyda Lale Sancaktar , Ebru Günlü

https://doi.org/10.17123/atad.777523

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı örgüt kültürünün ve takım birlikteliğinin takım performansına olan etkilerini incelemektir. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmış, araştırmanın evrenini, İzmir il sınırları içinde düzenlenen İzmir Kurumlararası Dragon Festivali’ne katılan takım üyeleri oluşturmuştur. Kümelere göre örnekleme ile kullanılabilir 399 anket elde edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçları değerlendirildiğinde, örgüt kültürü ile takım performansı arasında anlamlı ve pozitif bir ilişki; takım birlikteliği ile takım performansı arasında ise anlamlı ve negatif ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Örgüt kültürü ile takım birlikteliği arasında da anlamlı ve negatif bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Örgüt kültürü ile takım performansı arasındaki ilişkiye, takım birlikteliğinin aracı değişken olarak etki edip etmediğinin de irdelendiği araştırmada takım birlikteliğinin, örgüt kültürü ile takım performansı arasındaki ilişkiye aracılık ettiği belirlenmiştir.

Keywords

örgüt kültürü, birliktelik, performans, dragon festivali

Organizational Culture, Team Cohesion and Team Performance in Dragon Festival

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of organizational culture and team cohesiveness on team performance. A quantitative research method was used in the research, the population of the research constitutes team members who participate in Interenterprise Dragon Festival organized within the provincial borders of Izmir. With cluster sampling method, 399 usable questionnaires were obtained. When the results of the research were evaluated, it was found that there was a meaningful and positive relationship between organizational culture and team performance, and a meaningful and negative relationship between team cohesiveness and team performance. A meaningful and negative relationship was also found between organizational culture and team cohesiveness. In the study, the relationship between organizational culture and team performance, whether the team cohesion has an impact or not as a mediator, team cohesiveness was concluded to be the mediator in relationship between organizational culture and team performance.

Keywords

Organizational culture, Cohesiveness, Performance, Dragon Festival

References

• Abu-Jarad, I.S., Yusof, N.A. ve Nikbin, D. (2010). A Review Paper on Organizational Culture and Organizational Performance, International Journal of Busines and Social Science, 1 (3): 26- 46.
• Aktaş, E., Çiçek, I. ve Kıyak, M. (2011). The Effect of Organizational Culture on Organizational Efficiency: The Moderating Role of Organizational Environment and CEO Values, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24:1560- 1573.
• Babacan, E. ve Göztaş, A. (2011). Etkinlik Yönetimi. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Bollen, K. A. ve Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination, Social Forces, 69 (2): 479-504.
• Cameron, K. S. ve Quinn, R. E. (2006). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: John Wiley & Sons.
• Carron, A. V. (1982) Cohesiveness in Sport Groups: Interpretations and Considerations, Journal of Sport Psychology, 4 (2): 123- 138.
• Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N. ve Brawley, L. R. (1985). The Development of an Instrument to Assess Cohesion in Sport Teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire, Journal of Sport Psychology, 7 (3): 244- 266.
• Carron, A. V., Prapavessis, H. ve Grove, J. R. (1994). Group Effects and Self-handicapping, Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 16 (3): 246- 258.
• Carron, A.V., Colman, M.M., Wheeler, J. ve Stevens, D. (2002). Cohesion and Performance in Sport: A Meta Analysis, Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 24 (2): 168– 188.
• Cartwright, D. (1968). The Nature of Group Cohesiveness. İçinde; D. Cartwright ve A. Zander (Editörler), Group Dynamics: Research and Theory (ss. 91–109). New York: Harper & Row.
• Chang, A. ve Bordia, P. (2001). A Multidimensional Approach to the Group Cohesion-Group Performance Relationship, Small Group Research, 32 (4): 379- 405.
• Coleman, J. (2012). A Functional Model of Team Leadership for Sport (Basılmamış Doktora Tezi). Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: Florida State University, College of Education, Doctor of Philosophy.
• Chelladurai, P. (2007). Leadership in Sports. İçinde Tenenbaum ve R. C. Eklund (Editörler), Handbook of Sport Psychology (ss.113–135). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
• Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. U. ve Webster Jr, F. E. (1993). Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis, The Journal of Marketing, 57 (1): 23- 37.
• Fekete, H. ve Böcskei, E. (2011). Cultural Waves in Company Performance, Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT, 3 (2): 38- 42.
• Filho, E., Tenenbaum, G. ve Yang, Y. (2015). Cohesion, Team Mental Models and Collective Efficacy: Towards an Integrated Framework of Team Dynamics in Sport, Journal of Sports Sciences, 33 (6): 641-653.
• Gallagher, S., Brown, C. ve Brown, L. (2008). A Strong Market Culture Drives Organizational Performance and Success, Employment Relations Today, 35 (1): 25- 31.
• Gorji, M., Salmani, S. ve Safarzad, H. (2014). Examining the Relationship between Organizational Culture and Internal Cohesion of the Employees Working in Golestan Telecommunication Company, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7 (9): 1827- 1831.
• Grossman, R., Rosch, Z., Mazer, D. ve Salas, E. (2015). What Matters for Team Cohesion Measurement? A Synthesis. İçinde E. Salas, A. X. Estrada ve W. B. Vessey (Editörler), Team Cohesion: Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice (ss. 147-180). Birleşik Krallık: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Hair, J.F. Jr., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. ve Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Han, J.K., Kim, N. ve Srivasta, R.K. (1998). Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link?, Journal of Marketing, 62 (4): 30- 45.
• Hartnell, C. A., Ou, A. Y. ve Kinicki, A. (2011). Organizational Culture and Organizational Effectiveness: A Meta-analytic Investigation of the Competing Values Framework's Theoretical Suppositions, Journal of Applied Psychology, 96 (4): 677- 694.
• Hoigaard, R., Säfvenbom, R. ve Tonnessen, F. E. (2006). The Relationship between Group Cohesion, Group Norms, and Perceived Social Loafing in Soccer Teams, Small Group Research, 37 (3): 217- 232.
• Kaymak, T. (2011). Group Cohesion and Performance: A Search for Antecedents, Ekonomie a Management, 14 (4): 78- 91.
• Landers, D. ve Lueschen, G. (1974). Team Performance Outcome and the Cohesiveness of Competitive Coacting Groups, International Review of Sport Sociology, 9 (2): 57-71.
• Leo, F. M., Sánchez-Miguel, P. A., Sánchez-Oliva, D., Amado, D. ve García-Calvo, T. (2013). Analysis of Cohesion and Collective Efficacy Profiles for the Performance of Soccer Players, Journal of Human Kinetics, 39 (1): 221- 229.
• Mach, M., Dolan, S. ve Tzafrir, S. (2010). The Differential Effect of Team Members' Trust on Team Performance: The Mediation Role of Team Cohesion, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83 (3): 771- 794.
• Mallen, C. ve Adams, L. J. (2008). Traditional and Niche Sport, Recreation and Tourism Events. İçinde C. Mallen ve L. J. Adams (Editörler), Sport, Recreation and Tourism Event Management: Theoretical and Practical Dimensions (ss.1-8). Oxford: Elseiver Butterworth-Heinemann.
• Marcos, F. M. L., Miguel, P. A. S., Oliva, D. S. ve Calvo, T. G. (2010). Interactive Effects of Team Cohesion on Perceived Efficacy in Semi-Professional Sport, Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9 (2):320- 325.
• McCartney, G. ve Osti, L. (2007). From Cultural Events to Sport Events: A Case Study of Cultural Authenticity in the Dragon Boat Races, Journal of Sport Tourism, 12 (1): 25- 40.
• Mullen, B. ve Copper, C. (1994). The Relation between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Integration, Psychological Bulletin, 115 (2): 210- 227.
• Prapavessis, H. ve Carron, A. V. (1996). The Effect of Group Cohesion on Competitive State Anxiety, Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 18 (1): 64- 74.
• Prapavessis, H. ve Carron, A. V. (1997). Sacrifice, Cohesion, and Conformity to Norms in Sports Teams, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1 (3): 231- 240.
• Rovio, E., Eskola, J., Kozub, S. A., Duda, J. L. ve Lintunen, T. (2009). Can High Group Cohesion Be Harmful? A Case Study of a Junior Ice-hockey Team, Small Group Research, 40 (4): 421-435.
• Sabina, M., Florentina, Tonita, F., Nicoleta, A. ve Lavinia, P. (2012). Considerations Regarding the Team Cohesion Impact on Handball Performance, Ovidius University Annals, Series Physical Education & Sport/Science, Movement & Health, 12 (2): 166- 169.
• Sánchez, J. C. ve Yurrebaso, A. (2009). Group Cohesion: Relationships with Work Team Culture, Psicothema, 21 (1): 97- 104.
• Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri: John Wiley & Sons. Tseng, S. M. (2010). The Correlation between Organizational Culture and Knowledge Conversion on Corporate Performance, Journal of Knowledge Management, 14 (2): 269- 284.
• Zahedi, S. M. (2002). Organizational Culture Change, Tadbir Magazine, 27: 30- 37.
• Zakrajsek, R. A., Abildso, C. G., Hurst, J. R. ve Watson, J. C. (2007). The Relationships Among Coaches’ and Athletes’ Perceptions of Coaching Staff Cohesion, Team Cohesion, and Performance, The Online Journal of Sport Psychology, 9 (3): 1- 14.