Açık Alan Rekreasyonunda Stres, Hedonik ve Eudaimonik Refah

Year 2024, Volume: 35 Issue: 2, 103 - 117, 28.11.2024

Selin Kama

https://doi.org/10.17123/atad.1510519

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı stresle başa çıkma bağlamıyla açık alanlarda yapılan rekreasyon etkinliklerinde bireylerin boş zaman başa çıkma inanç ve stratejilerinin hedonik ve eudaimonik refahları üzerindeki etkisini bütüncül bir bakış açısıyla değerlendirmektir. Çalışmada Iwasaki ve Mannell (2000) tarafından geliştirilen boş zaman başa çıkma inançları ve stratejileri modeli temel alınmıştır. Bu model kapsamında nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden faydalanılarak anket araştırması yapılmıştır. Çalışmada Bitlis ilinde 07-15 Haziran 2024 tarihleri arasında anket tekniğiyle 302 örneklemden elde edilen veriler analiz için uygun koşulları sağlamıştır. Toplanan veriler SmartPLS 4 İstatistiki Analiz paket programında en küçük kısmi kareler tekniğiyle irdelenmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçları, açık alan rekreasyon sürecinde boş zaman başa çıkma inançlarının hedonik refahı, stratejilerinin ise bireylerin hedonik ve eudaimonik refahlarını pozitif yönlü ve anlamlı bir biçimde etkilediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu nedenle, kamu kurum ve kuruluşları başta olmak üzere, üniversitelerin, turistik destinasyonların ve rekreasyon yöneticilerinin açık alanları ve açık alanlarda yapılabilecek rekreasyon etkinlik sayılarını arttırmaları gerekmektedir.

Keywords

Stres, Stresle başa çıkma, Hedonik refah, Eudaimonik refah, Rekreasyon

Stress, Hedonia, and Eudaimonia in Outdoor Recreation

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of individuals’ leisure coping beliefs and strategies on hedonia and eudaimonia in outdoor recreational settings, from a holistic perspective. The study is based on the leisure coping beliefs and strategies model developed by Iwasaki and Mannell (2000). Within the scope of this model, survey research method was conducted using quantitative research methods. Data was collected between 7-15 June 2024 and the data obtained from 302 samples and analyzed using the least partial squares technique in the SmartPLS 4. The results of the study reveal that leisure coping beliefs positively affects hedonic well-being and leisure coping strategies positively and significantly affect the hedonic and eudaimonic well-being of individuals during the outdoor recreation process. For this reason, public institutions and organizations, universities, tourist destinations and recreation managers need to increase outdoor settings and the number of recreational activities.

Keywords

Stress, Stress coping, Hedonic well-being, Eudaimonic wellbeing, Recreation

References

• Akkoç, T. (2024). Festivallerin Sosyo-Ekonomik Sonuçlarının Yerel Halkın Turizm Desteğine Etkisi, GSI Journals Serie A: Advancements in Tourism, Recreation and Sports Sciences (ATRSS), 7 (1): 260-279.
• Alharbi, E. ve Smith, A. (2018). A Review of the Literature on Stress and Wellbeing Among International Students in English-Speaking Countries, International Education Studies, 11 (5): 22-44.
• Andrijašević, M., Paušić, J., Bavčević, T. ve Ciliga, D. (2005). Participation in Leisure Activities and Self-Perception of Health in the Students of the University of Split, Kinesiology, 37 (1): 21-31.
• Başaran, Y. K. (2019). Sosyal Bilimlerde Örnekleme Kuramı, The Journal of Academic Social Science, 47 (47): 480-495.
• Berto, R. (2014). The Role of Nature in Coping with Psycho-Physiological Stress: a Literature Review on Restorativeness, Behavioral Sciences, 4 (4): 394-409.
• Bono, G., Reil, K. ve Hescox, J. (2020). Stress and Wellbeing in Urban College Students in the US during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Can Grit and Gratitude Help?, International Journal of Wellbeing, 10 (3): 39-57.
• Caltabiano, M. L. (1994). Measuring the Similarity among Leisure Activities Based on a Perceived Stress-Reduction Benefit, Leisure Studies, 13 (1): 17-31.
• Chang, Y., Davidson, C., Conklin, S. ve Ewert, A. (2019). The Impact of Short-Term Adventure-Based Outdoor Programs on College Students’ Stress Reduction, Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19 (1): 67-83.
• Chang, L. C. (2015). Reexamining the Relationship between Leisure and Stress among Older Adults, Journal of Leisure Research, 47 (3): 358-372.
• Chen, H. ve Zeng, Z. (2024). Longitudinal Well-Being through the Pursuit of Hedonia and Eudaimonia: Inhibition and Enhancement of Eudaimonic Behavior, Current Psychology, 43 (7): 6603-6612.
• Chun, S., Lee, Y., Kim, B. ve Heo, J. (2012). The Contribution of Leisure Participation and Leisure Satisfaction to Stress-Related Growth, Leisure Sciences, 34 (5): 436-449.
• Corazon, S. S., Sidenius, U., Poulsen, D. V., Gramkow, M. C. ve Stigsdotter, U. K. (2019). Psycho-Physiological Stress Recovery in Outdoor Nature-Based Interventions: A Systematic Review of the Past Eight Years of Research, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (10): 1711.
• Cox, T. (1987). Stress, Coping and Problem Solving. Work & Stress, 1 (1): 5-14.
• Dalton, E. D. (2022). Exercise-Related Coping Beliefs Predict Physical Activity Levels in Response to Naturally Occurring Stress: A Daily Diary Study of College Students, Journal of American College Health, 70 (2): 411-419.
• Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, Eudaimonia, and Well-Being: An Introduction, Journal of Happiness Studies, 9: 1-11.
• Demiral, G. N., ve Akkoç, T. (2022). Destinasyonlarda Etkinlik Yönetimi. İçinde; O. Emir (Editör) Destinasyon Geliştirme ve Örnek Uygulamalar (ss. 151-168). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Demirel, D. H., Demirel, M. ve Serdar, E. (2017). University Students’ Opinions of the Meaning of Leisure and Their Perceived Freedom in Leisure, Journal of Human Sciences, 14 (1): 796-802.
• Denovan, A. ve Macaskill, A. (2017a). Stress and Subjective Well-Being among First Year UK Undergraduate Students, Journal of Happiness Studies, 18: 505-525.
• Denovan, A. ve Macaskill, A. (2017b). Building Resilience to Stress through Leisure Activities: A Qualitative Analysis, Annals of Leisure Research, 20 (4): 446-466.
• Evans, K., Walters, K. ve Anderson, D. (2020). The Case for Evidence-Based Outdoor Recreation Interventions for Girls: Helping Girls “Find Their Voice” in the Outdoors, Education Sciences, 10 (12): 363.
• Freire, C., Ferradás, M. D. M., Núñez, J. C., Valle, A. ve Vallejo, G. (2019). Eudaimonic Well-Being and Coping with Stress in University Students: The Mediating/Moderating Role of Self-Efficacy, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (1): 48.
• Greer, M. ve Vin-Raviv, N. (2019). Outdoor-based Therapeutic Recreation Programs among Military Veterans with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Assessing the Evidence, Military Behavioral Health, 7 (3): 286-303.
• Griffin, M. A. ve Clarke, S. (2011). Stress and Well-Being at Work. In S. Zedeck (Editör), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Volume 3 Maintaining, Expanding, and Contracting the Organization (ss. 359–397). Amerika: American Psychological Association.
• Hair Jr, J.F., Matthews, L.M., Matthews, R.L. ve Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated Guidelines on Which Method to Use, International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1 (2): 107 123.
• Hull, R. B. ve Michael, S. E. (1995). Nature‐Based Recreation, Mood Change, and Stress Restoration, Leisure Sciences, 17 (1): 1-14.
• Huta, V. (2020). How Distinct Are Eudaimonia and Hedonia? It Depends on How They Are Measured, Journal of Well-Being Assessment, 4 (3): 511-537.
• Hutchinson, S. L., Bland, A. D. ve Kleiber, D. A. (2008). Leisure and Stress-Coping: Implications for Therapeutic Recreation Practice, Therapeutic Recreation Journal, 42 (1): 9-23.
• Iso-Ahola, S. E. ve Park, C. J. (1996). Leisure-Related Social Support and Self-Determination as Buffers of Stress-Illness Relationship, Journal of Leisure Research, 28 (3): 169-187.
• Iwasaki, Y. (2001). Contributions of Leisure to Coping with Daily Hassles in University Students' Lives, Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33 (2): 128-141.
• Iwasaki, Y. (2003). The Impact of Leisure Coping Beliefs and Strategies on Adaptive Outcomes, Leisure Studies, 22 (2): 93-108.
• Iwasaki, Y. ve Mannell, R. C. (1999). The Effects of Leisure Beliefs and Coping Strategies on Stress‐Health Relationships: A field study, Leisure/Loisir, 24 (1-2): 3-57.
• Iwasaki, Y. ve Mannell, R. C. (2000). Hierarchical Dimensions of Leisure Stress Coping, Leisure Sciences, 22 (3): 163-181.
• Iwasaki, Y. ve Schneider, I. E. (2003). Leisure, Stress, and Coping: An Evolving Area of Inquiry, Leisure Sciences, 25 (2-3): 107-113.
• Jackson, E. M. (2013). Stress Relief: The Role of Exercise in Stress Management, ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal, 17 (3): 14-19.
• Jarratt, D., Gammon, S., Davies, N. ve Ward, J. (2022). Being at Leisure in Blue Spaces: The Role of Leisure in Amplifying the Well-Being Benefits of the Seaside, Coastal Studies & Society, 1 (2-4): 209-229.
• Jenkins, J. M. ve Pigram, J. J. (2006). Outdoor Recreation. İçinde; C.Rojek, S.M. Shaw ve A.J. Veal (Editörler) A Handbook of Leisure Studies (ss. 363-385). Londra: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
• Kama, S. ve Ağbay, N. C. (2024). Examining the Relationship Among Leisure Satisfaction, Emotional Intelligence, Hedonia and Eudaimonia, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 23 (1): 375-390.
• Kanters, M. A. (2000). Recreational Sport Participation as a Moderator of College Stress, Recreational Sports Journal, 24 (2): 10-23.
• Karagöz, D., Kama, S. ve Uysal, M. (2024). Examining the Relationships Between Mindfulness, Eudaimonic and Hedonic Experiences, Place Attachment, Loyalty: The Moderating Role of Flow, Journal of Leisure Research, 1-26.
• Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R. ve King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering Happiness: The Costs of Distinguishing between Hedonics and Eudaimonia, The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3 (4): 219-233.
• Kaya, S. (2015). An Examination of University Students’ Attitudes Towards Leisure Activities, Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 6 (3): 46-60.
• Kerr, J. L., Dattilo, J. ve O'Sullivan, D. (2012). Use of Recreation Activities as Positive Coping with Chronic Stress and Mental Health Outcomes Associated with Unemployment of People with Disabilities, Work, 43 (3): 279-292.
• Kim, J. H., Brown, S. L. ve Yang, H. (2019). Types of leisure, leisure motivation, and well-being in university students, World Leisure Journal, 61 (1): 43-57.
• Kim, M. S. ve Duda, J. L. (2003). The Coping Process: Cognitive Appraisals of Stress, Coping Strategies, and Coping Effectiveness, The Sport Psychologist, 17 (4): 406-425.
• Kim, J. H. ve McKenzie, L. A. (2014). The Impacts of Physical Exercise on Stress Coping and Well-Being in University Students in the Context of Leisure, Health, 6(19): 2570-2580.
• Kleiber, D. A. ve Rickards, W. H. (1981). Outdoor Recreation and Child Development. İçinde; J.R. Kelly (Editör) Social Benefits of Outdoor Recreation (ss.35-44).
• Kleiber, D. A., Hutchinson, S. L. ve Williams, R. (2002). Leisure as a Resource in Transcending Negative Life Events: Self-Protection, Self-Restoration, and Personal Transformation, Leisure Sciences, 24 (2): 219-235.
• Kondo, M. C., Fluehr, J. M., McKeon, T. ve Branas, C. C. (2018). Urban Green Space and Its Impact on Human Health, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(3): 445.
• Kovach, J. S. (2019). Outdoor Recreation Increases Self-Confidence in Women, The Journal of Student Leadership, 3 (1): 27-35.
• Lee, C. J., Wu, C. S. ve Lin, C. T. (2012). Leisure Activity and Coping with Stress: Adolescents as Case Study, Quality & Quantity, 46 (3): 979-991.
• Lehto, X. Y., Park, O., Fu, X. ve Lee, G. (2014). Student Life Stress and Leisure Participation, Annals of Leisure Research, 17 (2): 200-217.
• Lengieza, M. L., Hunt, C. A. ve Swim, J. K. (2019). Measuring Eudaimonic Travel Experiences, Annals of Tourism Research, 74: 195–197.
• Lu, S., Wei, F. ve Li, G. (2021). The Evolution of the Concept of Stress and the Framework of the Stress System, Cell Stress, 5(6): 76.
• McAnirlin, O. ve Maddox, C. B. (2022). ‘We Have to Be a Little More Realistic’: Women’s Outdoor Recreation Experiences in a Community Hiking Group, Annals of Leisure Research, 25 (3): 335-351.
• Miller, T. A. ve McCool, S. F. (2003). Coping with Stress in Outdoor Recreational Settings: An Application of Transactional Stress Theory, Leisure Sciences, 25 (2-3): 257-275.
• Muurlink, O. ve Poyatos Matas, C. (2011). A Higher Degree of Stress: Academic Wellbeing. İçinde; L. Marshall ve C.
• Morris (Editörler) Taking Wellbeing Forward in Higher Education: Reflections on Theory and Practice (ss. 60-71). Brighton: University of Brighton Press.
• Naseem, Z. ve Khalid, R. (2010). Positive Thinking in Coping with Stress and Health Outcomes: Literature Review, Journal of Research & Reflections in Education (JRRE), 4 (1): 42 -61.
• O'Connor, D. B., Thayer, J. F. ve Vedhara, K. (2021). Stress and Health: A Review of Psychobiological Processes, Annual Review of Psychology, 72: 663-688.
• Patry, D. A., Blanchard, C. M. ve Mask, L. (2007). Measuring University Students' Regulatory Leisure Coping Styles: Planned Breathers or Avoidance?, Leisure Sciences, 29 (3): 247-265.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879.
• Rahmani, K., Gnoth, J. ve Mather, D. (2018). Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being: A Psycholinguistic View, Tourism Management, 69: 155-166.
• Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2010). A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Social, Institutional, Cultural, and Economic Supports for Autonomy and Their Importance for Well-Being. In Human Autonomy in Cross-Cultural Context: Perspectives on the Psychology of Agency, Freedom, And Well-Being (ss. 45-64). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
• Ryff, C. D. (2023). In Pursuit of Eudaimonia: Past Advances and Future Directions. İçinde; M. Las Heras, M. Grau Grau ve Y. Rofcanin (Editörler), Human Flourishing: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Neuroscience, Health, Organizations and Arts (ss. 9-31). İsviçre: Springer Nature.
• Ruini, C. ve Cesetti, G. (2019). Spotlight on Eudaimonia and Depression. A Systematic Review of the Literature Over the Past 5 Years, Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 12: 767-792.
• Schuster, R. ve Hammitt, W. (2000). Effective Coping Strategies in Stressful Outdoor Recreation Situations: Conflict on the Ocoee River, In USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P, 15 (4): 167-174.
• Shobri, N. I. M., Rahman, N. A. ve Saman, N. H. M. (2021). Stressed Adult’s Preferences for Outdoor Recreational Activity in Urban Parks, Planning Malaysia, 19 (2): 173-185.
• Smith, A. P. (2015). Stress and Wellbeing at Work: An Update. İçinde; S. Sharples, S. Shorrock ve P. Waterson (Editörler) Contemporary Ergonomics and Human Factors (ss. 415-422). Taylor & Francis.
• Sop, S. A., Ongun, U. ve Arıcı, H. E. (2024). How Does Destination Natural Quality Influence Second Homeowners’ Life Satisfaction: A Mediation Model and Importance-Performance Map Analysis. Current Issues in Tourism, 1-17.
• Thoits, P. A. (1995). Stress, Coping, and Social Support Processes: Where Are We? What next?, Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53-79.
• Van Egeren, L. (2000). Stress and Coping and Behavioral Organization, Psychosomatic Medicine, 62(3): 451-460.
• Vella, E. J., Milligan, B. ve Bennett, J. L. (2013). Participation in Outdoor Recreation Program Predicts Improved Psychosocial Well-Being among Veterans with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: A Pilot Study. Military Medicine, 178 (3): 254-260.