Sosyal Hizmet Araştırma ve Uygulamalarında Odak Grup Tekniğinden Yararlanma

Year 2022, , 9 - 14, 01.03.2022

Büşra Uslu Ak

https://doi.org/10.54614/JSSI.2022.852177

Abstract

Sosyal hizmet bağlamında, çeşitli sosyal araştırma yöntemleri kullanılmaktadır. Nicel, nitel veya karma araştırma yöntemleri ile anketlerden eylem araştırmalarına kadar genişletilmiş bir yelpazede birçok veri toplama tekniğinden yararlanılabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, bu geniş araştırma tekniği yelpazesinden olan odak grup görüşmeleri tekniği hakkında olup, sosyal hizmet uzmanları ve araştırmacıları için sosyal hizmet araştırma ve uygulamalarında destek olacağı düşünülen çerçeve bilgiyi sunmaktır. Bu bağlamda, odak grup tekniğinin ne olduğu, planlama ve uygulamanın nasıl olması gerektiği ile ilgili alanyazın taraması sunulmuştur. Bunun yanında, odak grup görüşmelerinde veri toplama ve verilerin analizi ile ilgili bilgilere yer verilmiş olup, odak grup görüşmelerinin avantaj ve dezavantajları tartışılmıştır.

Keywords

Sosyal hizmet araştırması, odak grup tekniği, odak grup görüşmeler

Benefitting from Focus Group Technique in Social Research and Practice

Abstract

Various social research methods can be used in the field of social work. In this context, many data collection methods can be used in an expanded range from quantitative, qualitative or mixed research approaches and from questionnaires to action research. The aim of this study is to present the focus group interview technique, which is one of this wide range of research techniques, and to provide framework that is thought to support social work professionals and researchers in their research and practice. In this context, a literature review on focus group technique, its planning and implementation have been presented. In addition, information on the collection and the analysis of data from focus group interviews has been included. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of focus group interviews have been discussed.

Keywords

Social work research, focus group technique, focus group interviews

References

• Ansay, S., Perkins D., & Nelson, C. J. (2004). Interpreting outcomes: Using focus groups for evaluation research. Family Relations, 53(3): 310-316. Erişim http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.2004.53.issue-3/issu-etoc 28.12.2020 [Crossref]
• Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Cowan, S., & McLeod, J. (2004). Research methods: Discourse analysis. Counselling & Psychotherapy Research, 4, 102. [Crossref]
• Duggleby, W. (2005). What about focus group interaction data? Qualitative Health Research, 15, 832–840. [Crossref]
• Fielding, N. G., & Lee, R. M. (1998). Computer analysis and qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine. [Crossref]
• Kitzinger, J., & Barbour, R. S. (1999) Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus group. içinde Rosaline S. Barbour and Jenny Kitzinger (eds) Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory, and Practice, pp. 1–20. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Crossref]
• Krysik, J. L., & Finn, J. (2010). Research for effective social work practice. 2nd ed. New York, London: Routledge. [Crossref]
• Krueger, R. A. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
• Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks (Calif.): Sage Publications.
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2007). An array of qualitative data analysis tools: A call for qualitative data analysis triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 557–584. [Crossref]
• Leech, N. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2008). Qualitative data analysis: A compendium of techniques for school psychology research and beyond. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 587–604. [Crossref]
• Linhorst, D. M. (2002). A review of the use and potential of focus groups in social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 1: 208-227. Erişim: http://qsw. sagepub.com/con-tent/1/2/208 23.12.2020 [Crossref]
• Morgan, D. L. (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Crossref]
• Morgan, D. L. (1998). The focus group guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [Crossref]
• Peters, D. A. (1993). Improving quality requires consumer input: Using focus groups. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 7, 34–41.
• Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
• Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis as a way of analyzing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method, and practice (pp. 200–221). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Rubin A., & Babbie, E. (2010). Essential research methods for social work. 2nd ed. Belmont (Calif.): Brooks/Cole: Cengage Learning.
• Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 20. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Vaessen J., Lemine S., & Befani B. (2020). Evaluation of ınternational development ınterventions: An overview of approaches and methods. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank Washington, 20433. [Crossref]