A LITERATURE REVIEW OF THE SENTRIC RELATION AND REGISTRATION METHODS UP TO DATE

Abstract

-

Keywords

• -

DÜNDEN BUGÜNE SENTRİK İLİŞKİ TANIMI VE KAYIT YÖNTEMLERİ

Abstract

Alt ve üst çenelerin sagital yöndeki ilişkileri, özellikle de sentrik ilişki, yüzyılı aşkın bir süredir araştırmacıların üzerinde durduğu önemli bir konudur. Oklüzyon ve/veya temporomandibular eklem konusundaki tartışmalar; sentrik ilişkinin tanımı, kaydedilmesi ve kaydında kullanılan apareyler etrafında yoğunlaşmıştır. Sentrik ilişki (SI) teriminin tanımlaması, yüzyıl içinde “en geri, en arka ve en üst kondil pozisyonu” ndan, “ön-üst kondil pozisyonu” şeklinde değişmiştir. SI, diş kontaklarından bağımsız olarak kondillerin fossa içerisindeki pozisyonuyken, sentrik oklüzyon ise maksiller dişlerin mandibular dişlere göre interoklüzal dişsel pozisyonunu ifade etmektedir. Bu derlemenin amacı, sentrik ilişki terimi ile ilgili değişik görüşleri tartışmaktır

Keywords

• sentrik ilişki, oklüzyon, temporomandibular eklem

References

1. Çalıkkocaoğlu S. Tam Protezler. 3. Baskı. Teknog- rafik Matbaacılık; İstanbul:1998. p. 280−320.
2. Okeson JF. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion. 4th ed. Mosby St.Louis 1998. p. 87−104.
3. Pokorny PH, Wiens JP, Litvak H. Occlusion for fixed prosthodontics: a historical perspective of the gnathological influence. Review. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99(4): 299-313.
4. Rinchuse DJ, Kandasamy S. Centric relation: A historical perspective. Review. Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137(4): 494-501. orthodontic
5. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. The academy of Prosthodontics J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71(1): 41- 116.
6. Christensen GJ. Is occlusion becoming more confusing? A plea for simplicity. JADA 2004; 135(6): 767-770.
7. Jasinevicius TR, Yellowitz JA, Vaughan GG, Brooks ES, Baughan LW, Cline N, Theiss LB. Centric relation definitions taught in 7 dental schools: results of faculty and student surveys. J Prosthodont 2000; 9(2): 87-94.
8. Truitt J, Strauss RA, Best A. Centric relation: a survey study to determine whether a consensus exists between oral and maxillofacial surgeons and orthodontists. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67(5): 1058-1061.

9. Lucia VO. Principles of articulation. Dent Clin North Am 1979; 23(2): 199−211.
10. Celenza FV. The theory and clinical management of centric positions: I. Centric occlusion. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1984; 4(1): 8-26.
11. Rosner D, Goldberg GF. Condylar retruded contact position and intercuspal position correlation in dentulous patients. Part I. Three dimensional analysis of condylar registration. J Prosthet Dent 1986; 56(2): 230−239.
12. Keshvad A, Winstanley RB. An appraisal of the literature on centric relation. Part I. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 823−833.
13. Mohamed A, El-Aramany MA, George WA, Scott RH. Evaluation of the needle point tracing as a method for determining centric relation. J Prosthet Dent 1965; 15(6): 1043−1054.
14. Smith H. A comparison of empirical centric relation records with location of terminal hinge axis and apex of the gothic arch tracing. J Prosthet Dent 1975; 33(5): 511-520.
15. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A, D’addona A, Tartaglia G. Statistical evaluation of some mandibular reference positions in normal young people. Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5(2): 158-165.
16. Kaplan RL. Concepts of occlusion and gnathology. Dent Clin N Am 1963; 1, 557−590.
17. Paixão F, Silva WA, Silva FA, Ramos Gda G, Cruz MV. Evaluation of the reproducibility of two techniques used to determine and record centric relation in angle's class I patients. J Appl Oral Sci 2007; 15(4): 275-279.
18. Parker MW. The significance of occlusion in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1993; 37(3): 341-351.
19. Alvarez MC, Turbino ML, Barros C, Pagnano VO, Bezzon OL. Comparative study of intermaxillary relationships of manual and swallowing methods. Braz Dent J 2009; 20(1): 78-83.
20. Pyott SE, Schaffer A. Simultaneous recording of centric occlusion and vertical
21. dimension. J Am Dent Assoc 1952; 44(4): 430−436.
22. Long J. Location of the terminal hinge axis by intraoral means. J Prosthet Dent 1970; 23(1): 11- 24.
23. Alexander SR, Moore RN, DuBois LM. Mandibular condyle position: comparison of articulator mountings and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 104(3): 230- 239.
24. Gilboe DB. Centric relation as the treatment position. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50(5): 685-689.
25. Calagna LJ, Silverman SI, Garfinkel L. Influence of neuromuscular conditioning on centric relation registrations. J Prosthet Dent.1973; 30(4): 598- 604.
26. Capp NJ, Clayton JA. A technique for evaluation of centric relation tooth contacts. Part I. During normal temporomandibular joint function. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 54(4): 569-574.