BibTex RIS Cite

COMPARISON OF APICALLY EXTRUDED DEBRIS AND IRRIGANT USING THREE ROTARY INSTRUMENTATION TECHNIQUES

Year 2006, Volume: 2006 Issue: 2 , 33 - 36 , 01.02.2006
https://izlik.org/JA98RN63XA

Abstract

-

References

  • Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in Endodontics: I. Etiological Factors. J Endod 2005;30:476-481.
  • McKendry DJ. Comparison of balanced forces, endosonic, and step-back filing instrumentation techniques: quantification of extruded apical debris. J Endod 1990;16:24-27.
  • Vande Visse JE, Brilliant JD. Effect of the irrigation on the production of extruded material at the root apex during instrumentation J Endod 1975;1:243246
  • Fairbourn DR, McWalter GM, Montgomery S. The effect of four preparation techniques on the amount of apically extruded debris. J Endod 1987;13:102-108
  • Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod 1991;17:275-279.
  • Al-Omari MA, Dummer PM. Canal blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques. J Endod 1995;21:154-158.
  • Beeson TJ, Hartwell GR, Thornton JD, Gunsolley JC. Comparison of debris extruded apically in straight canals: conventional filing versus profile. 04 Taper series 29. J Endod 1998;24:18-22.
  • Reddy SA, Hicks ML. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1998; 24:180-183
  • Mangalam S, Rao CVN, Lakshminarayanan L. Evaluation of apically extruded debris and irrigant using three instrumentation techniques. Endodontology 2002;14:19-23.
  • Hinrichs RE, Walker WA, Schindler WG. A comparison of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems. J Endod 1998;24:102-106.
  • Ferraz CC, Gomes NV, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 2001;34:354-358.
  • Tnaz AC, Alaçam T, Uzun Ö, Maden M, Kayao
  • Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-275.
  • Glickman GN, Koch KA. 21st-Century endodontics. JADA 2000;131:39-46.

ÜÇ FARKLI DÖNER ALET TEKNİĞİNİN APİKALDEN İTİLEN YIKAMA SOLÜSYONU VE DEBRİS YÖNÜNDEN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2006, Volume: 2006 Issue: 2 , 33 - 36 , 01.02.2006
https://izlik.org/JA98RN63XA

Abstract

Bu in vitro çal man n amac ; üç farkl döner alet sisteminin, apikalden itilen y kama solüsyonu ve debris miktar yönünden kar la t r lmas d r. Çal mada kök geli imini tamamlam ve 15° den daha az bir e

References

  • Seltzer S, Naidorf IJ. Flare-ups in Endodontics: I. Etiological Factors. J Endod 2005;30:476-481.
  • McKendry DJ. Comparison of balanced forces, endosonic, and step-back filing instrumentation techniques: quantification of extruded apical debris. J Endod 1990;16:24-27.
  • Vande Visse JE, Brilliant JD. Effect of the irrigation on the production of extruded material at the root apex during instrumentation J Endod 1975;1:243246
  • Fairbourn DR, McWalter GM, Montgomery S. The effect of four preparation techniques on the amount of apically extruded debris. J Endod 1987;13:102-108
  • Myers GL, Montgomery S. A comparison of weights of debris extruded apically by conventional filing and Canal Master techniques. J Endod 1991;17:275-279.
  • Al-Omari MA, Dummer PM. Canal blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques. J Endod 1995;21:154-158.
  • Beeson TJ, Hartwell GR, Thornton JD, Gunsolley JC. Comparison of debris extruded apically in straight canals: conventional filing versus profile. 04 Taper series 29. J Endod 1998;24:18-22.
  • Reddy SA, Hicks ML. Apical extrusion of debris using two hand and two rotary instrumentation techniques. J Endod 1998; 24:180-183
  • Mangalam S, Rao CVN, Lakshminarayanan L. Evaluation of apically extruded debris and irrigant using three instrumentation techniques. Endodontology 2002;14:19-23.
  • Hinrichs RE, Walker WA, Schindler WG. A comparison of apically extruded debris using handpiece-driven nickel-titanium instrument systems. J Endod 1998;24:102-106.
  • Ferraz CC, Gomes NV, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine-driven instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 2001;34:354-358.
  • Tnaz AC, Alaçam T, Uzun Ö, Maden M, Kayao
  • Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-275.
  • Glickman GN, Koch KA. 21st-Century endodontics. JADA 2000;131:39-46.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Authors

Yrd. Doç. Dr. Tamer Taşdemir This is me

Dt. K. Tolga Ceyhanlı This is me

Publication Date February 1, 2006
IZ https://izlik.org/JA98RN63XA
Published in Issue Year 2006 Volume: 2006 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Taşdemir, Y. D. D. T., & Ceyhanlı, D. K. T. (2006). ÜÇ FARKLI DÖNER ALET TEKNİĞİNİN APİKALDEN İTİLEN YIKAMA SOLÜSYONU VE DEBRİS YÖNÜNDEN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 2006(2), 33-36. https://izlik.org/JA98RN63XA
AMA 1.Taşdemir YDDT, Ceyhanlı DKT. ÜÇ FARKLI DÖNER ALET TEKNİĞİNİN APİKALDEN İTİLEN YIKAMA SOLÜSYONU VE DEBRİS YÖNÜNDEN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006;2006(2):33-36. https://izlik.org/JA98RN63XA
Chicago Taşdemir, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Tamer, and Dt. K. Tolga Ceyhanlı. 2006. “ÜÇ FARKLI DÖNER ALET TEKNİĞİNİN APİKALDEN İTİLEN YIKAMA SOLÜSYONU VE DEBRİS YÖNÜNDEN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2006 (2): 33-36. https://izlik.org/JA98RN63XA.
EndNote Taşdemir YDDT, Ceyhanlı DKT (February 1, 2006) ÜÇ FARKLI DÖNER ALET TEKNİĞİNİN APİKALDEN İTİLEN YIKAMA SOLÜSYONU VE DEBRİS YÖNÜNDEN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2006 2 33–36.
IEEE [1]Y. D. D. T. Taşdemir and D. K. T. Ceyhanlı, “ÜÇ FARKLI DÖNER ALET TEKNİĞİNİN APİKALDEN İTİLEN YIKAMA SOLÜSYONU VE DEBRİS YÖNÜNDEN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 2006, no. 2, pp. 33–36, Feb. 2006, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA98RN63XA
ISNAD Taşdemir, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Tamer - Ceyhanlı, Dt. K. Tolga. “ÜÇ FARKLI DÖNER ALET TEKNİĞİNİN APİKALDEN İTİLEN YIKAMA SOLÜSYONU VE DEBRİS YÖNÜNDEN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2006/2 (February 1, 2006): 33-36. https://izlik.org/JA98RN63XA.
JAMA 1.Taşdemir YDDT, Ceyhanlı DKT. ÜÇ FARKLI DÖNER ALET TEKNİĞİNİN APİKALDEN İTİLEN YIKAMA SOLÜSYONU VE DEBRİS YÖNÜNDEN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006;2006:33–36.
MLA Taşdemir, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Tamer, and Dt. K. Tolga Ceyhanlı. “ÜÇ FARKLI DÖNER ALET TEKNİĞİNİN APİKALDEN İTİLEN YIKAMA SOLÜSYONU VE DEBRİS YÖNÜNDEN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 2006, no. 2, Feb. 2006, pp. 33-36, https://izlik.org/JA98RN63XA.
Vancouver 1.Yrd. Doç. Dr. Tamer Taşdemir, Dt. K. Tolga Ceyhanlı. ÜÇ FARKLI DÖNER ALET TEKNİĞİNİN APİKALDEN İTİLEN YIKAMA SOLÜSYONU VE DEBRİS YÖNÜNDEN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi [Internet]. 2006 Feb. 1;2006(2):33-6. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA98RN63XA