Case Report

REHABILITATION OF MAXILLECTOMY CASE WİTH CONVENTIONAL RETAINED OBTURATOR PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT

Volume: 28 Number: 4 October 14, 2018

REHABILITATION OF MAXILLECTOMY CASE WİTH CONVENTIONAL RETAINED OBTURATOR PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Maxillary resection performed for removal of the tumor mass, leads to esthetic, phonetic, functional and important psychological problems for the patient. The primary aim of prosthetic rehabilitation is to close the maxillary defect and eliminate such problems by use of different bulb designs. An obturator is a treatment option for the defects after maxillary tumor surgery. In this article, rehabilitation with hollow bulb obturator prosthesis was explained for a patient subjected to maxillary resection because of tumor mass.

Keywords: Maxillary defect, obturator, hollow bulb, prosthetic rehabilitation

MAKSİLLER REZEKSİYONUN GELENEKSEL TUTUCULU OBTURATÖR İLE REHABİLİTASYONU: VAKA RAPORU


ÖZ

Tümör kitlesini ortadan kaldırmak için yapılan maksiler rezeksiyon hastalar için estetik, fonetik, işlevsel ve önemli psikolojik sorunlara yol açar. Protetik rehabilitasyonun öncelikli amacı farklı bulb dizaynlarını kullanarak maksiller defekti ve buna bağlı bazı problemleri ortadan kaldırmaktır. Obturatörler, maksiller tümör cerrahisi sonrası oluşan defektler için bir tedavi yöntemidir. Bu makalede, tümör kitlesi nedeniyle maksiller rezeksiyon yapılan bir hastanın hollow bulb obturatör protez ile rehabilitasyon anlatılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Maksiller defekt, obturatör, hollow bulb, protetik rehabilitasyon

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Taylor TD. Clinical maxillofacial prosthetics. Quintessence Publishing Co: 2000. p. 103–20.
  2. 2. Roumanas ED, Nishimura RD, Davis BK. Clinical evaluation of implants retaining edentulous maxillary obturator prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:184-90.
  3. 3. Dingman C, Hegedus PD, Likes C, McDowell P, McCarthy E, Zwilling C. A coordinated, multidisciplinary approach to caring for the patient with head and neck cancer. J Support Oncol 2008;6:125-31.
  4. 4. Jacob FJ. Clinical management of the edentulous maxillectomy patient. Quintessence Publishing Co: 2000. p. 85-7.
  5. 5. Minsley GE, Warren DW, Hinton V. Physiologic responses to maxillary resection and subsequent obturation. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:338-44.
  6. 6. Okay DJ, Genden E, Buchbinder D, Urken M. Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: A classification system of defects. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:352-63.
  7. 7. Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part II: Design principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:562.
  8. 8. Grossmann Y, Madjar D. Resin bonded attachments for maxillary obturator retention: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:229-32.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Case Report

Publication Date

October 14, 2018

Submission Date

October 1, 2016

Acceptance Date

February 2, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 28 Number: 4

APA
Karcı, M., & Demir, N. (2018). REHABILITATION OF MAXILLECTOMY CASE WİTH CONVENTIONAL RETAINED OBTURATOR PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(4), 570-573. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473978
AMA
1.Karcı M, Demir N. REHABILITATION OF MAXILLECTOMY CASE WİTH CONVENTIONAL RETAINED OBTURATOR PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018;28(4):570-573. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.473978
Chicago
Karcı, Muhammet, and Necla Demir. 2018. “REHABILITATION OF MAXILLECTOMY CASE WİTH CONVENTIONAL RETAINED OBTURATOR PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28 (4): 570-73. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473978.
EndNote
Karcı M, Demir N (October 1, 2018) REHABILITATION OF MAXILLECTOMY CASE WİTH CONVENTIONAL RETAINED OBTURATOR PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28 4 570–573.
IEEE
[1]M. Karcı and N. Demir, “REHABILITATION OF MAXILLECTOMY CASE WİTH CONVENTIONAL RETAINED OBTURATOR PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 570–573, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.473978.
ISNAD
Karcı, Muhammet - Demir, Necla. “REHABILITATION OF MAXILLECTOMY CASE WİTH CONVENTIONAL RETAINED OBTURATOR PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 28/4 (October 1, 2018): 570-573. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.473978.
JAMA
1.Karcı M, Demir N. REHABILITATION OF MAXILLECTOMY CASE WİTH CONVENTIONAL RETAINED OBTURATOR PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018;28:570–573.
MLA
Karcı, Muhammet, and Necla Demir. “REHABILITATION OF MAXILLECTOMY CASE WİTH CONVENTIONAL RETAINED OBTURATOR PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 28, no. 4, Oct. 2018, pp. 570-3, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.473978.
Vancouver
1.Muhammet Karcı, Necla Demir. REHABILITATION OF MAXILLECTOMY CASE WİTH CONVENTIONAL RETAINED OBTURATOR PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2018 Oct. 1;28(4):570-3. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.473978