RADIOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF SUPERNUMERARY TEETH IN THE SOUTHERN TURKISH INDIVIDUALS

Year 2019, Volume: 29 Issue: 1, 55 - 60, 15.01.2019

Hümeyra Tercanlı Alkış Sevcihan Günen Yılmaz

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.522702

Abstract

ABSTRACT

 

Aim: The aim of this study was to assess
radiographic features of supernumerary teeth and demographic factors of Southern Turkish individuals.

Material and Method: Retrospectively; panoramic
radiographs of 3713 randomly selected individuals were analyzed by two oral
radiologists based on the presence of supernumerary teeth. Chi-square test was
performed for comparing the frequency of supernumerary teeth between female and
male patients. p<0.05 was accepted statistically significant.

Results: Twenty-nine (0.78%) of the 3713
individuals had one and more supernumerary teeth (22, 6, and 1 patients had
one, two and three supernumerary teeth, respectively). Of these 29 individuals,
16 were female and 13 were male. Total of 37 supernumerary teeth were found and
mandibula (n = 21) was more frequently than maxilla (n = 16). There was not
statistically significant difference in the distribution according to the
genders.

Conclusions: The evaluation of
3713 panoramic radiographs revealed
a prevalence of supernumerary teeth of 0.78%. Supernumerary teeth were more
common in the mandibula than in the maxilla, and there was not statistically
significant difference in the gender disturbance.

Key
words: Supernumerary Teeth, Prevalence, Panoramic
Radiography

GÜNEYLİ TÜRK BİREYLERDE
SÜPERNÜMERE DİŞLERİN RADYOGRAFİK ÖZELLİKLERİ

ÖZ

 

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Güneyli
Türk bireylerde süpernümere dişlerin radyografik özelliklerini ve demografik
faktörlerini değerlendirmektir.

Gereç ve Yöntem: Rastgele seçilen bireylerden
elde edilen 3713 adet panoramik radyografi süpernümere diş varlığı açısından
iki radyolog tarafından retrospektif olarak analiz edildi. Kadın erkek
arasındaki süpernümere diş sıklığını kıyaslamak amacıyla ki kare testi
uygulandı. p < 0.05 istatistiki olarak önemli sayıldı.

Bulgular: 3713 bireyin 29’unda (0.78%)
bir veya daha fazla süpernümere diş vardı (22, 6, ve 1 bireyde sırasıyla bir, iki
ve üç süpernümere diş). 29 hastadan 16’sı kadın ve 13’ü erkekti. Toplam 37
süpernümere diş bulundu ve mandibulada (21 adet) süpernümere diş sıklığı
maksilladan (16 adet) daha fazla bulundu. Cinsiyete göre dağılımda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı
fark yoktu.

Sonuç: 3713 panoramik radyografi
değerlendirmesi sonucu süpernümere diş prevelansı 0.78% olarak bulundu. Süpernümere
diş mandibulada maksilladan daha sıktı ve cinsiyet dağılımında istatiksel bir
farklılık bulunamadı.

Anahtar
Kelimeler: Süpernümere Dişler; Prevelans; Panoramik Radyografi

 

Keywords

Supernumerary Teeth, Prevalence

References

• 1. Kashyap RR, Kashyap RS, Kini R, Naik V. Prevalence of hyperdontia in nonsyndromic South Indian population: An institutional analysis. Indian J Dent 2015; 6: 135-8.
• 2. Ata-Ali F, Ata-Ali J, Penarrocha-Oltra D, Penarrocha-Diago M. Prevalence, etiology, diagnosis, treatment and complications of supernumerary teeth. J Clin Exp Dent 2014; 6: 414-8.
• 3. Singh VP, Sharma A, Sharma S. Supernumerary teeth in Nepalese children. Scı World J 2014; 2014: 215396.
• 4. Cassetta M, Altieri F, Giansanti M, Di-Giorgio R, Calasso S. Morphological and topographical characteristics of posterior supernumerary molar teeth: an epidemiological study on 25,186 subjects. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2014; 19: 545-9.
• 5. Kara MI, Aktan AM, Ay S, Bereket C, Sener I, Bulbul M, Ezirganli S, Polat HB. Characteristics of 351 supernumerary molar teeth in Turkish population. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17: 395-400.
• 6. Demiriz L, Durmuslar MC, Misir AF. Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth: A survey on 7348 people. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015; 5: 39-43.
• 7. Cassetta M, Altieri F, Di Mambro A, Galluccio G, Barbato E. Impaction of permanent mandibular second molar: a retrospective study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013; 18: 564-68.
• 8. Subasioglu A, Savas S, Kucukyilmaz E, Kesim S, Yagci A, Dundar M. Genetic background of supernumerary teeth. Eur J Dent 2015; 9: 153- 8.
• 9. Kumar DK, Gopal KS. An epidemiological study on supernumerary teeth: a survey on 5,000 people. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7: 1504- 7.
• 10. De Oliveira Gomes C, Drummond SN, Jham BC, Abdo EN, Mesquita RA. A survey of 460 supernumerary teeth in Brazilian children and adolescents. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008; 18: 98-106.
• 11. Mahabob MN, Anbuselvan GJ, Kumar BS, Raja S, Kothari S. Prevalence rate of supernumerary teeth among non-syndromic South Indian population: An analysis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012; 4: 373-5.
• 12. Mercuri E, Cassetta M, Cavallini C, Vicari D, Leonardi R, Barbato E. Dental anomalies and clinical features in patients with maxillary canine impaction. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 22-8.
• 13. Shah A, Gill DS, Tredwin C, Naini FB. Diagnosis and management of supernumerary teeth. Dent Update 2008; 35: 510-2, 514-6, 519-520.
• 14. Solares R, Romero MI. Supernumerary premolars: a literature review. Pediatr Dent 2004; 26: 450-8.
• 15. Celikoglu M, Kamak H, Oktay H. Prevalence and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a non-syndrome Turkish population: associated pathologies and proposed treatment. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: 575-8.
• 16. Kuchler EC, Costa AG, Costa Mde C, Vieira AR, Granjeiro JM. Supernumerary teeth vary depending on gender. Braz Oral Res 2011; 25: 76-9.
• 17. Menardia-Pejuan V, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Supernumerary molars. A review of 53 cases. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol 2000; 42: 101-5.
• 18. Ramesh K, Venkataraghavan K, Kunjappan S, Ramesh M. Mesiodens: A clinical and radiographic study of 82 teeth in 55 children below 14 years. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2013; 5: 60-2.
• 19. Över H, Uysal İ, Çetinkaya M. Meziodenslerin Değerlendirilmesi: Klinik ve radyografik bir çalışma. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2012; 22: 120-4.