ADEZİV UYGULAMA SÜRESİNİN UZATILMASININ MAKASLAMA BAĞLANMA DAYANIMI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Year 2020, Volume: 30 Issue: 2, 196 - 201, 15.04.2020

Buket Karalar Selin Nacak Nurcan Özakar İlday

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.687990

Cited By: 1

Abstract

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı; üniversal adezivlerin uygulama zamanlarının uzatılmasının, makaslama bağlanma dayanımı üzerine etkisinin araştırılmasıdır.
GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Çalışmamızda 63 adet çürüksüz insan molar dişi kullanıldı. Okluzal kısımda yüzeyel dentin açığa çıkarıldıktan sonra; örnekler, rastgele, kullanılacak olan üç farklı adezivin farklı uygulama sürelerine göre (5 sn, 10 sn, 20 sn) 9 gruba ayrıldı (n=7) (1. Single Bond Universal, 2. One Coat 7 Universal, 3. All-Bond Universal) . X-trafil bulk-fill kompozit kullanılarak tek tabaka halinde 4 mm yüksekliğinde ve 3 mm çapında kalıplar yardımıyla restoratif kısım tamamlandı ve LED cihazıyla polimerize edildi. Örnekler 24 saat 37oC suda bekletilip üniversal test cihazına (Instron 3344, Instron Corp, Wilmington, ABD) yerleştirildi. Veriler ANOVA ve Duncan testleri ile 0.05 anlamlılık düzeyinde analiz edildi.
BULGULAR: En yüksek (8.35±1.90) ve en düşük (4.99±2.67) makaslama bağlanma dayanım değerleri All-Bond’ da, 20 saniye ve 10 saniye uygulama süreli gruplarda gözlenmiştir. All-Bond grubunda istatistiksel anlamda farklılık gözlenirken (p<0.05), diğer gruplarda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık bulunamamıştır (p>0.05).
SONUÇ: Uygulama süresinin arttırılması All-Bond grubunda makaslama bağlanma dayanımını anlamlı oranda yükseltmiştir (p<0.05). Single Bond Universal ve One Coat 7 gruplarında ise istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir farklılık görülmemiştir (p>0.05).
ANAHTAR KELİMELER: Dentin, Makaslama bağlanma dayanımı, Uygulama süresi, Üniversal adeziv
AIM: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of prolonged application time on the resin-dentin shear bond strength (SBS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Caries-free sixty three human molars were used. After superficial dentin was exposed, samples were divided into nine groups (n=7) according to according to different application times (5 sec, 10 sec, 20 sec) of the three different adhesives (1. Single Bond Universal, 2. One Coat 7 Universal, 3. All-Bond Universal) Composite build-ups were made with X-trafil bulk-fill composite with the help of 4 mm height and 3 mm diameter molds as a single layer and polymerized with a light-emitting diode (LED). After immersion in water at 37°C for 24 h, the shear bond strength were measured by using with the universal testing machine (Instron 3344, Instron Corp, Wilmington, ABD). The results were analyzed statistically by using one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s post-hoc analysis at a significance level of 0.05.
RESULTS: The highest and the lowest SBS values were observed in the All bond groups (8.35±1.90) and (4.99±2.67) applied 20s and 10s. A statistically significant difference was observed between All-bond groups (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the other groups (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: Increasing the application time significantly improved the bond strength of All-bond group; however, it had no significant effect on the bond strength of Single Bond Universal and One Coat 7 groups.
KEYWORDS: Dentin, Shear bond strength, Application time, Universal adhesive

Keywords

Dentin, Makaslama bağlanma dayanımı, Uygulama süresi

References

• 1. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater, 2008, 24: 90-101.
• 2. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. Journal of Dental Research, 2005, 84: 118-132.
• 3. Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Bonding effectiveness of a new 'multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. Journal of Dentistry, 2012, 40: 475-484.
• 4. Karadaş M, Hatipoğlu Ö, Ateş SM. Üniversal Adezivlerin Mineye Bağlanma Dayanımının Değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 28: 204-209.
• 5. Caneppele TM, Torres CR, Sassaki A, Valdetaro F, Fernandes RS, Prieto de Freitas C, Batista GR. Effects of surface hydration state and application method on the bond strength of self-etching adhesives to cut enamel. J Adhes Dent, 2012, 14: 25-30.
• 6. do Amaral RC, Stanislawczuk R, Zander-Grande C, Michel MD, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Active application improves the bonding performance of self-etch adhesives to dentin. Journal of Dentistry, 2009, 37: 82-90.
• 7. Gokce K, Aykor A, Ersoy M, Ozel E, Soyman M. Effect of phosphoric acid etching and self-etching primer application methods on dentinal shear bond strength. J Adhes Dent, 2008, 10: 345-349.
• 8. Strydom C. Self-etching adhesives: review of adhesion to tooth structure part I. SADJ, 2004, 59: 413, 415-417, 419.
• 9. Perdigao J, Gomes G, Lopes MM. Influence of conditioning time on enamel adhesion. Quintessence Int, 2006, 37: 35-41.
• 10. Velasquez LM, Sergent RS, Burgess JO, Mercante DE. Effect of placement agitation and placement time on the shear bond strength of 3 self-etching adhesives. Operative Dentistry, 2006, 31: 426-430.
• 11. Kimmes NS, Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL, Latta MA. Adhesive bond strengths to enamel and dentin using recommended and extended treatment times. Operative Dentistry, 2010, 35: 112-119.
• 12. Tsuchiya H, Tsubota K, Iwasa M, Ando S, Miyazaki M, Platt JA. Influence of adhesive application time on enamel bond strength of single-step self-etch adhesive systems. Operative Dentistry, 2010, 35: 77-83.
• 13. Reis A, de Carvalho Cardoso P, Vieira LC, Baratieri LN, Grande RH, Loguercio AD. Effect of prolonged application times on the durability of resin-dentin bonds. Dent Mater, 2008, 24: 639-644.
• 14. Türk GI, Kara E. Üç farklı universal adeziv sistemin dentine makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarının karşılaştırılması. Selcuk Dental Journal, 2.2: 51-57.
• 15. Botelho MPJ, Isolan CP, Schwantz JK, Lopes MB, Moraes RR. Rubbing time and bonding performance of one-step adhesives to primary enamel and dentin. J Appl Oral Sci, 2017, 25: 523-532.
• 16. Cardenas AM, Siqueira F, Rocha J, Szesz AL, Anwar M, El-Askary F, Reis A, Loguercio A. Influence of Conditioning Time of Universal Adhesives on Adhesive Properties and Enamel-Etching Pattern. Operative Dentistry, 2016, 41: 481-490.
• 17. Karaman E, Tuncer D, Karahan S, Ertan A. Farklı adeziv sistemlerin dentine makaslama bağlanma dayanımı: in vitro çalışma. Acta Odontologica Turcica, 2015, 32(3), 112-115.
• 18. Itthagarun A, Tay FR. Self-contamination of deep dentin by dentin fluid. Am J Dent, 2000, 13: 195-200.
• 19. Marshall GW, Jr., Marshall SJ, Kinney JH, Balooch M. The dentin substrate: structure and properties related to bonding. Journal of Dentistry, 1997, 25: 441-458.
• 20. Pashley D, Okabe A, Parham P. The relationship between dentin microhardness and tubule density. Endod Dent Traumatol, 1985, 1: 176-179.
• 21. Moll K, Fritzenschaft A, Haller B. In vitro comparison of dentin bonding systems: effect of testing method and operator. Quintessence Int, 2004, 35: 845-852.
• 22. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes. Journal of Dentistry, 2014, 42: 800-807.
• 23. Spencer P, Swafford JR. Unprotected protein at the dentin-adhesive interface. Quintessence Int, 1999, 30: 501-507.
• 24. Wang Y, Spencer P. Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive/dentin interface with wet bonding. Journal of Dental Research, 2003, 82: 141-145.
• 25. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. Journal of Dental Research, 1996, 75: 1706-1715.
• 26. Perdigao J, May KN, Jr., Wilder AD, Jr., Lopes M. The effect of depth of dentin demineralization on bond strengths and morphology of the hybrid layer. Operative Dentistry, 2000, 25: 186-194.
• 27. Takahashi A, Sato Y, Uno S, Pereira PN, Sano H. Effects of mechanical properties of adhesive resins on bond strength to dentin. Dent Mater, 2002, 18: 263-268.
• 28. Reis A, Grandi V, Carlotto L, Bortoli G, Patzlaff R, Rodrigues Accorinte Mde L, Dourado Loguercio A. Effect of smear layer thickness and acidity of self-etching solutions on early and long-term bond strength to dentin. Journal of Dentistry, 2005, 33: 549-559.
• 29. Bae JH, Cho BH, Kim JS, Kim MS, Lee IB, Son HH, Um CM, Kim CK, Kim OY. Adhesive layer properties as a determinant of dentin bond strength. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2005, 74: 822-828.
• 30. Ikeda T, De Munck J, Shirai K, Hikita K, Inoue S, Sano H, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Effect of evaporation of primer components on ultimate tensile strengths of primer–adhesive mixture. J Dental Materials, 2005, 21: 1051-1058.
• 31. de Carvalho Cardoso P, Loguercio AD, Vieira LCC, Baratieri LN, Reis A. Effect of prolonged application times on resin-dentin bond strengths. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2005, 7: 143–9.
• 32. Abate P, Rodriguez V, Macchi R. Evaporation of solvent in one-bottle adhesives. Journal of Dentistry, 2000, 28: 437-440.
• 33. Pashley EL, Zhang Y, Lockwood PE, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH. Effects of HEMA on water evaporation from water-HEMA mixtures. Dent Mater, 1998, 14: 6-10.
• 34. Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau GJAds. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. 2017, 8: 1.