ADEZİV REZİN SİMANLARIN SU EMİLİMİ VE SUDA ÇÖZÜNÜRLÜĞÜ ÜZERİNE FARKLI POLİMERİZASYON YÖNTEMLERİNİN ETKİSİ

Year 2021, Volume: 31 Issue: 4, 599 - 605, 14.10.2021

Mustafa Gündoğdu Murat Alkurt Esra Gündoğdu Prof. Dr. Zeynep Yeşil Duymuş Nuri Bakan

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.831783

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı adeziv rezin simanların su emilimi ve suda çözünürlüğü üzerine polimerizasyon yönteminin etkisinin incelenmesidir.
Gereç ve yöntem: Mevcut çalışmada 2 farklı self-etch adeziv rezin siman (Duo-Link B, Clearfil Esthetic Cement C) ve 2 farklı self adeziv rezin siman (RelyX U200 Automix R, Maxcem Elite M) test edildi. Her bir adeziv rezin siman için 24 adet örnek hazırlandı ve kullanılan polimerizasyon yöntemine göre 3 farklı gruba ayrıldı; ışıkla polimerizasyon, iki kez ışıkla polimerizasyon ve kimyasal polimerizasyon. Su emilimi ve suda çözünürlük testi ISO 4049:2009 standardına göre yapıldı. Veriler tek yönlü varyans analizi ile analiz edildi ve Tukey testi anlamlı farklılıkları tespit etmek için kullanıldı (α=0.05).
Bulgular: Adeziv rezin simanlar arasında su emilimi ve suda çözünürlük değerleri anlamlı olarak farklıydı (p<0.05). M grubu en yüksek su emilimi değerine sahipken (p<0.05), C grubu en düşük değere sahipti (p<0.05). Suda çözünürlük açısından, en fazla kütle kaybı M grubunda belirlendi. B ve R grupları negatif suda çözünürlük değerleri gösterirken, C ve M grupları pozitif çözünürlük değerleri gösterdi. C ve R grupları için polimerizasyon yöntemleri arasında anlamlı farklılıklar belirlendi (p<0.05).
Sonuç: M grubu hariç diğer rezin simanların su emilimi ve suda çözünürlük değerleri ISO standartlarıyla uyumluydu. Polimerizasyon yöntemi R grubunun su emilimini, C grubunun ise su emilimini ve suda çözünürlüğünü etkiledi.
Anahtar kelimeler: Rezin siman; su emilimi; suda çözünürlük

Effect of different polymerization type on water sorption and solubility of adhesive resin cements
ABSTRACT
Aim: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different polymerization types on water sorption and solubility of adhesive resin cements.
Material and methods: Two self-etch adhesive resin cements (Duo-Link B, Clearfil Esthetic Cement C) and two self-adhesive resin cements (RelyX U200 Automix R, Maxcem Elite M) were tested in the present study. Twenty-four specimens were prepared for each adhesive resin cement and divided into 3 groups according to the polymerization type used: light-curing, double light-curing, and self-curing. The water sorption and solubility were determined according to ISO 4049:2009. Data were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance, and the post-hoc Tukey test (α=0.05).
Results: The water sorption and solubility were significantly different among the adhesive resin cements (p<0.05). M group had the highest water sorption values (p<0.05), while C group had the lowest values (p<0.05). Concerning the water solubility, the highest mass loss was noted for M group. B and R groups have exhibited negative solubility; C and M groups positive solubility. Significant differences were noted among the polymerization type in the C and R groups (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The water sorption and solubility of resin cements were in accordance with ISO requirement, except M group for water sorption. The polymerization type affected water sorption and solubility of C group, and water sorption of R group.
Keywords: Resin cement; water sorption; water solubility

Keywords

Rezin siman, su emilimi, suda çözünürlük

References

• 1. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:389-404.
• 2. Edelhoff D, Brix O. All-ceramic restorations in different indications: a case series. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142 Suppl 2:14S-9S.
• 3. Vargas MA, Bergeron C, Diaz-Arnold A. Cementing all-ceramic restorations: recommendations for success. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142 Suppl 2:20S-4S.
• 4. Vrochari AD, Eliades G, Hellwig E, Wrbas KT. Water sorption and solubility of four self-etching, self-adhesive resin luting agents. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:39-43.
• 5. Hill EE, Lott J. A clinically focused discussion of luting materials. Aust Dent J 2011;56 Suppl 1:67-76.
• 6. Weiser F, Behr M. Self-adhesive resin cements: a clinical review. J Prosthodont 2015;24:100-8.
• 7. Ferracane JL, Stansbury JW, Burke FJT. Self-adhesive resin cements - chemistry, properties and clinical considerations. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:295-314.
• 8. Shiozawa M, Takahashi H, Asakawa Y, Iwasaki N. Color stability of adhesive resin cements after immersion in coffee. Clin Oral Investig 2015;19:309-17.
• 9. Cekic-Nagas I, Ergun G. Effect of different light curing methods on mechanical and physical properties of resin-cements polymerized through ceramic discs. J Appl Oral Sci 2011;19:403-12.
• 10. Petropoulou A, Vrochari AD, Hellwig E, Stampf S, Polydorou O. Water sorption and water solubility of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:674-9.
• 11. Marghalani HY. Sorption and solubility characteristics of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 2012;28:e187-98.
• 12. Leal CL, Queiroz A, Foxton RM, Argolo S, Mathias P, Cavalcanti AN. Water Sorption and Solubility of Luting Agents Used Under Ceramic Laminates With Different Degrees of Translucency. Oper Dent 2016;41:E141-E148.
• 13. Muller JA, Rohr N, Fischer J. Evaluation of ISO 4049: water sorption and water solubility of resin cements. Eur J Oral Sci 2017;125:141-150.
• 14. Meşe A, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Sorption and solubility of luting cements in different solutions. Dent Mater J 2008;27:702-9.
• 15. Silva EM, Noronha-Filho JD, Amaral CM, Poskus LT, Guimarães JG. Long-term degradation of resin-based cements in substances present in the oral environment: influence of activation mode. J Appl Oral Sci 2013;21:271-7.
• 16. Kim HJ, Bagheri R, Kim YK, Son JS, Kwon TY. Influence of Curing Mode on the Surface Energy and Sorption/Solubility of Dental Self-Adhesive Resin Cements. Materials (Basel) 2017;10:129.
• 17. Aguiar TR, André CB, Ambrosano GM, Giannini M. The Effect of Light Exposure on Water Sorption and Solubility of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements. Int Sch Res Notices 2014;2014:610452.
• 18. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4049:2009—Dentistry—Polymer-based restorative materials.
• 19. de Gee AJ, Wendt SL, Werner A, Davidson CL. Influence of enzymes and plaque acids on in vitro wear of dental composites. Biomaterials 1996;17:1327-32.
• 20. Sokolowski G, Szczesio A, Bociong K, Kaluzinska K, Lapinska B, Sokolowski J, Domarecka M, Lukomska-Szymanska M. Dental Resin Cements-The Influence of Water Sorption on Contraction Stress Changes and Hydroscopic Expansion. Materials (Basel) 2018;11:973.
• 21. Ortengren U, Wellendorf H, Karlsson S, Ruyter IE. Water sorption and solubility of dental composites and identification of monomers released in an aqueous environment. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:1106-15.
• 22. Sundfeld RH, Valentino TA, de Alexandre RS, Briso AL, Sundefeld ML. Hybrid layer thickness and resin tag length of a self-etching adhesive bonded to sound dentin. J Dent 2005;33:675-81.
• 23. Yan YL, Kim YK, Kim KH, Kwon TY. Changes in degree of conversion and microhardness of dental resin cements. Oper Dent 2010;35:203-10.
• 24. Moraes RR, Faria-e-Silva AL, Ogliari FA, Correr-Sobrinho L, Demarco FF, Piva E. Impact of immediate and delayed light activation on self-polymerization of dual-cured dental resin luting agents. Acta Biomater 2009;5:2095-100.
• 25. Moreira Fdo C, Antoniosi Filho NR, Souza JB, Lopes LG. Sorption, solubility and residual monomers of a dental adhesive cured by different light-curing units. Braz Dent J 2010;21:432-8.