ÖRGÜTSEL ÖZDEŞLEŞME VE KONTROL ALGILAMALARININ, ÇALIŞANLARIN İŞTEN AYRILMA NİYETİ VE İŞ PERFORMANSINA ETKİLERİ

Year 2010, Volume: 24 Issue: 3, 163 - 181, 06.07.2011

Ömer Turunç Mazlum Çelik

Abstract

Günümüzde çalışanların iş performanslarının artırılması önemli
bir süreçtir. Bu kapsamda örgütsel özdeşleşme kavramı çok sayıda bağımlı
değişkenin öncülü olarak bir çok araştırmaya konu olmaktadır. Bu çalışmada,
bankacılık sektöründe faaliyet gösteren çalışanların örgütsel özdeşleşme ve
kontrol algılamalarının işten ayrılma niyetleri ve iş performansları üzerindeki
etkileri araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada her bir değişkenin birbiri ile olan ilişkileri
ortaya konulan hipotezler vasıtası ile incelenmiş ve modelin uyumluluğu yapısal
eşitlik modeli yardımıyla analiz edilmiştir. Belirlenen örneklem üzerinde
uyumluluk testleri yapılarak modelin hedef örneklem üzerindeki geçerliliği
tartışılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, çalışanların örgütsel özdeşleşme düzeylerinin
süreç kontrol ve karar kontrol algılarını, işten ayrılma niyetlerini ve iş
performanslarını anlamlı bir şekilde etkilediği belirlenmiştir. Analiz edilen
yapısal eşitlik modelinin uyum indeksleri incelendiğinde (GFI:0.90; AGFI:0.85;
CFI:0.94;TLI:0.92; NFI:0.87; RMSEA:0.05; CMIN/DF:1,6) modelin kabul
edilebilir bir model olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Örgütsel Özdeşleşme, Süreç Kontrol, Karar Kontrol, İşten Ayrılma Niyeti, İş Performansı

References

• Akal, Z., (2003) Performans Kavramları ve Performans Yönetimi, MPM, Ankara.
• Ashforth, B.E. ve Mael, F., (1989) “Social Identity Theory and the Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 14.
• Bhattacharya, R., (1998), “A Formal Model of Trsut Based on Outcomes”, Academy of Management Review, 23:3.
• Borman, W. C. ve Motowıidlo, S. J. (1993), ”Expanding The Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance” (Der.), Schmitt, N. ve Borman, W.C. Personnel Selection in Organizations, San Francisco, Ca: Jossey-Bass.
• Brashear, B. ve Zinta, S., (2005), “Fairness Reduces the Negative Effects of Organizational Politics on Turnover Intentions, Citizenship Behavior and Job Performance”, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 2.
• Brockner, J., Spreitzer, G., Mishra, A., Hochwarter, W., Pepper, L.ve Weinberg, J. (2004) “Perceived Control as an Antidote to the Negative Effects of Layoffs on Survivors' Organizational Commitnnent and Job Performance”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 49.
• Byrne, Z. S. (2005) “Fairness Reduces The Negative Effects of Organizational Politics On Turnover Intentions, Citizenship Behavior and Job Performance”, Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 2.
• Campbell, J. P. (1990) “Modeling The Performance Prediction Problem in Industrial and Organizational Psychology” (Der.) Dunnette, M. D. ve Hough, L. M. 2nd (Ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc.
• Carmeli, A. (2005) “Perceived external Prestige, Affective Commitment, and Citizenship Behaviors”, Organization Studies, 26.
• Carmeli, A., Gilat G. ve Waldman, D.A. (2007) “The Role of Perceived Organizational Performance in Organizational Identification, Adjustment and Job Performance”, Journal of Management Studies, 44:6.
• Cheney, G. (1983) “On The Various And Changing Meaning Of Organizational Membership: A Field Study of Organizational Identification”, Communication Monographs, 50.
• Çöl, G., (2008) “Algılanan Güçlendirmenin İşgören Performansı Üzerine Etkileri”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9 (1).
• Dutton, J. Dukerich, J.ve Harquail, C.V. (1994) “Organizational Images and Membership Commitment”, Administrative Science Quarterly,34.
• Elliot, A.J. ve Church, M.A. (1997) “A Hierarchical Model of Approach and Avoidance Achievement Motivation”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 721.
• Elliot, A.J. ve Harackiewicz, J.M. (1994) “Goal Setting, Achievement Orientation, and intrinsic Motivation: A Mediational Analysis”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 665.
• Elliot, A.J. ve Harackiewicz, J.M., (1996) “Approach and Avoidance Achievement Goals and intrinsic Motivation: A Mediational Analysis”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 703.
• Elliot, A.J.ve Thrash, T.M. (2002) “Approach-Avoidance Motivation in Personality: Approach and Avoidance Temperaments and Goals”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 825.
• Frone, M.R., Finn, K.V. (2001) “Academic Performance and Cheating:Moderating Role of School Identification and Self- Efficacy”, The Journal of Eductional Research.
• Giacobbe-Miller, J., (1995), “A Test of The Group Values and Control Models of Procedural Justice From The Competing Perspectives of Labor and Management”, Personal Psychology, 48(1).
• Horngren, C.T., Foster, G. ve Datar, S.M., (2002), Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis, Prentice- Hall, USA.
• Hui, C., Wong, A. ve Tjosvold, D., (2007) “Turnover Intention and Performance in China: The Role of Positive Affectivity, Chinese Values, Perceived Organizational Support and Constructive Controversy”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80.
• Jaramillo, F., Mulki, Jay, P., Solomon, P. (2006) ”The Role of Ethical Climate On Salesperson’s Role Stress, Job Attitudes, Turnover Intention, And Job Performance”, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. XXVI, Nu. 3.
• Jones, E., Chonko, L., Rangarajan, D. ve Roberts, J. (2007) “The Role of Overload on Job Attitudes, Turnover Intentions, and Salesperson Performance”, Journal of Business Research, 60.
• Joreskog, K. G. ve Sorbom, D., (1993), LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago, IL: Scientific International Software.
• Kabak, M. ve Turunç, Ö, (2008). “Günümüzde Çalışanları Motive Eden Faktörler: Özel Sektör Motivasyon Önceliklerinin Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemiyle Belirlenmesi”, KHO Bilim Dergisi, Cilt:18, s.2, ss.168- 191.
• Kaplan, R.S., Atkinson, A.A., (1998) Advanced Management Accounting, 3 Prentice-Hall, Third (Ed.) USA.
• Kirkman, B. L. Rosen, B., (1999), ” Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42 Issue 1.
• Kline, R. B., (1998), Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Kovach, K.A., (1995) “Employee Motivation: Addressing a Crucial Factor in Your Organization”s Performance”, Employee Relations Today, 22, 2.
• Kreiner, G. E. ve Ashforth, B. E. (2004) “Evidence Toward an Expanded Model of Organizational Identification”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25.
• Landy, F. J., ve Farr, J. L., (1983) The Measurement of Work Performance. Orlando, Fl: Academic Pres,
• Mael ,F. ve Tetrick, L.E. (1992) “Identifying Organizational Identification”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52.
• Mael, F. ve Ashforth, B. (1992) “Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of The Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol 13.
• Mathieu, J. E. ve Zajac, D. M. (1990) “A Review and Meta-Analysis of The Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences of Organizational Commitment”, Psychological Bulletin, 108.
• Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L. ve Topolnytsky, L. (2002) “Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-Analysis Of Antecedents, Correlates, And Consequences”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61.
• Mignonac, K., Herrbach, O. ve Guerrero, S. (2006) “The Interactive Efects of Perceived External Prestige and Need for Organizational Identification on Turnover Intentions”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69.
• Miller, M. L., (1989) “Process and Decision Control in the Work Place: Separate Effects, Independence From Distributive Justice, and Tests of Explanatory Mechanisms”, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(4).
• Motowidlo, S. J., (2003) Job Performance. Inw. Borman, Ilgen, D. ve Klimoski, R. (Der.), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 12,Hoboken, Nj: John Wiley and Sons.
• Öztürk, Z.ve Dündar, H. (2003) “Örgütsel Motivasyon Ve Kamu Çalışanlarını Motive Eden Faktörler”, C.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 4.
• Remedios, R. ve Boreham, N., (2004) “Organizational Learning and Employees’ Intrinsic Motivation”, Journal of Education and Work, Vol. 17, No. 2, June.
• Riketta, M. (2005) “Organizational Identification: a Meta-Analysis” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66.
• Riketta, M. ve Van Dick, R. (2005) “Foci of Attachment in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis Comparison of the Strength and Correlates of Work- Group Versus Organizational Commitment and Identification”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67.
• Rousseau, D. M., ve Mclean P. J., (1993) The Contracts of Individuals and Organizations. (Ed.), Cummings, L. L. ve Staw, B. M., Research in Organizational Behavior Vol. 15, Greenwich, Ct: Jai Pres.
• Scott, S.G. ve Lane, V.R., (2000) “A Stakeholder Approach to Organizational Identity”, Academy of Management Review, 25 :1.
• Sekaran, U. (1992) Research Methods for Business, Canada: John Wiley &Sons, Inc.
• Sigler, T.H. ve Pearson, C. M., (2000) ”Creating An Empowering Culture: Examining The Relationship Between Organizational Culture and Perceptions of Empowerment”, Journal of Quality Management, Vol.5.
• Smitdhs, A. Pryun, A. ve Van Riel, C.B.M., (2001), “The Impact of Employee Communication and Perceived External Prestige on Organizational Identification”, Academy of Management Journal, 44:5.
• Sullivan, J. J. (1989) “Self Theories and Employee Motivation”, Journal of Management, Vol. 15. No. 2.
• Şimşek, Ö. F., (2007), Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş: Temel İlkeler ve Lisrel Uygulamaları, Ekinoks, Ankara.
• Tangirala S., Ramanujam R. (2008) “Exploring Nonlinearıty in Employee Voice: The Effects of Personal Control and Organizational Identification” Academy of Management Journal,, Vol. 51, No. 6.
• Tompkins, P.K. ve Cheney, G. (1985) “Communication and Unobtrusive Control in Contemporary Organizations”, R.D. McPhee ve P.K. Tompkins (Der). Organzaitional Communication: Traditional Themes and New Directions, Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
• Tüzün, İ. K. (2006), Örgütsel Güven, Örgütsel Kimlik ve Örgütsel Özdeşleşme İlişkisi; Uygulamalı Bir Çalışma, Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara,
• Tyler, T. R. (1999) “Why People Cooperate With Organizations: An Identity- Based Perspective”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 21.
• Tyler, T.R, (1989), ”The Psychology of Procedural Justice: A Test of The Group Values Model”, Journal Pers Soc Psychol, 57 (5).
• Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J. , Zhu, W. (2008), “How Transformatıonal Leadership Weaves Its Influence on Individual Job Performance: The Role of Identification and Effıcacy Beliefs”, Personnel Psychology, 61.
• Walumbwa, F. O.ve Avolio B. J. Zhu, W. (2008) ”How Transformational Leadership Weaves Its Influence on Individual Job Performance: The Role of Identification and Effıcacy Beliefs”, Personnel Psychology, 61.
• Van Knippenberg D. ve Van Schie, E. C. M. (2000) “Foci and Correlates of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 73.
• Van Knippenberg, D. ve Sleebos E. (2006) “Organizational Identification Versus Organizational Commitment: Self-Definition, Social Exchange, and Job Attitudes”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27.
• Wayne S.J., Shore L. M. Ve Lınden R. C. (1997) “Perceived Organizational Support and Leader Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40.
• Whitner, E.M., Brodt, S.E., Korsgaard, M.A. ve Werner, J.M., (1998) “Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior”, Academic Management Review (3).