KEŞFEDİCİ KARMA DESEN KULLANILARAK ÖĞRENCİ POPÜLERLİK ALGISI ÖLÇEĞİNİN GELİŞTİRİLMESİ

Year 2021, Issue: 43, 372 - 394, 29.12.2021

Abdullah Atli , Murat Canpolat

https://doi.org/10.33418/ataunikkefd.821186

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı keşfedici karma deseni kullanarak lise öğrencilerinin okuldaki popülerlik algılarının düzeylerini belirleyen geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı geliştirmektir. Bu araştırma nitel ve nicel olmak üzere iki aşamada gerçekleştirildi. Araştırmanın nitel aşamasında 48 lise öğrencisi ile liselerdeki popüler öğrencilerin özellikleri üzerine yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapıldı. Bu görüşmeler sonrasında öğrenci popülerlik algılarına ilişkin altı ana tema (arkadaşlık ilişkileri, öğretmenlerle ilişkiler, özgüven, kıyafet ve moda, fiziksel çekicilik, spor ve sanatsal etkinlikler) belirlendi ve bu temalar çerçevesinde ölçek maddeleri hazırlandı. Araştırmanın nicel aşamasında ilk olarak hazırlanan ölçek maddeleri 282 lise öğrencisine uygulanarak Açımlayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA), ardından 148 kişiden oluşan farklı lise öğrencisine uygulanarak Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) yapıldı. Daha sonra geliştirilen Öğrenci Popülerlik Algısı (ÖPAÖ) ile yaşam doyumu, yalnızlık ve benlik saygısı arasındaki korelasyon kanıtları birleşme-ayrılma (convergent-divergent lidity) geçerliği için kullanıldı. Sonuç olarak nitel aşamada keşfedilen boyutların nicel aşamada doğrulandığı ve bu boyutların ölçek maddeleri üzerinden evrene genellenebileceği görüldü.

Keywords

Popülerlik, Ergen, Lise Öğrencisi, Keşfedici karma desen

DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT POPULARITY PERCEPTION SCALE THROUGH THE USE OF EXPLORATORY MIXED METHOD DESIGN

Abstract

The aim of this study is to develop a valid and reliable measurement tool that determines the popularity perception levels of high school students in school using exploratory mixed design. This research was carried out in two stages, qualitative and quantitative. In the qualitative phase of the study, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 48 high school students on the characteristics of popular students in high schools. After these interviews, six main themes (friendship relations, relationships with teachers, self-confidence, clothing and fashion, physical attraction, sports and artistic activities) related to student popularity perceptions were determined and scale items were prepared within the framework of these themes. In the quantitative phase of the study, the scale items, which were prepared first, were applied to 282 high school students, and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), then Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) was applied to 148 different high school students. The correlation evidences between Student Popularity Perception (PAS) and life satisfaction, loneliness and self-esteem developed later were used for convergent-divergent validity validity. As a result, it was seen that the dimensions discovered in the qualitative stage were confirmed in the quantitative stage and that these dimensions could be generalized to the universe through scale items.

Keywords

Popularity,, Adolescent,, High school student,, Exploratory mixed design

References

• Adams, G. R. (1983). Social competence during adolescence: social sensitivity, locus of control, empathy and peer popularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12, 203-211.
• Alexander C., Piazza M., Mekos D. ve Valente T. (2001). Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1054-139X(01)00210-5
• Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., McFarland, C. F., Marsh, P. A., ve McElhaney, K. B. (2005). The two faces of adolescents’ success with peers: adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development, 76,747–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00875.x
• Ammerman, R. T., Kazdin, A. E., ve Van Hasselt, B. (1993). Correlates of loneliness in nonreferred and psychiatrically hospitalized children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2, 187–202.
• Avcı, Ö. H., ve Yıldırım, İ. (2014). Ergenlerde şiddet eğilimi, yalnızlık ve sosyal destek. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 157-168.
• Bandura A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice–Hall.
• Bierman, K. L. (2004). Understanding and treating peer rejection. New York: Guilford Press.
• Borch, C., Hyde, A., ve Cillessen, A. H. N. (2011). The role of attractiveness and aggression in high school popularity. Social Psychology Education, 14, 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-010-9131-1
• Braun, V., ve Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
• Bronson, W.C. (1966). Central orientations: A study of behavior organization from childhood to adolescence. Child Development, 37, 125-155.
• Brown, B. B., ve Larson, J. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner ve L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology: Contextual influences on adolescent development (pp. 74–103). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479193.adlpsy002004
• Brown, J. E., ve Mann, L. (1991). Decision-making competence and self-esteem: A comparison of parents and adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 14(4), 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-1971(91)90004-B
• Byrne, D., London, O., ve Reeves, K. (1968). The effects of physical attractiveness, sex, and attitude similarity on interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality, 36, 259-271. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1968.tb01473.x
• Cassidy, J., ve Asher, S. R. (1992). Loneliness and peer relations in young children. Child Development, 63, 350-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01632.x
• Cillessen, A. H. N., ve Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102-105. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.0963-7214.2005.00343.x
• Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., ve Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0012-1649.18.4.557
• Coleman, J. C. (1980). Friendship and the peer group in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 408-431). New York: John Wiley.
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approache. California: Sage Publication.
• Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research. planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
• Creswell, J. W., Fetters, M. D., ve Ivankova, N. V. (2004). Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. The Annals of Family Medicine, 2(1), 7-12.
• Creswell, J.W. ve Plano Clark, V.L. (2011) Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage Publication.
• Çuhadaroğlu, Ö. (1986). Ergenlerde benlik saygısı (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Dağlı, A., ve Baysal, N. (2016). Yaşam doyumu ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(59), 1250-1263. DOI: 10,17755 / esosder.75955
• Demir, A. (1989). UCLA Yalnızlık Ölçeği'nin geçerlilik ve güvenirliği. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 7(23), 14-18.
• Demirbaş, E. (2009). Lise öğrencilerinin utangaçlık ve benlik saygısının işlevsel olmayan tutumlar açısından incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Selçuk Üniversitesi, Konya, Türkiye.
• Diener, E., ve Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653–663. DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0 4
• Dion, K.K., Berscheid, E.ve Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285-290. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0033731
• Dorak, N. (2016). Reddedilen, ihmal edilen ve popüler olan 9-10 yaşındaki çocukların depresyon ve sosyal anksiyete düzeylerinin sosyometrik bağlamda incelenmesi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Çağ Üniversitesi, Mersin, Türkiye.
• Dowell, L. J. (1970). Environmental factors of childhoodcompetitive athletics. Physical Educator Journal, 27, 17-21.
• Düzgün, M., (2004). Popüler kültürlerin ve ürünlerin oluşumunda medyanın rolü. Bilim ve Zihnin Işığında Eğitim Dergisi, 57, 149-152.
• Eisenberg, M. E. ve Forster, J. L. (2003). Adolescent smoking behavior: measures of social norms. American Journal Of Preventive Medicine, 25(2), 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00116-8.
• Estévez López, E., Martínez Ferrer, B., ve Jiménez Gutiérrez, T. I. (2009). Las relaciones sociales en la escuela: el problema del rechazo escolar. Educational Psychology, 15(1), 45-60.
• Gottman, J., Gonso, J., ve Rasmussen, B.(1975). Social interaction, social competence, and friendship in children. Child Development, 46, 709-718.
• Greene, J. C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Journal of mixed methods research, 2(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1558689807309969
• Günaydın, B. ve Yöndem, Z. D. (2007). Ergenlerin akran bağlılığının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 141-153.
• Hartup, W.W. (1983). Peer Relations. In P.H. Mussen (Series Ed.), E.M. Hetherington (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology:Vo.3. Socialization, personality and social development. (pp.103-196). New York: Wiley.
• Huebner, E. S. (1991). Correlates of life satisfaction in children. Social Psychology Quarterly, 6, 103–111. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0088805
• Joffe, H., ve Yardley, L. (2004). Content and thematic analysis. In D.F. Marks ve L. Yardley (Eds.), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp.56-68). Sage Publications Inc.
• Kelly JA, St. Lawrence J, Diaz Y, et al. (1991). HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: An experimental analysis. Am J Pub Health, 81, 168–71. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.81.2.168
• Kernis, M. H. (2005). Measuring self‐esteem in context: The importance of stability of self‐esteem in psychological functioning. Journal of personality, 73(6), 1569-1605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00359.x
• Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M. J., ve Cillessen, A. H. N. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00550.x
• Michell, L., ve Amos, A. (1997). Girls, pecking order and smoking. Social Science & Medicine, 44(12), 1861-1869. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00295-X
• Morse, J. M. (2003). Principles mixed methods and multimethod reseach design. In A. Tashakkori ve C. Teddlie (Ed.) Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. (pp.189-209). California: Sage Publication.
• Mundy, J. (1997). Developing anger and aggression control in youth in recreation and park systems. Parks & Recreation, 32(3), 62-69.
• Onwuegbuzie, A. J. ve Johnson, R. B. (2004). Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come. American Educational Research, 33, (7), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X033007014
• Öğel, K. (2007). Riskli davranış gösteren çocuk ve ergenler. İstanbul: Yeniden Yayınları.
• Patton, M. Q. (2013). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
• Prinstein, M. J. (2017). Popular: The power of likability in a status-obsessed world. Penguin.
• Rosenberg, M. (1985). Self-concept and psychological well-being in adolescence. In R. L. Leahy (Ed.), The development of the self (pp. 205–246). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
• Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding. New York: Academic Press.
• Steinberg, L. (2004). Risk taking in adolescence: what changes, and why? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1308.005
• Tashakkori, A., ve Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social andbehavioral research. California: Sage Publication.
• Teddlie, C., ve Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1558689806292430
• Topçu, Ç., Yıldırım, A., Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2013). Okullarda siber zorbalık: Türk ergenler ne düşünüyor? International Journal for the Advancement of Counseling, 35(2), 139-151. DOI 10.1007 / s10447-012-9173-5
• Topuz, S. (1995). Popülerlik, mizah duygusu ve akademik başarı arasındaki ilişki (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Tucker, J. S., Green Jr, H. D., Zhou, A. J., Miles, J. N., Shih, R. A., ve D’Amico, E. J. (2011). Substance use among middle school students: Associations with self-rated and peer-nominated popularity. Journal of adolescence, 34(3), 513-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.05.016
• Valente T. W., Unger J. B., Johnson C. A. (2005). Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37(4), 323-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.10.016
• Walcott, C. M., Upton, A., Bolen, L. M., ve Brown, M. B. (2008). Associations between peer-perceived status and aggression in young adolescents. Psychology in the Schools, 45(6), 550-561. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20323
• Yavuzer, Y. (2013). Ergenlerde saldırganlık ve sosyometrik popülerlik arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(2), 767-780.
• Yörükoğlu, A. (1998). Çocuk ruh sağlığı. İstanbul: Özgür Yayınları.