BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2014, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 367 - 382, 23.03.2015

Haluk Yergin Mehmet Mercan Ömer Yılmaz

Abstract

Increase in Intra-Industry Trade (IIT) co-efficient calculated according to Grubel-Lloyd model does not always indicate IIT increase in that sector. Increase in interindustry trade in the related sector may cause an increase in intra-industry trade co-efficient. Therefore, in order to define the real effect of intra-industry trade in the related sector, “Marginal Intra-Industry Co-Efficient Index” was developed. In the study, foreign trade and Marginal Intra-Industry Trade (MIIT) of the 1990-2008 period between EU (15 countries) and Turkey were examined, and effects of Customs Union were searched. In the MEIT analysis between Turkey-EU (15 countries), in the primary goods belonging to 0-4 group, an important stable change was not found on MIIT rates, but an increase in foreign trade volume was noted. In contrast, despite an increase in foriegn trade volume in 5-8 industrial goods, a change in MIIT rates was found

Keywords

Marginal Intra-Industry Trade Intra-Industry Trade European Union Turkey

References

  • Abd el-Rahman, K. (1991). “Firm’s Competitive and National Comparative Advantage as Joint Determinants of Trade Composition”. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127(1), 83-97.
  • Aquino, A. (1978). “Intra Industry Trade Inter- Industry Trade Specialization as Concurrent Sources of İnternational Trade in Manufactures”. Weltwirtschaftlichec Archiv, 114(1) 275-296
  • Balassa B. (1966). “Tariff Reduction and Trade in Manufacturers among The Industrial Countries”. The American Economic Review, 56 (3), 466-473.
  • Balassa B. (1986). “Intra-Industry Specialization: A Cross-Counry Analysis European”. Economic Review, 21 (42), 27-42.
  • Balassa B. (1988) “Bauwens Luc, Inter-Industry and Intra-Industry Specialization in Manufactured Goods”. Weltwirtschaftlichec Archiv, 124, 1-12
  • Başkol, M. O. (2005). “Endüstri İçi Ticaret Teorisi Açısından Dış Ticaret Yapımızın Değerlemesi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İktisat Anabilim Dalı.
  • Bernhofen, M. D. (1997). “Intra Industry Trade and Strategic Interaction: Theory and Evidence”. Journal of İnternational Economics, 45, 77-96.
  • Brulhart, M. (1995). “Industrial Specialisation, in The European Union: A Test of The New Trade Theory”. Trinity Economic Papers Series, Technical Paper, 95/5, 4-29.
  • Brulhart, M. (2002). “Intra- Industry Trade: Towards Measure of Non-Disruptive Trade Expansion, Published in “Frontiers of Research on Intra-Industry Trade”. Palgrave- Macmillan, Edited by P.J. Lloyd and Hyun Lee, 1-26
  • Brulhart, M. (2008). “An Account of Global Intra-Industry Trade 1962-2006. University of Lausenne, School of Economic and Business Administration (FEC- Lausenne), Research Paper Series, 401-459.
  • Czarny, E. (2003). “Intra-Industry Trade Do We Really Know What Is?”. Erişim Tarihi: 20 Eylül 2011. www.Etsg.org/ETSG 2003/Papers/Czarny
  • Çakmak, Ö. A. (2006). “Türkiye ile Almanya, İtalya, Fransa ve İngiltere Arasında İma
  • lat Endüstrisinde Endüstri-İçi Ticaretin Yapısı: 1991-2004”. Ekonomik ve
  • Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt:3, Yıl:2 Sayı:1,3, ss.33-47.
  • Drèze, J. (1961). “Les exportations intra-C.E.E. en 1958 et la position Belge”, Recherches Économiques de Louvain, 27, 717-738.
  • Emirhan, P. N. (2002). “Intra-Industry Trade Dynamıcs of Turkey”, Erişim Tarihi: 20 Eylül 2011. http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2002/Papers/Emirhan.pdf
  • Finger, J. M. (1975). “Trade Overlap And Intra-Industry Trade”. Economic Inquiry, 13(4), 581-589.
  • Gray, H. P. (1980). “Intra Industry Trade: An “Untidy” Phenomenon”. Review of World Economics, 124(2), 211-229.
  • Greenaway, D. and Milner, C. (1981) “Trade Imbalance Effects in the Measurement of Intra-Industry Trade”. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv: 117, 756-762.
  • Greenaway, D. and Milner, C. (1987) “The Economics of Intra Industry Trade”. Journal of International Economics”, 23(1-2), 182-185.
  • Greenaway, D., Hine, R. and Milner, C. (1995) “Vertical and Horizontal Intra-Industry Trade: A Cross Country Analysis for the United Kingdom”. Economic Journal, 105(433), 1505-1518.
  • Grubel, H. G. (1967). “Intra-industry Specialization and the Pattern of Trade”. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Sciences, 33(3), 374-388.
  • Grubel, H. G. and Lloyd, P. J. (1971).”The Empirical Measurement of Intra –Industry Trade”, Economic Record. 47(4), 494–517.
  • Grubel, H. G. and Lloyd P. J. (2007). “The Empirical Measurement of Intra- Industry Trade”. Economic Record, 47(4), 494-517.
  • Hamilton, C., Kniest, P. (1991). “Trade Liberalisation Structural Adjustment and Intra Industry Trady: A Note”. Review of World Economics, 127 (2), 356-367.
  • Krugman, R. P. (1981). “Intra Industry Specialization, and Gains from Trade”. The Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 959-973.
  • Lloyd, P. J., Grubel, H. G. (1975). “Intra-Industry Trade: Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differaentiated Products”. Journal of Economic Literature, 13(4), 1361-1362.
  • Lüthje, T. (2006). “Does Intra-Industry Trade Exist in The Real World?”. Applied Economic Letters, 825-827.
  • Marvel, H. P. and Ray, E. J. (1987). “Intraindustry Trade: Sources and Effects on Protection”. Journal of Political Economy, 95(6), 1278-1291.
  • Pomfret, R. (1986). “On the Division of Labour and International Trade: or, Adam Smith’s Explanation of Intra-Industry Trade”. Journal of Economic Studies, 13(4), 56-63.
  • Verdoorn, P. J. (1960). “The Intra-Block Trade of Benelux, Economic Consequences of the Size of Nation”. Ed. EAG, Robinson, Mc Millan Co. 291-329.
  • Yılmaz, Ş. E. (1992). Dış Ticaret Kuramlarının Evrimi. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Yay. No:178, İİBF Yay., No:57
  • Yükseler, Z. ve Türkan, E. (2008). “Türkiye’nin Üretim ve Dış Ticaret Yapısında Dönü- şüm, Küresel Yönelimler ve Yansımalar”. TÜSİAD 02/453, 67.

Türkiye-AB (15 Ülke) Arasındaki Dış Ticaret ve Gümrük Birliği’nin Marjinal Endüstri-İçi Ticarete Etkisi ve Endüstri-İçi Ticaretle Karşılaştırılması

Year 2014, Volume: 18 Issue: 3, 367 - 382, 23.03.2015

Haluk Yergin Mehmet Mercan Ömer Yılmaz

Abstract

Grubel-Lloyd yöntemine göre hesaplanan endüstri-içi ticaret katsayısının (EİT) yükselmesi
her zaman o sektörde EİT’in artmasına işaret etmemektedir. İlgili sektörde endüstriler
arası ticaretin artması da endüstri-içi ticaret katsayısının yükselmesine neden olabilmektedir.
Bu nedenle, ilgili sektörde endüstri-içi ticaretin gerçek etkisini belirleyebilmek için “Marjinal
Endüstri İçi Ticaret Katsayısı Endeksi” geliştirilmiştir. Çalışmada, AB (15 Ülke) ve Türkiye
arasında 1990 -2008 dönemine ait dış ticaret ve Marjinal Endüstri-İçi Ticaret (MEİT) incelenmiş
ve Gümrük Birliği’nin etkileri araştırılmıştır. Türkiye-AB 15 ülke arasındaki MEİT
incelendiğinde 0-4 gruba ait birincil mallarda, MEİT oranlarında önemli istikrarlı değişim
görülmemiş fakat dış ticaret hacminde artış kaydedilmiştir. Buna karşın 5-8 sanayi mallarında
ise dış ticaret hacminde artış olmakla beraber, MEİT oranlarında değişim görülmüştür.

Keywords

Marjinal Endüstriler İçi Ticaret Endüstri İçi Ticaret Avrupa Birliği Türkiye

References

  • Abd el-Rahman, K. (1991). “Firm’s Competitive and National Comparative Advantage as Joint Determinants of Trade Composition”. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 127(1), 83-97.
  • Aquino, A. (1978). “Intra Industry Trade Inter- Industry Trade Specialization as Concurrent Sources of İnternational Trade in Manufactures”. Weltwirtschaftlichec Archiv, 114(1) 275-296
  • Balassa B. (1966). “Tariff Reduction and Trade in Manufacturers among The Industrial Countries”. The American Economic Review, 56 (3), 466-473.
  • Balassa B. (1986). “Intra-Industry Specialization: A Cross-Counry Analysis European”. Economic Review, 21 (42), 27-42.
  • Balassa B. (1988) “Bauwens Luc, Inter-Industry and Intra-Industry Specialization in Manufactured Goods”. Weltwirtschaftlichec Archiv, 124, 1-12
  • Başkol, M. O. (2005). “Endüstri İçi Ticaret Teorisi Açısından Dış Ticaret Yapımızın Değerlemesi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Bursa: Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü İktisat Anabilim Dalı.
  • Bernhofen, M. D. (1997). “Intra Industry Trade and Strategic Interaction: Theory and Evidence”. Journal of İnternational Economics, 45, 77-96.
  • Brulhart, M. (1995). “Industrial Specialisation, in The European Union: A Test of The New Trade Theory”. Trinity Economic Papers Series, Technical Paper, 95/5, 4-29.
  • Brulhart, M. (2002). “Intra- Industry Trade: Towards Measure of Non-Disruptive Trade Expansion, Published in “Frontiers of Research on Intra-Industry Trade”. Palgrave- Macmillan, Edited by P.J. Lloyd and Hyun Lee, 1-26
  • Brulhart, M. (2008). “An Account of Global Intra-Industry Trade 1962-2006. University of Lausenne, School of Economic and Business Administration (FEC- Lausenne), Research Paper Series, 401-459.
  • Czarny, E. (2003). “Intra-Industry Trade Do We Really Know What Is?”. Erişim Tarihi: 20 Eylül 2011. www.Etsg.org/ETSG 2003/Papers/Czarny
  • Çakmak, Ö. A. (2006). “Türkiye ile Almanya, İtalya, Fransa ve İngiltere Arasında İma
  • lat Endüstrisinde Endüstri-İçi Ticaretin Yapısı: 1991-2004”. Ekonomik ve
  • Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt:3, Yıl:2 Sayı:1,3, ss.33-47.
  • Drèze, J. (1961). “Les exportations intra-C.E.E. en 1958 et la position Belge”, Recherches Économiques de Louvain, 27, 717-738.
  • Emirhan, P. N. (2002). “Intra-Industry Trade Dynamıcs of Turkey”, Erişim Tarihi: 20 Eylül 2011. http://www.etsg.org/ETSG2002/Papers/Emirhan.pdf
  • Finger, J. M. (1975). “Trade Overlap And Intra-Industry Trade”. Economic Inquiry, 13(4), 581-589.
  • Gray, H. P. (1980). “Intra Industry Trade: An “Untidy” Phenomenon”. Review of World Economics, 124(2), 211-229.
  • Greenaway, D. and Milner, C. (1981) “Trade Imbalance Effects in the Measurement of Intra-Industry Trade”. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv: 117, 756-762.
  • Greenaway, D. and Milner, C. (1987) “The Economics of Intra Industry Trade”. Journal of International Economics”, 23(1-2), 182-185.
  • Greenaway, D., Hine, R. and Milner, C. (1995) “Vertical and Horizontal Intra-Industry Trade: A Cross Country Analysis for the United Kingdom”. Economic Journal, 105(433), 1505-1518.
  • Grubel, H. G. (1967). “Intra-industry Specialization and the Pattern of Trade”. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Sciences, 33(3), 374-388.
  • Grubel, H. G. and Lloyd, P. J. (1971).”The Empirical Measurement of Intra –Industry Trade”, Economic Record. 47(4), 494–517.
  • Grubel, H. G. and Lloyd P. J. (2007). “The Empirical Measurement of Intra- Industry Trade”. Economic Record, 47(4), 494-517.
  • Hamilton, C., Kniest, P. (1991). “Trade Liberalisation Structural Adjustment and Intra Industry Trady: A Note”. Review of World Economics, 127 (2), 356-367.
  • Krugman, R. P. (1981). “Intra Industry Specialization, and Gains from Trade”. The Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 959-973.
  • Lloyd, P. J., Grubel, H. G. (1975). “Intra-Industry Trade: Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differaentiated Products”. Journal of Economic Literature, 13(4), 1361-1362.
  • Lüthje, T. (2006). “Does Intra-Industry Trade Exist in The Real World?”. Applied Economic Letters, 825-827.
  • Marvel, H. P. and Ray, E. J. (1987). “Intraindustry Trade: Sources and Effects on Protection”. Journal of Political Economy, 95(6), 1278-1291.
  • Pomfret, R. (1986). “On the Division of Labour and International Trade: or, Adam Smith’s Explanation of Intra-Industry Trade”. Journal of Economic Studies, 13(4), 56-63.
  • Verdoorn, P. J. (1960). “The Intra-Block Trade of Benelux, Economic Consequences of the Size of Nation”. Ed. EAG, Robinson, Mc Millan Co. 291-329.
  • Yılmaz, Ş. E. (1992). Dış Ticaret Kuramlarının Evrimi. Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Yay. No:178, İİBF Yay., No:57
  • Yükseler, Z. ve Türkan, E. (2008). “Türkiye’nin Üretim ve Dış Ticaret Yapısında Dönü- şüm, Küresel Yönelimler ve Yansımalar”. TÜSİAD 02/453, 67.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language tr;en
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Haluk Yergin This is me

Mehmet Mercan This is me

Ömer Yılmaz This is me

Publication Date March 23, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 18 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Yergin, H., Mercan, M., & Yılmaz, Ö. (2015). Türkiye-AB (15 Ülke) Arasındaki Dış Ticaret ve Gümrük Birliği’nin Marjinal Endüstri-İçi Ticarete Etkisi ve Endüstri-İçi Ticaretle Karşılaştırılması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(3), 367-382.
 Download Cover Image

Creative Commons Lisansı
ATASOBED- Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari-AynıLisanslaPaylaş 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.