Implementation of The Fuzzy Dematel Method in Higher Education Course Selection: The Case of Eskişehir Vocational School

Year 2017, Volume: 21 Issue: 4, 1597 - 1614, 20.12.2017

Serpil Altınırmak Mustafa Ergün Çağlar Karamaşa

Abstract

Elective
courses play an essential role in the process of improving students’ skills and
also help with identifying their interests, talents and potentials for a given
field or vocation. Therefore the relationships between course selection criteria
have been considered crucial in the decision making process. In this study, the
aim has been to determine what constitutes the course selection criteria for
students in Eskişehir Vocatonal School. Given this aim, a survey was designed
and applied to 50 student respondents from different departments (marketing,
hospitality management, secretary and office management, foreign trade,
culinary arts, real estate and property management) current at Eskişehir
Vocational School. Criteria, which are defined within the literature review
undertaken, are ranked according to importance level via the fuzzy DEMATEL (The
Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) method. In addition, a general
review of criteria has also been considered but as part of a cause and effect
process, by using a causal diagram.

Keywords

Course Selection, Vocational School, Fuzzy Logic

References

• Aksakal, E. & Dağdeviren M. (2010). ANP ve DEMATEL Yöntemleri ile Personel Seçimi Problemine Bütünleşik Bir Yaklaşım, Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(4), 905-913.
• Babad, E., Darley J., M. & Kaplowitz H. (1999). Development Aspects in Course Selection, Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 157-168.
• Bai, C. & Sarkis, J. (2013). A Grey-Based DEMATEL Model for Evaluating Business Process Management Critical Success Factors, International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 281-292.
• Baykasoğlu, A., Kaplanoğlu, V., Durmuşoğlu, Z.D.U. & Şahin, C. (2013). Integrating Fuzzy DEMATEL and Fuzzy Hierarchical TOPSIS Methods for Truck Selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 40(3), 899-907.
• Chang, B., Chang, C.H. & Wu, C.H. (2011). Fuzzy DEMATEL Method for Developing Supplier Selection Criteria. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 1850-1858.
• Dalalah, D., Hayajneh, M. & Batieha, F. (2011). A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Supplier Selection, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 8384-8391.
• Demir, A. (1996). Üniversitedeki Seçmeli Ders Uygulamasının Öğrenciler ve Öğretim Üyelerince Değerlendirilmesi, Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 2(7), 24-31.
• Demir, A. & Ok, A. (1996). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesindeki Öğretim Üye ve Öğrencilerinin Seçmeli Dersler Hakkındaki Görüşleri, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12, 121-125.
• Dubois, D. & Prade, H. (1978). Operations on Fuzzy Number, International Journal of Systems Science, 9, 613-626.
• Dündar, S. (2008). Ders Seçiminde Analitik Hiyerarşi Proses Uygulaması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 217-226.
• Ersöz, F., Kabak M. & Yılmaz Z., (2011). Lisansüstü Öğrenimde Ders Seçimine Yönelik Bir Model Önerisi, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 13(2), 227-244.
• Ertuğrul, İ. & Karakaşoğlu, N. (2009). Performance Evaluation of Turkish Cement Firms with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS Methods, Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 702-715.
• Fontela, E. & Gabus, A. (1974). DEMATEL, Innovative Methods. Report No.2 Structural Analysis of the World Problematique, Battelle Geneva Research Institute, 67-69.
• Gharakhani, D. (2012). The Evaluation of Supplier Selection Criteria by Fuzzy DEMATEL Method, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(4), 3215-3224.
• Hung, Y., Chou, S.T. & Tzeng, G. (2006). Using a Fuzzy Group Decision Approach-Knowledge Management Adoption, APRU Distance Learning and the Internet 2006 Conference, 225-228.
• Isabel, F.R. (2000). Influences on Choice of Course Made by University, Year I Bioscience Students a Case Study. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 1201-1218.
• Kurnaz, M.A. & Alev, N. (2003). İlköğretim ve Ortaöğretim Lisansüstü Öğrencilerinin Ders Seçimi Yaklaşımları ve İlgili Sorunları, Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 6(3), 38-52.
• Kutlu, B.S., Abalı,Y.A. & Eren T. (2012). Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleri İle Seçmeli Ders Seçimi, Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2 (2), 6-21.
• Mahmoodzadeh, S., Shahrabi, J., Priazar, M. & Zaeri, M.S. (2007). Project Selection by Using Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS Technique, International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation, 1(6), 270-275.
• Malaviya, A. & Peters, L. (1997). Fuzzy Feature Description of Handwriting Patterns, Pattern Recognition, 30(10), 1591-1604. Onay, A., Karamaşa, Ç. & Saraç, B. (2016). Application of Fuzzy AHP in Selection of Accounting Elective Courses in Undergraduate and Graduate Level, Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies, 2(4), 20-42.
• Opricovic, S. & Tzeng, G.H. (2003). Defuzzification within a Multicriteria Decision Model, International Journal of Uncertainty. Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 11(5), 635-652.
• Ömürbek, N., Demirci, N. & Akalın, P. (2013). Analitik Ağ Süreci ve TOPSIS Yöntemleri ile Bilimdalı Seçimi, Akademik Araştırmalar ve Çalışmalar Dergisi, 5(9), 118-140.
• Özgüven, İ. E. (1989). Yükseköğretimde Öğrenci Kişilik Hizmetleri, Yükseköğretimde Rehberlik ve Psikolojik Danışma Toplantısı. Ankara: A.Ü Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları, No.161.
• Paykoç, F., İçöz, N. & Zorba, E. (1989). ODTÜ Lisans Programlarında Verilen Teknik Nitelikte Olmayan Seçmeli Derslerle İlgili Bir Çalışma, Yayınlanmamış ODTÜ Eğitim Kurulu Komisyon Raporu.
• Tezcan, H. & Gümüş Y. (2008). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Seçmeli Ders Tercihlerine Etki Eden Faktörlerin Karşılaştırılması, Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), 1-17.
• Tseng, M. & Lin, Y. (2009). Application of Fuzzy DEMATEL to Develop a Cause and Effect Model of Municipal Solid Waste Management in Metro Manila, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 158, 519-533.
• Von Altrock, C. (1996) Fuzzy Logic and Neurofuzzy Applications in Business and Finance, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
• Wang, M.J.J. & Chang, T.C. (1995). Tool Steel Materials Selection Under Fuzzy Environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 72, 263-270.
• Woolnough, B. E. (1994). Why Students Choose Physics or Reject it. Physics Education, 29(6), 368-374.
• Wu, W. & Lee, Y. (2007). Developing Global Managers’ Competencies Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL Method, Expert Systems with Applications, 32, 499-507.
• Yücebaş E., Alkan, G., Atasağun, H. G. & Egeli, H.A.(2013). Ege Bölgesi’nde Bulunan Meslek Yüksekokullarının Durum Analizi; Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri. Electronic Journal of Colleges. Aralık 2013 UMYOS Özel Sayı.
• Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
• Zhou, Q., Huang, W. & Zhang, Y. (2011). Identifying Critical Success Factors in Emergency Management Using a Fuzzy DEMATEL Method, Safety Science, 49, 243-252.
• https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr (Accessing time: 20.01.2017)
• www.kalkinma.gov.tr (Accessing time: 15.04.2017)
• www.yok.gov.tr (Accessing time: 20.01.2017)