Exploring of the Relationship Between School Administrators' Inclusive Leadership Behaviours and Teachers' Autonomy

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the correlation between school administrators' inclusive leadership behaviors and teacher autonomy as seen by teachers. The relational survey model, a quantitative research method, was used to conduct the study. The model is based on a sample of 390 teachers working in primary, secondary and high school type schools in Şehitkamil district of Gaziantep in the 2023-2024 academic year. The study utilised the Personal Information Form, the Inclusive Leadership Scale, and the Teacher Autonomy Scale as instruments for data collection. The examination of participants' perceptions of inclusive leadership based on gender was performed using Student's t-test and Welch's t-test.The study employed many analytical techniques, including independent sample t-tests, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple regression analyses. The predictive relationship between the perception of inclusive leadership and teacher autonomy was determined through the implementation of simple multiple regression analysis. The study's findings indicated that male teachers perceived school administrators as more supportive leaders compared to their female counterparts. The analysis demonstrated a favorable correlation between all sub-dimensions of inclusive leadership and the sub-dimensions of the teaching process, in addition to the rights and duties associated with teacher autonomy.

Keywords

• Inclusive leadership
• school administrator
• teachers autonomy
• teacher

Okul Yöneticilerinin Kapsayıcı Liderlik Davranışları ile Öğretmen Özerkliği Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı öğretmen algılarına göre okul yöneticilerinin kapsayıcı liderlik davranışları ile öğretmen özerkliği arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesidir. Nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ilişkisel tarama modelinde gerçekleştirilen çalışmanın örneklemini 2023-2024 öğretim yılında Gaziantep’in Şehitkamil ilçesinde ilkokul, ortaokul ve lise türü okullarda görev yapan 390 öğretmen oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak Kişisel Bilgi Formu, Kapsayıcı Liderlik Ölçeği ve Öğretmen Özerkliği Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Veriler Google form aracılığıyla dijital ortamda toplanmış, verilerin analizinde Jamovi 2.3.28 programından yararlanılmıştır. Araştırmada betimsel ve yordamsal istatistik analizleri yapılmıştır. Katılımcıların cinsiyet değişkenine göre kapsayıcı liderlik algıları normal dağılım gösteren ilişkisiz iki örneklemden elde edilen puanların birbirinden anlamlı bir şekilde farklılık gösterip göstermediğini test eden Student’s t testi ve Welch’s t testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan araştırmada bağımsız örneklem t-testi, tek yönlü varyans analizi (ANOVA), Pearson korelasyon analizi ve çoklu regresyon analizleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın sonuçlarına göre; erkek öğretmenlerin kadın öğretmenlere göre okul yöneticilerini daha destekleyici çalışan liderler olarak gördükleri sonucuna varılmıştır. Kapsayıcı liderlik ile öğretmen özerkliği arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı bir ilişki vardır. Kapsayıcı liderliğin tüm alt boyutlarının öğretmen özerkliğinin öğretim süreci ve hak ve sorumluluklar alt boyutları ile pozitif ilişkisinin olduğu diğer alt boyutlar olan eğitim sistemi ve özerklik uygulamaları alt boyutları ile ilişkisinin olmadığı ortaya çıkmıştır.

Keywords

• Kapsayıcı liderlik
• okul yöneticisi
• öğretmen özerkliği
• öğretmen

References

1. Ağcihan, E. (2022). Okullarda kapsayıcı liderlik ve sosyal diyalog ilişkisinin incelenmesi [Examination of the relationship between inclusive leadership and social dialogue in schools] (Thesis No. 786773), [Doctoral thesis, Kocaeli University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
2. Akyüz, Y. (2019). Türk eğitim tarihi (20. baskı) [History of Turkish education]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
3. Allodi, M. W., & Fischbein, S. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of their work environment in Swedish junior high schools. Research in Comparative and International Education, 7(3), 376-393. https://doi.org/10.2304/rcie.2012.7.3.376
4. Altınel Yüncü, Z. (2022). Okul yöneticilerinin kapsayıcı liderlik özelliklerine ilişkin öğretmenlerin algıları [Teachers' perceptions of school administrators' inclusive leadership traits ]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Eğitim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı Eğitim Yönetimi Bilim Dalı Tezsiz Yüksek Lisans Projesi.
5. Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065
6. Baş, K. (2023). Kamu çalışanlarının kapsayıcı liderlik algıları ve ilişkili bazı faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi [Public employees’ perceptions of inclusive leadership and an evaluation of related factors]. Journal of Healthcare Management and Leadership, (1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.35345/johmal.1252770
7. Beachum F. & Dentith A. M. (2004). Teacher leaders creating cultures of school renewal and transformation. Educational Forum, 68, 276-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720408984639
8. Billingsley, B., DeMatthews, D., Connally, K., & McLeskey, J. (2018). Leadership for effective inclusive schools: Considerations for preparation and reform. Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education, 42(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2018.6​

9. Bordens, K. S. & Abbott, B. B. (2017). Research design and methods: A process approach (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
10. Bourke, J., & Espedido, A. (2020, March 6). The key to inclusive leadership. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/03/the-key-to-inclusive-leadership
11. Brady, J., & Wilson, E. (2021). Teacher wellbeing in England: Teacher responses to school-level initiatives. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1775789
12. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2021). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook of data analysis for the social sciences] (29th ed.). Ankara: Pegem.
13. Byrd, M. Y. (2022). Creating a culture of inclusion and belongingness in remote work environments that sustains meaningful work. Human Resource Development International, 25(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2022.2047252
14. Cambron-McCabe, N. (2006). Challenging the current organization of schools. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 1(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1177/194277510600100110
15. Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R. & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
16. Chamberland L. (2009). Distributed leadership: Developing a new practice: An action research study (Order No. 3367708). Available from ProQuest Dissertations ve Theses Global. (UMI No. 304856820)
17. Chew, J. O. A. & Andrews, D. (2010). Enabling teachers to become pedagogical leaders: Case studies of two IDEAS schools in Singapore and Australia. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 9, 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-010-9079-0
18. Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., Perry, N. E., & Martin, A. J. (2016). Teachers' psychological functioning in the workplace: Exploring the roles of contextual beliefs, need satisfaction, and personal characteristics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(6), 788-799. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000088
19. Crisol-Moya, E., Romero-López, M. A., Burgos-García, A. & Sánchez-Hernández, Y. (2022). Inclusive leadership from the family perspective in compulsory education. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 11(2), 226-245.
20. Çakalcı, N. (2019). Okul iklimi ve bireysel yenilikçilik kavramları arasındaki ilişkide öğretmen özerkliğinin aracılık rolü [The intermediate role of teacher authority in the relationship between school climate and individual innovation concepts]. (Thesis No. 557920), [Master thesis, Fırat University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
21. Çelik, S. (2016). Resmi liselerde dağıtılmış liderlik ve öğretmen özerkliği ilişkisinin öğretmen görüşlerine göre incelenmesi (Elazığ ili örneği) [A study of the relationship between distributed leadership in official high schools and teacher autonomy based on teachers' opinions (Elazig sample)]. (Thesis No. 446891), [Master thesis, Hacettepe University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
22. Çolak, İ. (2016). Okul iklimi ile öğretmenlerin özerklik davranışları arasındaki ilişki (Muğla ili örneği) [The relationship between school climate and teacher autonomy (Muğla sample)]. (Thesis No. 448387), [Master thesis, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
23. Çolak, İ., Altınkurt, Y., & Yılmaz, K. (2017). Öğretmenlerin özerklik davranışları ile iş doyumları arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between teachers' autonomy behaviors and job satisfaction]. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(2), 189-208.
24. Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221-258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863 Done, E. J., & Murphy, M. (2018). The responsibilisation of teachers: A neoliberal solution to the problem of inclusion. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(1), 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1243517
25. Edda Öskarsdóttir, V., Donnelly, M., Turner-Cmuchal, M., & Florian, L. (2020). Inclusive school leaders - their role in raising the achievement of all learners. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(5), 521-537. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2019-0190
26. Ertay, I. (2022). Yeni uzaktan eğitim çağıyla öğretmen özerkliği ve özyeterliliğinin ilişki analizi [An analysis of teacher self efficacy and teacher autonomy in relation to a new distance learning era]. (Thesis No. 773985), [Master thesis, Gaziantep University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
27. Fernet, C., Trépanier, S. G., Austin, S., & Levesque-Côté, J. (2016). Committed, inspiring, and healthy teachers: How do school environment and motivational factors facilitate optimal functioning at career start? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 481-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.019
28. Friedman H. (2011). The myth behind the subject leader as a school key player. Teachers and Teaching, 17, 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.554701
29. Friedman, I. A. (1999). Teacher-perceived work autonomy: The concept and its measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164499591005
30. Garvin, N. M. (2007). Teacher autonomy: Distinguishing perceptions by school cultural characteristics. University of Pennsylvania.
31. Genç, B. (2022). Öğretmen özerkliğinin profesyonellik, yansıtıcı öğretim ve öz yeterlik ile ilgisine yönelik tanımlayıcı bir çalışma: Çorum ili lise İngilizce öğretmenleri örneği [Teacher autonomy and its relation with teacher professionalism, reflection and self-efficacy: A sample of high school EFL teachers in Çorum]. (Thesis No. 722811), [Master thesis, Uludağ University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
32. Gül, E. (2021). Kapsayıcı liderliğin iş performansı üzerindeki etkisinde psikolojik güvenliğin aracılık rolü [The mediating role of psychological safety in the impact of inclusive leadership on job performance] (Thesis No. 663121), [Master thesis, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
33. Gül, F. Ö. (2015). Eğitimsel liderlik uygulamaları bağlamında öğretmen özerkliğinin incelenmesi [An analysis on teacher autonomy in the context of educational leadership]. (Thesis No. 437096), [Master thesis, Marmara University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
34. Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7-8), 798-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.009
35. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Helgøy, I., & Homme, A. (2007). Towards a new professionalism in school? A comparative study of teacher autonomy in Norway and Sweden. European Educational Research Journal, 6(3), 232-249. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2007.6.3.232
37. Hofstein, A., Carmeli, M. & Shore, R. (2004). The professional development of high school chemistry coordinators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15, 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JSTE.0000031460.64585.fd
38. Hollander, E. P. (2009). Inclusive leadership: The essential leader-follower relationship. New York: Routledge.
39. Huang, J. (2005). Teacher autonomy in language learning: A review of the research. Research Studies in Education, 3(203-18). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345437079
40. Hunzicker, J. (2012). Professional development and job-embedded collaboration: How teachers learn to exercise leadership. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 267-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.657870
41. Karasar, N. (2023). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar ilkeler teknikler [Scientific research method: Concepts, principles, techniques] (38th edition). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
42. Klinker, J. F., Watson, P. A., Furgerson, P., Halsey, P., & Janisch, C. (2010). “Tipping” teachers toward change: Developing leadership characteristics through book club. Teacher Education and Practice, 23(1), 103-119.
43. Kuloğlu, M. E. (2023). Program özerkliği, öğretmen özerkliği, öğretim programı okuryazarlığı, öğretim programına bağlılık ve TBAP arasındaki ilişkiler [The relationships among the curriculum autonomy, teacher autonomy, curriculum literacy, curriculum fidelity, and technological pedagogical content knowledge]. (Thesis No. 809805), [Doctoral thesis, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
44. Kürkçü, M. (2019). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin öğretmen özerkliği davranışları akademik iyimserlik düzeyleri ve öğretmen liderliği algıları arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between class teachers 'teaching authority behaviors academic performance levels and perceptions of teaching leadership]. (Thesis No. 545149), [Master thesis, Amasya University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
45. Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2012). The nature and effects of transformational school leadership: A meta-analytic review of unpublished research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 387-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11436268
46. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D. & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
47. Malik, S. (2023). What it takes to be an inclusive leader? Developing six signature traits to master inclusive leadership. Strategic HR Review, 22(3), 98-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-03-2023-0017
48. Manasia, L., Pârvan, A. & Macovei, M. (2020). Towards a model of teacher well-being from a positive emotions perspective. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(1), 469-496. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10010035
49. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [Ministry of National Education - MoNE]. (2018). 2023 Eğitim Vizyonu [Education Vision 2023]. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. Nembhard, I. M. & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(7), 941-966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413
50. Nishii, L. H. & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader-member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1412-1426. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017190
51. Öskarsdóttir, E., Donnelly, V., Turner-Cmuchal, M., & Florian, L. (2020). Inclusive school leaders - their role in raising the achievement of all learners. Journal of Educational Administration, 58(5), 521-537. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2019-0190
52. Parker, G. (2015). Postmodernist perceptions of teacher professionalism: A critique. Curriculum Journal, 26(3), 452-467. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.992920
53. Pazar, B. (2021). Öğretmen özerkliği ve örgütsel mutluluk arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between the teachers autonomy and organizational happiness] (Thesis No. 673883), [Master thesis, İstanbul Kültür University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
54. Pearson, L. C. & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 38-54. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ej718115 Pearson, L. C. & Moomw, W. (2006). Continuing validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(1), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.100.1.44-51
55. Pelletier, L. G., Séguin-Lévesque, C., & Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 186-196. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.186
56. Perryman, J., & Calvert, G. (2020). What motivates people to teach, and why do they leave? Accountability, performativity and teacher retention. British Journal of Educational Studies, 68(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2019.1589417
57. Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A. & Kedharnath, U. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 190-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002
58. Ryan, J. (2006). Inclusive leadership: A review. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240637430_Inclusive_Leadership_A_Review
59. Sanders M. G. (2006). Missteps in team leadership: The experiences of six novice teachers in three urban middle schools. Urban Education, 41, 277-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085906287903
60. Sevinç, H. H. (2021). Öğretmen algılarına göre okul yöneticilerinin yönetim tarzları ile öğretmen özerkliği arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between the management styles of school managements and teacher autonomy]. (Thesis No. 702139), [Master thesis, İstanbul Aydın University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
61. Singh, A., Yager, S. O., Yutakom, N., Yager, R. E. & Ali, M. M. (2012). Constructivist teaching practices used by five teacher leaders for the Iowa Chautauqua professional development program. International Journal of Environmental ve Science Education, 7, 197-216. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ990516
62. Skerritt, C. (2019). I think Irish schools need to keep doing what they’re doing: Irish teachers’ views on school autonomy after working in English academies. Improving Schools, 22(3), 267-287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480219853457
63. Skerritt, C. (2020). Autonomy, Accountability and Social Justice: Stories of English Schooling: by Amanda Keddie and Martin Mills, Oxon, Routledge, 2019, 146 pp., £29.99 (paperback), ISBN: 9781138104655. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 19(2), 319-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1695852
64. Strong, L. E., & Yoshida, R. K. (2014). Teachers’ autonomy in today's educational climate: Current perceptions from an acceptable instrument. Educational Studies, 50(2), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2014.880922
65. Subaşı, A. (2022). Okul müdürü yönetim tarzları ile öğretmen özerkliği arasındaki ilişki [Correlation between teacher autonomy and school principals' management style]. (Thesis No. 728528), [Master thesis, İstanbul Kültür University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
66. Şahin İpek, D. (2017). Yansıtıcı öğretim ve öğretmen özerkliği arasındaki ilişkinin belirli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi [The relationship between teacher reflection and teacher autonomy with respect to certain variables]. (Thesis No. 481601), [Master thesis, Orta Doğu Teknik University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
67. Şahin, O. (2022). Okul yöneticilerinin kapsayıcı liderlik davranışları ile rehber öğretmen/psikolojik danışmanların örgütsel mutluluk düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Investigation of the relationship between inclusive leadership behaviors of school administrators and organizational happiness level of counselors/psychological counselors]. (Thesis No. 768252), [Master thesis, Siirt University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
68. Şakar, S. A. (2013). English teachers self-perceptions of teacher autonomy in middle schools and high schools: The case of Sakarya [Ortaokul ve liselerde çalişan İngilizce öğretmenlerinin öğretmen özerkliğine dair algilari: Sakarya ili örneği] (Thesis No. 345831), [Master thesis, On Sekiz Mart University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
69. Şentürk, H. A. (2019). Kapsayıcı liderlik davranışı ve iş modeli ilişkisi[The relationship between inclusive leadership behavior and business model]. (Thesis No. 590524), [Master thesis, Aydın Adnan Menderes University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
70. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6 th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon. Theoharis, G. & Scanlan, M. K. (Eds.). (2020). Leadership for increasingly diverse schools. Routledge.
71. Usma Wilches, J. (2007). Teacher Autonomy: A critical review of the research and concept beyond applied linguistics. Íkala, 12(1), pp. 245-275. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.2720
72. Ünsal, S. (2018). Türkiye’de öğretmenlik mesleğinin statüsüne ilişkin bir Pareto analizi (A Pareto Analysis on the Status of the Teaching Profession in Turkey). Sakarya University Journal of Education, 8(2), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.379040
73. Üzüm, P. (2014). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin öğretmen özerkliğine ilişkin farkındalık düzeylerinin yapısal ve bireysel boyutları açısından değerlendirilmesi (İzmir ili örneği )[Assesment of the structural and individual dimensions of grade teacher's awareness level of teacher autonomy (Case of İzmi̇r)] (Thesis No. 375615), [Doctoral thesis, On Sekiz Mart University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
74. Üzüm, P., & Karslı, M. (2013). Awareness levels of classroom teachers about teacher authonomy (An example of the province of Izmir). İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (Journal of the Faculty of Education of İnönü University), 14(3), 79-94.
75. Vasile, C. (2013). Autonomy variation in teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 610-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.361
76. Wenner, J. A. & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the Literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134-171. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478
77. Wermke, W. & Höstfält, G. (2014). Contextualizing teacher autonomy in time and space: A model for comparing various forms of governing the teaching profession. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 58-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.812681
78. Wu, G.-f., & Li, M. (2023). Impact of inclusive leadership on employees’ innovative behavior: A relational silence approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1144791. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1144791
79. Wuffli, P. A. (2016). Inclusive leadership: A framework for the global era. Springer International Publishing. Yolcu, M. A. (2021). Ortaöğretim kurumlarında örgütsel sessizlik ile öğretmen özerkliği arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Analysis of the relationship between organizational silence and teacher autonomy in secondary education institutions]. (Thesis No. 668270), [Master thesis, Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
80. Yolcu, O. (2019). Ortaokul fen bilimleri öğretim programının Stufflebeam Değerlendirme Modeli temelinde öğretmen özerkliği açısından incelenmesi [Examining of secondary school science curriculum in terms of teacher autonomy based on stufflebeam evaluation model] (Thesis No. 603087), [Doctoral thesis, Aydın Adnan Menderes University). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/