Tasarım Tabanlı Araştırmayı Anlamak: Eşanlamlı Kullanılan Araştırma Türleriyle Kavramsal Ayrımlar

Abstract

Tasarım tabanlı araştırmalar (TTA), kuram, uygulama ve tasarım süreçlerinin birbirini desteklediği ve eğitim ortamlarında yenilikçi çözümler sunmayı amaçlayan bir yaklaşım olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Bu araştırmalar eğitim sürecinin iyileştirilmesine ve uygulamaya dayalı çözümler geliştirilmesine katkı sağlamaktadır. TTA, sadece mevcut kuramları test etmek yerine, otantik eğitim ortamlarında yenilikleri deneyerek ve bu yeniliklerden yapılan çıkarımlarla kuramsal ve uygulamalı bilgiler oluşturarak eğitimsel değişimlere rehberlik etmektedir. Tasarım tabanlı araştırmalar, alanyazında genellikle tasarım deneyleri (design experimentation), geliştirme araştırması (development research), gelişimsel araştırma (developmental research), eylem araştırması (action research) ve biçimlendirici araştırma (formative research) gibi araştırma türleriyle eşanlamlı olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu kapsamdabu çalışmada tasarım tabanlı araştırmanın tanımı yapılarak diğer araştırma türleriyle farkları ele alınmakta, yinelemeli (iteratif) doğası ve süreci detaylandırılmaktadır. Ayrıca, eğitim teknolojileriyle desteklenen öğrenme ortamlarında tasarım tabanlı araştırmaların nasıl uygulanabileceği ve bu süreçlerin eğitimdeki dönüşüme nasıl katkı sağladığı da tartışılmaktadır. Son olarak, kullanımı giderek yaygınlaşan tasarım tabanlı araştırmaların etkili şekilde uygulanabilmesi için öneriler sunulmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, araştırmacı ve uygulayıcıların iş birliği yapmasının, sürecin sistematik olarak belgelenmesinin ve elde edilen bulguların şeffaf, doğru, güvenilir ve detaylı bir şekilde raporlanmasının önemi vurgulanmaktadır.

Keywords

• : tasarım tabanlı araştırma
• tasarım deneyleri
• geliştirme araştırması
• gelişimsel araştırma
• biçimlendirici araştırma

Ethical Statement

Bu çalışma insan veya hayvan denekler üzerinde herhangi bir deneysel uygulama içermemektedir. Bu nedenle etik kurul onayı gerektirmemektedir..

Understanding Design-Based Research: Conceptual Distinctions Among Research Types Used Synonymously

Abstract

Design-based research (DBR) is an approach in which theory, practice, and design processes support one another and aim to offer innovative solutions in educational settings. These studies contribute to the improvement of the educational process and the development of practical solutions. DBR does not only test existing theories, but also guides educational change by trying out innovations in authentic learning environments and generating theoretical and practical knowledge from these experiences.In the literature, design-based research is often used synonymously with research types such as design experiment, development research, developmental research, action research, and formative research. Within this scope, the present study defines design-based research, highlights its differences from other research types, and elaborates on its iterative nature and process. Furthermore, the application of DBR in technology-enhanced learning environments and its contribution to educational transformation are also discussed. Finally, the study offers suggestions for the effective implementation of DBR, which is becoming increasingly widespread. Moreover, the importance of fostering collaboration between researchers and practitioners, ensuring systematic documentation of the process, and reporting findings in a transparent, accurate, reliable, and detailed manner is strongly emphasized.

Keywords

• design-based research
• design experiment
• development research
• developmental research
• formative research

Ethical Statement

This study does not involve any experimental procedures on human or animal subjects. Therefore, ethical approval was not required.

References

1. Amiel, T. & Reeves, T. C. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda. Educational Technology and Society, 11(4), 29–40.
2. Anderson, T. & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X114288
3. Aslan, E., & Bağçeçi, B. (2024). İngilizce öğretmenlerinin ortaöğretim ingilizce öğretim programı hakkındaki görüşleri [The Opinions of English Teachers About the English Curriculum in the High Schools]. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, (97), 129-146. https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1286172
4. Atasoy, E. (2022). Rizomatik öğrenmeye dayalı KAÇeD (rKAÇeD) tasarımına ilişkin öğrenen görüşlerinin incelenmesi ve tasarım ilkelerinin belirlenmesi [Investigation of learner perspectives into a rhizomatic learning based MOOC (rMOOC) and determination of design principles] [Doktora tezi]. Anadolu Üniversitesi.
5. Armstrong, M., Dopp, C., & Welsh, J. (2020). Design-Based Research. In the Students' Guide to Learning Design and Research (pp. 37-43). https://edtechbooks.org/studentguide/design-based_research
6. Ayvacı, H. Ş., & Bülbül, S. (2023). Activity Design for Secondary School Students’ Modeling Skills: A Design-Based Research. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.52826/mcbuefd.1306944
7. Bachhuber, J. (2012). Formative research for game design. New York, NY: Center for Children & Technology, Education Development Center, Inc.
8. Bakker, A. (2018). What is design research in education? In Design research in education (pp. 3-22). Routledge.

9. Barab, S. ve Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
10. Barab, S. A., Gresalfi, M., & Ingram-Goble, A. (2010). Transformational play: Using games to position person, content, and context. Educational Researcher, 39(7), 525-536.
11. Barab, S. (2014). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for engineering change. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 151–170). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Bell, P. (2004). On the Theoretical breadth of design-based research in education. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_6
13. Brown, A. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178. https://doi.10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
14. Bozkurt, A. & Sharma, R.C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global-crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i-vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.377808
15. Buhl, M., Hanghøj, T., & Henriksen, T. D. (2022). Reconceptualising design-based research: Between research ideals and practical implications. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 17(4), 205-210. https://doi.org/10.18261/njdl.17.4.1
16. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak Kılıç, E., Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2018). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods in education] (25. bs.). Ankara: Pegem akademi.
17. Campanella, M., & Penuel, W. R. (2021). Design-based research in educational settings: Motivations, crosscutting features, and considerations for design. Design-based research in education: Theory and applications, 3-22.
18. Chen, X. (2008). On design experiment teaching in engineering quality cultivation. International Education Studies, 1(3), 49-51.
19. Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2024). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson. One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.
20. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3699928 in 10.05.2025.
21. Collins, A. (1990). Toward a design science of education. Technical Report No. 1.New York, NY: Center for Technology in Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED326179 in 10.05.2025
22. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (NATO ASI Series, Vol. 96, pp. 15–22). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77750-9_2
23. Collins, A., Joseph, D., Bielaczyc, K., Collins, A. & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research : Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.
24. Çelebi, S., & Kalay, M. (2023). İngilizce öğretimine yönelik öğretmen ve okul yöneticilerinin görüşleri [The opinions of teachers and school administators towards english teaching]. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(16), 268-287. 10.54831/vanyyuiibfd.1380455
25. DiSessa, A. A. ve Cobb, P. (2004). Ontological innovation and the role of theory in design experiments. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 77–103. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1466933 in 10.05.2025
26. Doğan, D., Çınar, M., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016). “Her Çocuğa Bir Bilgisayar” Projeleri ve FATİH Projesi: Karşılaştırmalı Bir Değerlendirme [“One Laptop per Child” Projects and FATIH Project: A Comparative Examination] SDU International Journal of Educational Studies, 3(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.33710/sduijes.223878
27. Doğan, H., Savran Gencer, A., ve Bilen, K. (2022). STEM öğrenme modülü geliştirilmesi: Tasarım tabanlı araştırma uygulaması [Developing Stem Learnıng Module: A design based research implementation].
28. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (61), 390-424. Dorst, K., & Dijkhuis, J. (1995). Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Design Studies, 16(2), 261-274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)00012-3
29. Educational Researcher (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
30. Edelson, D. C. (2002). Design Research: What we learn when we engage in design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_4
31. Easterday, M. W., Lewis, D. R., & Gerber, E. M. (2014). Design-based research process: Problems, phases, and applications. Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
32. eGyanKosh (2017) Unit-1: Basics of development research. Retrieved from https://egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/78708/1/Unit-16.pdf
33. Hall, T. (2020). Bridging practice and theory: The emerging potential of design-based research (DBR) for digital innovation in education. Education Research and Perspectives, 47, 157–173.
34. Henriksen, T. D., & Ejsing-Duun, S. (2022). Implementation in design-based research projects: A map of implementation typologies and strategies. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 17(4), 234–247. https://doi.org/10.18261/njdl.17.4.4
35. Herrington, J., McKenney, S., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (2007). Design-based research and doctoral students: Guidelines for preparing a dissertation proposal. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007 (pp. 4089-4097). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
36. Hjalmarson, M. A., Parsons, A. W., Parsons, S. A., & Hutchison, A. C. (2021). Adressing publication challenges in design-based research. Design-Based Research. Theory and Application, 23-42.
37. Hoadley, C., & Campos, F. C. (2022). Design-based research: What it is and why it matters to studying online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2022.2079128
38. Jayatilleke, B., Ranawaka, G., Wijesekera, C., & Kumarasinha, M. (2018). Development of mobile application through design-based research. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13(2), pp. 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-02-2018-0013
39. Kaya, E., & Bayram, H. (2021). Utilization of the Research Compliance Matrix in educational research design and evaluation: A design based research. International Journal of Education Technology and Scientific Researches, 6(15), 887-944. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijetsar.325
40. Kennedy Clark, S. (2013). Research by Design: Design-Based Research and the Higher Degree Research student. Journal of Learning Design, 6(2), 26-32.
41. Khlaif, Z. N., Salha, S., Affouneh, S., Rashed, H., & ElKimishy, L. A. (2021). The Covid-19 epidemic: teachers’ responses to school closure in developing countries. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 95-109
42. Kılınç, A. K., & Özkök, G. A. (2025). Design-based Research in Teaching Turkish to Foreigners: Models, Procedure and a Design Example. Uluslararası Türkçe Öğretimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(1), 172-200. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15154147
43. Kim, M., & Reigeluth, C. (2018). Formative research. research methods for librarians and educators: Practical applications in formal and informal learning environments, 105
44. Krathwohl, D. R. (1993). Methods of educational and social science research: An integrated approach. Longman/Addison Wesley Longman.
45. Kurt, A., & Melekoğlu, M. (2022). Özel Eğitim Alanında Tasarım Tabanlı Araştırma Yöntemiyle Yapılmış Olan Çalışmalar: Sistematik Derleme [The Studies Designed with Design-Based Research Method in the Field of Special Education: A Systematic Review]. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(2), 1397-1422. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1162969
46. Kuzu, A., Çankaya, S., & Mısırlı, Z. A. (2011). Tasarım tabanlı araştırma ve öğrenme ortamlarının tasarımı ve geliştirilmesinde kullanımı [Design-Based Research and Its Implementation in the Design and Development of Learning Environments]. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 1(1), 19-35.
47. Lewis, D. R., Carlson, S., Riesbeck, C., Lu, K., Gerber, E., & Easterday, M. (2020). The logic of effective iteration in design-based research. In M. Gresalfi & I. S. Horn (Eds.), The interdisciplinarity of the learning sciences: 14th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) 2020 (Vol. 2, pp. 1149–1156). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
48. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. (2018). Conducting educational design research (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105642
49. Minichiello, A., & Caldwell, L. (2021). A Narrative Review of Design-Based Research in Engineering Education: Opportunities and Challenges. Studies in Engineering Education, 1(2), pp. 31–54.
50. Mieyeville, F., Gaultier, R., Péché, J.-P., & Silberzahn, P. (2015). A design-based approach research on innovation: from pluridisciplinarity to transdisciplinarity. 11th European Academy of Design Conference, Paris Descartes University.
51. Ørngreen, R. (2015). Reflections on design-based research. In Proceedings of the 4th IFIP 13.6 Working Conference on Human Work Interaction Design (HWID) (pp.20–38).Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27048-7_2
52. Özmen, H., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (Eds.) (2019). Eğitimde araştırma yöntemleri. [Research methods in education]. Pegem Akademi. https://doi.org/10.14527/9786052417867
53. Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Haugan Cheng, B. ve Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11421826
54. Reigeluth, C. M., & Frick, T. W. (1999). Formative research: A methodology for creating and improving design theories. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (pp. 633-651). Hillsdale, NJ:: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. Reinking, D. (2021). Design-based research in education: Theory and applications. Guilford Publications. Reeves, T. (2006). Design research from a technology perspective. In Educational design research (pp. 64-78). Routledge.
56. Richey, R. C. (1994). Developmental research: The definition and scope. In Proceedings of selected research and development presentations at the 1994 national convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology sponsored by the Research and Theory Division (16th, Nashville, TN, February 16–20, 1994).
57. Richey, R. Klein, J. & Nelson, W. (1996). Developmental research: Studies of instructional design and development. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed.) (pp 1213–1245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.
58. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in higher Education, 16(2), 23-38.
59. Rienties, B., Tessarolo, F., Coughlan, T., Herodotou, C., Domingue, J., & Whitelock, D. (2025). A Design-Based Research Approach to What Distance Learners Expect and Value from an Institutional AI Digital Assistant. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 27(2): 4, 1–11.
60. Sandoval, W. (2013). Conjecture mapping: An approach to systematic educational design research. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.778204
61. Saritepeci, M., & Durak, H. (2024). Effectiveness of artificial intelligence integration in design-based learning on design thinking mindset, creative and reflective thinking skills: An experimental study. Educ. Inf. Technol., 29 (18), 25175-25209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12829-2.
62. Schmalenbach, C., & Ashouri, C. (2025). Design-Based Research—A Framework for Participation and Action in Educational Research. International Review of Qualitative Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447251387
63. Shidende, D., & Moebs, S. (2025). Integrating Design-Based Research and Agile Scrum for Inclusive Educational Technology Design: Best Practices and Challenges from an Accessible Augmented Reality Learning Authoring Tool Project. Multimedia, 1(2), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/multimedia1020006
64. Stringer, E. T. (2008). Action research in education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
65. Tüzün, H. (2006). Eğitsel bilgisayar oyunlari ve bir örnek: Quest Atlantis [Educatıonal computer games and a case: Quest Atlantis]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(30), 220-229.
66. Van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In Design Approaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp. 1–14). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_1
67. VSO (2019). The action research guidebook. Retrieved from https://www.vsointernational.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/vso-cambodia-action-research-guidebook-english.pdf
68. Wang, F. & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504682
69. Yang, Z., & Lee, Y.-Y. (2025). Challenges and opportunities of design-based research in applied linguistics: Insights from a scoping review. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4, 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100178
70. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. (12.baskı). Ankara: Seçkin.
71. Yücel-Toy, B., Arslan-Buyruk, A., Deveci, C., & Erdoğan, P. (2016). İngilizce konuşma becerisini geliştirmeye yönelik tasarım tabanlı araştırma [Design-based research aimed at improving English speaking skills]. İçinde 4. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Kongresi (pp. 507–508). Antalya, Turkey.