Okul Müdürlerinin Paternalist Liderlik Davranışları Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi; Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Abstract

Örgütsel ve yönetsel bir yaklaşım olarak paternalist (babacan) liderliğin Asya toplumlarında çok derin kültürel bir mirasa dayandırılarak genel anlamda olumlu bir değer ve işlevsel bir yaklaşım olarak ele alındığı görülmektedir. Paternalist liderliğin boyutlarını belirlemeye dönük çalışmalar kavramı, genelde hayırseverlik, ahlakilik ve otoriterlik boyutları ile sınırlı tutmuşlarsa da paternal yaklaşımların esasında sömürücü olduğu, özerkliğe bir takım sınırlamalar getirdiği, bir tür müdahalecilik barındırdığı, yararlanıcıyı yetersiz bulduğu, otoriterliği baba şefkati ve sevgisiyle maskelediği belirtilmektedir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, okul müdürlerinin paternalist liderlik davranışlarını ölçebilecek güvenilir ve geçerli bir ölçme aracı geliştirmektir. Bu amaçla Ankara ili Mamak, Gölbaşı ve Çankaya ilçe merkezlerindeki ilkokullarında görev yapan 245 öğretmen üzerinde uygulama yapılmıştır. Araştırmada uzman görüşlerine başvurulmuş böylece kapsam geçerliği sağlanmıştır. Analizler, açıklanan varyansın % 67.16 ve yapının 5 faktörden oluştuğu belirlenmiş, uyum indekslerinin iyi düzeyde olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ölçeğin güvenirlik analizi için Cronbach Alfa katsayısı, ölçek maddelerinin ayırt ediciliği için ise düzeltilmiş madde toplam korelasyonları incelenmiştir. Analizler sonucunda ölçeğin güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğu saptanmıştır.

Keywords

• Paternalist liderlik,ölçek geliştirme,okul müdürü

Development of The Paternalist Leadership Behavior Scale of School Principals: Validity and Reliability Study

Abstract

As an organizational and managerial approach, paternalist leadership is generally considered as a positive value and a functional approach by relying on a deep cultural heritage in Asian societies. Although the concept of studies aimed at determining the dimensions of paternalist leadership has generally limited to benevolent, morality and authoritarianism, it is stated that paternal approaches are essentially exploitative, have some limitations on autonomy, contain some kind of interventionism, find the beneficiary insufficient, and mask the authoritarianism with the compassion and love of the father. The aim of this study is to develop a reliable and valid measurement tool to measure the paternalist behavior of school principals. For this purpose, 245 teachers working in primary schools in Ankara, Mamak, Gölbaşı and Çankaya district centers were applied. Expert opinions were used for the scope validity of the study. As a result of the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) applied for the construct validity of the study, the variance explained by the scale was determined as 67.16 % and a structure consisting of 5 factors was obtained. According to the results of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) conducted to confirm the AFA results, the fit index of the 5-factor structure was found to be at a good level. On the other hand, Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient was used for the reliability analysis of the paternalist leadership scale, and the corrected item total correlations for the distinguishing characteristics of the scale items were examined and it was found that the scale was a reliable measurement tool.

Keywords

• Paternalist leadership,leadership behaviors of school principals,scale development,validity,reliability

References

1. KaynakçaAgich, G. (2003). Dependence and autonomy in old age: an ethical framework for long-term care. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
2. Andre, C. andVelasquez, M. (1991). For your own good. Issues in Ethics, 4(2) Fall.https://legacy.scu.edu/ethics/publications/iie/v4n2/owngood.html
3. Ansari, M. A., Ahmad, Z. A. and Aafaqi, R. (2004). Organizational leadership in the Malaysian context. In D. Tjosvold and K. Leung (Eds.), Leading in high growth Asia: Managing relationship for teamwork and change: 109-138. Singapore: World Scientific.
4. Aycan, Z., ve Kanungo, R. N. (2000). Toplumsal kültürün kurumsal kültür ve insan kaynakları uygulamaları üzerine etkileri.Z. Aycan (Ed). Türkiye’de yönetim, liderlik ve insan kaynakları uygulamaları içinde (ss. 25-47). Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları
5. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G., and Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10‐country comparison. Applied Psychology, 49(1), 192-221.
6. Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. In K.S.Yang, K.K. Hwang andU. Kim (Eds.). Scientific Advances in Indigenous Psychologies: Empirical, Philosophical, and Cultural Contributions. (pp. 445-466). London: Cambridge University Press.
7. Aydın, İ. (2017). Paternalist Yönetim. A. Kasapoğlu, A.Ç. İlhan, Z. Güler (Ed).Prof.Dr. Mahmut Tezcan’a armağaniçinde (ss. 152-167). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 224
8. Balcı, A. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma: Yöntem teknik ve ilkeler (10. Baskı), Pegem A Yayıncılık.

9. Beauchamp, T. L.,and Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford UniversityPress
10. Beaver, A. R. (1987). Personal autonomy through education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Nottingham.
11. Blokland, H. (1997). Freedom and culture in western society. London: Routledge.
12. Bryman, AE ve Cramer, D (2002) Quantitative data analysis with SPSS Release 10 for Windows: A guide for social scientists, Routledge, ISBN: 0 415 24399 8
13. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için very analizi el kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
14. Canbolat, E. Ö., Beraha, A., Çeliksoy, E., ve Türker, Y. (2010). Türk liderlik profili: türk siyasi liderleri üzerine niteliksel bir çalışma. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Dergisi, 2(2), 37-45.
15. Cevizci, A. (2000). Paradigmafelsefe sözlüğü, (4.basım). İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları
16. Chen, X. P., Eberly, M. B., Chiang, T. J., Farh, J. L., and Cheng, B. S. (2014). Affective trust in chinese leaders linking paternalistic leadership to employee performance. Journal of Management, 40(3), 796-819.
17. Chen, H. Y.,and Kao, H. S. R. (2009). Chinese paternalistic leadership and non-Chinese subordinates' psychological health. The international journal of human resource management, 20(12), 2533-2546.
18. Cheng, B. S. (1995). Paternalistic authority and leadership: A case study of a Taiwanese CEO. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academic Sinica, 79(3), 119-173.
19. Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., and Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89-117.
20. Chou, H. J. (2012). Effects of paternalistic leadership on job satisfaction-regulatory focus as the mediator. International Journal of Organizational Innovation (Online), 4(4), 62-85.
21. Cheng, B. S.,and Jen, C. K. (2005). The contingent model of paternalistic leadership: Subordinate dependence and leader competence. In Annual Meeting of Academy of Management.Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.616.3308&rep=rep1&type=pdf
22. Chu, P. C. and Hung, C. C. (2009). The Relationship of Paternalistic Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Upward Communication. Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 5(2), 66-73
23. Cohen, E. S. (1985). Autonomy and paternalism: Two goals in conflict. Law, Medicine and Health Care, 13(4), 145-150.
24. Conly, S. (2013). Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Coşkun, V. (2000, 8 Ağustos). Paternalizm ve Avrupa. Radikal. http://www.radikal.com.tr/2000/08/10/yorum/pat.shtml adresinden erişilmiştir.
26. Cserne, P. (2008). Freedom of choice and paternalism in contract law: prospects and limits of an economic approach (unpublished doctoral dissertation), Universität Hamburg, online: http://www. sub. uni-hamburg. de/opus/volltexte/2008/3765).
27. Dictionary, Oxford English. (1971). Compact edition. Volume I (1971).
28. Dworkin, G., (1983). Paternalism: some second thoughts. in R. Sartorius (Eds). Paternalism Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
29. Dworkin, G. (2002). Paternalism. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/paternalism
30. Erben, G., S., (2004). Toplumsal kültür aile kültürü etkileşimi bağlamında paternalizm boyutuyla işletme kültürü: Türkiye örneği. T. Koçel (Ed). 1. Aile İşletmeleri Kongresi Bildirileri içinde (ss. 345-356). İstanbul: İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Yayınları
31. Erben, G. S.,and Güneşer, A. B. (2008). The relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment: Investigating the role of climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 955-968.
32. Ersoy, N. C., Born, M. P., Derous, E., andVan Der Molen, H. T. (2012). The effect of cultural orientation and leadership style on self-versus other-oriented organizational citizenship behaviour in Turkey and the Netherlands. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15(4), 249-260.
33. Farh, J. L., and Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui and E. Weldon (Eds). Management and organizations in the chinese context (pp. 84-127). London: Palgrave Macmillan
34. Farh, J.L., Cheng, B.S., Chou, L.F., and Chu, X. P. (2006). Authority and benevolence: Employees’ responses to paternalistic leadership in china. In A.S. Tsui, Y. Bian, and L. Cheng (Eds.), China’s domestic priate firms: Multidisciplinary perspectives on management and performance: 230-260. New York: Sharpe.
35. Fikret Paşa, S., (2000). Türkiye ortamında liderlik özellikleri, (Ed:Aycan, Z.). Akademisyenler ve profesyoneller bakiş açisiyla Türkiye’de yönetim, liderlik ve insan kaynaklari uygulamalari (201-225), Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
36. Fikret Pasa, S., Kabasakal, H., and Bodur, M. (2001). Society, organisations, and leadership in Turkey. Applied Psychology, 50(4), 559-589.
37. Gray, C. B. (Ed.). (2013). The philosophy of law: an encyclopedia (Vol. 1743). New York: Taylor and Francis
38. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., ve Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. Harris, J. (1985). The value of life. London: Routledge.
39. Häyry, H. (1998). Paternalism. Encyclopedia of applied ethics,(pp. 449-457). Volume 3, New York: Academic Press,
40. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, 2.Edition. London: Sage Publications.
41. Husak, D., (2010). Paternalism and consent. In F. G. Miller and A. Wertheimer (Eds). The ethics of consent: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Pres
42. Kant, I. (1995). Ahlak metafiziğinin temellendirilmesi [groundwork for the metaphysics of morals]. (İ. Kuçuradi, çev.), Ankara:Felsefe Kurumu Yayınları(Orijinal kitabın yayın tarihi 1785).
43. Kline, P. (1979). Psychometrics and psychology. London: Acaderric Press
44. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NewYork: Guilford Publications.
45. Köksal, O. (2011). Paternalizm ile algılanan örgütsel adalet arasındaki ilişkinin tespitine yönelik bir araştırma. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İİ BF Dergisi, 12(2), 159-170.
46. Lau, W. K. E. (2012). A study of effective leadership in the Chinese context. (unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of North Texas, USA.
47. Martínez, P. G. (2003). Paternalism as a positive form of leader-subordinate exchange: Evidence from Mexico. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 1(3), 227-242.
48. Martinez, P. G. (2005). Paternalism as a positive form of leadership in the Latin American context: Leader benevolence, decision-making control and human resources management practices. In M. Elvira and A. Davila (Eds.).Managing human resources in Latin America: An agenda for international leaders. London: Routledge., 75-93.
49. Mathur, P., Aycan, Z., and Kanungo, R. N. (1996). Work cultures in Indian organisations: A comparison between public and private sector. Psychology and Developing Societies, 8(2), 199-222.
50. Kant, I. (1995). Hürriyet üstüne[On Libert]. (M. Destel, Çev.). Ankara:Liberte Yayınları.(Orijinal kitabın yayın tarihi 1859).
51. Miller, R. B. (2003). Children, ethics, and modern medicine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
52. Niu, C. P., Wang, A. C., and Cheng, B. S. (2009). Effectiveness of a moral and benevolent leader: Probing the interactions of the dimensions of paternalistic leadership. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12(1), 32-39.
53. Paulo N. (2015) The bite of rights in paternalism. In Schramme T. (eds). New Perspectives on Paternalism and Health Care. Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy. (pp. 127-141). Cham: Springer.
54. Pellegrini, E. K. (2006). A cross-cultural investigation of the relations among organizational justice, paternalism, delegation and leader-member exchange (LMX) relationships. (published doctoral dissertation) University of Miami, Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/5c893b573fe882fa2608b4a6d3b3a037/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
55. Pellegrini, E. K.and Scandura, T. A. (2006). Leader–member exchange (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turkish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(2), 264-279.
56. Pellegrini, E. K. and Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566-593.
57. Pellegrini, E. K., Scandura, T. A., and Jayaraman, V. (2010). Cross-cultural generalizability of paternalistic leadership: An expansion of leader-member exchange theory. Group and Organization Management, 35(4), 391-420.
58. Paoching, C. and Chichun, H. (2009). The relationship of paternalistic leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating effect of upward communication. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 5(2), 66-73.
59. Redding, S.G. (1990). The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
60. Saylık, A. (2017). Okul müdürlerinin paternalist liderlik davranışları ile Hofstede’nin kültür boyutları arasındaki ilişki.(Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
61. Saher, N., Naz, S., Tasleem, I., Naz, R., and Kausar, S. (2013). Does paternalistic leadership lead to commitment? Trust in leader as moderator in Pakistani context. Interdiscıplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Busıness, 5(1), 443-455.
62. Sennett, R. (2005). Otorite[Authority]. (K. Durand, Çev.). İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
63. Shinebourne, E. A. and Bush, A. (1994). For paternalism in the doctor-patient relationship. In R. Gillon (Ed.), Principles of health care ethics (pp. 399-408). New York: Wiley.
64. Silin, R. H. (1976). Leadership and values: The organization of large-scale Taiwanese enterprises (No. 62). Cambridge: Harvard UniversityPress.
65. Suber, P. (1999). Paternalism. In C. B. Gray (Eds.). Philosophy of Law: An Encyclopedia. (pp. 632-635).New York, NY: Garland Publication.
66. Sun, J. M., and Wang, B. (2009). Servant leadership in China: Conceptualization and measurement. In W. H. Mobley, Y. W. Ming Li (eds.). Advances in global leadership. (pp. 321-344). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
67. Uhl-Bien, M., Tierney, P., Graen, G., and Wakabayashi, M. (1990). Company paternalism and the hidden investment process: Identification of the “right type” for line managers in leading Japanese organizations. Group and Organization Studies, 15: 414-430.
68. Uhl-Bien, M., and Maslyn, M. (2005, August). Paternalism as a form of leadership: Differentiating paternalism from leader-member exchange. In meeting of the Academy of Management. Honolulu, Hawaii.
69. Van De Veer, D. (2014). Paternalistic intervention: The moral bounds on benevolence. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70. Veatch, R. M.,and Spicer, C. M. (1994). Against paternalism in the patient-physician relationship. In R. Gillon (Ed.), Principles of health care ethics (pp. 409-419). New York, NY: Wiley.
71. Weber, M. (1968). The types of legitimate domination, In G. Roth and C. Wittich (Eds.). Economy and Society. (pp. 212-216). New York, NY: Bedminster.
72. Westwood, R. I. (1997). Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for paternalistic headship among the overseas Chinese. Organization studies,18(3), 445-480.
73. Westwood, R. and Chan, A. (1992) Headship and Leadership. In Westwood, R. (Ed.) Organizational Behaviour: Southeast Asian Perspectives. Hong Kong: Longman
74. Yardımcı, C. (2010). Paternalistik liderlik davranışlarının iş tatmini üzerindeki etkisi: Bankacılık sektörü üzerinde bir uygulama (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
75. Yeh, H. R., Chi, H. K., and Chiou, C. Y. (2008). The influences of paternalistic leadership, job stress, and organizational commitment on organizational performance: an empirical study of policemen in Taiwan. The Journal of International Management Studies, 3(2), 85-91.
76. Yetim, N. and Yetim, Ü. (2006). The cultural orientations of entrepreneurs and employees’ job satisfaction: The Turkish small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) case. Social Indicators Research, 77(2), 257-286.