BibTex RIS Cite

İbn Haldun ile John Locke’un Epistemoloji ile ilgili Bazı Görüşlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Year 2010, Volume: 43 Issue: 2, 89 - 122, 01.10.2010
https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001204

Abstract

Comparing Some Ideas of Ibn Haldun and John Locke about the Epistemology from Some Aspects

Year 2010, Volume: 43 Issue: 2, 89 - 122, 01.10.2010
https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001204

Abstract

In this article some opinions of Ibn Haldun who lived at the end of the Middle Age and some opinions of John Locke who lived in the New Age about epistemology were tried to be compared from some aspects. For both thinkers, who have rejected the innatism and accepted the mind as a blank slate at first, the source of knowledge is senses and thought. According to Ibn Haldun, the knowledge’s subject is universals, and according to Locke, the knowledge’s subject is ideas and the relations between ideas. Ibn Haldun asserted that the perceptions about concretes are more reliable and far from fault than abstracts. Locke accepted that the intuitive knowledge is the most evident and reliable knowledge

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Other ID JA99FF65NP
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Hacer âşık Ev This is me

Publication Date October 1, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 43 Issue: 2

Cite

APA âşık Ev, H. (2010). Comparing Some Ideas of Ibn Haldun and John Locke about the Epistemology from Some Aspects. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 43(2), 89-122. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001204
Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (AUJFES) is a formal journal of Ankara University.

The content of the Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences adopts Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

AUJFES is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0