Al-Ḥākim al-Naysābūrī and Allegation of Shiism Against Him

Volume: 57 Number: 1 April 1, 2016
  • Enbiya Yıldırım
EN TR

Al-Ḥākim al-Naysābūrī and Allegation of Shiism Against Him

Abstract

Hadith scholars conduct investigations in various ways about hadith narrators as well as those who have authored a work in the field. In so doing, they try to develop an approach by examining what has been said about them. However, sometimes they fail to find out the truth of the information their research yields about the narrators. And yet scholars, by passing on the information to next generations, contribute to the formation of an ill-founded judgment in people’s mind about the narrators. Al-Ḥākim al-Naysābūrī, who has an important place in the history of hadith due to his works, has been subjected to such a situation where he was alleged to be a Shiite. Allegations of this sort were mentioned in biographical works on him. Because of these, suspicions were aroused with regard to his hadith scholarship, and thus whether or not he should be trusted in his transmissions about certain topics was called into question. This article offers an analysis of such allegations by examining historical information about al-Ḥākim and concludes that those allegations do not have solid foundations

Keywords

References

  1. el- Acemī, Ḥasen Abdullāh. İrşādu’l-Ḥā ir ilā Ṣiḥḥati Ḥadīsi’t-Ṭā ir (http://www.h- alajmi.com/catalog.php?catid=36).
  2. el-Ācurrī, Su ālātu Ebī Ubeyd el-Ācurrī Ebā Dāvūd Suleymān b. el-Eş as̠ es- Sīcistānī. Tah. Abdul aẓīm Abdul alīm el-Bestevī. Beyrut: Mu essesetu’r- Rayyān, 1997.
  3. Aḥmed b. Ḥanbel. Min Kelāmi Aḥmed b. Ḥanbel fī İleli’l-Ḥadīs̠ ve Ma rifeti’r-Ricāl. Tah. Ṣubḥī el-Bedrī es-Sāmerrā ī. Riyad: Mektebetu’l-Ma ārif, 1409.
  4. Aksu, Ali. “Kerbela Literatürü,” Alim Yıldız (ed.), Çeşitli Yönleriyle Kerbela, 3 c. (Sivas: Asitan Yayıncılık, 2010) içinde, c.2, ss.341-376.
  5. el- Amīdī, S̱ āmir Hāşim Ḥabīb. “Tārīḫu’l-Ḥadīs̠ ve Ulūmihi,” Turās̠unā 47-48 (1417 H) ss.194-267.
  6. el-Bābulī, Ebū’l-Faḍl Hāfiẓyān. Rasā il fī Dirāyeti’l-Ḥadīs̠ . 2 c. Kum: Dāru’l-Had ,
  7. Bulliet, Richard W. The Patricians of Nishapur: A Study in Medieval Islamic Social History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.
  8. el-Elbānī, Muḥammed Nāṣiruddīn. Silsiletu’l-Eḥādīs̠ i’ṣ-Ṣaḥīḥa ve Şey min Fiḳhihā ve Fevā idihā. 4 c. Riyad, 1991.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Enbiya Yıldırım This is me

Publication Date

April 1, 2016

Submission Date

April 1, 2016

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 57 Number: 1

APA
Yıldırım, E. (2016). El-Ḥākim en-Neysābūrī’nin Şiîlikle İtham Edilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 57(1), 57-84. https://doi.org/10.1501/Ilhfak_0000001445
AMA
1.Yıldırım E. El-Ḥākim en-Neysābūrī’nin Şiîlikle İtham Edilmesi. AUIFD. 2016;57(1):57-84. doi:10.1501/Ilhfak_0000001445
Chicago
Yıldırım, Enbiya. 2016. “El-Ḥākim En-Neysābūrī’nin Şiîlikle İtham Edilmesi”. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 57 (1): 57-84. https://doi.org/10.1501/Ilhfak_0000001445.
EndNote
Yıldırım E (April 1, 2016) El-Ḥākim en-Neysābūrī’nin Şiîlikle İtham Edilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 57 1 57–84.
IEEE
[1]E. Yıldırım, “El-Ḥākim en-Neysābūrī’nin Şiîlikle İtham Edilmesi”, AUIFD, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 57–84, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1501/Ilhfak_0000001445.
ISNAD
Yıldırım, Enbiya. “El-Ḥākim En-Neysābūrī’nin Şiîlikle İtham Edilmesi”. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 57/1 (April 1, 2016): 57-84. https://doi.org/10.1501/Ilhfak_0000001445.
JAMA
1.Yıldırım E. El-Ḥākim en-Neysābūrī’nin Şiîlikle İtham Edilmesi. AUIFD. 2016;57:57–84.
MLA
Yıldırım, Enbiya. “El-Ḥākim En-Neysābūrī’nin Şiîlikle İtham Edilmesi”. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 57, no. 1, Apr. 2016, pp. 57-84, doi:10.1501/Ilhfak_0000001445.
Vancouver
1.Enbiya Yıldırım. El-Ḥākim en-Neysābūrī’nin Şiîlikle İtham Edilmesi. AUIFD. 2016 Apr. 1;57(1):57-84. doi:10.1501/Ilhfak_0000001445