"Bilgi Çağında" Din, Kültür ve Toplum

Year 2008, , 253 - 269, 01.04.2008

Philip A. Mellor İhsan Çapcıoğlu

https://doi.org/10.1501/Ilhfak_0000000963

Abstract

gerekir: Her þeyden önce, bu iddialar, sosyoloji kuramcýlarý arasýnda, genel anlamda, sosyoloji için yeni bir paradigma inþa etme çabalarýnýn parçasý olarak gittikçe daha etkin hale geliyorlar (bkz. Abell ve Reynlers 2000). Din sosyolojisinde yeni bir paradigma düþüncesinden doðasýnda çok farklý olmalarýna raðmen (Warner 1993), bu geliþmelerin ikisi de, çaðdaþ sosyal ve kültürel gerçeklerle sorgulanýyor görünen geleneksel sosyolojik varsa

References

• Abell, P. and D. Reyniers. 2000. On the Failure of Social Theory. British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 739–750.
• Alexander, J. C. (ed.) 1988. Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies. Cambridge: Cambrid- ge University Press.
• Archer, M. S. 2000. Being Human. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• ______ 1995. Realist Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Armitage, J. 2000. From Modernism to Hypermodernism and Beyond: An Interview with Paul Virilio. In Paul Virilio, edited by J. Armitage, 25–56. London: Sage.
• Barber, B. R. 1996. Jihad vs. McWorld. New York: Ballantine Books.
• Bataille, G. 1991 [1967]. The Accursed Share, Vol. I. New York: Zone Books.
• Baudrillard, J. 1990a. Cool Memories. London: Verso.
• _______ 1990b. Fatal Strategies. New York: Semiotext (e).
• _______ 1988. America. London: Verso.
• _______ 1983. In The Shadow of the Silent Majorities. New York: Semiotext (e).
• Beckford, J. A. 1989. Religion in Advanced Industrial Society. London: Unwin Hyman
• Berger, P.L. 1990 [1967]. The Sacred Canopy. New York: Doubleday.
• Billig, M. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.
• Bogard, W. 2000. Sociology in the Absence of the Social: The Significance of Baudrillard for Contemporary Thought. In Jean Baudrillard, Vol. II, edited by M. Gane, 234–246. London: Sage.
• Calhoun, C. 1998. Community without Propinquity Revisited: Communication Technology and the Transformation of the Urban Public Sphere. Sociological Inquiry 68 (3): 373–97.
• Castells, M. 2000. Materials for An Exploratory Theory of the Network Society. British Journal of Sociology 51 (2): 5–24.
• ______ 1998. End of Millennium. Oxford: Blackwell.
• ______ 1997. The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
• ______ 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Deleuze, G. 1979. “Introduction,” in The Policing of Families, edited by J. Donzelot. London: Hutchinson.
• Derrida, J. 1991. A Derrida Reader. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.
• Durkheim, E. 1995 [1912]. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Translated by Karen E. Fields. New York: Free Press.
• ______ 1974a [1906]. The Determination of Moral Facts. In Sociology and philosophy 35– 62. New York: Free Press.
• ______ 1974b [1898]. Individual and Collective Representations. In Sociology and philo- sophy, 1–34. New York: Free Press.
• ______ 1970 [1888]. Cours de Science Sociale. In La Science sociale et I’action, edited by C. Filloux, 23–48. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
• Featherstone, M. (ed.) 1992. Cultural Theory and Cultural Change. London: Sage.
• Fulcher, J. 2000. Globalisation, The Nation-State and Global Society. Sociological Review 48 (4): 522–543.
• Hardt, M. and A. Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Hayles, N.K. 1991. Chaos and Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Hervieu-Leger, D. 2000. Religion as a Chain of Memory. Cambridge: Polity.
• Jenkins, T. 1999. Religion in English Everyday Life. Oxford: Bergahn Books.
• Jones, R. A. 1999. The Development of Durkheim’s Social Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lash, S. and M. Featherstone. 2001. Recognition and Difference: Politics, Identity, Multicul- ture, Theory, Culture and Society 18 (2–3): 1–19.
• Lemert, C. 1995. Sociology after the Crisis. Oxford: Westview Press.
• Lukes, S. 1973. Emile Durkheim: His Life and Work. London: Penguin.
• Lyotard, J-F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Lyon, D. 2000. Jesus in Disneyland. Cambridge: Polity.
• ______ 1988. The Information Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
• May, C. 2002. The Information Society. Cambridge: Polity.
• Mellor, PA. 2004. Religion, Realism and Social Theory. London: Sage.
• ______ 2002. In Defence of Durkheim: Sociology, the Sacred and ‘Society.’ Durkheimian Studies 8: 15–34.
• ______ 1998. Sacred Contagion and Social Vitality: Collective Effervescence. In Les Formes Elementaires de la Vie Religieuse. Durkheimian Studies 4: 87–114.
• Mellor, P.A. and C. Shilling. 1997. Re-forming the Body. London: Sage.
• Morrison, K. 2000. The Disavowal of The Social in the American Reception of Durkheim. Journal of Classical Sociology 1 (1): 95–125.
• Pickering, W.S.F. 1984. Durkheim’s Sociology of Religion. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Rose, N. 1996. The Death of the Social? Refiguring the Territory of Government. Economy and Society 25: 327–56.
• Shilling, C. and P.A. Mellor. 2001. The sociological Ambition. London: Sage.
• Touraine, A. 1995. Critique of Modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
• _______ 1989. Is Sociology still the Study of Society? Thesis Eleven, 23: 5–34.
• _______ 1969. La Societe Post-industrielle. Paris: Editions Denoel.
• Urry, J. 2003. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity.
• _______ 2000. Sociology Beyond Societies. London: Routledge.
• Virilio, P. 2002. Ground Zero. London: Verso.
• _______ 2000. The Information Bomb. London: Verso.
• _______ 1984. L’Horizon Negatif. Paris: Galilee.
• Virilio, P. and S. Lotringer. 1997. Pure War. New York: Semiotext (e).
• Warner, R.S. 1993. Work in Progress Toward A New Paradigm for the Sociological Study of Religion in the United States. American Journal of Sociobgy 98 (5): 1044–1093.
• Weher, M. 1991 [1904–5]. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Harper Collins.
• Wehster, F. 1995. Theories of the Information Society. London: Routledge.
• Zizek, S. 2002. Welcome to the Desert of the Real. London: Verso.
• _______ 2000. The Fragile Absolute or, Why is the Christian Legacy Worth Fighting for? London: Verso.
• _______ 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.