Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin akademik güdülenmesi ve öğrenme stilleri

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı öğretmen adaylarının akademik güdülenme türü ve öğrenme stili arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Araştırma tanımlayıcı ilişkisel modelde tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmanın katılımcılarını Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi'nde 9 farklı bölümde öğrenim gören 574 öğretmen adayı oluşturmaktadır. Verilerin toplanmasında iki araştırma aracı (Akademik Güdülenme Ölçeği ve Öğrenme Stilleri Envanteri) kullanılmıştır. Araştırma amacı doğrultusunda üç hipotez oluşturulmuştur ve hipotezlerde sunulan olası ilişkileri test etmek için SPSS programında pearson ki-kare bağımsızlık testi yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, ayrıştıran ve yerleştiren öğrenme stiline sahip öğretmen adaylarının baskın akademik güdülenme türü dışsal düzenleme iken, özümseyen öğrenme stiline sahip öğretmen adaylarının “bilme” güdülenme türüne sahip olma olasılıkları daha yüksektir. Ayrıca, değiştiren öğrenme stiline sahip öğretmen adayları “bilme” ya da “dışsal düzenleme” akademik güdülenme türünü tercih etmişlerdir. Son olarak, öğretmen adaylarının bölümleri ile akademik güdülenme türleri arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamamıştır. Benzer şekilde öğretmen adaylarının bölümleri ve öğrenme stilleri arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamamıştır.

Keywords

• öğretmen adayları
• öğrenme stili
• akademik güdülenme
• öz-düzenleme teorisi
• deneyimsel öğrenme modeli

Academic motivation types and learning styles of students in a faculty of education

Abstract

This paper aimed to report the results of a descriptive correlational study that examined the relationship between academic motivation and learning styles of pre-service teachers. The study’s participants were 574 pre-service teachers at the Faculty of Education, University of Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat. Two research instruments (Academic Motivation Scale and Learning Styles Inventory) were used for collecting the data. Keeping the aim in mind, three hypotheses were formulated and the pearson’s chi-square test was run in SPSS so as to test the possible relationships in the hypotheses. According to the analysis of the data, the first hypothesis was confirmed while the second and third hypotheses were rejected. Thus, the dominant academic motivation type of converger and accommodator pre-service teachers was external regulation while the preservice teachers with assimilating learning styles were more likely to have knowing motivation. Besides, diverger pre-service teachers preferred either “knowing” or “external regulation” academic motivation type. Last, departments of the pre-service teachers did not determine their academic motivation types and learning styles.

Keywords

• Pre-service teachers
• academic motivation
• learning style
• self-determination theory
• experiential learning theory

References

1. Baltaoğlu, M. G., & Güven, M. (2019). Relationship between self-efficacy, learning strategies, and learning styles of teacher candidates (Anadolu University example). South African Journal of Education, 39(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n2a1579
2. Balyer, A., & Özcan, K. (2014). Choosing teaching profession as a career: Students' reasons. International Education Studies, 7(5), 104-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n5p104
3. Başöz, T. (2021). “I’ve decided to become an English teacher”: Pre-service EFL teachers’ reasons for choosing teaching as a career. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 29(5), 813-821. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.860727
4. Bozkurt, N. (2013). An examination of the links between pre-service teacher's metacognitive level, learning styles and their achievement of history class. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1634-1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.093
5. Calderón, A., Meroño, L., & MacPhail, A. (2020). A student-centred digital technology approach: The relationship between intrinsic motivation, learning climate and academic achievement of physical education pre-service teachers. European Physical Education Review, 26(1), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X19850852
6. Curtis, K., & Youngquist, S. T. (2013). Part 21: Categoric analysis: Pearson chi-square test. Air Medical Journal, 32(4), 179-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2013.04.007
7. Ҫakıroğlu, E., & Ҫakıroğlu, J. (2003). Reflections on teacher education in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2), 253-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976032000088774
8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
10. Demir, Z. (2008). Uzaktan eğitim öğrencilerinin akademik güdülenme düzeyleri (SAÜ örneği) (Publication No. 228626). [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi], Sakarya Üniversitesi.
11. Elban, M. (2018). Learning styles as the predictor of academic success of the pre-service history teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 659-665. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.3.659
12. Fernet, C., Guay, F., Senécal, C., & Austin, S. (2012). Predicting intraindividual changes in teacher burnout: The role of perceived school environment and motivational factors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 514-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.11.013
13. Gencel, İ. E. (2007). Kolb'un deneyimsel öğrenme kuramına dayalı öğrenme stilleri envanteri-III'ü Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması [Study of adapting learning styles inventory-III based on Kolb's experiential learning theory into Turkish]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 9(2), 120-139. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12397/5475
14. Gencel, İ. E. (2015). Learning styles and problem solving skills of Turkish prospective teachers. International Journal of Progressive Education, 11(2), 39-56.
15. Gencel, İ. E., & Köse, A. (2011). Relationship between the prospective science teachers› learning styles, learning and study strategies and self-efficacy beliefs in science teaching. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 7(2), 311-333. http://eku.comu.edu.tr/index/7/2/iegencel_akose.pdf
16. Güven, M., & Kürüm, D. (2008) The relationship between teacher candidates’ learning styles and critical thinking dispositions. Elementary Education Online, 7(1), 53-70.
17. Kaldi, S., & Xafakos, E. (2017). Student teachers' school teaching practice: The relation amongst perceived self-competence, motivation and sources of support. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 246-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.019
18. Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). Experiential Learning Theory: A dynamic, holistic approach to management learning, education and development. In S. J. Armstrong & C. V. Fukami (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Management Learning, Education and Development (pp. 42-68). Sage Publishing.
19. Kolb, D. A. (1999). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory. Hay Resources Direct.
20. Lappe, J. M. (2000). Taking the mystery out of research: Descriptive correlational design. Orthopaedic Nursing, 19(2), 81.
21. Malmberg, L. E. (2006). Goal-orientation and teacher motivation among teacher applicants and student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(1), 58-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.07.005
22. McHugh, M. L. (2013). The chi-square test of independence. Biochemia Medica, 23(2), 143- 149. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.018
23. Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
24. Özder, H., & Motorcan, A. (2013). An analysis of teacher candidates’ academic motivation levels with respect to several variables. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 15(1), 42-53. http://www.bjournal.co.uk/BJASS.aspx
25. Özgür, S. D., Temel, S. & Yilmaz, A. (2012). The effect of learning styles of preservice chemistry teachers on their perceptions of problem solving skills and problem solving achievements, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1450-1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.319
26. Öztürk, G, Aydın, B. (2019). English language teacher education in Turkey: Why do we fail and what policy reforms are needed?. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International (AJESI), 9(1), 181-213. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.520842
27. Peker, M., & Mirasyedioğlu, Ş. (2008). Pre-service elementary school teachers’ learning styles and attitudes towards mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75302
28. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
29. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2019). Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in Motivation Science (pp. 111-156). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.01.001
30. Topkaya, E. Z., & Uztosun, M. S. (2012). Choosing teaching as a career: Motivations of pre-service English teachers in Turkey. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 3(1), 126-134. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.3.1.126-134
31. Tulbure, C. (2012). Learning styles, teaching strategies and academic achievement in higher education: A cross-sectional investigation, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 398-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.151
32. Uysal, D. (2022). The relationship between academic motivation types and learning styles of pre-service EFL teachers. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 12(3), 591-611. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1108158
33. Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L., Blais, M., Briere, N., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. (1992). The academic motivation scale: a measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in education. Education and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025
34. Yüce, K., Şahin, E.Y., Koçer, Ö. et al. (2013). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: a perspective of pre-service teachers from a Turkish context. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 14, 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9258-9