Danimarka’nın Kamu Diplomasisi Uygulamaları

Year 2024, Volume: 24 Issue: Özel Sayı, 193 - 210, 01.10.2024

Mustafa Yıldız

https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1484298

Abstract

Bu makalenin amacı, Danimarka’nın kamu diplomasisi uygulamalarının bir derlemesini yapmak ve son yıllarda ortaya çıkan ulus markalama ve yeni kamu diplomasisi kavramlarının Danimarka’nın dış politikasında yaşanan gelişmelerle doğrudan ilintili olduğunu ortaya koymaktır. Uluslararası ilişkilerde diplomasinin alt alanlarından birisi olan kamu diplomasinin önemi ve başvurulma sıklığı giderek artmaktadır. Danimarka da özellikle son yıllarda geleneksel diplomasi faaliyetlerinin yanına kamu diplomasisi uygulamalarını eklemiştir. Ülkenin yapısı, tanınırlığı, profili ve tarihi geçmişi bu araçların kullanımında kolaylık sağlamaktadır. Bu doğrultuda maliyeti çok daha düşük olan kamu diplomasisi faaliyetlerinin birçok safhasını Danimarka çok yönlü bir şekilde kullanmaktadır. Bu makale, Danimarka’nın dış politikasında kullanılan kamu diplomasisi araçlarının genel bir değerlendirmesini yapmaktadır. Soğuk Savaş sonrası daha sık görülmeye başlanan kamu diplomasisi faaliyetleri yaşanan birtakım gelişmelerle çeşitli sınamalardan geçmiştir. 2000’li yıllarla beraber etkisi artan yeni kamu diplomasisi faaliyetleri incelendiğinde bu faaliyetlerin ulus markalama çabalarıyla paralellik içerdiği gözlenmektedir.

Keywords

Kamu Diplomasisi, Kamu Diplomasisi Uygulamaları, Danimarka, Ulus Markalama

Danish Public Diplomacy Practices

Abstract

The aim of this article is to provide a review of Denmark's public diplomacy practices and to demonstrate that the concepts of nation branding and new public diplomacy that have emerged in recent years are directly related to the developments in Denmark's foreign policy. The importance and frequency of public diplomacy, which is one of the sub-fields of diplomacy in international relations, is increasing. In recent years, Denmark has also added public diplomacy practices to its traditional diplomacy activities. The structure, recognition, profile and historical background of the country facilitate the use of these tools. In this direction, Denmark uses many phases of public diplomacy activities, which have much lower costs, in a versatile way. This article provides an overview of the public diplomacy tools used in Denmark's foreign policy. Public diplomacy activities, which started to be seen more frequently after the Cold War, have passed through various tests with a number of developments. When we examine new public diplomacy activities that have increased in impact since the 2000s, it is observed that these activities are in parallel with nation branding efforts.

Keywords

Public Diplomacy, Public Diplomacy Practices, Denmark, Nation Branding

References

• Adetiba, T. C. (2022). Integrating religion to as a tool of public diplomacy in twenty-first-century-Africa. O. Ogunnubi ve S. Folarin (Ed.), Religion and global politics: Soft power in Nigeria and beyond içinde (s. 15-34). Lanham: Lexington Books.
• Africa Programme for Peace (2024). Africa programme for peace, phase IV (APP IV), 2018-2021. Erişim adresi: https://etiopien.um.dk/en/-/media/country-sites/etiopien-en/about-ethiopia/programme-document-africa-programme-for-peace-iv.ashx#:~:text=APP%20IV%20is%20focused%20on,prioritises%20peac e%2C%20security%20and%20protection.
• Angell, S. I. ve Mordhorst, M. (2015). National reputation management and the competition state: The cases of Denmark and Norway. Journal of Cultural Economy, 8(2), 184-201. doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2014.885459
• Avrupa Komisyonu (2024). Mobility in higher education. Erişim adresi: https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-education-systems/denmark/mobility-higher-education
• Aydemir, E. (2016). Dış politikada yumuşak güç ve medya. İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayınları.
• Aydemir, E. (2018). Kamu diplomasisi: Ülkeler-Avrupa Birliği-kurumlar-uygulamalar. İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayınları.
• Ceyhan, A. İ. (2018). Siyasal iletişimde kamu diplomasisi. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitapevi.
• Cull, N. J. (2006). Public diplomacy before Gullion: The evolution of a phrase. USC Center of Public Diplomacy Blog. Erişim adresi: https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/public-diplomacy-gullion-evolution-phrase
• Cull, N.J. (2009). Public diplomacy: Lessons from the Past. CPD Perspectives on Public Diplomacy. Erişim Adresi: https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/story/cpd-perspectives-public-diplomacy-lessons-past
• Cummings, M. C. (2009). Cultural diplomacy and the United States government: A Survey. Americans for the Arts, 0(0), 1-15. Erişim adresi: https://www.americansforthearts.org/by-program/reports-and-data/legislation-policy/naappd/cultural-diplomacy-and-the-united-states-government-a-survey
• Danimarka Kültür Enstitüsü (2024). Ne yapıyoruz. Erişim adresi: https://www.danishcultureturkiye.com/tr/ne-yapiyoruz/
• International Federation of Art Councils and Culture Agencies. (2024). The International culture panel. Erişim adresi: https://ifacca.org/news/2015/04/14/international-culture-panel/
• Kampmark, B. (2010). The cartoon riots: A new cultural diplomacy. J. A. R. Nafziger, R. K. Paterson ve A. D. Renteln (Ed.), Cultural law: International, comparative, and indigenous içinde (s. 834-837). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Karadağ, H. (2016). Uluslararası ilişkilerde yeni bir boyut: Kamu diplomasisi. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
• Kjærsgaard, K. (2015). A public diplomacy entrepreneur: Danish ambassador Bodil Begtrup in Iceland, Switzerland and Portugal, 1949-1973. L. Clerc, N. Glover ve P. Jordan (Ed.), Histories of public diplomacy and nation branding in the Nordic and Baltic countries içinde (s. 102-122). Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.
• Knight, J. G., Mitchell, B. S. ve Gao, H. (2009). Riding out the Muhammad Cartoons Crisis: Contrasting Strategies and Outcomes. Long Range Planning, 42(1), 6-22. doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.11.002
• Ministry of Culture Denmark (2024a). Cultural policy. Erişim adresi: https://kum.dk/english/
• Ministry of Culture Denmark (2024b). International exchange and cooperation. Erişim adresi: https://kum.dk/english/cultural-policy/cultural-policy/international-exchange-and-cooperation
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (2007). Annual report 2007, 1-57. Erişim adresi: https://um.dk/en/-/media/websites/umen/about-us/economy-and-results/annualreport07-1-.ashx
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (2020). Global climate action strategy, 1-20. Erişim adresi: https://um.dk/en/foreign-policy/new-climate-action-strategy
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (2021). Tech for democracy. Erişim adresi: https://um.dk/en/foreign-policy/tech-for-democracy-2021
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (2023). Foreign and security policy strategy 2023. Erişim adresi: https://um.dk/en/foreign-policy/foreign-and-security-policy-2023
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (2024a). Office of the special representative of freedom of religion or belief. Erişim adresi: https://um.dk/en/foreign-policy/office-of-the-special-representative-for-freedom-of-religions-or-belief
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (2024b). Danish forum for freedom of religion or belief. Erişim adresi: https://um.dk/en/foreign-policy/office-of-the-special-representative-for-freedom-of-religions-or-belief/danish-forum-for-freedom-of-religion-or-belief
• Mordhorst, M. (2015). Public diplomacy vs nation branding: The case of Denmark after the cartoon crisis. L. Clerc, N. Glover ve P. Jordan (Ed.), Histories of public diplomacy and nation branding in the Nordic and Baltic countries içinde (s. 237-256). Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.
• Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power and American foreign policy. Political Science Quarterly, 119(2), 255-270. https://doi.org/10.2307/20202345
• Peace and Stabilization Programme (2024). Peace and stabilization programme 2023-2026. Erişim adresi: https://somalia.um.dk/en/danida-en/peace-and-stabilisation-4
• Pultz, K. (2012). Dialogue and Power: Understanding Danish public diplomacy efforts in the Middle East. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7(2), 161-180. doi.org/10.1163/187119112X625529
• Rasmussen, R. K. ve Merkelsen H. (2012). The new PR of states: How nation branding practices affect the security fonction of public diplomacy. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 810-818. doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.06.007
• Strategy for Tech Diplomacy (2024). Read the new strategy. Erişim adresi: https://techamb.um.dk/strategy
• Szondi, G. (2008). Public diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual similarities and differences, Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael. Erişim adresi: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253744488_Public_Diplomacy_and_Nation_Branding_Conceptual_Similarities_and_Differences
• Ultan, M. Ö. (2023a). Uluslararası değişim programlarının kamu diplomasisindeki rolü: Erasmus+ ve Fulbright örnekleri. Aydemir. E. ve Güner, O. (Ed.), Kamu diplomasisinde ulusötesi perspektifler: Coğrafya, anlatı stratejisi ve uygulamalar içinde (s. 159-186). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Ultan, M. Ö. (2023b). Avrupa Birliği’nde kamu diplomasisi ve katılım öncesi mali yardım aracı olarak eşleştirme mekanizması. Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Diplomasi Dergisi, 6(1), 1-15. doi.org/10.51763/uid.1230508
• United Nations Peacekeeping (2024). Where we operate. Erişim adresi: https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/where-we-operate
• Yağmurlu, A. (2019). Kamu diplomasisi bakışından spor diplomasisi. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18(4), 1367-1380. doi.org/10.21547/jss.556513
• Yazar, F. (2021). Kamu diplomasisi bağlamında Türkiye’nin ulus markalama faaliyetlerinin değerlendirilmesi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırması Dergisi, 10(1), 133-150. doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.811944