BibTex RIS Cite

GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK

Year 2009, , 197 - 220, 01.03.2009
https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002118

Abstract

References

  • ALGER, Chadwick (1963), “Comparison of Intranational and International Politics,” The AmericanPolitical Science Review, 57/2.
  • ALKER, Hayward R. (1990), “Rescuing 'Reason' from the 'Rationalists': Reading Vico, Marx andWeber as Reflective Institutionalists,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies,19/2.
  • ALKER, Hayward/BIERSTEKER, Thomas (1984), “The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a FutureArcheologist of International Savoir Faire,” International Studies Quarterly, 28/2.
  • AYDIN, Mustafa (2004), “Uluslararas× ĀliĂkilerin Gerçekçi Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsam×, Kritiÿi,”Uluslararas×ĀliĂkiler, 1/1.
  • BANKS, Michael (1984), “The Evolution of International Relations Theory,” BANKS, Michael (ed.), Conflict in World Society: A New Perspective on International Relations (Sussex:Wheatsheaf Books). BAUER, Raymond A., et al. (1958), “National Support for Behavioral Science,” Political Research Organization and Design, 1/5. BERNSTEIN, Steven, et al. (2000), “God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Sciences to An Unpredictable World,” European Journal of International Relations, 6/1. BRAUMOELLER, Bear F./SARTORI, Anne E. (1999), “Empirical-Quantitative Approaches to the Study of International Relations,” SPRINZ, Detlef/WOLINSKY, Yael (eds.), The Analysis of International Relations (Evanston: Northwestern University Press) . BREMER, Stuart A., et al. (2003), “Building a Science of World Politics: Emerging Methodologies and the Study of Conflict,”Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47/1.
  • BROWN, Chris (1997), Understanding International Relations (London: Macmillan Press).
  • BULL, Hedley (1966), “International Theory: The Case for A Classical Approach,” World Politics, 18/3.

GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK

Year 2009, , 197 - 220, 01.03.2009
https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002118

Abstract

References

  • ALGER, Chadwick (1963), “Comparison of Intranational and International Politics,” The AmericanPolitical Science Review, 57/2.
  • ALKER, Hayward R. (1990), “Rescuing 'Reason' from the 'Rationalists': Reading Vico, Marx andWeber as Reflective Institutionalists,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies,19/2.
  • ALKER, Hayward/BIERSTEKER, Thomas (1984), “The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a FutureArcheologist of International Savoir Faire,” International Studies Quarterly, 28/2.
  • AYDIN, Mustafa (2004), “Uluslararas× ĀliĂkilerin Gerçekçi Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsam×, Kritiÿi,”Uluslararas×ĀliĂkiler, 1/1.
  • BANKS, Michael (1984), “The Evolution of International Relations Theory,” BANKS, Michael (ed.), Conflict in World Society: A New Perspective on International Relations (Sussex:Wheatsheaf Books). BAUER, Raymond A., et al. (1958), “National Support for Behavioral Science,” Political Research Organization and Design, 1/5. BERNSTEIN, Steven, et al. (2000), “God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Sciences to An Unpredictable World,” European Journal of International Relations, 6/1. BRAUMOELLER, Bear F./SARTORI, Anne E. (1999), “Empirical-Quantitative Approaches to the Study of International Relations,” SPRINZ, Detlef/WOLINSKY, Yael (eds.), The Analysis of International Relations (Evanston: Northwestern University Press) . BREMER, Stuart A., et al. (2003), “Building a Science of World Politics: Emerging Methodologies and the Study of Conflict,”Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47/1.
  • BROWN, Chris (1997), Understanding International Relations (London: Macmillan Press).
  • BULL, Hedley (1966), “International Theory: The Case for A Classical Approach,” World Politics, 18/3.
There are 7 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Erdem Özlük This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2009
Submission Date July 31, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2009

Cite

APA Özlük, E. (2009). GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 64(03), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002118
AMA Özlük E. GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK. SBF Dergisi. March 2009;64(03):197-220. doi:10.1501/SBFder_0000002118
Chicago Özlük, Erdem. “GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 64, no. 03 (March 2009): 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002118.
EndNote Özlük E (March 1, 2009) GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 64 03 197–220.
IEEE E. Özlük, “GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK”, SBF Dergisi, vol. 64, no. 03, pp. 197–220, 2009, doi: 10.1501/SBFder_0000002118.
ISNAD Özlük, Erdem. “GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 64/03 (March 2009), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002118.
JAMA Özlük E. GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK. SBF Dergisi. 2009;64:197–220.
MLA Özlük, Erdem. “GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, vol. 64, no. 03, 2009, pp. 197-20, doi:10.1501/SBFder_0000002118.
Vancouver Özlük E. GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK. SBF Dergisi. 2009;64(03):197-220.