BibTex RIS Cite

GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK

Year 2009, Volume: 64 Issue: 03, 197 - 220, 01.03.2009
https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002118

Abstract

References

  • ALGER, Chadwick (1963), “Comparison of Intranational and International Politics,” The AmericanPolitical Science Review, 57/2.
  • ALKER, Hayward R. (1990), “Rescuing 'Reason' from the 'Rationalists': Reading Vico, Marx andWeber as Reflective Institutionalists,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies,19/2.
  • ALKER, Hayward/BIERSTEKER, Thomas (1984), “The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a FutureArcheologist of International Savoir Faire,” International Studies Quarterly, 28/2.
  • AYDIN, Mustafa (2004), “Uluslararas× ĀliĂkilerin Gerçekçi Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsam×, Kritiÿi,”Uluslararas×ĀliĂkiler, 1/1.
  • BANKS, Michael (1984), “The Evolution of International Relations Theory,” BANKS, Michael (ed.), Conflict in World Society: A New Perspective on International Relations (Sussex:Wheatsheaf Books). BAUER, Raymond A., et al. (1958), “National Support for Behavioral Science,” Political Research Organization and Design, 1/5. BERNSTEIN, Steven, et al. (2000), “God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Sciences to An Unpredictable World,” European Journal of International Relations, 6/1. BRAUMOELLER, Bear F./SARTORI, Anne E. (1999), “Empirical-Quantitative Approaches to the Study of International Relations,” SPRINZ, Detlef/WOLINSKY, Yael (eds.), The Analysis of International Relations (Evanston: Northwestern University Press) . BREMER, Stuart A., et al. (2003), “Building a Science of World Politics: Emerging Methodologies and the Study of Conflict,”Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47/1.
  • BROWN, Chris (1997), Understanding International Relations (London: Macmillan Press).
  • BULL, Hedley (1966), “International Theory: The Case for A Classical Approach,” World Politics, 18/3.

GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK

Year 2009, Volume: 64 Issue: 03, 197 - 220, 01.03.2009
https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002118

Abstract

References

  • ALGER, Chadwick (1963), “Comparison of Intranational and International Politics,” The AmericanPolitical Science Review, 57/2.
  • ALKER, Hayward R. (1990), “Rescuing 'Reason' from the 'Rationalists': Reading Vico, Marx andWeber as Reflective Institutionalists,” Millennium: Journal of International Studies,19/2.
  • ALKER, Hayward/BIERSTEKER, Thomas (1984), “The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a FutureArcheologist of International Savoir Faire,” International Studies Quarterly, 28/2.
  • AYDIN, Mustafa (2004), “Uluslararas× ĀliĂkilerin Gerçekçi Teorisi: Kökeni, Kapsam×, Kritiÿi,”Uluslararas×ĀliĂkiler, 1/1.
  • BANKS, Michael (1984), “The Evolution of International Relations Theory,” BANKS, Michael (ed.), Conflict in World Society: A New Perspective on International Relations (Sussex:Wheatsheaf Books). BAUER, Raymond A., et al. (1958), “National Support for Behavioral Science,” Political Research Organization and Design, 1/5. BERNSTEIN, Steven, et al. (2000), “God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Sciences to An Unpredictable World,” European Journal of International Relations, 6/1. BRAUMOELLER, Bear F./SARTORI, Anne E. (1999), “Empirical-Quantitative Approaches to the Study of International Relations,” SPRINZ, Detlef/WOLINSKY, Yael (eds.), The Analysis of International Relations (Evanston: Northwestern University Press) . BREMER, Stuart A., et al. (2003), “Building a Science of World Politics: Emerging Methodologies and the Study of Conflict,”Journal of Conflict Resolution, 47/1.
  • BROWN, Chris (1997), Understanding International Relations (London: Macmillan Press).
  • BULL, Hedley (1966), “International Theory: The Case for A Classical Approach,” World Politics, 18/3.
There are 7 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Authors

Erdem Özlük This is me

Submission Date July 31, 2014
Publication Date March 1, 2009
Published in Issue Year 2009 Volume: 64 Issue: 03

Cite

APA Özlük, E. (2009). GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 64(03), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002118
AMA Özlük E. GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK. SBF Dergisi. March 2009;64(03):197-220. doi:10.1501/SBFder_0000002118
Chicago Özlük, Erdem. “GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 64, no. 03 (March 2009): 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002118.
EndNote Özlük E (March 1, 2009) GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 64 03 197–220.
IEEE E. Özlük, “GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK”, SBF Dergisi, vol. 64, no. 03, pp. 197–220, 2009, doi: 10.1501/SBFder_0000002118.
ISNAD Özlük, Erdem. “GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi 64/03 (March2009), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1501/SBFder_0000002118.
JAMA Özlük E. GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK. SBF Dergisi. 2009;64:197–220.
MLA Özlük, Erdem. “GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, vol. 64, no. 03, 2009, pp. 197-20, doi:10.1501/SBFder_0000002118.
Vancouver Özlük E. GELENEKSELCİLİK-DAVRANIŞSALCILIK TARTIŞMASINI BAĞLAMINDA ANLAMAK. SBF Dergisi. 2009;64(03):197-220.