Research Article

FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING

Volume: 13 Number: 1 June 30, 2022
TR EN

FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING

Abstract

Drones, which have recently grown in popularity and provide endless potential in a variety of fields, are a useful commercial tool in addition to being a fun hobby. This study aimed to analyze the direct effects of perceived trust, perceived speed, and problem awareness on positive word-of-mouth communication intention for drone-based delivery services. In addition, the effect of drone-based delivery service on positive word-of-mouth communication intention and whether consumers' positive word-of-mouth communication intentions for drone-based delivery service differ significantly by gender and generation were also analyzed. The online survey method was used to reach 433 people for the study. Many different statistical analyzes were used to analyze the obtained data. One-sample t-test, independent-group t-test and ANOVA were used to test the differences in consumers' WOM communication intentions according to control variables. As a result of the study, it was concluded that the positive effect of the drone-based delivery service on positive word-of-mouth communication intention was significant. It has also been concluded that perceived trust, perceived speed, and problem awareness have direct significant and positive effects on positive word of mouth communication intention for drone-based delivery services. However, no significant difference was found in the positive word of mouth communication intentions of consumers according to gender and generations. The results of the study were discussed and recommendations were provided.

Keywords

Drone-based delivery , Perceived speed , Perceived trust , Problem awareness , WOM communication intention , Drone-based delivery, Perceived speed, Perceived trust, Problem awareness, WOM communication intention

References

  1. Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word-of-mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 1–14
  2. Aydın, İ. (2021). Investigation of the effect of robot waiter usage desire on word of mouth communication and robot waiter usage attitude in restaurants. Turkish Business Journal, 2(4), 93-105.
  3. Belanche, D., Flavián, M., & Pérez-Rueda, A. (2020). Mobile apps use and wom in the food delivery sector: the role of planned behavior, perceived security and customer lifestyle compatibility. Sustainability, 12(10), 4275.
  4. Cha, S. S. (2020). Customers’ intention to use robot-serviced restaurants in korea: relationship of coolness and mci factors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(9), 2947-2968.
  5. Chiasson, M. A., Shaw, F. S., Humberstone, M., Hirshfield, S., & Hartel, D. (2009). Increased HIV disclosure three months after an online video intervention for men who have sex with men (MSM). AIDS Care, 21(9), 1081-1089.
  6. Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (ewom) in social networking site. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47–75.
  7. Del Rio, A. B., Vazquez, R., & Iglesias, V. (2001). The effects of brand associations on consumer response. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(5), 410-425.
  8. Dichter, E. (1966). How word-of-mouth advertising Works. Harvard Business Review, 44, 147-166.
  9. Divanoğlu, S. U. (2016). Ağızdan ağıza iletişim ile tüketicilerin alışveriş merkezi tercih etme davranışı arasındaki ilişki. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 97-106.
  10. Ennew, C. T., Banerjee, A. K., & Li, D. (2000). Managing word of mouth communication: empirical evidence from India. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 18(2), 75-83.
APA
Dülek, B., & Çelik, Z. (2022). FACTORS AFFECTING POSITIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION INTENTION FOR DRONE-BASED DELIVERY SERVICE IN RETAILING. Journal of Academic Approaches, 13(1), 40-55. https://doi.org/10.54688/ayd.1105843