Uygulayıcı Olarak Öğretmen: Program Okuryazarlığı Üzerine Bir Sistematik Derleme

Abstract

Bu sistematik derleme Türkiye'de "program okuryazarlığı" kavramını anlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla literatür taraması yapılmış ve veriler PRISMA kriterleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular teorik çerçeve ışığında tartışılmıştır. Çalışma, program okuryazarlığının öncelikle öğretmenlerin uygulayıcı olarak rolünü vurguladığını ileri sürmektedir. Sonuçlar, geniş bir bağlamda program okuryazarlığının mesleki bir beceri ve/veya yeterlilik olarak tanımlandığını göstermektedir. Araştırmacılar eğitim programının dört temel öğesini (hedefler, içerik, öğrenme-öğretme süreçleri ve değerlendirme) ele almış olsalar da, esas olarak eğitim programının anlaşılması ve uygulanmasına odaklanmışlardır. Sonuç olarak, incelenen çalışmalar, öğretmenlerin programı anlama, kavrama, değerlendirme, uyarlama ve sonuçta uygulamadaki rolünün önemine dair bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Ayrıca sonuçlar, araştırmacıların program okuryazarlığı düzeylerini ölçmek için nicel tasarımları tercih ettiğini göstermektedir. Gelecekte yapılacak araştırmalar, nispeten yeni bir kavram olan program okuryazarlığının farklı metodolojik tasarımlarla derinlemesine incelenmesi, kavramın tanımlanmasına, ölçülmesine ve tartışılmasına yardımcı olacaktır.

Keywords

• Eğitim programı
• Program okuryazarlığı
• Öğretim programı okuryazarlığı

The Teacher as An Implementer: A Systematic Review of Curriculum Literacy

Abstract

Bu sistematik derleme Türkiye'de "program okuryazarlığı" kavramını anlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla literatür taraması yapılmış ve veriler PRISMA kriterleri kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular teorik çerçeve ışığında tartışılmıştır. Çalışma, program okuryazarlığının öncelikle öğretmenlerin uygulayıcı olarak rolünü vurguladığını ileri sürmektedir. Sonuçlar, geniş bir bağlamda program okuryazarlığının mesleki bir beceri ve/veya yeterlilik olarak tanımlandığını göstermektedir. Araştırmacılar eğitim programının dört temel öğesini (hedefler, içerik, öğrenme-öğretme süreçleri ve değerlendirme) ele almış olsalar da, esas olarak eğitim programının anlaşılması ve uygulanmasına odaklanmışlardır. Sonuç olarak, incelenen çalışmalar, öğretmenlerin programı anlama, kavrama, değerlendirme, uyarlama ve sonuçta uygulamadaki rolünün önemine dair bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Ayrıca sonuçlar, araştırmacıların program okuryazarlığı düzeylerini ölçmek için nicel tasarımları tercih ettiğini göstermektedir. Gelecekte yapılacak araştırmalar, nispeten yeni bir kavram olan program okuryazarlığının farklı metodolojik tasarımlarla derinlemesine incelenmesi, kavramın tanımlanmasına, ölçülmesine ve tartışılmasına yardımcı olacaktır.

Keywords

• Curriculum
• Curriculum literacy
• Instructional literacy
• Systematic review.

References

1. Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. (2006). (In) Fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review. 76(1), 30–63. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.76.1.e14543458r811864
2. Akınoglu, O. & Doğan, S. (2012, September, 12-14). A new concept proposal for curriculum development in education: curriculum literacy. [Paper presentation]. 21. International Congress of Educational Sciences. Istanbul, Türkiye.
3. *Akyıldız, S. (2020). A conceptual analysis of curriculum literacy concept: A study of scale development. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 19(73), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.554205
4. Alter, J., & Coggshall, J. G. (2009). Teaching as a clinical practice profession: ımplications for teacher preparation and state policy. (Issue Brief). National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED543819.pdf
5. *Altuncu, N. (2021). Examining the curriculum literacy level of high school teachers: Sample of Kayseri. (Thesis No: 694356) [Master Thesis, Erciyes University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
6. Ariav, T. (1991). Growth in teachers' curriculum knowledge through the process of curriculum analysis. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 6(3), 183–200. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED299234.pdf
7. *Aslan, S. (2018). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin program okuryazarlık düzeyleri (The curriculum literacy levels of secondary school teachers). (Thesis No: 516831) [Master Thesis, Hacettepe University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
8. *Aslan, O. (2019). The analysis of primary and secondary school administrators' perception of curriculum literacy according to various variables. (Thesis No: 573023) [Mater Thesis, Harran University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.

9. *Aslan, S. (2019). An analysis of prospective teachers' curriculum literacy levels in terms of reading and writing. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(4), 973–979. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070408
10. *Atlı, K., Kara, Ö., & Mirzeoğlu, A. D. (2021). Investigating physical education perceptions about their curriculum literacy levels according to some variables. Gazi Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 26(2), 281–299. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gbesbd/issue/61222/837824
11. *Aydın, R., & Kurt, S. (2022). Examination of teachers' perceptions of self-efficiency and program literacy. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(1), 90–117. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.01.422
12. *Aygün, E. (2022). Examination of program literacy status of special education teachers and school administrators. (Thesis No: 762284) [Master Thesis, Kafkas University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
13. *Aygün, E. H. (2019). The prediction of the teaching readiness level of pre-service teachers in terms of curriculum literacy. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction Studies, 9(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.31704/ijocis.2019.009.
14. Barut, C., Gündoğdu, K. (2023). The relationship between teachers' curriculum literacy levels and critical thinking dispositions. Journal of Bayburt Faculty of Education, 18(37), 198–217. doi: 10.35675/befdergi.1213781
15. *Başar, T., & Berilgen, S. (2021). Determination of curriculum literacy levels of school administrators. Kastamonu Education Journal, 29(2), 348-361. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.766306
16. Bay, E., Kahramanoğlu, R., Döş, B., & Özpolat, E. (2017). Analysis of factors affecting commitment to the program. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Faculty of Education, 1(43), 110–137. https://doi.org/10.21764/efd.02208
17. Ben-Peretz, M. (1990). The teacher curriculum encounter: Freeing teachers from the tyranny of texts. New York: State University of New York Press.
18. Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and teacher education, 20(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
19. *Bolat, Y. (2017). Curriculum literacy concept and curriculum literacy scale. International Periodical for The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 12(18), 121–138. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12103
20. *Boncuk, A. (2021). Examining the relationship between teachers' curriculum literacy and their commitment to the curriculum. Anatolian Turkish Journal of Education. 3(1), 88–108. http://anadoluturkegitim.com/index.php/ated/article/view/33
21. *Boyraz, C. (2021). Examination of pre-service primary school teachers’ opinions about the elective primary school program course. Eurasian Journal of Teacher Education, 2(3), 142–158. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/2051981
22. Bümen, N. T. (2019). Education programs in the grip of centralism versus autonomy in Türkiye: Problems and suggestions. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(1), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2450
23. Bümen, N. T., Çakar, E., & Yıldız, D. G. (2014). Adherence to the curriculum in Türkiye and factors affecting adherence. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 14(1), 203–228. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.1.2020
24. Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2010). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (7th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
25. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative research methods (6th ed.). (M. Bütün & S.B. Demir, Trans.). İstanbul: Siyasal Publishing (Original work published in 2013).
26. Çakmak, Z., Bulut, B. & Taşkıran, C. (2016). Investigation of pre-service social studies teachers' views on educational beliefs in terms of various variables. Abant Izzet Baysal University Journal of Faculty of Education, 16 (Special Issue II), 1190–1205.
27. Çam, O., & Bilge, A. (2013). The process of stigmatization, attitude, and belief about mental illness and patient in Türkiye: a systematic review. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 4(2), 91–102. doi: 10.5505/phd.2013.92300
28. *Çetinkaya, S., & Tabak, S. (2019). Curriculum literacy efficiency of preservice teachers. Ondokuz Mayıs University Journal of Faculty of Education, 38(1), 296–309. https://doi.org/10.7822/omuefd.535482
29. *Çıkrık, M. (2017). The Problems of Teachers Who Work in Multigrade Classes: Examples in Denizli and Erzurum. (Thesis No: 481787) [Master Thesis, Pamukkale University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
30. *Çınar, F. (2022). Examination of the relationship between middle school teachers' perceived curriculum literacys and classroom management anxieties: The case of Gebze district, (Thesis No: 775666) [Master Thesis, Sakarya University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
31. *Dağ, Ş. (2021). Investigation of the curriculum literacy and teaching motivations of teachers, (Thesis No: 701331) [Master Thesis, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
32. Demeuse, M. & Christine, S. (2016). Curriculum development in education from policy decisions to practice (Y. Budak, Trans.). Ankara: Pegem A Publishing. (Original work published in 2013). Demirel, Ö. (2005). Curriculum development in education: From theory to practice. Ankara: Pegem A Publishing
33. *Demir, B., Yücesoy, Y., & Serttaş, Z. (2020). Program literacy levels of teacher candidates: The example of TRNC. International Journal of Social Sciences in Turkic Cultural Geography, 5(1), 28–37. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1396216
34. *Demir, E. & Toraman, Ç. (2021). Teachers ' levels of curriculum literacy. Trakya Journal of Education, 11(3), 1516–1528. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.858813
35. Demir, K. S. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between class teachers' program literacy and their attitudes to the teaching profession (Thesis No: 783434) [Master Thesis, Sütçü İmam University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
36. Dikbayır, A., & Bümen, N. T. (2016). Investigation of adherence to the ninth-grade mathematics curriculum. International Journal of Curriculum and Instructional Studies, 6(11), 17–38. https://www.ijocis.com/index.php/ijocis/article/view/166/130
37. *Dilek, Ç (2020). Examining the curriculum literacy levels and pedagogical knowledge and skill levels of preservice teachers. (Thesis No: 641676) [Master Thesis, Atatürk University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
38. Doğan, D. & Semerci, N. (2016). Administrator opinions on the problems encountered in the implementation of curriculum and solutions to problems. Turkish Studies, 11(9), 279–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.9547
39. Educationfirst (2022). Curriculum Literacy Guide. Retrieved from https://www.education-first.com/insights/our-publications/curriculum-literacy-guide/
40. Eisner, E. (2002). The tree curricula that all schools teach. In the educational imagination: on the design and evaluation of school programs (3th ed.). Merrill Prentice Hall.
41. *Erdamar, F. S. (2020). The analysis of primary school teachers' curriculum literacy perceptions and primary school administrators' perceptions of teachers' curriculum literacy skills in the context of progressive philosophy. (Thesis No: 621287) [Doctoral Dissertation, Fırat University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
42. Erdamar, F. S., & Akpınar, B. (2020). Analysis of classroom teachers' perceptions of curriculum literacy. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 8(3), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v8i3.4619
43. Erdamar, F. S., & Akpınar, B. (2021). Analysis of classroom teachers' curriculum literacy skills from the perspective of administrators. Journal of History School, 52(1), 1861–1884. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/Joh.49301
44. *Erdem, C., & Eğmir, E. (2018). Prospective teachers’ levels of curriculum literacy, Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences. 20(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.428727
45. *Erdem, S., & Yücel Toy, B. (2021). Examination of curriculum literacy phenomenon from the eyes of teacher educators in the field of curriculum and instruction. Jass Studies-The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 14(87), 1–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/JASSS.52822
46. Franzak, J. K. (2002). Developing a teacher identity: The impact of critical friends practice on the student teacher. English Education, 34(4), 258–280. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40173075
47. Friesen, M. D., & Besley, S. C. (2013). Teacher identity development in the first year of teacher education: A developmental and social psychological perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.005
48. Gelmez-Burakgazi, S. (2019). Commitment to the curriculum: Opening the Black Box. Başkent University Journal of Education, 6(2), 236–249, https://buje.baskent.edu.tr/index.php/buje/article/view/189
49. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. USA: Sociology Press.
50. Gökdemir, F., & Dolgun, G. (2020). Writing material & method section in qualitative, quantitative, systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-synthesis studies. Archives of Health Science and Research (Online), 7(2), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.5152/ArcHealthSciRes.2020.594665
51. *Gömleksiz, M. N., & Erdem, Ş. (2018). The views of pre-service teachers enrolled in the faculty of education and PFE program on curriculum literacy. Jass Studies-The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 73(1), 509–529. http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS7964
52. *Güleş, E. (2022). Examination of primary and secondary teachers' program literacy and commitment to the curriculum. (Thesis No: 715738) [Master Thesis, Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
53. *Gülpek, U. (2020). Investigation of the physical education and sports teachers and prospective teacher’s curriculum literacy and physical education efficacy levels. (Thesis No: 627563) [Master Thesis, Bursa Uludağ University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
54. *Gündoğan, G. (2019). A qualitative evaluation on teachers' curriculum literacy. (Thesis No: 579025) [Master Thesis, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
55. Güneş, G., & Baki, A. (2012). Primary school teachers' views on 4th grade mathematics curriculum. Education & Science, 37(163) 81–95. Retrieved from: http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/764/339
56. *Güneş Şınego, S., & Çakmak, M. (2021). Examination of education program literacy levels of teachers. The Journal of Kesit Academy, 7(27), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.29228/kesit.51337
57. *Gürbüz, Ş. (2021). Teachers’ curriculum literacy levels and curriculum fidelity. (Thesis No: 682861) [Master Thesis, Gazi University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
58. Gürbüz, S. & Sen, H.S. (2023). Teachers' Curriculum Literacy and Curriculum Fidelity: Differences According to Certain Variables. International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 14(1), 1-23. doi: 10.29329/ijrte.2023.523.1
59. Hanley, T., & Cutts, L. (2013). What is a systematic review. Counselling Psychology Review, 28(4), 3–6. https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/32908640/FULL_TEXT.PDF
60. Hewitt, T.W. (2006) Understanding and shaping curriculum: What we teach and why. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
61. İçen, M., İlğan, A. & Göker, H. (2013). Analysis of pre-service social studies teachers' epistemological beliefs. Anatolian Journal of Educational Leadership and Instruction, 1(2), 2–11. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ajeli/issue/1521/18702
62. Jukić Matić, L. (2019). The teacher as a lesson designer. Ceps Journal, 9(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.722
63. *Kahraman, A. (2020). Examination of private school teachers' levels of educational program literacy, epistemological beliefs, and individual innovativeness. (Thesis No: 662366) [Master Thesis, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University].
64. *Kahramanoğlu, R. (2019). A study on teachers’ levels of curriculum literacy. The Journal of International Social Research, 12(65), 827–840. https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2019.3495
65. *Kalkan Çelik, C. (2022). The relationship between the learning-centered leadership and curriculum literacy of school administrators. (Thesis No: 737975) [Master Thesis, Gazi University].
66. *Kana, F., Aşçı, E., Kana Zorlu, H. & Elkıran, M. Y. (2018). Curriculum literacy levels of prospective Turkish teachers. The Journal of Academic Social Science. 6(80) 233–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.14202
67. Karaağaç, M. (2023). The relationship between teachers' critical thinking and problem solving skills with curriculum literacy. (Thesis No: 832301) [Master Thesis, Hacettepe University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
68. Karaçam, Z. (2013). Systematic review methodology: A guide for preparing a systematic review. Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Nursing Electronic Journal, 6(1), 26–33. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/753523
69. *Karagülle, S., Varki, E., & Hekimoğlu, E. (2019). An investigation of the concept of program literacy in the context of applicability and functionality of educational program. Journal of Educational Reflections, 3(2), 85–97. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/880314
70. Karhan, İ. (2007). Investigation of Epistemological Beliefs of Primary School Teachers According to Their Demographic Characteristics and Their Use of Information Technologies. (Thesis No: 219319) [Doctoral Dissertation, Yıldız Teknik University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
71. Kasap, G. (2015). To be determined prospective teachers' views about the classes of school experi̇ence and teachi̇ng practi̇ce. (Thesis No: 415484) [Master Thesis, Giresun University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
72. *Kasapoglu, K. (2020). Perceived curriculum literacy scale for teachers: A scale development and validation study. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(2), 963-977. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.709688
73. *Keskin, A. (2019). Determining the perceptions of teachers' instructional program literacy levels. (Thesis No: 618850) [Doctoral Dissertation, Hacettepe University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
74. Kızılaslan Tunçer, B., & Şahin, Ç. (2019). Investigation of pre-service teachers' level of knowledge about curriculum. Erzincan University Journal of Faculty of Education, 21(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.511367
75. Knowles, J. G. (1992). Models for understanding pre-service and beginning teachers’ biographies: illustrations from case studies. In I. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp. 99–152). New York: Teachers College Press.
76. Koç, S., & Memduhoğlu, H. B. (2017). Pre-service teachers' epistemological beliefs: A mixed method study. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 16(60), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.289655 *Kuloğlu, A. (2022). The relationship between 21st century learner skills and program literacy levels of preservice teachers. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(3), 624–632. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1083782
77. *Kuyubaşıoğlu, R. M. (2019). Investigation of teacher's education program literacy qualifications. (Thesis No: 608523) [Master Thesis, Mersin University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
78. Lee, Y.J., & Chue, S. (2013). The value of fidelity of implementation criteria to evaluate school-based science curriculum innovations. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2508–2537. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.609189
79. *Mansuroğlu, C. (2019). The investigation of teachers' curriculum literacy and reflective thinking trends. (Thesis No: 581221) [Master Thesis, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
80. Marsh, C.J., & Willis, G. (2007). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues. USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
81. Ministry of National Education Regulations. (2012). 12 years compulsory education: Questions-answers. Retrieved from: https://www.meb.gov.tr/duyurular/duyurular2012/12Yil_Soru_Cevaplar.pdf
82. Ministry of National Education. (2017). Instructional programs. Retrieved from: http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Programlar.aspx Ministry of National Education. (2018). General competencies for teaching profession. Retrieved from: https://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_06/29111119_TeachersGeneralCompetencies.pdf
83. *Nasırcı, H. (2022). Examination of curriculum literacy competencies of classroom teachers. (Thesis No: 714076) [Doctoral Dissertation, Cukurova University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
84. Nsibande, R. N., & Modiba, M. M. (2012). I just do as expected. Teachers’ implementation of continuous assessment and challenges to curriculum literacy. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 629-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.560961
85. OECD. (2019). Country note: Türkiye. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from: https://www.oecd.org/education/education-at-a-glance/EAG2019_CN_TUR.pdf
86. Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2016). Curriculum--foundations, principles, and issues. Global edition. USA: Pearson Education Limited.
87. *Oruç, T. (2022). The investigation of relationship between primary school teachers's education curriculum literacy levels and teaching and learning approaches. (Thesis No: 737419) [Master Thesis, Fırat University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
88. Önal, İ. (2010). Lifelong learning and literacy in historical change: Türkiye experience. Knowledge World, 11(1), 101–121. Retrieved from: https://bby.hacettepe.edu.tr/yayinlar/116-164-1-SM.pdf
89. Özeren, E. & Akpınar, B. (2020). Investigation of Teachers' Epistemological Beliefs and Measurement and Evaluation Practices in the Context of Turkish Education System. Journal of History School, 48(1), 3175–3200. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/Joh.45810
90. Öztürk, İ. H. (2012). Teacher’s role and autonomy in instructional planning: The case of secondary school history teachers with regard to the preparation and implementation of annual instructional plans, Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1) 295–299. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ978444.pdf
91. *Özüdoğru, F. (2022). Analysis of the factors predicting curriculum literacy of preservice teachers. Research in Pedagogy, 12(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.5937/IstrPed2201112O
92. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, (2020). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
93. *Pektaş, Ö. (2019). Examination of teachers' awareness of curriculum. (Thesis No: 662811) [Master Thesis, Siirt University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
94. Polikoff, M. S., & Porter, A. C. (2014). Instructional alignment as a measure of teaching quality. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714531851
95. Posner, G.J. (1995). Analyzing the curriculum. McGraw-Hill.
96. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2): 211–246. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3516049
97. *Saral, N. S. (2019). Exploring curriculum literacy level of English language teachers in Türkiye. (Thesis No: 588832) [Master Thesis, Gazi University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
98. *Sarıca, R. (2021). A study on teachers' curriculum literacy. Journal of Kırşehir Faculty of Education, 22(1), 132–170. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.776214
99. *Sarıgöz, O. (2021). The opinions of teacher candidates on educational programmes and its literacy. Social Science Development Journal, 6(25), 273–284. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31567/ssd.393
100. Sarıtaş, M. (2007). Evaluation of the opinions on the benefits of school experience for prospective teachers. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education. 20(1), 121–143. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/153310
101. Shkedi, A. (2009). From curriculum guide to classroom practice: teachers’ narratives of curriculum application. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(6), 833–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270902927030
102. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 498–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
103. Steiner, D., Magee, J., Jensen, B., & Button, J. (2018). Curriculum literacy in schools of education? The hole at the center of American teacher preparation. Retrieved from: https://jscholarship.library.jhu.edu/bitstream/handle/1774.2/62968/curriculum-literacy-in-schools-of-education-final-2911-1.pdf?sequence=1
104. *Sural, S., & Dedebali N. C. (2018). A study of curriculum literacy and information literacy levels of teacher candidates in department of social sciences education. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.303
105. *Süğümlü, Ü. (2022). Investigation of the relationship between curriculum literacy and teacher performance. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 9(4), 1342–1355. https://dx.doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2022.9.4.948
106. *Şahin, A. İ. (2020). An investigation of primary school teacher candidate’s curriculum literacy. (Thesis No: 644183) [Master Thesis, Kastamonu University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
107. Şahin, A., & Kumral, O. (2013). Pre-Service teachers’ images of school curriculum and their curricular roles. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 7(14), 19–32. Retrieved from: https://mjer.inased.org/files/10/manuscript/manuscript_332/mjer-332-manuscript-224914.pdf
108. Ünver, G. (2021). Teacher training for curriculum studies. Teacher Education and Instruction, 2(2), 30–55. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jnate
109. *Tan-Şişman, G. (2021). Acquisition of the curriculum development knowledge in pre-service teacher education. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 11(1), 355–400. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2021.010
110. Tan-Şişman, G. & Karsantık, Y. (2021). Curriculum development in Singapore and Turkiye: Reflections of administrative structure and educational reforms. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 10(1), 109-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/buefad.704869
111. The International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2019). ISTE Standarts for Educators, Retrieved form:https://iste.org/standards/educators
112. Tokgöz, Ö. (2013). Transformation of centralized curriculum into teaching and learning processes: Teachers’ journey of thought curriculum into enacted one (Merkeziyetçi öğretim programının öğrenme ve öğretme sürecine dönüştürülmesi: Tasarlanan programın uygulama yolculuğu). (Thesis No: 345161) [Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
113. Tian, X., Bao, L., Li, T., & Gu, Y. (2022) Teacher becoming curriculum designer: professional teaching and learning in china’s early childhood education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(873044). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.873044
114. *Tutuş, F. (2021). English teachers' curriculum literacy levels and views on English language teaching. (Thesis No: 687258) [Master Thesis, Fırat University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
115. Troyer, M. (2019) Teachers’ adaptations to and orientations towards an adolescent literacy curriculum, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(2), 202–228, doi: 10.1080/00220272.2017.1407458 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO, 2023) Message from Ms Audrey Azoulay, Director-General of UNESCO, on the occasion of International Literacy Day. Retrieved from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386707_eng?posInSet=2&queryId=N-78769467-b842-49ca-92ae-cdb295c4ec26
116. *Ustabulut, M. Y. (2021). Curriculum literacy levels of instructors teaching Turkish as a foreign language. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 31(3), 1235–1243. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.941957
117. *Ünal, Ö. (2022). The relationship between self-efficacy, class management skills, and curriculum literacy levels of teachers working in special education schools. (Thesis No: 723821) [Master Thesis, İstanbul Sabahattin Zaim University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
118. Yaşar, M., Karabay, A., & Bilaloğlu, R. G. (2013). "Am I a teacher now?" Pre-service teachers' views on the factors that affect the formation of teaching identity. Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(7) 269–282. https://www.acarindex.com/pdfler/acarindex-1412a1f2-dd23.pdf
119. *Yar Yıldırım, V. (2018). Developing and evaluating in-service training curriculum for school administrators' curriculum literacy. (Thesis No: 493983) [Doctoral Dissertation, Gaziosmanpaşa University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
120. *Yar Yıldırım, V. (2020). Development of teachers’ curriculum literacy scale: validity and reliability study. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 21(1), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.590695
121. *Yar Yıldırım, V. (2021). The impact of teacher idealism on curriculum literacy: the role of believing in education as a mediator variable. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 13(2) 1548–1563. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1292330.pdf
122. *Yıldırım, İ. (2019). Development of curriculum literacy scale: validity and reliability study. Harran Maarif Journal, 4(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.22596/2019.0402.1.28
123. Yıldırım, A. (1999). Basic features of qualitative research methods and their place and importance in educational research. Education and Science, 23(112), 7–17.
124. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.
125. *Yıldız, S. (2019). The relationship between pre-service teachers' cognitive awareness perceptions of curriculum development and curriculum literacy, International Social Sciences Studies Journal, 5(44), 5177–5191. http://dx.doi.org/10.26449/sssj.1767
126. *Yılmaz, G. (2021). Examining the relationship between curriculum literacy levels, curriculum orientations and curriculum fidelity levels of teachers. (Thesis No: 676822) [Master Thesis, Gaziantep University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
127. Yurdakul, S., Gür, B. S., Çelik, Z., & Kurt, T. (2016). Teaching profession and the status of the profession. Ankara: Eğitim-Bir-Sen Strategic Research Center.).Retrieved from: http://www.ebs.org.tr/ebs_files/files/yayinlarimiz/mesleginstatusu_web.pdf
128. *Yurtseven, N., Doğan, S. & Çelik, İ. (2021). Designer teacher scale: a scale development and validation study based on exploratory mixed research method. Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal, 41(3), 1489–1523.
129. *Yüksel Güler, Ş. (2021). The relationship between preschool teachers' curriculum literacy, self- efficiency beliefs and classroom management skills. (Thesis No: 681722) [Master Thesis, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University]. Turkish Council of Higher Education Theses Center.
130. Wang, X. (2014). Investigation on the professional identity of senior high school English teachers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(4), 769–774. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.4.769-774
131. Weare, K., & Nind, M. (2011). Mental health promotion and problem prevention in schools: what does the evidence say? Health Promotion International, 26(1), 29–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dar075
132. Westwood Taylor, M. (2013) Replacing the ‘teacher-proof’ curriculum with the ‘curriculum-proof’ teacher: Toward more effective interactions with mathematics textbooks. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(3), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.710253
133. *Zelyurt, H. (2021), An analysis of prospective teachers’ curriculum literacy levels in terms of various variables. The Asian Institute of Research Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(3) 334–341. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.342