Siber Pornografi Kullanım Envanteri-9’un Türkçe Geçerlilik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Yıl 2023, , 448 - 460, 29.12.2023

Hüseyin Ünübol , Başak Ünübol , Aylin Tutgun-ünal , Gökben Hızlı Sayar

https://doi.org/10.51982/bagimli.1243882

Cited By: 1

Öz

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, Grubbs ve arkadaşları tarafından geliştirilen Siber Pornografi Kullanım Envanteri-9’un (SPKE-9) Türkçe formunun dil eşdeğerliği, geçerlilik ve güvenirliğinin incelenmesidir.
Yöntem: SPKE-9 Türkiye genelinde 4390 kişiden oluşan bir çalışma grubuna uygulanmıştır. Envanter “Kesinlikle Katılmıyorum” ile “Kesinlikle Katılıyorum” aralığında yedili likert tipinde derecelendirilmekte ve bireylerin siber porno kullanım seviyesini ölçmektedir. SPKE-9’un İngilizce ve Türkçe formu arasındaki uyumu incelemek için yapılan Pearson korelasyon katsayıları sonucunda pozitif ve anlamlı değerlere ulaşılmıştır.
Bulgular: Orijinali 3 faktörden oluşan envanterin yapı geçerliliğini sağlamak için yapılan faktör analizi sonucunda Türkçe formunda da aynı yapının geçerli ortaya çıkmıştır. Birinci faktör olan “Algılanan Zorlanma” varyansın %47,57’sini, ikinci faktör olan “Duygusal Sıkıntı” varyansın %24,23’ünü, üçüncü faktör olan “Erişim Çabaları” varyansın %10,72’sini açıklamaktadır. Toplam 9 maddeden oluşan üç faktörlü yapı toplam varyansın %82,53’ünü açıklamıştır. Ayrıca yapılan doğrulayıcı faktör analizinde üç faktör SPKE-9’u doğrulanmıştır. Uyum iyiliği değerleri kabul edilebilir bulunmuştur (Ki-kare/serbestlik değeri: 3,97; RMSEA: 0,08; NFI: 0,95; NNFI: 0,93; CFI: 0,96; GFI:0,94; AGFI: 0,90). Ölçeğin iç tutarlılık katsayısı Cronbach Alfa değeri 0,84 bulunmuştur.
Sonuç: “Siber Pornografi Kullanım Envanteri-9” (SPKE-9) Türkçe formunun geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olarak kullanılabileceği bulunmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Pornografi, Siber, Envanter, Geçerlilik ve Güvenirlik, Bağımlılık

Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of the Cyber Pornography Use Inventory-9 (CPUI-9)

Öz

Objective: The aim of this study is to examine the language equivalence, validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Cyber Pornography Use Inventory-9 (CPUI-9) developed by Grubbs et al.
Method: CPUI-9 was applied to a study group consisting of 4390 people throughout Turkey. The Inventory is rated on a seven-point Likert scale, ranging from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree," and measures individuals' level of cyber porn use. As a result of the Pearson correlation coefficients made to examine the compatibility between the English and Turkish forms of CPUI-9, positive and significant values were reached.
Results: The factor analysis performed to ensure the construct validity of the Inventory, which initially consisted of 3 factors, the same structure was revealed in the Turkish form. The first factor, "Perceived Difficulty," explained 47.57% of the variance, the second factor, "Emotional Distress," 24.23%, and the third factor, "Access Efforts," explained 10.72% of the variance. The three-factor structure consisting of 9 items explained 82.53% of the total variance. In addition, three factors confirmed CPUI-9 in the confirmatory factor analysis. The goodness of fit values was found to be acceptable (Chi-square/freedom value: 3.97; RMSEA: 0.08; NFI: 0.95; NNFI: 0.93; CFI: 0.96; GFI:0.94; AGFI: 0.90). The Cronbach Alpha value of the internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.84.
Conclusion: Turkish version of the CPUI-9 Inventory is both valid and reliable and can be utilized as a dependable and accurate measurement tool.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Pornography, cyber, inventory, validity, reliability

Kaynakça

• Hald GM, Malamuth NM. Self-perceived effects of pornography consumption. Arch Sex Behav 2008; 37(4): 614–625.
• Griffiths MD. Internet sex addiction: A review of empirical research. Addict Res Theory 2012; 20(2): 111–124.
• Wysocki DK. Cybersex, computer sex addiction, and cyberpornography. In Bryant C (editor). The Routledge Handbook of Deviant Behavior, New York: Routledge, 2011: 291–295.
• Cooper A, Delmonico DL, Burg R. Cybersex users, abusers, and compulsives: New findings and implications. Sex Addict Compulsivity 2000; 7(1-2): 5–29.
• Layden MA. Pornography and violence: A new look at the research. In Stoner JR, Hughes DM (editors). The Social Costs of Pornography: A Collection of Papers. Princeton, NJ: Witherspoon Institute, 2010: 57–68.
• Paul P. From pornography to Porno to porn: How porn became the norm. In Stoner JR, Hughes DM (editors). The Social Costs of Pornography: A Collection of Papers. Princeton, NJ: Witherspoon Institute, 2022: 3–20.
• McKee A. The positive and negative effects of pornography as attributed by consumers. Australian Journal of Communication 2007; 34(1): 87–104.
• Spitznagel E. Where the filthy things are. https://www.popularmechanics.com/culture/web/a29623446/pornhub-porn-data-storage/ (Accessed 01.03.2023).
• Zattoni F, Gül M, Soligo M, et al. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on pornography habits: a global analysis of Google Trends. Int J Impot Res 2020; 33(8): 824–831.
• Gaspar MJ, Carvalheira A. The consumption of pornography on the internet in a sample of Portuguese women. Psychol Community Health 2012; 1(2): 163–171.
• Landripet I, Štulhofer A. Is pornography use associated with sexual difficulties and dysfunctions among younger heterosexual men? J Sex Med 2015; 12(5): 1136–1139.
• Ünübol H, Sayar GH. TURBAHAR- Türkiye Bağımlılık Risk Profili ve Ruh Sağlığı Haritası Proje Sonuç Raporu. İstanbul: Üsküdar Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2019: 150-157.
• Daneback K, Traeen B, Månsson SA. Use of pornography in a random sample of Norwegian heterosexual couples. Arch Sex Behav 2009; 38(5): 746–753.
• Kohut T, Fisher WA, Campbell L. Perceived effects of pornography on the couple relationship: initial findings of open-ended, participant-informed, “bottom-up” research. Arch Sex Behav 2017; 46(2): 585–602.
• Wright PJ, Tokunaga RS. Men’s objectifying media consumption, objectification of women, and attitudes supportive of violence against women. Arch Sex Behav 2016; 45(4): 955–964.
• Bonino S, Ciairano S, Rabaglietti E, Cattelino E. Use of pornography and self-reported engagement in sexual violence among adolescents. Eur J Dev Psychol 2006; 3(3): 265–288.
• Manning JC. The impact of internet pornography on marriage and the family: A review of the research. Sex Addict Compulsivity 2006; 13(2-3): 131–165.
• Morgan EM. Associations between young adults’ use of sexually explicit materials and their sexual preferences, behaviors, and satisfaction. J Sex Res 2011; 48(6): 520–530.
• Allen A, Kannis-Dymand L, Katsikitis M. Problematic internet pornography use: The role of craving, desire thinking, and metacognition. Addict Behav 2017; 70: 65–71.
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, 5th edition (DSM-5).Washington DC: American Psychiatric Assocaition, 2013.
• Grubbs JB, Exline JJ, Pargament KI, et al. Internet pornography use, perceived addiction, and religious/spiritual struggles. Arch Sex Behav 2017; 46(6): 1733–1745.
• Kafka MP. Hypersexual disorder: a proposed diagnosis for DSM-V. Arch Sex Behav 2010; 39(2): 377–400.
• Cavaglion G. Cyber-porn dependence: voices of distress in an Italian internet self-help community. Int J Ment Health Addict 2009; 7(2): 295–310.
• Grubbs JB, Sessoms J, Wheeler DM, Volk F. The Cyber-Pornography Use Inventory: The development of a new assessment instrument. Sex Addict Compulsivity 2010; 17(2): 106–126.
• Grubbs JB, Wilt JA, Exline JJ, et al. Moral disapproval and perceived addiction to internet pornography: a longitudinal examination. Addiction 2018; 113(3): 496–506.
• Grubbs JB, Exline JJ, Pargament KI, et al. Transgression as addiction: religiosity and moral disapproval as predictors of perceived addiction to pornography. Arch Sex Behav 2015; 44(1): 125–136.
• Balon R, Briken P. Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder: Understanding, Assessment, and Treatment. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2021.
• Kafka MP. The development and evolution of the criteria for a newly proposed diagnosis for DSM-5: Hypersexual disorder. Sex Addict Compulsivity 2013; 20(1-2): 19–26.
• Karila L, Wéry A, Weinstein A, et al. Sexual addiction or hypersexual disorder: different terms for the same problem? A review of the literature. Curr Pharm Des 2014; 20(25): 4012–4020.
• Andreassen CS, Pallesen S, Griffiths MD, et al. The development and validation of the Bergen–Yale Sex Addiction Scale with a large national sample. Front Psychol 2018; 9: 144.
• Reid RC, Carpenter BN, Draper ED, Manning JC. Exploring psychopathology, personality traits, and marital distress among women married to hypersexual men. J Couple Relatsh Ther 2010; 9(3): 203–222.
• Spenhoff M, Kruger THC, Hartmann U, Kobs J. Hypersexual behavior in an online sample of males: associations with personal distress and functional impairment. J Sex Med 2013; 10(12): 2996–3005.
• Carnes P, Green B, Carnes S. The same yet different: refocusing the sexual addiction screening test (sast) to reflect orientation and gender. Sex Addict Compulsivity 2010; 17(1): 7–30.
• Coleman E, Miner M, Ohlerking F, Raymond N. Compulsive sexual behavior inventory: a preliminary study of reliability and validity. J Sex Marital Ther 2001; 27(4): 325–332.
• Delmonico DL, Bubenzer DL, West JD. Assessing sexual addiction with the sexual dependency inventory-revised. Sex Addict Compulsivity 1998; 5(3): 179–187.
• Raymond NC, Lloyd MD, Miner MH, Kim SW. Preliminary report on the development and validation of the Sexual Symptom Assessment Scale. Sex Addict Compulsivity 2007; 14(2): 119–129.
• Hook JN, Hook JP, Davis DE, et al. Measuring sexual addiction and compulsivity: a critical review of instruments. J Sex Marital Ther 2010; 36(3): 227–260.
• Kircaburun K, Ünübol H, Sayar GH, et al. Sex addiction in Turkey: A large-scale survey with a national community sample. Curr Psychol 2021; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01632-8.
• Bőthe B, Potenza MN, Griffiths MD, et al. The development of the Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder Scale (CSBD-19): An ICD-11 based screening measure across three languages. J Behav Addict 2020; 9(2): 247–258.
• Bőthe B, Kovács M, Tóth-Király I, et al. The psychometric properties of the Hypersexual Behavior Inventory using a large-scale nonclinical sample. J Sex Res 2019; 56(2): 180–190.
• Akın A, Çelik E. Cinsel Kompülsiyon Ölçeği’nin uyarlanması. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences 2015; 14(3): 617–629.
• Ballester-Arnal R, Gómez-Martínez S, Llario MD-G, Salmerón-Sánchez P. Sexual compulsivity scale: adaptation and validation in the Spanish population. J Sex Marital Ther 2013; 39(6): 526–540.
• Aktuğ B. Pornografi Kullanımının Etkisi Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kıbrıs: Yakın Doğu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2018.
• Duffy A, Dawson DL, das Nair R. Pornography addiction in adults: a systematic review of definitions and reported impact. J Sex Med 2016; 13(5): 760–777.
• Grubbs JB, Volk F, Exline JJ, Pargament KI. Internet pornography use: perceived addiction, psychological distress, and the validation of a brief measure. J Sex Marital Ther 2015; 41(1): 83–106.
• Merriam-Webster. Definition of cyber. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cyber (Accessed 01.03.2023).
• Emond B, West RL. Cyberpsychology: a human-interaction perspective based on cognitive modeling. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003; 6(5): 527–536.
• Lozano-Blasco R, Quilez-Robres A, Latorre-Cosculluela C. Sex, age and cyber-victimization: A meta-analysis. Comput Human Behav 2023; 139: 107491.
• Catone G, Senese VP, Pisano S, et al. The drawbacks of Information and Communication Technologies: Interplay and psychopathological risk of nomophobia and cyber-bullying, results from the bullying and youth mental health Naples study (BYMHNS). Comput Human Behav 2020; 113: 106496.
• March E. Psychopathy: Cybercrime and cyber abuse. In Marques PB, Paulino M, Alho L (editors). Psychopathy and Criminal Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press: 423–444.
• Kalaycı Ş. SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım, 2010.
• Preacher KJ, MacCallum RC. Exploratory factor analysis in behavior genetics research: factor recovery with small sample sizes. Behav Genet 2002; 32(2): 153–161.
• Tavşancil E. Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS Ile Veri Analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık, 2002: 126-138.
• Ergin DY. 1. Ölçeklerde geçerlik ve güvenirlik. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 1995; 7(7): 125–148.
• Balcı A. Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntem, Teknik ve İlkeler. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık, 2020.
• Bryman A, Cramer D. Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for Windows: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Routledge, 1997.
• Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler Için Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık, 2018; 001–214.
• Hovardaoğlu S, Sezgin N. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme Standartları. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları, 1998.
• Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods. Boston: PWS-Kent, 1998.
• Sharma S. Applied Multivariate Techniques. New York: Wiley, 1996: 445-509.
• Tinsley HEA, Tinsley DJ. Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol 1987; 34(4): 414–424.
• Cardoso J, Ramos C, Almeida T. Portuguese version of the Cyber Pornography Use Inventory-9: Psychometric properties and gender invariance. J Sex Marital Ther 2019; 45(7): 594–603.
• Hald GM. Gender differences in pornography consumption among young heterosexual Danish adults. Arch Sex Behav 2006; 35(5): 577–585.
• Carroll JS, Padilla-Walker LM, Nelson LJ, et al. Generation XXX: Pornography Acceptance and Use Among Emerging Adults. J Adolesc Res 2008; 23(1): 6–30.
• Eljawad MA, Se’eda H, Ghozy S et al. Pornography use prevalence and associated factors in Arab Countries: A multinational cross-sectional study of 15,027 individuals. J Sex Med 2021; 18(3): 539–548.
• Malki K, Rahm C, Öberg KG, Ueda P. Frequency of pornography use and sexual health outcomes in sweden: analysis of a National Probability Survey. J Sex Med 2021; 18(10): 1735–1751.
• Sallie SN, Ritou VJE, Bowden-Jones H, Voon V. Assessing online gaming and pornography consumption patterns during COVID-19 isolation using an online survey: Highlighting distinct avenues of problematic internet behavior. Addict Behav 2021; 123: 107044.
• Moynihan AB, Igou ER, van Tilburg WAP. Pornography consumption as existential escape from boredom. Pers Individ Dif 2022; 198: 111802.
• Bőthe B, Tóth-Király I, Griffiths MD, et al9+85. Are sexual functioning problems associated with frequent pornography use and/or problematic pornography use? Results from a large community survey including males and females. Addict Behav 2021; 112: 106603.
• Niazof D, Weizman A, Weinstein A. The contribution of ADHD and attachment difficulties to online pornography use among students. Compr Psychiatry 2019; 93: 56–60.