Bazı Amerikan Asma Anaçlarında Farklı Kireç Konsantrasyonlarında PGPR Uygulamalarının Etkileri

Abstract

Ülkemiz genel olarak kil ve kireç içerikleri yüksek, organik maddece düşük ve kısmen strüktürü bozuk topraklara sahiptir. Yaklaşık %20 kireç içeren bu topraklarda başta demir klorozu olmak üzere bitkilerde strese neden olan bazı problemler görülmektedir. Son yıllarda stresin biyolojik uygulamalar ile hafifletilebileceği belirlenmiştir. Bu amaçla kullanılan uygulamalardan birisi de bakterilerdir. PGPR’ların bitki gelişimine etkisi doğrudan ve dolaylı olmaktadır. Bu araştırma ile farklı kireç konsantrasyonlarında yetiştirilen 5BB, 1103P ve 41B Amerikan asma anaçlarında PGPR uygulamalarının etkilerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla toprak, torf ve perlit (1: 1: 1) içeren potlara dikilen çeliklere bakteri uygulaması yapılarak %0, %10, %25 ve %40 oranında kireç (CaCO₃) uygulanmıştır. Bitkilerde fiziksel (sürgün ağırlığı, sürgün uzunluğu, ortalama yaprak sayısı, yaprak alanı, zararlanma derecesi, köklenme oranı ve kök ağırlığı) ve biyokimyasal (membran zararlanma derecesi, klorofil, prolin, toplam fenolik madde ve mineral madde) analizler yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda incelenen özelliklerin kireç konsantrasyonlarından etkilendiği ve kireçten kaynaklanan zararlanma belirtilerinin genel olarak PGPR uygulamaları ile azaldığı tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

• Kireç
• PGPR
• asma
• prolin
• mineral madde

The Effects of PGPR Applications on Different Lime Levels on Some American Grapevine Rootstock

Abstract

Turkey has generally soiled with high clay and lime contents, low organic matter content and that partly poorly. Soils containing approximately 20% lime cause many problems as iron chlorosis and lead to plant stress. In recent years, it has been determined that a plant stress can be alleviated by providing biological approaches. One of the applications is bacteria. PGPR have direct and indirect influence on the plant development. In this study, it was aimed to determine the effects of PGPR applications on 5BB, 1103P and 41B in different lime (CaCO₃) levels. The rootstocks were placed to pots including soil: turf: perlite (1: 1: 1) and then PGPR were applied. CaCO₃ was applied to plant on 0%, 10%, 25% and 40% ratios. Physical (shoot weight, shoot length, average leaf number, leaf area, degree of injurity, ratio of rooting and root weight) and biochemical (degree of membrane injurity, content of chlorophyll, proline, total phenolic compound and mineral matter) analysis were carried out in the plants. As a conclusion, all criteria were affected by CaCO₃ concentrations and injurity symptoms result from CaCO₃ generally reduced with the PGPR treatment.

Keywords

• Lime
• PGPR
• grapevine
• proline
• mineral matter

References

1. Anonim, 2016-a. Food and Agriculture Organization FAO (http://faostat.fao.org) (Erişim: Haziran 2017).
2. Anonim, 2016-b. TÜİK Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (http://www.tuik.gov.tr) (Erişim: Haziran 2017).
3. Yağmur, Y., 2008. Farklı Asma (Vitis vinifera L.) Çeşitlerinin Kuraklık Stresine Karşı Bazı Fizyolojik ve Biyokimyasal Tolerans Parametrelerinin Araştırılması (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Ege Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Biyoloji Anabilim Dalı, 124s.
4. Sivritepe, N., 2014. Sofralık Üzüm Endüstrisine Küresel Bakış. Bahçe Haber Bülteni, 2: 4-12.
5. Tırpancı, S., 2012. Bazı Sofralık Üzüm Çeşidi Kalemlerinin Farklı Süre ve Sıcaklıklarda Depolanmasının Aşı Materyal Kalitesi Üzerine Etkileri (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bahçe Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, Çanakkale, 52s.
6. Schinas, S. and D.L. Rowell, 1977. Lime Induced Chlorosis. European Journal of Soil Science 28: 351-368.
7. Çelik, S., 1998. Bağcılık (Ampeloloji) Cilt: 1. Anadolu Matbaa Ambalaj San ve Tic. Ltd. Şti. Baskısı, Tekirdağ. 426 s.
8. Eyüpoğlu, F., 1999. Türkiye Topraklarının Verimlilik Durumu. Toprak ve Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları 220: 122.

9. Gretzmacher, R., 1997. Influence of pH Value, Iron Concentration and Root Injury on Growth and Mineral Content of Vine Cuttings in Nutritive Broth. Mitt Klosterneuburg 27: 207-213.
10. Eyüpoğlu, F., Kurucu, N., Talaz, S., 1996. Türkiye Topraklarının Bitkiye Yarayışlı Bazı Mikro Element (Fe, Zn, Mn) Bakımından Genel Durumu. Toprak Gübre Araştırma Enstitüsü yayınları 217: 67.
11. Sivan, A. and I. Chet, 1992. Microbial Control of Plant Diseases. In: R. Mitchell Editor, Environmental Microbiology 335-354.
12. Eşitken, A., H. Karlıdağ, S. Ercişli and F. Sahin, 2002. Effect of Foliar Application of Bacillus Subtilis Osu 142 on the Yield, Growth and control of Shot-Hole Disease (Corneum blight) of Apricot. Gartenbauw 67: 139-142.
13. Dobbelaere, S., J. Vanderleyden and Y. Okon, 2003. Plant Growth Promoting Effects of Diazotrophs in the Rhizosphere. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 22: 107-149.
14. Arshad, M. and W.T. Frankenberger, 1998. Plant Growth Regulating Substances in the Rhizosphere: Microbial Production and Functions. Advances in Agronomy 62: 146-151.
15. Christiansen-Weneger, C., 1992. N2-fixation by ammonium-excreting Azospirillum brasilense in auxin-induced tumours of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Biology and Fertility of Soils 12: 85-100.
16. Bashan, Y. and H. Levanony, 1991. Alterations in Membrane Potential and in Proton Efflux in Plant Roots Induced by Azospirillum brasilense. Plant and Soil 137: 99-103.
17. Çakmakçı, R., F. Kantar and Ö.F. Algur, 1999. Sugar Beet and Barley Yield in Relation to Bacillus polymxa and Bacillus megaterium var. Phosphaticum inoculation. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 162: 437-442.
18. Şahin, F., R. Çakmakçı and F. Kantar, 2004. Sugar Beet and Barley Yields in Relation to Inoculation with N2-Fixing and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria. Plant and Soil, 265: 123-129.
19. Glick, B.R., D.M. Penrose and J. Li, 1998. A Model for the Lowering of Plant Ethylene Concentrations by Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria. Journal of Theoretical Biology 190: 63-68.
20. Safronova, V.I., V.V. Stepanok, G.L. Engqvist, Y.V. Alekseyev and A.A. Belimov, 2006. Root-Associated Bacteria Containing 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylate Deaminase Improve Growth and Nutrient Uptake by Pea Genotypes Cultivated in Cadmium Supplemented Soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 42: 267-272.
21. Çelik, H., 1996. Bağcılıkta Anaç Kullanımı ve Yetiştiricilikteki Önemi. Anadolu Dergisi, Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Yayınları, 2(6): 127-148.
22. Anonim, 1997. Descriptors for Grapevine (Vitis ssp.). International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome pp: 58.
23. Fan, S. and T.J., Blake, 1994. Abscisic Acid Induced Electrolyte Leakage in Woody Species with Contrasting Ecological Requirements. Plant Physiology 90: 414-419.
24. Bates, L., R.P. Waldren and I.D. Teare, 1973. Rapid Determination of Free Proline for Water-Stress Studies. Plant and Soil 39: 205-207.
25. Kiselev, K.V., A.S. Dubrovina, M.V. Veselova, V.P. Bulgakov, S.A. Fedoreyev, Y.N. Zhuravlev, 2007. The Rol-B Gene-Induced over Production of Resveratrol in Vitis amurensis Transformed Cells. Journal of Biotechnology 128: 681-692.
26. Singleton, V.L. and J.R., Rossi, 1965. Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic Phosphotungstic Acid. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 16: 144-158.
27. Bergmann, W., 1992. Nutritional disorders of plants. Development, Visual and Analytical Diagnosis. Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena, Stuttgart.
28. Özdemir, G., 2005. Farklı Kireç İçerikli Topraklarda Yetiştirilen Asma Genotiplerinde Değişik Uygulamaların Fe Alımı Üzerine Etkilerinin Morfolojik ve Fizyolojik Yönden İncelenmesi (Doktora Tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bahçe Bitkileri Anabilim Dalı, 206s.
29. Arruda, L., A. Beneduzi, A. Martins, B. Lisboa, C. Lopes, F. Bertolo, L.M.P. Passaglia, L.K. Vargas, 2013. Screening of rhizobacteria Isolated from Maize (Zea mays L.) in Rio Grande do Sul State (South Brazil) and Analysis of Their Potential to Improve Plant Growth. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 63: 15-22.
30. Barnawal, D., N. Bharti, D. Maji, C. S. Chanotiya and A. Kalra, 2014. ACC Deaminase-Containing Arthrobacter Protophormiae Induces NaCl Stress Tolerance Through Reduced ACC Oxidase Activity and Ethylene Production Resulting in Improved Nodulation and Mycorrhization in Pisum sativum. Journal of Plant Physiology 171: 884-894.
31. Martínez, R., A. Espejo, M. Sierra, I. Ortiz-Bernad, D. Correa, E. Bedmar, M. López-Juradoa and J.M. Porres, 2015. Co-Inoculation of Halomonas maura and Ensifer melilotito Improve Alfalfa Yield in Saline Soils. Applied Soil Ecology 87: 81-86.
32. Tıpırdamaz, R. and S. Ellialtıoğlu, 1997. Some Physiological and Biochemical Changes in Solanum melongena L. Genotypes Grown under Salt Conditions. First Balkan Botanical Congress, 19-22 September 1997. Thessaloniki, Greece. 377-380.
33. Dhanda, S., S. Sethi and G.S. Sethi, 2002. Tolerance to Drought Stress among Selected Indian Wheat Cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science 139: 319-326.
34. Mahmoodi, S., İ. Dauri, Ş.G. Al-Solaimani, S. Ahmadi, M.H. Madkour, M. Yasir, H. Hirt, S. Ali and Z. Ali, 2016. Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Silicon Synergistically Enhance Salinity Tolerance of Mung Bean. Plant Science 7(876): 1-14.
35. Bavaresco, L., M. Fregoni and C. Fogher, 1995. Effect of some Biological Methods to Improve Fe-Efficiency in Grafted Grapevine. J. Abadia (Ed.). Iron Nutrition in Soils and Plants, Kluwer Academic Publishers pp: 83-89.
36. Bavaresco, L., C. Fogher, V.D. Jolley and V. Romheld, 1996. Effect of Root Infection with Pseudomonas fluorescens and Glomus mosseae on Severity of Lime-induced Chlorosis in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinot Blanc. Journal of Plant Nutrition 19(8-9): 1319-1329.
37. Chen, T.H.H. and N. Murata, 2002. Enhancement of Tolerance of Abiotic Stress by Metabolic Engineering of Betaines and Other Compatible Solutes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 5: 250-257.
38. Yancey, P.H., M.E. Clark, S.C. Hand, R.D. Bowlus, G.N. Somero, 1982. Living with Water Stress: Evolution of Osmolyte Systems. Science 217: 1214-1222.
39. Mansour M.M.F., 1998. Protection of Plasma Membrane of Onion Epidermal Cells by glycinebetaine and Proline against NaCl stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 36: 767-772.
40. Ali, M.H., M.H. Siddiqui, M.H. Al-wahibi, M.O. Basalah, A.M. Sakran and M. El-Zaidy, 2013. Effect of Proline and Abscisic Acid on Growth and Physiological Performance of Faba Bean under Water Stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany 45(3): 933-940.
41. Kumari, S., A. Vaishnav, S. Jain, A. Varma, D.K. Choudhary, 2015. Bacterial-Mediated Induction of Systemic Tolerance to Salinity with Expression of Stress Alleviating Enzymes in Soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 34: 558-573.
42. Agami, R.A., R.A. Medani, I.A. Abd El-Mola and R.S. Taha, 2016. Exogenous Application with Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) or Proline Induces Stress Tolerance in Basil Plants (Ocimum basilicum L.) Exposed to Water Stress. International Journal of Environmental & Agriculture Research 5(2).
43. Singh, U.P, B.K. Sarma and D.P. Singh, 2003. Effect of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and Culture Filtrate of Sclerotium rolfsii on Phenolic and Salicylic Acid Contents in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Current Microbiology 46: 131-140.
44. Lavania, M., P.S. Chauhan, S.V.S. Chauhan, H.B. Singh and C.S. Nautiyal, 2006. Induction of Plant Defense Enzymes and Phenolics by Treatment with Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Serratia marcescens NBRI1213. Current Microbiology 52: 363-368.
45. Pešaković, M., S. Milenković, D. Đukić, L. Mandić, Ž. Karaklajić-Stajić, J. Tomić and N. Miletić, 2016. Phenolic Composition and Antioxidant Capacity of Integrated and Conventionally Grown Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). Horticultural Science 43(1): 17-24.