BÖTE Lisans Programının Öğretmen ve Akademisyen Görüşlerine Göre İncelenmesi

Year 2023, , 1 - 25, 30.06.2023

Eyup Yünkül , Ahmet Melih Güneş

https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1294187

Abstract

Bu çalışma, öğretmen ve akademisyenlerin görüşleri doğrultusunda BÖTE lisans programının etkililiğini ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada nitel araştırma desenlerinden fenomenoloji deseni kullanılmıştır. Çalışma grubu çok aşamalı örnekleme yoluyla seçilen 14 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Katılımcıların 8'i BÖTE lisans programından mezun öğretmenler, 6'sı ise BÖTE programında görev yapan akademisyenlerdir. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada elde edilen veriler içerik analizi tekniği kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada hem öğretmenler hem de akademisyenler programın uygulanması sırasında bilgisayar sınıfı sorunlarına, ders saatlerinin yetersizliğine ve uygulamalı derslerin eksikliğine değinmişlerdir. Programdaki derslerin dağılımına ilişkin olarak öğretmenler güncel yazılımlar ve alan derslerine yönelik eğitimlere ağırlık verilmesi gerektiğini; akademisyenler ise alan seçmeli derslerinin sayısının ve haftalık saatlerinin artırılması gerektiğini belirtmişlerdir.

Keywords

BÖTE programı, öğretmen, akademisyen

Supporting Institution

Balıkesir Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi

Project Number

2022/045

Investigation of CEIT Undergraduate Program According to Teachers’ and Academicians’ Views

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the effectiveness of the CEIT undergraduate program in line with the views of teachers and academicians. Phenomenology design, one of the qualitative research designs, was used in the study. The study group consisted of 14 individuals selected via multistage sampling. Of the participants, 8 were teachers who graduated from CEIT undergraduate program and 6 were academicians working in the CEIT program. In the study, a semi-structured interview form developed by the researcher was used as the data collection tool. The data obtained in the study were analyzed using the content analysis technique. In the study, both teachers and academics mentioned the computer class problems, insufficient class hours and lack of applied courses during the implementation of the program Regarding the distribution of the courses in the program, teachers stated that training on current software and field courses should be emphasized; academics stated that the number of field elective courses and the weekly hours of field elective courses should be increased.

Keywords

CEIT program, teacher, academician

Project Number

2022/045

References

• Akgün, Ö. E., Topal, M., & Kıyıcı, M. (2019). Investigation of the effectiveness of a CEIT undergraduate program on students' competencies. Journal of Higher Education (Turkey), 10(1), 12-26. https://doi.org/10.2399/yod.19.010
• Aslan, M., & Sağlam, M. (2018). Evaluation of teaching practice course according to opinions of student teachers. H. U. Journal of Education, 33(1),144-162. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2017030313
• Aydın, F., & Akgün, Ö. E. (2014). Problems of senior teacher students in on-site school training. Sakarya University Journal of Education Faculty, 28, 1-14. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/115885
• Altun, E., & Ateş, A. (2008). The problems and future concerns of computer and instructional technologies preservice teachers. Elementary Education Online, 7(3), 680-692. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/90928
• Bakar-Çörez, A., & Geçer, A. K. (2020). Academicians’ views of the department of computer education and instructional technologies. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(1), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3325
• Bardakcı, S., Kılıçer, K., & Özeke, V. (2017). A projection from computer education & instructional technologies departments in Turkey. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 7(2), 123-148. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.286627
• Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education. Allyn and Bacon.
• Gökmen, Ö. F. (2015). The computer education and instructional technology teacher candidates’ views about teaching practice. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 11(1), 96-115. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/161072
• Gülcü, A., Aydın, S., & Aydın, Ş. (2013). Evaluation of the new teaching programme developed under the name of svet in informatics technologies lesson in the vocational high schools via the teachers’ point of view. The Black Sea Journal of Social Sciences, 5(8), 73-92. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/149897
• Hamutoğlu, N. B., Sezen-Gültekin, G., & Kıyıcı, M. (2022). In-depth evaluation of the CEIT profession profile within the scope of managerial education policies in the COVID-19 pandemic process: The case of Sakarya University. Manisa Celal Bayar University Journal of Social Sciences, 20(1), 223-242. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1032987
• Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. State University of New York Press.
• Kayak, S. (2019). Examination of the new CEIT undergraduate major area courses in terms of teaching profession efficiency. 1st International Science, Education, Art & Technology Symposium UBEST 2019, İzmir, Turkey.
• Kearney, W. S., & Garfield, T. (2019). Student readiness to learn and teacher effectiveness: Two key factors in middle grades mathematics achievement. RMLE Online, 42(5), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2019.1607138
• Köse, E., & Caner, H. N. (2022). Content analysis of studies published between the years 2015 and 2020 on teaching practice in Turkey. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 23(1), 1221-1267. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1731333
• Kurtoğlu-Erden, M., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2015). Examination of department of computer education and instructional technology students’ perception towards their department's future. Eğitim Teknolojileri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 1-20. https://www.idealonline.com.tr/IdealOnline/pdfViewer/index.xhtml?uId=6135&ioM=Paper&preview=true&isViewer=true#pagemode=bookmarks
• Meşe, C., Özer, S., Dindar, M., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2014). “Interest" and the domains of interest in the curricula of CEIT departments. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10(1), 143-170. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/63377
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Sage.
• Muskin, J. A. (2015). Student learning assessment and the curriculum: Issues and implications for policy, design and implementation. UNESCO International Bureau of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235489
• Odabaşı, H. F., Kurt, A. A., Haseski, H. İ., Mısırlı, Ö., Ersoy, M., Karakoyun, F., & Günüç, S. (2011). Field factor in teaching practicum: A sample from CEIT. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 1(1), 24-40. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/71831
• Orhan, E. E. (2017). What do teacher candidates in turkey think about their teacher education? A qualitative study. Education and Science, 42(189), 197-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2017.4661
• Osman, E., & Kurt, A. A. (2017). Investigation of CEIT students’ attitudes towards programming. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 1(41), 314-325. https://doi.org/10.21764/efd.64721
• Önal, N. (2018). What do information technology teacher candidates think about their professional education? The Journal of Turkish Social Research, 22(1), 299-322. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/453727
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri [Qualitative research & evaluation methods] (Trans. Bütün, M., & Demir, B. S.). PegemA Yayınları.
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Semerci, Ç. (2012). The evaluation of students on ideas about the department of computer education and instructional technology (CEIT) according to Rasch measurement model. NWSA-Education Sciences, 7(2), 777-784. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/185460
• Süme, G., & Aslan, H. (2022). Problems experienced by information technology teachers and solution suggestions. International Anatolian Journal of Social Sciences, 6(4), 1285-1298. https://doi.org/10.47525/ulasbid.1186681
• Şahin, M., Keskin, S., & Yurdugül, H. (2018). Determination of the learning priorities of students in department of CEIT based on their career preferences using AHP. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 7(3), 745-764. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.372453
• Van Manen, M. (2016). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Routledge.
• Yakar, Z. Y., Uzun E., & Tekerek, B. (2021). Problems encountered within the scope of teaching practice course and solution suggestions. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Journal of Social Sciences, 18(1), 220-245. https://doi.org/10.33437/ksusbd.655590
• Yaşar, Ç. (2019). An investigation of the effect of social media platforms on ICT teacher candidate's career trends & instructional activities [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Balıkesir University.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Seçkin.
• Yükseltürk, E., & Altıok, S. (2015). Pre-service information technologies teachers' views on computer programming teaching. Amasya Education Journal, 4(1), 50-65. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/19646