Online Distance Graduate Education in Turkey Through the Lenses of Administrators

Year 2019, , 1216 - 1238, 31.12.2019

Serkan İzmirli , Özden Şahin İzmirli , Serkan Çankaya

https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.643361

Cited By: 4

Abstract

This study investigates the opinions of people who
have administrative experiences in distance education application and research
centers in universities in Turkey about graduate distance education programs
(master’s and doctoral degree). It was examined that why the number of master’s
degree distance education programs are so few and why universities don’t open
doctoral degree distance education programs. In this qualitative study, data
were collected by an online questionnaire with open ended questions.
Participants of the study were 11 academic members who have administrative
experiences in distance education. Qualitative date was analyzed with content
analysis method. According to the findings of the study, participants indicate
that regulations are insufficient and this is one of the reasons for limited
number of online distance education programs. In addition, they stated that
there is a negative perception towards distance education among academics. Most
of them think that distance education graduate programs should be offered

Keywords

distance education, online education, online distance education, online master program, online PhD program

Yöneticilerin Gözünden Türkiye’de Çevrimiçi Uzaktan Lisansüstü Eğitim

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’deki
çevrimiçi uzaktan lisansüstü eğitim (YL ve DR) hakkında yöneticilik deneyimi
olan uzmanların görüşleri incelenmiştir. Çalışmada Türkiye’de uzaktan tezli
YL’nin neden yaygın olmadığı ve DR programlarının neden bulunmadığı
sorgulanmıştır. Nitel olarak desenlenen araştırmada veriler, açık uçlu soru
formu ile çevrimiçi olarak toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın katılımcılarını uzaktan
öğretimde yöneticilik deneyimi olan 12 öğretim elemanı oluşturmuştur.
Araştırmadan elde edilen nitel veriler içerik analizi yöntemi ile analiz
edilmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına göre, uzaktan öğretim yöneticileri,
Türkiye’de uzaktan tezli YL’nin yaygın olmaması ve DR’nin olmamasının nedenleri
arasında mevzuatın olmaması, uzaktan eğitime karşı negatif algı gibi çeşitli
sorunları ifade etmişlerdir. Araştırmaya katılan yöneticilerin büyük bir
çoğunluğu Türkiye’de tezli YL ve DR’nin uzaktan verilebileceğini ifade
etmişlerdir.

Keywords

uzaktan eğitim, çevrimiçi eğitim, çevrimiçi uzaktan eğitim, çevrimiçi yüksek lisans programı, çevrimiçi doktora programı

References

• Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi (2018). İnternet ve Bilişim Teknolojileri Yönetimi (Tezli). http://ibty.aku.edu.tr/ adresinden 01.10.2018 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on Demand Online Education in the United States, 2009. Babson Survey Research Group.
• Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. (2018). Anabilim dalları. https://www.anadolu.edu.tr/akademik/enstituler/580/egitim-bilimleri-enstitusu/bolumler adresinden 01.10.2018 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü. (2018). Uzaktan öğretim programları. http://www.sosbilens.anadolu.edu.tr/tr/uzaktan-egitim adresinden 01.10.2018 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Muth, R. (2012). Use of Learner-Centered Instructional Strategies in Higher Education: Doctoral Student Assessments. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(2).
• Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2011). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Columbaro, N. L. (2009). e-Mentoring Possibilities for Online Doctoral Students: A Literature Review. Adult Learning, 20(3–4), 9–15.
• de Beer, M., & Mason, R. B. (2009). Using a blended approach to facilitate postgraduate supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(2), 213–226.
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Emilsson, U. M., & Johnsson, E. (2007). Supervision of supervisors: on developing supervision in postgraduate education. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(2), 163–179.
• Fariza, N., Nor, M., Hamat, A., & Embi, M. A. (2012). Patterns of discourse in online interaction : seeking evidence of the collaborative learning process, 8221.
• Fedynich, L., Bradley, K. S., & Bradley, J. (2015). Graduate students ’ perceptions of online learning, 27, 1–13.
• Iriberri, A., & Leroy, G. (2009). A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(2).
• İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi (2018). İşletme Yüksek Lisans Programı (Uzaktan Eğitim). https://sbe.iku.edu.tr/tr/programlar/isletme-yuksek-lisans-programi-uzaktan-egitim adresinden 04.08.2018 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Izmirli, S. & Kirmaci, O. (2017). Developing online teaching competencies of educators in Turkey. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(22), 38-52.
• Kumar, S., & Dawson, K. (2012). Theory to Practice: Implementation and Initial Impact of an Online Doctoral Program. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 15(1), 1–13. Retrieved from https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring151/kumar_dawson.html
• Kumar, S., Dawson, K., Black, E. W., Cavanaugh, C., & Sessums, C. D. (2011). Applying the Community of Inquiry framework to an online professional practice doctoral program. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(6), 126–142.
• Kumar, S., Johnson, M., & Hardemon, T. (2013). Dissertations at a Distance: Students’ Perceptions of Online Mentoring in a Doctoral Program. Journal of Distance Education, 27(1).
• Mayne, L. A., & Wu, Q. (2011). Creating and Measuring Social Presence in Online Graduate Nursing Courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 110–114.
• McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63–74.
• Merriam, S. B., ve Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
• Park, C. (2005). New variant PhD: The changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 189–207.
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Purdue Online Learning (2018). Master’s and PhD programs. https://digitaleducation.purdue.edu/graduate-programs/masters-phd.html adresinden 04.08.2018 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Rodwell, J., & Neumann, R. (2008). Predictors of timely doctoral student completions by type of attendance: The utility of a pragmatic approach. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30(1), 65–76.
• Roumell, E. A. L., & Bolliger, D. U. (2017). Experiences of Faculty With Doctoral Student Supervision in Programs Delivered via Distance. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 82–93.
• Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2012). Socialization in online doctorates: Academic socialization in an online residency program. Journal of Distance Education, 26(1).
• Sheingold, B. H., Hahn, J. A., & Hofmeyer, A. (2013). Hiding In Plain Sight: Building Community Social Capital In Distance Education Graduate Programs. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 6(2), 265.
• St. George, E. (2006). Positioning higher education for the knowledge based economy. Higher Education, 52(4), 589–610.
• Taylor, S., & Beasley, N. (2005). A handbook for doctoral supervisors. Higher Education Research & Development (Vol. 38). London and New York: Routledge.
• Yükseköğretim Kurulu. (2015). Yükseköğretim kurumlarında uzaktan öğretime ilişkin usul ve esaslar. http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10279/17374/Uzaktan_ogretime_%C4%B0liskin_Usul_ve_Esaslar_19.06.2014+_GK_15.04.2015_YK_%28Maliye_+Goruslu%29.pdf/5b6dae07-ff5c-4c40-8cf3-3fc7e62cac7f adresinden 04.08.2018 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Walker, M., & Thomson, P. (2010). The Routledge Doctoral Supervisor’s Companion. The Routledge Doctoral Supervisor’s Companion. London: Routledge.