Ortaöğretim Matematik Öğretmenlerinin Öğretim Materyalleri Hakkindaki Anlayişlari Ve Ürettikleri Materyaller
Abstract
Araştırmanın amacı; matematik öğretmenlerinin öğretim tasarımı sürecinde materyal kullanımlarının incelenmesidir. Eylem araştırmasının nitel paradigmasıyla gerçekleştirilen araştırma, Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı bünyesinde görev yapmakta olan sekiz öğretmenin katıldığı bir eğitim sürecinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Katılımcılar ile birlikte toplam onbir oturum gerçekleştirilmiş olup veriler yarı-yapılandırılmış görüşmeler, yazılı dokümanlar, video kayıtları ve odak grup görüşmeleri ile toplanmıştır. Veriler içerik analizi ve sürekli karşılaştırmalı analiz yoluyla analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonucunda; katılımcıların eğitim öncesi öğretim tasarımlarında yer verdikleri materyallerin öğretmen kullanımına açık, öğrencinin yalnızca izleyebildiği yapıda olduğu görülürken; eğitim sonrasında öğrencinin yaparak-yaşayarak deneyimleyebileceği, öğretmenin sadece rehber olduğu materyallere yer verdikleri görülmektedir.
Keywords
öğretmen eğitimi öğretim tasarımı manipülatif sanal materyal. öğretmen eğitimi, öğretim tasarımı, manipülatif, sanal materyal.
References
- Abrami, P. 2001. Improving judgements about teaching effectiveness using teacher rating forms. New Directions for Instutional Research, 109(1), 59-87.
- Bellinio, J. (2012). Multi-Sensory Manipulatives in Mathematics: Linking the Abstract to the Concrete. Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute.
- Boggan, M., Harper, S, & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using manipulatives to teach elementary mathematics. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3(1), 1-6.
- Bozkurt, A., &Akalın, S. (2010). Matematik öğretiminde materyal geliştirmenin ve kullanımının yeri, önemi ve bu konuda öğretmenin rolü [The place and importance of material development and usage in mathematics teaching and the role of teacher in this subject]. Dumlupınar University The Journal of Education Faculty, 27(1), 556-558.
- Cope, L. (2015). Math manipulatives: Making the abstract tangible. Delta Journal of Education, 5(1), 10-19.
- Cummings, T., & Worley, C. (1997). Organization development and change. Cincinnati: South-Western College.
- Dennis, R. (2011). The effects of the use of manipulatives on the comprehension of math concepts among fifth-grade students.
- Domino, J. (2010). The effects of physical manipulatives on achievement mathematics in grades K-6: a meta-analysis. Doctoral Thesis, State University of New York: Departmente of Learning anda Instruction Faculty of the Graduate School of the University Buffalo, New York.
- Haara, F. (2010). Unveiling teachers’ reasons for choosing practical activities in mathematics teaching. Doctoral Thesis, University of Bergen, Norway.
- Hartshorn, R., & Boren, S. (1990). Experiential learning of mathematics: Using manipulatives. ERIC Publications, ERIC Digests.
- Huentick, L., & Munshin, S. (2004). Teaching mathematics for the 21st century methods and activities for grades 6-12. USA: Pearson and Merril Prentice.
- Holmes, A. (2013). Effects of manipulative use on PK-12 mathematics achievement: A meta-analysis. Poster presented at the meeting of Society for Research in Educational Effectiveness, Washington, DC.
- İnan, C. (2013). Influence of the Constructivist Learning Approach on Students' Levels of Learning Trigonometry and on Their Attitudes towards Mathematics. Hacettepe University Journal of Eduction Faculty, 28 (3), 219-234. http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/219-published.pdf Kamii, C, Lewis, B., & Kirkland, L. (2001). Manipulatives: When are they useful? Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 20, 21-31.
- Kelly, Ce. (2006). Using manipulatives in mathematical problem solving: A performance-based analysis. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 13(2), 184.
- Laski, E., Jor’dan, J., Daoust, C., & Murray, A. (2015). What makes mathematics manipulatives effective? Lessons from cognitive science and montessori education. SAGE Open, 1-8. Marshall, L., & Swan, P. (2005). Developing mathematical thinking with the assistance of manipulatives. The Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project.
- McClung, L. (1998). A study on the use of manipulatives and their effect on student achievement in a high school algebra class. Salem-Teikyo University.
- McIntosh, G. (2012). Testing instrumentation validity for measuring teachers' attitudes toward manipulative use in the elementary classroom. University of Pittsburgh.
- McNeil, N., & Uttal, D. (2009). Rethinking the Use of Concrete Materials in Learning: Perspectives From Development and Education. Child Development Perspectives, 3(3), 137-139.
- The Ministry of National Education. (2008). Öğretmen yeterlilikleri [Teacher qualifications]. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.
- Moyer, P. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipülatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 175-197.
- Munger, D. (2007). Science blogs. Children learn and retain math better using manipülatives.
- Moyer, P., Bolyard, J., & Spikell, M. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives? Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(6), 372-377.
- Ojose, B., & Sexton, L. (2009). The effect of manipulative materials on mathematics achievement of first grade students. The Mathematics Educator, 12(1), 3-14.
- Patton, M. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Perry, B., & Howard, P. (1994). Manipulatives: constraints on ınstruction.
- Shaw, J. (2016, 11 17). Manipulatives enhace the learning of mathematics. Education Place.
- Thompson, P. (1992). Notations, conventions, and constraints: Contributions to effective uses of concrete materials in elementary mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 123-147.
- Thompson, P.. (1994). Concrete materials and teaching for mathematical understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 41(9), 556-558.
- White, K. (2012). The effect of an instructional model utilizing hands-on learning and manipulatives on math achievement of middle school students in Georgia. Lynchburg, Virginia: Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA.
- Yalın, H. (2015). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme [Instructional technologies and material development]. Ankara: Nobel.
- Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin.
Abstract
The study aimed to examine mathematics teachers’ materials usage in instructional design and was carried out via qualitative paradigm of action research with eight teachers working at the Ministry of National Education. Eleven sessions were held in total and data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, written documents, video recordings and focus group interviews. The data were analyzed via content analysis and constant comparative analysis. The results revealed while manipulatives in pre-education could be only observed by students; in post-education they were experienced by students, with teacher acting as a guide.
Keywords
teacher training instructional design manipulative virtual material öğretmen eğitimi öğretim tasarımı manipülatif sanal materyal.
References
- Abrami, P. 2001. Improving judgements about teaching effectiveness using teacher rating forms. New Directions for Instutional Research, 109(1), 59-87.
- Bellinio, J. (2012). Multi-Sensory Manipulatives in Mathematics: Linking the Abstract to the Concrete. Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute.
- Boggan, M., Harper, S, & Whitmire, A. (2010). Using manipulatives to teach elementary mathematics. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 3(1), 1-6.
- Bozkurt, A., &Akalın, S. (2010). Matematik öğretiminde materyal geliştirmenin ve kullanımının yeri, önemi ve bu konuda öğretmenin rolü [The place and importance of material development and usage in mathematics teaching and the role of teacher in this subject]. Dumlupınar University The Journal of Education Faculty, 27(1), 556-558.
- Cope, L. (2015). Math manipulatives: Making the abstract tangible. Delta Journal of Education, 5(1), 10-19.
- Cummings, T., & Worley, C. (1997). Organization development and change. Cincinnati: South-Western College.
- Dennis, R. (2011). The effects of the use of manipulatives on the comprehension of math concepts among fifth-grade students.
- Domino, J. (2010). The effects of physical manipulatives on achievement mathematics in grades K-6: a meta-analysis. Doctoral Thesis, State University of New York: Departmente of Learning anda Instruction Faculty of the Graduate School of the University Buffalo, New York.
- Haara, F. (2010). Unveiling teachers’ reasons for choosing practical activities in mathematics teaching. Doctoral Thesis, University of Bergen, Norway.
- Hartshorn, R., & Boren, S. (1990). Experiential learning of mathematics: Using manipulatives. ERIC Publications, ERIC Digests.
- Huentick, L., & Munshin, S. (2004). Teaching mathematics for the 21st century methods and activities for grades 6-12. USA: Pearson and Merril Prentice.
- Holmes, A. (2013). Effects of manipulative use on PK-12 mathematics achievement: A meta-analysis. Poster presented at the meeting of Society for Research in Educational Effectiveness, Washington, DC.
- İnan, C. (2013). Influence of the Constructivist Learning Approach on Students' Levels of Learning Trigonometry and on Their Attitudes towards Mathematics. Hacettepe University Journal of Eduction Faculty, 28 (3), 219-234. http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/219-published.pdf Kamii, C, Lewis, B., & Kirkland, L. (2001). Manipulatives: When are they useful? Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 20, 21-31.
- Kelly, Ce. (2006). Using manipulatives in mathematical problem solving: A performance-based analysis. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 13(2), 184.
- Laski, E., Jor’dan, J., Daoust, C., & Murray, A. (2015). What makes mathematics manipulatives effective? Lessons from cognitive science and montessori education. SAGE Open, 1-8. Marshall, L., & Swan, P. (2005). Developing mathematical thinking with the assistance of manipulatives. The Mathematics Education into the 21st Century Project.
- McClung, L. (1998). A study on the use of manipulatives and their effect on student achievement in a high school algebra class. Salem-Teikyo University.
- McIntosh, G. (2012). Testing instrumentation validity for measuring teachers' attitudes toward manipulative use in the elementary classroom. University of Pittsburgh.
- McNeil, N., & Uttal, D. (2009). Rethinking the Use of Concrete Materials in Learning: Perspectives From Development and Education. Child Development Perspectives, 3(3), 137-139.
- The Ministry of National Education. (2008). Öğretmen yeterlilikleri [Teacher qualifications]. Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.
- Moyer, P. (2001). Are we having fun yet? How teachers use manipülatives to teach mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 175-197.
- Munger, D. (2007). Science blogs. Children learn and retain math better using manipülatives.
- Moyer, P., Bolyard, J., & Spikell, M. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives? Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(6), 372-377.
- Ojose, B., & Sexton, L. (2009). The effect of manipulative materials on mathematics achievement of first grade students. The Mathematics Educator, 12(1), 3-14.
- Patton, M. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Perry, B., & Howard, P. (1994). Manipulatives: constraints on ınstruction.
- Shaw, J. (2016, 11 17). Manipulatives enhace the learning of mathematics. Education Place.
- Thompson, P. (1992). Notations, conventions, and constraints: Contributions to effective uses of concrete materials in elementary mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 123-147.
- Thompson, P.. (1994). Concrete materials and teaching for mathematical understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 41(9), 556-558.
- White, K. (2012). The effect of an instructional model utilizing hands-on learning and manipulatives on math achievement of middle school students in Georgia. Lynchburg, Virginia: Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA.
- Yalın, H. (2015). Öğretim teknolojileri ve materyal geliştirme [Instructional technologies and material development]. Ankara: Nobel.
- Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin.
Details
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Makaleler |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | December 31, 2022 |
| Submission Date | June 27, 2022 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2022 Volume: 16 Issue: 2 |
