THE GLOBAL JUSTICE DREAM RELATED TO INTERNATIONAL LAW

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 3, 229 - 243, 15.09.2017

Umut Kedikli

Öz

It is understood that peace and security in the international community are threatened at all times, and therefore reaching global peace is a myth. However, effective application of international law rules and international legitimacy in the actions of international organizations and states are important to ensure a non-conflicted environment in international relations. In international law, in a society composed of states that are the creators of the rules, the fact that a state is not bound by the rules that it puts and the will to apply these rules causes the function of the law to be questioned. The law must have a certain impulse against its creator so that global justice can be talked about. In this study, international political attenuating policies of the governments of international states and especially of the strong states of the international community are put forward, and the question is how to find a reliable, democratic and just form of the insecure international environment which is the result of these policies. By way of example, international law-abusing practices will be exemplified, and in the context of these examples, opinions and concrete practices on the establishment and strengthening of global justice in the theoretical-practical level will be explained.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Global Justice, International Obligations, Use of Force, United Nations

Kaynakça

• Alakel, Murat ve Yıldırım, Ahmet, Safa (2014). “11 Eylül Sonrası ABD’nin Irak İşgali Sürecinde Hegemonya-Emperyalizm Tartışmalarına Eleştirel Bir Bakış,” Yalova Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(8): 135-165.
• Başeren, Sertaç H. (2003). Uluslararası Hukukta Devletlerin Münferiden Kuvvet Kullanmalarının Sınırları, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.
• Cosnard, Michel (2008). “Sovereign Equality- ‘the Wimbledon Sails on’”, United States, Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law, Eds. M. Byers and G. Nolte. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
• Denk, Erdem (2004). “Güle Güle Uluslararası Hukuk Cehenneme Kadar Yolun Var,” Tartışma Metinleri, 74:1-30.
• Denk, Erdem (2001). “Uluslararası Antlaşmalar Hukukunda Jus Cogens Kurallar,” Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, Vol. 56(2): 43-70.
• Franck, Thomas (1990). The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
• Henkin, Louis (1979). How Nations Behave Law and Foreign Policy, 2nd Edition, New York, Columbia Univ. Press.
• Jallow, Hassan, B. (2010), “International Criminal Justice: Reflections on the Past and the Future,” Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 36(2):269-280.
• Kant, Immanuel (1960), Ebedi Barış Üzerine Felsefi Bir Deneme, Çev. Yavuz Abadan and Seha Meray, Ankara:Ajans Türk Matbaası.
• Kedikli, Umut (2005). Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması’nda Meşru Müdafaa Hakkı, Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara:Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Keyman, Fuat, E. (2006) “Küreselleşme, Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Hegemonya,” Uluslararası İlişkiler, 3(9):1-20.
• Klein, Pierre (2008). “The Effects of US Predominance on the Elaboration of Treaty Regimes and on the Evolution of the Law of Treaties,” United States, Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law, Eds. M. Byers and G. Nolte. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
• Koskenniemi, Martti (2010). “International Law and Hegemony: A Reconfiguration,” Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 17(2): 197-218.
• Krisch, Nico (2008). “More Equal than than the Rest? Hierarchy,Equality and US Predomşnance in International Law,” United States, Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law, Eds. M. Byers and G. Nolte. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
• Kwakwa, Edward (2008). “The International Community, International Law, and the United States: Three in One, Two Against, One, or One and the Same?,” United States, Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law, Eds. M. Byers and G. Nolte. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
• Michael Byers (2008). “Introduction: the Complexities of Foundational Change,” United States, Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law, Eds. M. Byers and G. Nolte. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
• Mundis, Darly (2004). “The United States of America and International Justice,” Journal of International Criminal Justice, 2: 2-10.
• Ovalı, Şevket, (2010). “Westfalyan Adaletten İnsan Merkezli Adalete: Uluslararası Adalet ve Adaletsizliğin Gündemi,” Ege Akademik Bakış, 10(3): 911-931.
• Ratner, Steven, Koskenniemi Martti, etc. (2008). “Comments on Chapters 1 and 2,” United States, Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law, Eds. M. Byers and G. Nolte. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
• Ratner, Steven (1998). “International Law: The Trials of Global Norms,” Foreign Policy, 16:65-80.
• Ronzoni, Miriam (2012). “Two Conseptions of State Sovereignty and Their Implications for Global Institutional Design,” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 15(5):573-591.
• Stoll, Peter-Tobias (2008). “Compliance: Multilateral Achievements and Predominant Powers,” United States, Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law, Eds. M. Byers and G. Nolte. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
• Toope, Stephen (2008). “Powerful but Unpersuasive? The Role of the United States in the Evolution of Customary International Law,” United States, Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law, Eds. M. Byers and G. Nolte. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.