Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Sezgisel önermeler lojiği için semantikler

Year 2018, Volume: 20 Issue: 2, 425 - 436, 01.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.25092/baunfbed.485549

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Sezgisel Önermeler Lojiği (IPL) için üç semantik sunuyoruz; yani Kripke semantiği, Heyting semantiği ve topolojik semantik.  IPL’nin bu semantiklere göre sağlam ve tam olduğunu gösteriyoruz. 

References

  • Bezhanishvili, N. ve de Jong, D., Intuitionistic Logic, ILLC, Universiteit van Amsterdam, (2010).
  • Brown, C. E., Semantics of intuitionistic propositional logic, Heyting algebras and Kripke models, (2014).
  • Kato, T., Boolean algebra and Propositional Logic, June 23, (2015).
  • Kojima, K., Relational and neighborhood semantics for intuitionistic modal logic, Reports on Mathematical Modal Logic, 47, 87-113, (2012).
  • Kuznetsov, S., Lecture Notes on Logic, University of Pennsylvania, (2017).
  • McKinsey, J.C.C. ve Tarski, A., The algebra of topology, Annals of Mathematics, 141-191, (1944).
  • Moniri, M. ve Maleki, F.S, Neighborhood semantics for basic and ıntuitionistic logic, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 24, 334-355, (2015).
  • Palmgren, E., Semantics of Intuitionistic Propositional Logic, Lecture Notes for Applied Logic, Dept. of Math. Uppsala University, (2009).
  • Troelstra, A.S. ve van Dalen, D., Constructivism in Mathematics: An Introduction, Volume 2, North-Holland, (1988).
  • Van Dalen, D., Logic and Structure, Springer, (2012).
  • Witczak, T., Intuitionistic modal logic based on neighborhood semantics without superset axiom, arXiv:1707.03859v2[math L0], (2017).

Semantics for intuitionistic propositional logic

Year 2018, Volume: 20 Issue: 2, 425 - 436, 01.12.2018
https://doi.org/10.25092/baunfbed.485549

Abstract

In this study we present three semantics for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic (IPL); namely, Kripke semantics, Heyting semantics, and topological semantics. We show that IPL is sound and complete with respect to these semantics.

References

  • Bezhanishvili, N. ve de Jong, D., Intuitionistic Logic, ILLC, Universiteit van Amsterdam, (2010).
  • Brown, C. E., Semantics of intuitionistic propositional logic, Heyting algebras and Kripke models, (2014).
  • Kato, T., Boolean algebra and Propositional Logic, June 23, (2015).
  • Kojima, K., Relational and neighborhood semantics for intuitionistic modal logic, Reports on Mathematical Modal Logic, 47, 87-113, (2012).
  • Kuznetsov, S., Lecture Notes on Logic, University of Pennsylvania, (2017).
  • McKinsey, J.C.C. ve Tarski, A., The algebra of topology, Annals of Mathematics, 141-191, (1944).
  • Moniri, M. ve Maleki, F.S, Neighborhood semantics for basic and ıntuitionistic logic, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 24, 334-355, (2015).
  • Palmgren, E., Semantics of Intuitionistic Propositional Logic, Lecture Notes for Applied Logic, Dept. of Math. Uppsala University, (2009).
  • Troelstra, A.S. ve van Dalen, D., Constructivism in Mathematics: An Introduction, Volume 2, North-Holland, (1988).
  • Van Dalen, D., Logic and Structure, Springer, (2012).
  • Witczak, T., Intuitionistic modal logic based on neighborhood semantics without superset axiom, arXiv:1707.03859v2[math L0], (2017).
There are 11 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Süleyman Polat This is me 0000-0002-5418-1412

Mehmet Terziler 0000-0002-0837-474X

Publication Date December 1, 2018
Submission Date April 3, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 20 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Polat, S., & Terziler, M. (2018). Sezgisel önermeler lojiği için semantikler. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(2), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.25092/baunfbed.485549
AMA Polat S, Terziler M. Sezgisel önermeler lojiği için semantikler. BAUN Fen. Bil. Enst. Dergisi. December 2018;20(2):425-436. doi:10.25092/baunfbed.485549
Chicago Polat, Süleyman, and Mehmet Terziler. “Sezgisel önermeler lojiği için Semantikler”. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 20, no. 2 (December 2018): 425-36. https://doi.org/10.25092/baunfbed.485549.
EndNote Polat S, Terziler M (December 1, 2018) Sezgisel önermeler lojiği için semantikler. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 20 2 425–436.
IEEE S. Polat and M. Terziler, “Sezgisel önermeler lojiği için semantikler”, BAUN Fen. Bil. Enst. Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 425–436, 2018, doi: 10.25092/baunfbed.485549.
ISNAD Polat, Süleyman - Terziler, Mehmet. “Sezgisel önermeler lojiği için Semantikler”. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 20/2 (December 2018), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.25092/baunfbed.485549.
JAMA Polat S, Terziler M. Sezgisel önermeler lojiği için semantikler. BAUN Fen. Bil. Enst. Dergisi. 2018;20:425–436.
MLA Polat, Süleyman and Mehmet Terziler. “Sezgisel önermeler lojiği için Semantikler”. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 2, 2018, pp. 425-36, doi:10.25092/baunfbed.485549.
Vancouver Polat S, Terziler M. Sezgisel önermeler lojiği için semantikler. BAUN Fen. Bil. Enst. Dergisi. 2018;20(2):425-36.