Research Article

Determining Prospective Teachers’ Misconceptions about Electrochemistry

Volume: 12 Number: 24 December 29, 2017
EN TR

Determining Prospective Teachers’ Misconceptions about Electrochemistry

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine of prospective teachers’ misconceptions related to electrochemistry. Qualitative and quantitative research techniques were used together in the study. An electrochemistry concept test consisting of 20 items about electrochemistry; semi-structured interviews and focus group discussion were used as data collecting tools. Data were collected after the subject of electrochemistry was taught in the scope of general chemistry lesson. Sample of the study consisted of 95 prospective teachers enrolled in the first grade of elementary science teaching department at Kazım Karabekir Education Faculty in 2011-2012 semester. The electrochemistry concept test was given to the sample at the end of electrochemistry unit. The interviews and the focus group discussion were conducted with the prospective teachers’ chosen according to the results of concept test. Findings of the study showed that the prospective teachers’ understanding of electrochemistry was inadequate and there were many misconceptions. Many misconceptions, different from misconceptions previously detected in literature, were found.

Keywords

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Lederman, N.G., Bell, R.L. & Schwartz, R.S. (2001). View of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. In Proceedings of The Annual Meeting of The Association For The Education of Teachers In Science. January 18-21. Costa Mesa,CA.
  2. Akdeniz, A. R., Yıldız, İ. & Yiğit, N. (2000). İlköğretim 6. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Işık Ünitesindeki Kavram Yanılgıları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 19(1), 5-14.
  3. Aykaç, N. & Aydın, H. (Ed). (2006). Öğrenme-öğretme sürecinde planlama ve uygulama. Ankara: Naturel Yayıncılık.
  4. Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63(10), 873-878.
  5. Borazan, İ. (2008). Kavram Yanılgısı ve Çoklu Zeka Alanlarının İlişkilendirilmesine Dayalı Bir Öğretimin Kavram Yanılgılarının Giderilmesindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi “Dolaşım Sistemi Örneği”. Yüksek lisans tezi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  6. Büyükkasap, E., Düzgün, B., Ertuğrul, M. & Samancı, O. (1998). Bilgisayar destekli fen öğretiminin kavram yanılgıları üzerine etkisi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi,6(2), 59-66.
  7. Canpolat, N., Pınarbaşı, T., Bayrakçeken, S. & Geban, Ö. (2004). Kimyadaki bazı yaygın yanlış kavramlar. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(1), 135-146.
  8. Capel, S., Leask, M. & Turner, T. (2001). Learning To Teach In The Secondary School. New York, Routledge.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Adem Yılmaz
KASTAMONU ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, İLKÖĞRETİM BÖLÜMÜ
Türkiye

Samih Bayrakçeken
Ataturk University, Kazim Karabekir Education Faculty, Erzurum, Turkey
Türkiye

Publication Date

December 29, 2017

Submission Date

December 22, 2016

Acceptance Date

December 28, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2017 Volume: 12 Number: 24

APA
Yılmaz, A., & Bayrakçeken, S. (2017). Öğretmen Adaylarının Elektrokimya Konusundaki Kavram Yanılgılarının Belirlenmesi. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(24), 881-906. https://izlik.org/JA28MM39GN