TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR RİSK YÖNETİMİ: ÇEVRESEL, SOSYAL VE JEOPOLİTİK RİSKLERİ AZALTMA STRATEJİLERİ

Gülçin Kazan; Tuğçe Uzun Kocamış

doi:10.54860/beyder.1482356

TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR RİSK YÖNETİMİ: ÇEVRESEL, SOSYAL VE JEOPOLİTİK RİSKLERİ AZALTMA STRATEJİLERİ

Abstract

Küresel tedarik zincirleri daha karmaşık ve birbirine bağlı hale geldikçe, işletmeler geleneksel operasyonel ve finansal kaygıların ötesine geçen, giderek artan farklı risklerle karşı karşıya kalmaktadır. Çevresel zorluklar, sosyal dinamikler ve jeopolitik belirsizlikler, tedarik zinciri esnekliğini ve uzun vadeli sürdürülebilirliği etkileyen kritik faktörlerdir. Bu bağlamda Tedarik Zincirlerinde Sürdürülebilir Risk Yönetimi kavramı kritik bir stratejik gereklilik olarak ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu proaktif yaklaşım, çevresel, sosyal ve jeopolitik risklerin kapsamlı bir şekilde ele alınmasını sağlamak için risklerin tanımlanmasını ve değerlendirilmesini ve sürece sürdürülebilirlik ilkelerinin entegre edilmesini içerir. Çevresel belirsizlikler ve sosyal sorumluluklardan jeopolitik istikrarsızlığa kadar, modern tedarik zincirlerinde risklerin sürdürülebilir yönetimini yönlendiren zorluklar bu içerikte sunulmakta ve stratejiler açıklanmaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında, sürdürülebilir risk yönetiminin geleceğini şekillendiren yeni stratejiler ve teknolojiler de ele alınmıştır. Gelişmiş veri analitiği, blockchain teknolojisi, döngüsel ekonomi entegrasyonu ve sorumlu inovasyon, tedarik zincirlerindeki risklerin tahmin edilmesinde ve azaltılmasında temel itici güçler olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışmada ayrıca, sürdürülebilirliği risk yönetimi stratejilerine entegre etmenin önemini vurgulamakta ve gerçek dünya uygulamalarından örnekler sunmaktadır.

Keywords

References

Adesanya, A., Yang, B., Iqda, F., ve Yang, Y. (2020). Improving sustainability performance through supplier relationship management in the tobacco industry. Supply Chain Management, 25(4), 413-426. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2018
Althaqafi, T. (2024). Assessing the Evolving Role of Geopolitical Risks in Supply Chain Logistics: An Empirical Analysis of Risk Management Strategies. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 16(1), 1-14.
Aman, S., Seuring, S., ve Khalid, R. (2023). Sustainability performance measurement in risk and uncertainty management: An analysis of base of the pyramid supply chain literature. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(4), 2373-2398.
Apple. (2023). People and Environment in Our Supply Chain. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/ supplier-responsibility/pdf/Apple_SR_2023_Progress_Report.pdf
Bednarski, L., Roscoe, S., Blome, C., ve Schleper, M. C. (2024). Geopolitical disruptions in global supply chains: a state-of-the-art literature review. Production Planning ve Control, 1-27.
Blackhurst, J., Scheibe, K., ve Johnson, D. (2008). Supplier risk assessment and monitoring for the automotive industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 143-165.
Blessley, M., ve Mudambi, S. M. (2022). A trade war and a pandemic: Disruption and resilience in the food bank supply chain. Industrial Marketing Management, 58-73.
Carr, D. (2019). The Effectiveness of Collaboration Within Supply Chain Management: A Case Study of Adidas Group. CMC Senior Theses. Retrieved from https://scholarship.claremont.edu/ cmc_theses/2078

Carter, C., ve Rogers, D. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International journal of physical distribution ve logistics management, 38(5), 360-387. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
Diabat, A., Govindan, K., ve Panicker, V. (2012). Supply Chain Risk Management and Its Mitigation in A Food Industry. International Journal of Production Research, 3039-3050.
Erdal, H. (2017). Tedarik Zinciri Ağında Riskin Yönetimi: Tedarik Yönlü Bir Karar Destek Sistemi Tasarımı. (Doctoral dissertation, Ataturk University) Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/ UlusalTezMerkezi/tezDetay.jsp?id=YaSdk26X883ShdqF8_vOGwveno=PxgJ1aTtd3TDQG9P4Q2pxg
Erdal, H. (2018). Kavramsal çerçeve ve tedarik yönlü bir literatür araştırması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Muhasebe Bilim Dergisi, 764-796.
Fernando, Y., Walters, T., Ismail, M., Seo, Y., ve Kaimasu, M. (2018). Managing project success using project risk and green supply chain management: A survey of automotive industry. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 11(2), 332-365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-01-2017-0007
Finch, P. (2004). Supply chain risk management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 183-196.
Freise, M., ve Seuring, S. (2015). Social and environmental risk management in supply chains: a survey in the clothing industry. Logistics Research, 1-12.
Gaudenzi, B., ve Borghesi, A. (2006). Managing risks in the supply chain using the AHP method. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 114-136.
Gemechu, E., Sonnemann, G., ve Young, S. B. (2017). Geopolitical-related supply risk assessment as a complement to environmental impact assessment: the case of electric vehicles. The international Journal of life cycle assessment, 31-39. Ghande, A., Dani, S., ve Kalawsky, R. (2012). Supply chain risk management: present and future scope. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 313-339.
Hald, K., Wiik, S., ve Larssen, A. (2021). Sustainable procurement initiatives and their risk-related costs: a framework and a case study application. Measuring Business Excellence, 25(2), 230-243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-04-2020-0052
Han, X. (2022). Analysis and Reflection of IKEA’s Supply Chain Management. 2022 4th International Conference on Economic Management and Cultural Industry (ICEMCI 2022). Atlantis Press.
Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yıldız, H., ve Talluri, S. (2015). Supply Chain Risk Management: A Literature Review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 1-56. doi:10.1080 /00207543. 2015. 1030467
Holzmann, R., ve Jørgensen, S. (2001). Social risk management: A new conceptual framework for social protection, and beyond. International Tax and Public Finance, 8, 529-556.
Hout, T. (2022). 12. The US–China trade war of 2018‒2020: origins and consequences. Research Handbook on Trade Wars, 231.
Hussain, M., Awasthi, A., ve Tiwari, M. (2016). Interpretive structural modeling-analytic network process integrated framework for evaluating sustainable supply chain management alternatives. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 3671-3687.
Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., ve Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International Journal of Production Research, 57(3), 829-846. doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1488086
Jamalnia, A., Gong, Y., ve Govindan, K. (2023). A decision support system for selection and risk management of sustainability governance approaches in multi-tier supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108960
Jarkko Leppälä, E. M. (2011). Farm Risk Management Applied to Sustainability of the Food Supply Chain: A Case Study of Sustainability Risks in Dairy Farming. Environmental Management Accounting and Supply Chain Management, 27. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1390-1_5
Jiang, S., Yang, C., Guo, Y., ve Jiao, X. (2021). Integrated Horticultural Practices for Improving Apple Supply Chain Sustainability: A Case Study in the North China Plain. Agronomy.
Jüttner, U., Peck, H., ve Christopher, M. (2003). Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 197-210.
Jüttner, U., ve Ziegenbein, A. (2009). Supply Chain Risk Management for Small and Medium-Sized Businesses. Supply Chain Risk. Springer, USA.
Gopalakrishnan, K., Yusuf, Y. Y., Musa, A., Abubakar, T., ve Ambursa, H. M. (2012). Sustainable supply chain management: A case study of British Aerospace (BAe) Systems. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 193-203.
Laurin, F., ve Fantazy, K. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management: a case study at IKEA. Transnational Corporations Review, 309-318.
Lin, Y., ve Zhou, L. (2011). The impacts of product design changes on supply chain risk: a case study. International Journal of Physical Distribution ve Logistics Management, 41(2), 162-186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031111118549
Magableh, G. M. (2021). Supply chains and the COVID‐19 pandemic: A comprehensive framework. European Management Review, 363-382.
Merna, A., ve Smith, N. (1999). Privately financed infrastructure in the 21st century. Civil Engineering, 166-173.
Nisar, Q., Haider, S., Ameer, I., Hussa, M., Gill, S., ve Usam, A. (2022). Sustainable supply chain management performance in post COVID-19 era in an emerging economy: a big data perspective. International Journal of Emerging Markets. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-12-2021-1807
Özdemir, D., Sharma, M., Dhir, A., ve Daim, T. (2022). Supply chain resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Technology in Society.
Öztek, G., ve Kabak, M. (2022). A Multi-Criteria Approach to Sustainable Risk Management of Supplier Portfolio: A Case Study at Defense Industry. Gazi University Journal of Science, 35(4), 1054-1519. doi:10.35378/gujs.883894 T2
Park, C.-Y., Petri, P. A., ve Plummer, M. G. (2021). The economics of conflict and cooperation in the Asia-pacific: RCEP, CPTPP and the US-China trade war. East Asain Economic Review, 233-272.
Razak, G. M., Hendry, L. C., ve Stevenson, M. (2021). Supply chain traceability: a review of the benefits and its relationship with supply chain resilience. Production Planning ve Control, 1114-1134.
Rebs, T. (2018). Quantitative Modeling of Sustainability in Interorganizational Supply Chains. M. Brandenburg, H. Gerd J., ve R. Tobias, Social and Environmental Dimensions of Organizations and Supply Chains: Tradeoffs and Synergies. Cham: Springer. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59587-0_8
Reshad, A., Biswas, T., ve Agarwal, R. (2023). Evaluating barriers and strategies to sustainable supply chain risk management in the context of an emerging economy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3367
Samir, Y., Sood, K., ve Grima, S. (2023). Blockchain-Augmented Digital Supply Chain Management: A Way to Sustainable Business. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16, 1-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16010007
Sánchez-Flores, R., Cruz-Sotelo, S., Ojeda-Benitez, S., ve Ramírez-Barreto, M. (2022). Sustainable Supply Chain Management—A Literature Review on Emerging Economies. Sustainability, 12(17). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176972
Sarkis, J. (2020). Supply chain sustainability: learning from the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Operations ve Production Management, 63-73.
Satariano, A., ve Burrows, P. (2011). Apple’s supply-chain secret? Hoard lasers. Bloomberg Businessweek, 50-54.
Schuessler, E., Frenkel, S. J., ve Wright, C. F. (2019). Governance of labor standards in Australian and German garment supply chains: The impact of Rana Plaza. ILR Review, 552-579.
Seuring, S., ve Beske, P. (2014). Putting sustainability into supply chain management. Supply Chain Management, 19(3), 322-331. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0432
Sharfman, M. P., ve Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic management journal, 29(6), 569-592.
Sheffi, Y. (2001). Supply chain management under the threat of international terrorism. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 1-11.
Shekarian, E., Ijadi, B., Zare, A., ve Majava, J. (2022). Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Industrial Practices. Sustainability, 14(13).
Tang, C. (2006). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 33-45.
Teh, R., Keck, A., Nee, C., ve Escaith, H. (2011). Retrieved from https://cepr.org/voxeu. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/japans-earthquake-and-tsunami-international-trade-and-global-supply-chain-impacts
Trkman, P., ve McCormack, K. (2009). Supply chain risk in turbulent environments-a conceptual model for managing supply chain network risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 247-258.
Wright, C. F. (2016). Leveraging Reputational Risk: Sustainable Sourcing Campaigns for Improving Labour Standards in Production Networks. J Bus Ethics (137), 195-210. doi:https:// doi.org/10.1007/ s10551-015-2552-1
https://about.ikea.com/en/sustainability/a-world-without-waste https://report.adidas-group.com/2020/en/group-management-report-ourcompany/sustainability/supply-chain.html https://www.adidas-group.com/en/sustainability/social-impacts/supply-chain/ https://dfreight.org/blog/an-insight-into-nestle-supply-chain-strategy/ https://www.nestle.com/sustainability/sustainablesourcing/cocoa#:~:text=The%20Nestl%C3%A9%20Cocoa%20Plan%2C%20along,Nestl%C3%A9%20Cocoa%20Plan%20by%202025. https://studycorgi.com/unilever-groups-supply-chain-and-management/ https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2015/apr/23/rana-plaza-factory-collapse-history-cities-50-buildings https://www.unilever.com/:https://www.unilever.com/files/8c652127-8ea5-4db0-bedb-f03a37637285/unilever-s-supply-chain.pdf

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Macroeconomics (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Gülçin Kazan ^*
0000-0002-3877-6774
Türkiye

Tuğçe Uzun Kocamış
0000-0002-2338-1286
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

July 8, 2024

Publication Date

July 7, 2024

Submission Date

May 11, 2024

Acceptance Date

July 7, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2024 Volume: 19 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.54860/beyder.1482356

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA79WY58NK

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Kazan, G., & Uzun Kocamış, T. (2024). TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR RİSK YÖNETİMİ: ÇEVRESEL, SOSYAL VE JEOPOLİTİK RİSKLERİ AZALTMA STRATEJİLERİ. Bilgi Ekonomisi Ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 19(1), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.54860/beyder.1482356

AMA

1.Kazan G, Uzun Kocamış T. TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR RİSK YÖNETİMİ: ÇEVRESEL, SOSYAL VE JEOPOLİTİK RİSKLERİ AZALTMA STRATEJİLERİ. JKEM. 2024;19(1):75-92. doi:10.54860/beyder.1482356

Chicago

Kazan, Gülçin, and Tuğçe Uzun Kocamış. 2024. “TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR RİSK YÖNETİMİ: ÇEVRESEL, SOSYAL VE JEOPOLİTİK RİSKLERİ AZALTMA STRATEJİLERİ”. Bilgi Ekonomisi Ve Yönetimi Dergisi 19 (1): 75-92. https://doi.org/10.54860/beyder.1482356.

EndNote

Kazan G, Uzun Kocamış T (July 1, 2024) TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR RİSK YÖNETİMİ: ÇEVRESEL, SOSYAL VE JEOPOLİTİK RİSKLERİ AZALTMA STRATEJİLERİ. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi 19 1 75–92.

IEEE

[1]G. Kazan and T. Uzun Kocamış, “TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR RİSK YÖNETİMİ: ÇEVRESEL, SOSYAL VE JEOPOLİTİK RİSKLERİ AZALTMA STRATEJİLERİ”, JKEM, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 75–92, July 2024, doi: 10.54860/beyder.1482356.

ISNAD

Kazan, Gülçin - Uzun Kocamış, Tuğçe. “TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR RİSK YÖNETİMİ: ÇEVRESEL, SOSYAL VE JEOPOLİTİK RİSKLERİ AZALTMA STRATEJİLERİ”. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi 19/1 (July 1, 2024): 75-92. https://doi.org/10.54860/beyder.1482356.

JAMA

1.Kazan G, Uzun Kocamış T. TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR RİSK YÖNETİMİ: ÇEVRESEL, SOSYAL VE JEOPOLİTİK RİSKLERİ AZALTMA STRATEJİLERİ. JKEM. 2024;19:75–92.

MLA

Kazan, Gülçin, and Tuğçe Uzun Kocamış. “TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR RİSK YÖNETİMİ: ÇEVRESEL, SOSYAL VE JEOPOLİTİK RİSKLERİ AZALTMA STRATEJİLERİ”. Bilgi Ekonomisi Ve Yönetimi Dergisi, vol. 19, no. 1, July 2024, pp. 75-92, doi:10.54860/beyder.1482356.

Vancouver

1.Gülçin Kazan, Tuğçe Uzun Kocamış. TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR RİSK YÖNETİMİ: ÇEVRESEL, SOSYAL VE JEOPOLİTİK RİSKLERİ AZALTMA STRATEJİLERİ. JKEM. 2024 Jul. 1;19(1):75-92. doi:10.54860/beyder.1482356

Cited By

Sürdürülebilir Akıllı Tedarikçi Seçimi için Bulanık TOPSIS ve Aralık Tip-2 Bulanık TOPSIS Temelli Bir Yaklaşım

İstatistik ve Uygulamalı Bilimler Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.52693/jsas.1796950