Research Article

Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear?

Number: 91 October 22, 2019
TR EN

Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear?

Abstract

The Silk Road Economic Belt is the key component of China’s Eurasian Pivot strategy. In this study, China’s Eurasian Pivot is approached as a creativity strategy from the perspective of social identity theory. In order to succeed in its creativity strategy, China is trying to create a common in-group identity with the Silk Road Economic Belt countries through the Chinese Dream. However, the Chinese Dream is not perceived as a common identity by Central Asians and Uyghurs. While Central Asians respond China’s economic presence in the region positively, they are afraid of demographic changes and cultural influences that Chinese migration will cause. Therefore, the Chinese Dream has been a common fear for Turkic societies along the Silk Road Economic Belt rather than common identity. This fear could be one of the most important factors that will prevent the success of China’s Eurasian Pivot in the long run.

Keywords

References

  1. Barth, Fredrik (1969). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Little, Brown Series in Anthropology.
  2. Bellér-Hann, Ildikó (2002). “Temperamental Neighbours: Uighur-Han Relations in Xinjiang, Northwest China”. Imagined Differences: Hatred and the Construction of Identity. Ed. Günther Schlee. 5. 57-83.
  3. Burkhanov, Aziz and Chen Yu-Wen (2016). “Kazakh Perspective on China, the Chinese, and Chinese Migration”. Ethnic and Racial Studies 39 (12): 2129-2148.
  4. Callahan, William A. (2016). “China’s “Asia Dream” The Belt Road Initiative and the New Regional Order”. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 1 (3): 226-243.
  5. Cesaro, M. Cristina (2000). “Consuming Identities: Food and Resistance among the Uyghur in Contemporary Xinjiang”. Inner Asia 2 (2): 225-238.
  6. Clinton, Hillary (2011). “America’s Pacific Century”. Foreign Policy 189: 56-63.
  7. Dillon, Michael (2004). Xinjiang: China’s Muslim Far Northwest. Routledge.
  8. Dreyer, June Teufel (1975). “Go West Young Han: The Hsia Fang Movement to China’s Minority Areas”. Pacific Affairs 48 (3): 353-369.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 22, 2019

Submission Date

March 20, 2018

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Number: 91

APA
Eliküçük Yıldırım, N. (2019). Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear? Bilig, 91, 235-254. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9110
AMA
1.Eliküçük Yıldırım N. Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear? Bilig. 2019;(91):235-254. doi:10.12995/bilig.9110
Chicago
Eliküçük Yıldırım, Nilgün. 2019. “Silk Road Economic Belt As China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear?”. Bilig, nos. 91: 235-54. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9110.
EndNote
Eliküçük Yıldırım N (October 1, 2019) Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear? Bilig 91 235–254.
IEEE
[1]N. Eliküçük Yıldırım, “Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear?”, Bilig, no. 91, pp. 235–254, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.12995/bilig.9110.
ISNAD
Eliküçük Yıldırım, Nilgün. “Silk Road Economic Belt As China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear?”. Bilig. 91 (October 1, 2019): 235-254. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.9110.
JAMA
1.Eliküçük Yıldırım N. Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear? Bilig. 2019;:235–254.
MLA
Eliküçük Yıldırım, Nilgün. “Silk Road Economic Belt As China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear?”. Bilig, no. 91, Oct. 2019, pp. 235-54, doi:10.12995/bilig.9110.
Vancouver
1.Nilgün Eliküçük Yıldırım. Silk Road Economic Belt as China’s Eurasian Dream: Common Identity or Common Fear? Bilig. 2019 Oct. 1;(91):235-54. doi:10.12995/bilig.9110

Ahmet Yesevi University Board of Trustees