Can Humility Make You Feel Good?

Abstract

Introduction

Together with the positive psychology movement, the virtues that represent the strong side of the human being have been investigated intensively in the field of psychology. Although the virtue of humility has been thought over for many years, it is a new topic in empirical research. Several factors come to the fore in the largely neglect of humility. The first is a general factor that prevents the research of virtues in the field of psychology. This factor is that virtues are linked to religion and values (Seligman, 2002; Tangney, 2000, 2002). As a field, for many years, mainstream psychology has avoided value-laden issues such as religion, morality, and virtue. The next two factors encountered in the neglect and the slow pace of humility studies is directly related to humility. In this context, the second factor is the lack of a clear definition agreed on humility (Davis, Worthington, ve diğerleri, 2010). The third factor that the study of humility has been slow is that not being agreed on an acceptable way to measure humility (Davis, Worthington, ve diğerleri, 2010; Tangney, 2000, 2002). Due to the insufficient development of studies on humility, the role of humility in improving psychological health in the literature has not been clearly established.

Within the scope of this research, humility is primarily addressed from a psychological and religious perspective. In the applied part of the research, the relationship and interaction between humility and psychological well-being and subjective well-being are examined. The predictive effect of humility on psychological well-being and life satisfaction which are symptoms of mental health is investigated.

With the recent studies carried out in the field of psychology, significant advances have been made in the conceptualization and measurement of humility. In the recent psychological researches (Davis ve diğerleri, 2011; Davis, Worthington, ve diğerleri, 2010; Hook ve Davis, 2014; Worthington ve Allison, 2018; Worthington ve diğerleri, 2017) about humility have focused on three main components of humility. First, humility involves an accurate assessment of self, including an awareness of one’s limitations. Second, humility involves a modest self-presentation. Third, humility involves an interpersonal stance that is other-oriented rather than self-oriented. In addition, developments in the conceptualization of humility encourage the measurement of humility with well-established assessment tools using different measurement techniques.

On the other hand, humility has been a central subject of religious thought for centuries. The religious perspective on humility often portrays it as a virtue. Indeed, most of the world religions promote humility as a virtue (Bollinger ve Hill, 2012; Hill ve Laney, 2016; Peterson ve Seligman, 2004; Woodruff ve diğerleri, 2014). For example, considering the three major theistic religions -Judaism, Christianity and Islam, it is seen that humility is an important virtue, appreciated and recommended to their followers.

The relationship between humility and well-being has begun to be the subject of empirical studies with the development of humility scientific literature. Few empirical studies on humility and well-being contain clues that there is a positive relationship between both variables.

The Present Study

Considering the link between humility and well-being in prior studies and the discussions that is provided above, two main hypotheses will be evaluated for the purpose of the current study:

1. There is a positive relationship between humility and psychological well-being.

2. There is a positive relationship between humility and satisfaction with life.

In addition, the following hypotheses are evaluated based on demographic variables:

1. The level of humility of women is higher than that of men.

2. As the grade level increases, the level of humility decreases.

3. As the general state of health increases, the level of humility increases.

Method

Participants

The sample of this study consisted of 2404 students who were selected by random sampling method among undergraduate students in different departments of Sakarya University in the 2018-2019 academic years. 43.8% (1052) of the participants were male and 56.2% (1352) were female. The average age was 20.76 and the standard deviation is 2.32. The age range is 17-41.

Measures

The Dispositional Humility Scale, The Psychological Well-Being Scale, and The Satisfaction with Life Scale were used to collect data in the current study. The Dispositional Humility Scale was developed by Bollinger, Kopp, Hill and Williams (2006). This scale was translated into Turkish by Saygın (2014). The Cronbach’s alpha value of the scale was found as .78 in current study which is similar to the one (.80) which was found by Saygın. The Psychological Well-Being Scale was developed by Ryff and Keyes (1995). This scale was standardized into Turkish by İmamoğlu. The Cronbach’s alpha value of the scale was found as .72 in this study. The Satisfaction with Life Scale was developed by Diener, Emmons, Larsen and Griffin (1985). The Cronbach’s alpha value of the scale, which was standardized to Turkish by Imamoglu, was found to be .87 in the current study.

Procedure

This study was approved by Ethics Committee, Sakarya University. Participants were recruited from undergraduate classes. The research was applied to the students who want to participate voluntarily.

Results and Discussion

The current research results show that the level of humility of women is higher than that of men. Similarly, the scientific literature of humility indicates that the level of humility of women is higher than that of men. According to the results of the research, it was found that the humility level decreased significantly as the grade level increased. These findings lead us to consider the relationship between the level of knowledge and humility. The knowledge level increases as the grade level progresses. According to the data reached, high knowledge does not bring a high level of humility, but a low level of humility.

According to the results of the analysis, a positive and significant relationship (r = .20; p <.01) was found between humility and general physical health status. This result shows that individuals who evaluate themselves as healthier generally tend to act more modestly.

As a result of the analysis, it has been determined that there was a moderate positive and significant relationship (r = 0.495, p <.01) between humility and psychological well-being. In addition, it has been found that there are positive and significant relationships between humility and all sub-dimensions of psychological well-being. The results clearly show that the level of psychological well-being increases as the level of humility increases.

In addition, as a result of the analysis, it was found that there is a low level of positive and significant relationship between humility and satisfaction with life (r = 0.112, p <.01). This result shows that as the level of humility increases, the level of subjective well-being increases, albeit at a low level.

Conclusion

Virtues are becoming an important research topic in psychology. However, research on humility has not progressed fast like research on many other virtues. Difficulties arising from the definition and measurement of humility can be cited as the reason for slow progress. But these difficulties have been overcome with recent studies. Along with recent developments, humility has been started to be researched by associating it with different areas such as health.

Current and previous research results show that there is a positive relationship between humility and general physical health. However, data showing the relationship between humility and physical health indicate that this relationship is weaker and indirect than the relationship between mental health and humility.

It appears that humility is positively associated with both variants of well-being, that is psychological well-being and subjective well-being. However, it has been found that the relationship between humility and psychological well-being is consistently positive and stronger than the relationship between humility and subjective well-being. These results can be explained by the eudaimonic and hedonic conceptualization on which psychological well-being and subjective well-being are based. Subjective well-being measurement tools are based on a hedonic conceptualization of well-being, and psychological well-being measuring tools are based on the eudaimonic conceptualization of well-being. 

Consequently, according to the scientific literature between humility and health, humility is a characteristic that supports human development. Increasing research shows that more humble people tend to have better physical and mental health than less humble ones.

Alçakgönüllülük İnsanın İyi Hissetmesini Sağlayabilir mi? Alçakgönüllülük, Psikolojik İyi Olma ve Öznel İyi Olma Arasındaki İlişki

Abstract

Pozitif psikoloji hareketiyle birlikte insanın güçlü yanını temsil eden erdemler yoğun bir şekilde araştırılmaya başlanmıştır. Ancak erdemler içerisinde her ne kadar alçakgönüllülük uzun yıllardır düşünülüp taşınılsa da ampirik araştırmalara yeni yeni konu olmaktadır. Pozitif psikoloji yaklaşımı çerçevesinde gelişen ve alçakgönüllülük erdeminin odağını oluşturduğu bu araştırmada alçakgönüllülükle psikolojik iyi olma ve öznel iyi olmanın göstergesi olan yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişki ve etkileşim araştırılmaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında ayrıca bireylerin alçakgönüllülük düzeyleriyle bazı olgusal nitelikleri arasında anlamlı bir ilişki olup olmadığı incelenmektedir. Araştırmanın katılımcılarını seçkisiz örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilmiş 2404 üniversite öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma sonucunda her ne kadar alçakgönüllülükle psikolojik iyi olma ve öznel iyi olma arasında pozitif anlamlı ilişkiler tespit edilse de alçakgönüllülüğün psikolojik iyi olma ile olan ilişkilerinin, sübjektif iyi olma ile olan ilişkilerinden daha olumlu ve güçlü olduğu görülmektedir. Bu bulgulara ek olarak alçakgönüllülük düzeyi ile genel sağlık durumu arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca olgusal nitelikler kapsamında kadınların erkelere göre daha mütevazı olma eğiliminde olduğu görülmüştür. Bunlara karşın öğrenim görülen sınıf seviyesi arttıkça alçakgönüllülük düzeyinin düştüğü tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

• Din Psikolojisi,Pozitif Psikoloji,Alçakgönüllülük,Psikolojik İyi Olma,Öznel İyi Olma

References

1. Aghababaei, N. (2014). God, the Good Life, and HEXACO: the Relations among Religion, Subjective Well-Being and Personality. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 17(3), 284-290.
2. Aghababaei, N. ve Arji, A. (2014). Well-Being and the HEXACO Model of Personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 139-142.
3. Aghababaei, N., Błachnio, A., Arji, A., Chiniforoushan, M., Tekke, M. ve Mehrabadi, A. F. (2016). Honesty–Humility and the HEXACO Structure of Religiosity and Well-Being. Current Psychology, 35(3), 421-426. doi:DOI 10.1007/s12144-015-9310-5
4. Aghababaei, N., Mohammadtabar, S. ve Saffarinia, M. (2014). Dirty Dozen vs. The H factor: Comparison of the Dark Triad and Honesty–Humility in prosociality, religiosity, and happiness. Personality and Individual Differences, (67), 6-10.
5. Beydoğan, B. (2008). Self-Construal Differences in Perceived Work Situation and Well-Being. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
6. Bollinger, R. A. (2010). Humility: An Integrative Analysis and the Validation of a Dispositional Measure. (Yayımlanmamış unpublished doctoral dissertation). Biola University Rosemead School of Psychology, California.
7. Bollinger, R. A. ve Hill, P. C. (2012). Humility. Religion, Spirituality, and Positive Psychology: Understanding the Psychological Fruits of Faith içinde . California: Praeger.
8. Bollinger, R. A., Kopp, K. J., Hill, P. C. ve Williams, J. (2006). Validation of a Measurement of Dispositional Humility. Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association Poster, New Orleans, LA.

9. Carver, C. S. ve Scheier, M. F. (1994). Optimism and Health-Related Cognition: What Variables Actually Matter? Psychology and Health, 9(3), 191-195.
10. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., Snyder, C. R. ve Lopez, S. J. (2002). Optimism. Handbook of Positive Psychology içinde (1. bs., ss. 231-243). New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Dangi, S. ve Nagle, Y. K. (2015). Personality Factors as Determinants of Psychological Well Being among Adolescents. Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, 6(4), 369-373.
12. Davis, D. E. (2011). Relational Humility. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
13. Davis, D. E. ve Hook, J. N. (2014). Humility, Religion, and Spirituality: An Endpiece. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 42(1), 111-117.
14. Davis, D. E., Hook, J. N., Worthington, E. L., Tongeren, D. R. V., Gartner, A. L. ve Emmons, R. A. (2011). Relational Humility: Conceptualizing and Measuring Humility as a Personality Judgement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(3), 225-234.
15. Davis, D. E., Hook, J. N., Worthington, E. L., Van Tongeren, D. R., Gartner, A. L. ve Jennings, D. J. (2010). Relational Spirituality and Forgiveness: Development of The Spiritual Humility Scale (SHS). Journal of Psychology and Theology, 38(2), 91-100.
16. Davis, D. E., Placeres, V., Choe, E., DeBlaere, C., Zeyala, D. ve Hook, J. N. (2017). Relational Humility. E. L. Worthington, D. E. Davis ve J. N. Hook (Ed.), Handbook of Humility Theory, Research, and Applications içinde (1. bs.). New York: Routledge.
17. Davis, D. E., Worthington, E. L., Hook, J. N., Emmons, R. A., Hill, P. C., Bollinger, R. A. ve Tongeren, D. R. V. (2013). Humility and the Development and Repair of Social Bonds: Two Longitudinal Studies. Self and Identity, 12(1), 58-77.
18. Davis, Worthington, E. L. ve Hook, J. N. (2010). Humility: Review of Measurement Strategies and Conceptualization as Personality Judgment. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(4), 243-252.
19. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
20. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34-43. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34
21. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. ve Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
22. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E. ve Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and Life Satisfaction. C. R. Snyder ve J. S. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of Positive Psychology içinde . New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Dwiwardani, C., Hill, P. C., Bollinger, R. A., Hook, J. N. ve Davis, D. E. (2014). Virtues Develop From a Secure Base: Attachment and Resilience as Predictors of Humility, Gratitude, and Forgiveness. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 42(1), 83-90.
24. el-Cevheri, İ. b. H. (1984). V-d-a. Es-Sıhâh Tâcu’l-Luga ve Sıhâhu’l-Arabiyye. Beyrut: Daru’l-İlm li’l-Melayin.
25. el-İsfahâni, R. (2009). Erdemli Yol. (M. Tan, Çev.). İstanbul: iz Yayıncılık.
26. Elliott, J. C. (2010). Humility: Development and Analysis of a Scale. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
27. Emmons, R. A. (1999). The psychology of Ultimate Concerns: Motivation and Spirituality in Personality. New York: The Guilford Press.
28. Emmons, R. A. ve McCullough, M. E. (2004). The Psychology of Gratitude (1. bs.). New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Exline, J. J. (2012). Humility and the Ability to Receive from Others. Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 31(1), 40-50.
30. Exline, J. J. ve Geyer, A. L. (2004). Perceptions of Humility: A Preliminary Study. Self and Identity, (3), 95-114.
31. Ezherî, M. b. A. (t.y.). V-d-a. Tehzîbu’l-Luga. Kahire: ed-Dâru’l-Mısrıyye.
32. Ferâhîdî, H. b. A. (2003). V-d-a. Kitâbu’l-Ayn. Beyrut: Daru’l-Kutubu’l-İlmiyye.
33. Fîrûzâbâdî, M. b. Y. (2005). V-d-a. El-Kâmûsu’l-Muhît. Beyrut: Müessesetu’r-Risâle.
34. Gazzâlî. (1989). İhyâu Ulûmi’d-Dîn. (A. Serdaroğlu, Çev.) (C. 1-4, C. 3). İstanbul: Bedir Yayınevi.
35. Gediksiz. (2013). Alçakgönüllülük İle Psikolojik İyi Olma Arasındaki İlişkinin Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Sakarya Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya.
36. Green, R. (1973). Jewish Ethics and the Virtue of Humility. The Journal of Religious Ethics, 1(1), 53-63.
37. Gregg, A. P. ve Mahadevan, N. (2014). Intellectual Arrogance and Intellectual Humility: An Evolutionary-Epistemological Account. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 42(1), 7-18.
38. Heatherington, L., Burns, A. B. ve Gustafson, T. B. (1998). When Another Stumbles: Gender and Self-Presentation to Vulnerable Others. Sex Roles, 38(11/12), 889–913.
39. Hefferon, K. ve Boniwell, I. (2011). Positive Psychology: Theory, Research and Applications. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
40. Hill, P. C. ve Laney, E. K. (2016). Beyond Self-Interest: Humility and the Quieted Self. The Oxford Handbook of Hypo-egoic Phenomena içinde (1. bs., ss. 243-256). New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Hopkin, C. R., Hoyle, R. H. ve Toner, K. (2014). Intellectual Humility and Reactions to Opinions About Religious Beliefs. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 42(1), 50-61.
42. Izutsu, T. (1975). Kur’ân’da Allah ve İnsan. (S. Ateş, Çev.). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.
43. İbn Manzur. (t.y.). V-d-a. Lisanu’l-Arab. Beyrut: Dâru Sâdr.
44. Jankowski, P. J., Sandage, S. J. ve Hill, P. C. (2013). Differentiation-Based Models of Forgivingness, Mental Health and Social Justice Commitment: Mediator Effects for Differentiation of Self and Humility. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(5), 412-424.
45. Johnson, M. K., Rowatt, W. C. ve Petrini, L. (2011). A New Trait on the Market: Honesty Humility as a Unique Predictor of Job Performance Ratings. Personality and Individual Differences, (50), 857–862.
46. Kesebir, P. (2014). A Quiet Ego Quiets Death Anxiety: Humility as an Existential Anxiety Buffer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(4), 610-623.
47. Koç, M., Çolak, T. S. ve Düşünceli, B. (2013). Anksiyete, Duygudurum ve Psikotik Belirtilerin Lisans Eğitimi Sürecindeki Gidişi. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, (14), 260-266.
48. Krause, N. (2010). Religious Involvement, Humility, and Self-Rated Health. Soc. Indic. Res., (98), 23-39.
49. Krause, N. (2012). Religious Involvement, Humility, and Change in Self-Rated Health Over Time. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 40(3), 199–210.
50. Krause, N. (2014). Exploring the Relationships among Humility, Negative Interaction in the Church, and Depressed Affect. Aging & Mental Health, 18(8), 970-979.
51. Krause, N. (2016). Assessing the Relationships Among Wisdom, Humility, and Life Satisfaction. Journal of Adult Development, 23(3), 40-49.
52. Krause, N. ve Hayward, R. D. (2014). Religious Involvement and Humility. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9(3), 254-265. Krause, N., Pargament, K. I., Hill, P. C. ve Ironson, G. (2016). Humility, Stressful Life Events, and Psychological Well-Being: Findings from the Landmark Spirituality and Health Survey. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 499-510.
53. LaBouff, J. P., Rowatt, W. C., Johnson, M. K., Tsang, J. ve McCullough-Willerton, G. (2012). Humble Persons are More Helpful than less Humble Persons: Evidence from Three Studies. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(1), 16-29.
54. McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I. ve Thoresen, Carl. E. (Ed.). (2000). Forgiveness: Theory, Research, and Practice (1. bs.). New York: The Guilford Press.
55. McElroy, S. E., Rice, K. G., Davis, D. E., Hook, J. N., Hill, P. C., Worthington, E. L. ve Van Tongeren, D. R. (2014). Intellectual Humility: Scale Development and Theoretical Elaborations in the Context of Religious Leadership. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 42(1), 19-30.
56. McElroy-Heltzel, S. E., Davis, D. E., DeBlaere, C., Hook, J. N., Massengale, M., Choe, E. ve Rice, K. G. (2018). Cultural Humility: Pilot Study Testing the Social Bonds Hypothesis in Interethnic Couples. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 65(4), 531-537.
57. Mosher, D. K., Hook, J. N., Captari, L. E., Davis, D. E., DeBlaere, C. ve Owen, J. (2017). Cultural Humility: A Therapeutic Framework for Engaging Diverse Clients. Practice Innovations, 2(4), 221-233.
58. Mosher, D. K., Hook, J. N., Farrel, J. E., Watkins, C. E. ve Davis, D. E. (2017). Cultural Humility. E. L. Worthington, D. E. Davis ve J. N. Hook (Ed.), Handbook of Humility Theory, Research, and Applications içinde (1. bs.). New York: Routledge.
59. Murray, A. (1910). Humility: The Beauty of Holiness. New York: Fleming H. Revell Company.
60. Myers, D. G. ve Diener, E. (1995). Who is Happy? Psychological Science, 6(1), 10-19.
61. Nelson, D. M. (1985). The Virtue of Humility in Judaism: A Critique of Rationalist Hermeneutics. The Journal of Religious Ethics, 13(2), 298-311.
62. Owen, J., Jordan, T. A., Turner, D., Davis, D. E., Hook, J. N. ve Leach, M. M. (2014). Therapists’ Multicultural Orientation: Client Perceptions of Cultural Humility, Spiritual/Religious Commitment, and Therapy Outcomes. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 42(1), 91-98.
63. Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D. ve Mitchell, T. R. (2013). Expressed Humility in Organizations: Implications for Performance, Teams, and Leadership. Organization Science, 24(5), 1517-1538.
64. Pargament, K. I. (1997). The Psychology of Religion and Coping Theory, Research, Practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
65. Park, N., Peterson, C. ve Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Strengths of Character and Well-Being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(5), 603-619.
66. Peterson, C. ve Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character Strengths and Virtues: A Handbook and Classification (1. bs.). New York: Oxford University Press.
67. Pollock, N. C., Noser, A. E., Holden, C. J. ve Zeigler-Hill, V. (2016). Do Orientations to Happiness Mediate the Associations Between Personality Traits and Subjective Well-Being? Journal of Happiness Studies, (17), 713-729.
68. Porter, S. L., Rambachan, A., Vélez de Cea, A., Rabinowitz, D., Pardue, S. ve Jackson, S. (2017). Religious Perspectives on Humility. E. L. Worthington, D. E. Davis ve J. N. Hook (Ed.), Handbook of Humility Theory, Research, and Applications içinde (1. bs.). New York: Routledge.
69. Quiros, A. E. (2006). The Development, Construct Validity, and Clinical Utility of the Healthy Humility Inventory. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Texas A&M University, Texas.
70. Richards, N. (1988). Is Humility a Virtue? American Philosophical Quarterly, 25(3), 253-259.
71. Richards, N. (1992). Humility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
72. Rowatt, W. C., Kang, L. L., Haggard, M. C. ve LaBouff, J. P. (2014). A Social-Personality Perspective on Humility, Religiousness, and Spirituality. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 42(1), 31-40.
73. Rowatt, W. C., Powers, C., Targhetta, V., Comer, J., Kennedy, S. ve LaBouff, J. P. (2006). Development and Initial Validation of an Implicit Measure of Humility Relative to Arrogance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(4), 198-211.
74. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is Everything, or is it? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.
75. Ryff, C. D. ve Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727.
76. Saygın, Y. (2014). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Tevazu Düzeylerinin Denetim Odağı ve Kişilik Özellikleri Açısından İncelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Nemettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.
77. Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic Happiness Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize Your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. New York: Atria Paperback Books.
78. Snyder, C. R., Rand, K. L. ve Sigmon, D. R. (2002). Hope Theory: A Member of the Positive Psychology Family. C. R. Snyder ve S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of Positive Psychology içinde (1. bs., ss. 257-276). New York: Oxford University Press.
79. Sühreveverdî, Ş. (2016). Gerçek Tasavvuf [Avârifü’l-Meârif]. (D. Selvi, Çev.) (11. bs.). İstanbul: Semerkand Yayınları.
80. Tangney, J. P. (2000). Humility: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Findings and Directions for Future Research. Lournal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 70-82.
81. Tangney, J. P. (2002). Humility. C. R. Snyder ve J. S. Lopez (Ed.), Handbook of Positive Psychology içinde . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
82. Templeton, J. (2012). The Essential Worldwide Laws of Life. West Conshohocken: Templeton Press.
83. Ulu, M. (2018a). Hayatı Anlamlandırma ile Kişilik Özellikleri Arasındaki İlişki Üzerine. Bilimname, XXXVI(2), 165-187. DOI: 10.28949/bilimname.459247
84. Ulu, M. (2018b). İlahiyat Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Psikolojik İyi Oluşları ile Değer Yönelimleri Arasındaki İlişki. Sakarya Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (37), 183-215. DOI: 10.17335/sakaifd.414012
85. Vural, M. E. (2016). Yetişkinlerde Alçakgönüllülük, Dindarlık ve Psikolojik İyi Oluş İlişkisi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
86. Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two Conceptions of Happiness: Contrasts of Personal Expressiveness (Eudaimonia) and Hedonic Enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 678-69.
87. Woodruff, E., Tongeren, D. R. V., McElroy, S. E., Davis, D. E. ve Hook, J. N. (2014). Humility and Religion: Benefits, Difficulties, and a Model of Religious Tolerance. C. Kim-Prieto (Ed.), Religion and Spirituality Across Cultures içinde , Cross-Cultural advancements in Positive Psychology. Dordrecht: Springer.
88. Worthington, E. L. (2017). Political Humility:A Post-Modern Reconceptualization. E. L. Worthington, D. E. Davis ve J. N. Hook (Ed.), Handbook of Humility Theory, Research, and Applications içinde (1. bs.). New York: Routledge.
89. Worthington, E. L. ve Allison, S. T. (2018). Heroic Humility What the Science of Humility Can Say to People Raised on Self-Focus (1. bs.). Washington DC: Amrican Psychological Association.
90. Worthington, E. L., Davis, D. E. ve Hook, J. N. (2017). Introduction: Context, Overview, and Guiding Questions. E. L. Worthington, D. E. Davis ve J. N. Hook (Ed.), Handbook of Humility Theory, Research, and Applications içinde (1. bs., ss. 1-15). New York: Routledge.
91. Worthington, Everett L. (Ed.). (2005). Handbook of Forgiveness (1. bs.). New York: Routledge.
92. Worthington, Everett L. (2006). Forgiveness and Reconciliation: Theory and Application (1. bs.). New York: Routledge.
93. Worthington, Everett L., Goldstein, L., Hammock, B., Griffin, B. J., Garthe, R., Lavelock, C. R., … Tongeren, D. R. V. (2019). Humility: A Qualitative Review. C. R. Snyder ve J. S. Lopez (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology içinde (3. bs.). New York: Oxford University Press.
94. Zawadzka, A. M. ve Zalewska, J. (2013). Can Humility Bring Happiness In Life? The Relationship between Life Aspirations, Subjective Well-Being, And Humility. Roczniki Psychologiczne/Annals Of Psychology, 16(3), 433-449.