A Comparison of Open-Source Learning Management Systems Used for Distance Education in Higher Education Institutions

Abstract

In recent years, advancements in digitalization and internet technologies have facilitated the widespread adoption of distance education and blended learning models in higher education institutions. In this process, Learning Management Systems (LMS) have become essential tools that enhance the quality of education by providing functions such as sharing educational materials, organizing exams, and monitoring student performance. Open-source LMS platforms stand out due to their customizable structures, cost advantages, and strong community support. This study analyzes the strengths and weaknesses of open-source LMSs commonly used in higher education institutions, such as Moodle, Open edX, Sakai, ILIAS, and Canvas. Based on criteria such as user-friendly interfaces, plugin options, data security, and technical support, this review assesses the systems' contributions to educational processes and user experiences. The findings reveal that Moodle and Open edX, with over 140 million and 14 million users respectively, excel in scalability and analytics capabilities, while platforms like Chamilo and Dokeos are more suitable for smaller institutions due to their simplicity and lightweight structure. The study concludes that open-source LMS platforms, with their flexible and economical structures, provide effective tools for supporting the digital transformation of education and offers guidance for selecting suitable platforms to meet institutional goals.

Keywords

• Learning management system (LMS)
• distance learning
• higher education

References

1. [1] D. Ülker and Y. Yılmaz, “Learning Management Systems and Comparison of Open Source Learning Management Systems and Proprietary Learning Management Systems,” Journal of Systems Integration, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 18-24, 2016. Available: https://doi.org/10.20470/jsi.v7i2.255.
2. [2] S. Yılmaz, “Web Teknolojileri ve Yabancı Dil Öğretimi-Japon Yazısı Öğretimi Örneği,” RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, no. Ö15, pp. 933-949, 2024.
3. [3] Ç. Elmas, N. Doğan, S. Biroğul, and M. Koç, “Moodle eğitim yönetim sistemi ile örnek bir dersin uzaktan eğitim uygulaması,” Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, vol. 1, no. 2, 2008.
4. [4] Y. Özarslan, “Uzaktan Eğitim Uygulamaları İçin Açık Kaynak Kodlu Öğrenme Yönetim Sistemleri,” in XIII. Türkiye'de İnternet Konferansı, ODTÜ, Ankara, pp. 55-60, 2008.
5. [5] Ö. Aydın, “Yeni Başlayanlar için Moodle”, XVI. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, Mersin Üniversitesi, Mersin, pp. 115-120, 2014.
6. [6] Ö. Önal, Z. Kaya, and H. Draman, “Moodle: Açık Kaynak Kodlu Bir LMS Örneği,” in Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, Denizli, Türkiye, 2006. Available: https://ab.org.tr/ab06/bildiri/179.pdf.
7. [7] J. Cabero-Almenara, M. L. Arancibia, and A. Del Prete, “Technical and Didactic Knowledge of the Moodle LMS in Higher Education: Beyond Functional Use,” Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2019. Available: https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.1.327.
8. [8] D. Volchek, A. Romanov, and D. Mouromtsev, “Towards the Semantic MOOC: Extracting, Enriching and Interlinking E-Learning Data in Open edX Platform,” in Knowledge Engineering and Semantic Web, P. Różewski and C. Lange, Eds. Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 295–305. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69548-8_20.

9. [9] M. A. Tagoe and Y. Cole, “Using the Sakai Learning Management System to change the way Distance Education nursing students learn: Are we getting it right?” Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 201–221, 2020. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1704232.
10. [10] P. Hasan and A. Varol, “Developing Additional Features into Ilias Learning Management System,” International Journal of Innovative Engineering Applications, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 14-17, 2017.
11. [11] R. John, Canvas LMS Course Design: Create and Deliver Interactive Online Courses on the Canvas Learning Management System, 2nd ed., Packt Publishing Ltd, 2021.
12. [12] Utilization of Chamilo LMS in Learning Media Courses as an Effort to Digitalize Education, (n.d.). International Journal of Business, Law, and Education. Retrieved December 3, 2024, from http://ijble.com/index.php/journal/article/view/284.
13. [13] P. Campanella, “LMS: Benchmarking ATutor, Moodle and Docebo,” in 2022 20th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), pp. 85–90, 2022. Available: Doi: 10.1109/ICETA57911.2022.9974688.
14. [14] N. B. Awang and M. Y. B. Darus, “Evaluation of an Open Source Learning Management System: Claroline,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 67, pp. 416–426, 2012. Available: Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.346.
15. [15] Opigno LMS | Learning Management System based on Drupal, (n.d.). Retrieved December 3, 2024, from https://www.opigno.org/.
16. [16] N. Cavus and T. Zabadi, “A Comparison of Open Source Learning Management Systems,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 143, pp. 521–526, 2014. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.430.
17. [17] N. N. Mohd Kasim and F. Khalid, “Choosing the Right Learning Management System (LMS) for the Higher Education Institution Context: A Systematic Review,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 11, no. 06, p. 55, 2016. Available: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644.
18. [18] G. Issa, S. M. Hussain, and H. Al-Bahadili, “Competition-Based Learning: A Model for the Integration of Competitions with Project-Based Learning using Open Source LMS,” International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2014. Available: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijicte.2014010101.
19. [19] A. Alameen and B. Dhupia, “Implementing Adaptive e-Learning Conceptual Model: A Survey and Comparison with Open Source LMS,” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), vol. 14, no. 21, pp. 28–45, 2019.
20. [20] M. Aberdour, “Open Source Learning Management Systems,” in EPIC White Paper, 2007. Available: https://shorturl.at/010TU. [Accessed: Dec. 2, 2024].
21. [21] S. Alshomrani, “Evaluation of technical factors in distance learning with respect to open source LMS,” Asian Transactions on Computers, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 1117, 2012.