AB Üyesi Ülkelerdeki Yerel Vergi Uygulamaları ve Türkiye’deki Belediyeler İçin Vergi Önerileri

Abstract

Türkiye’de nüfus potansiyeli, gelir ve harcama düzeyi nedeniyle en önemli yerel yönetim birimi, belediyelerdir. Ancak belediyelerin üstlendikleri görev ve sorumluluklar kapsamında yaptıkları harcamalar ile öz gelirleri ve özellikle vergi gelirleri arasında önemli bir tutarsızlık bulunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada belediyelerin içerisine düştüğü mali tutarsızlıktan kurtarılması amacıyla, uzun yıllardır üye olunmaya çalışılan Avrupa Birliği’nin örneklem olarak incelenmesine karar verilmiştir. İnceleme sonucunda ilgili ülkelerde yerel düzeyde uygulanan farklı vergi türleri ve vergileme sistemleri ele alınarak, Türkiye’deki belediyelerin gelir sorununu çözme yolunda vergi gelirlerini artırma odaklı alternatif çözüm önerileri sunulmaya çalışılmıştır. Nihai amaç; Türkiye’deki belediyeleri görevleriyle orantılı gelir kaynaklarına sahip kılma sürecinde, öz gelirler içerisindeki vergi gelirlerinin artışını esas alan yapısal bir dönüşüm sağlamaktır. Araştırma sonucunda belirtilen dönüşümü sağlayacak farklı birçok vergi uygulaması olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.   

Keywords

• Yerel Yönetim,Yerel Vergi,Belediye

Local Tax Applications in EU Member Countries and Tax Recommendations for Municipalities in Turkey

Abstract

The most important units of local government are municipalities in Turkey due to its population potential and income/expenditure levels. However, there is a significant inconsistency between the expenditures of municipalities in the context of their duties and responsibilities and their own-revenues and especially tax revenues. In this study, in order to get rid of the financial inconsistency of municipalities, it has been decided to examine the European Union which Turkey has been trying to become a member for many years. As a result of the study, different tax types and taxation systems applied at the local level in the relevant countries are discussed. Alternative solutions are proposed to increase the tax revenues of municipalities in Turkey in order to solve their income problems. The ultimate aim is a structural transformation that enables growth of tax revenues in achieving municipal duties in Turkey. As a result of the research, it was concluded that there are many different tax applications to provide the stated transformation.

Keywords

• Local Government,Local Tax,Municipality

References

1. Adam, S., Emmerson, C., & Kenley, A. (2007). A Survey of UK Local Government Finance. Institute for Fiscal Studies, IFS Briefing Note, Nr. 74, 1-39.
2. Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (2018). Legea nr. 227/2015 privind Codul fiscal. (Accessed on 08.04.2018), https://static.anaf.ro/static/10/Anaf/legislatie/Cod _fiscal_norme_2016.htm#A486
3. Akdemir, T. (2014). Yerel Vergi Yönetimi: Ülke Uygulamalarına Yönelik Bir Analiz. İçinde: Mustafa Sakal, Ahmet Kesik, Tekin Akdemir A. Kesik, H. Canpolat (Ed.), Mali Yerinden Yönetim: Teori, Kavramsal Açıklamalar ve Türkiye’ye İlişkin Değerlendirmeler (s. 85-144). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
4. Akdemir, T., & Karakurt, B. (2016). Nordik Ülkelerinde İdarelerarası Mali İlişkiler. KTÜ Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6 (11), 127-159.
5. Alcidi, C., Giovannini A., Infelise, F., & Ferrer, J. N. (2014). Division of powers between the European Union, member states, candidate and some potential candidate countries and local and regional authorities: Fiscal decentralisation or federalism. European Committee of the Regions.
6. Alkan, A. T. (2005). Şehir ve Şehir Kavramlarını Yeniden Yorumlamakta Belediyelerin Yeni Görevleri Üzerine Düşünceler. İçinde: Vecdi Akyüz (Ed.), İslam Geleneğinden Günümüze Şehir Hayatı ve Yerel Yönetimler II, (s. 281-285). İstanbul: İlke Yayıncılık.
7. Association of Netherlands Municipalities (2007). Local Government in The Netherlands. (Accessed on 08.09.2016). https://www.vng-international.nl/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Local_Government_in_the_Netherlands.pdf
8. Bağlı, M. S. (2014). Mali Yerelleşme Düzeyinin Ölçümü (Mali Özerklik Derecesi). TODAİE Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler, 23(2), 27-47.

9. Bahl, R., & Bird, R. (2008). Subnational taxes in developing countries: The way forward. Public Budgeting & Finance, 28(4), 1-25.
10. Bailey, S. J. (1999). Local Government Economics: Principles and Practice. UK: Macmillan Press Limited.
11. Basic Law (1949). Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. (Accessed on 04.02.2018), https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_gg /englisch_gg.html#p0585
12. Beer-Tóth, K. (2009). Local Financial Autonomy in Theory and Practice: The Impact of Fiscal Decentralisation in Hungary. Doctoral Thesis. Fribourg: University of Fribourg Switzerland
13. Bird, R. (1995). Financing local services: patterns, problems, and possibilities. Centre for Urban and Community Studies, Major Report 31, Toronto: University of Toronto.
14. Bird, R. (2010). Subnational Taxation in Developing Countries: A Review of the Literature. Policy Research Working Paper 5450, World Bank.
15. Bosch, N., & Durán, J. M. (2008). The Financing System of Spanish Regions: Main Features, Weak Points and Possible Reforms. In: Núria Bosch and José M. Durán (Ed.), Fiscal Federalism and Political Decentralization Lessons from Spain, Germany and Canada (p. 3-26). Studies in Fiscal Federalism and State–Local Finance.
16. Bosch, N., & Espasa, M. (2006). Local government finance in the European Union (EU-15). Barcelona: Diputació de Barcelona.
17. Bozdoğanoğlu, B. (2013). Konaklama Vergisi Uygulaması ve Türkiye’de Uygulanabilirliği. Maliye Dergisi, (164), 131-149.
18. Brezovnik, B., Finžgar, M., & Oplotnik, Ž. J. (2016). Fiscal Decentralisation in Slovenia, Lex Localis, Maribor: Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement, 3-103.
19. Buzescu Ca (2018). Romanian Tax Laws. (Accessed on 08.04.2018), https://www.buzescu.com/romanian-tax-laws/
20. Çelik, A. (2013). Yerel Özerklik Açısından 5393 Sayılı Belediye Kanunu’nun Genel Bir Değerlendirmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 18 (1), 17-28.
21. Çetinkaya, Ö., & Demirbaş, T. (2010). Belediye Gelirlerinin Analizi ve Mali Özerklik Açısından Değerlendirilmesi, İstanbul Üniversitesi. Maliye Araştırma Merkezi Konferansları, 53, 1-18.
22. Citizens Information (2018). Local Property Tax. (Accessed on 29.03.2018), http://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/money_ and_tax/tax/housing_taxes_and_reliefs/local_property_tax .html
23. Çoban, H. (2014). Mali Yerinden Yönetim Kavramı ve İçeriği, İçinde: Mustafa Sakal, Ahmet Kesik, Tekin Akdemir (Ed.), Mali Yerinden Yönetim: Teori, Kavramsal Açıklamalar ve Türkiye’ye İlişkin Değerlendirmeler (s. 24-38). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
24. Commonwealth Local Government Forum (2018). Malta. (Accessed on 21.06.2018), http://www.clgf.org.uk/regions/clgf-europe/malta/
25. Coucounis, G. (2012). Local Government in Cyprus, Inside: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 91-110). Spain: National Insiıtute Of Public Administration.
26. Darby, J., Muscatelli, A., & Roy, G. (2003). Fiscal decentralisation in Europe: A review of recent experience. European Research in Regional Science, 13, 1-32.
27. Davulis, G. (2014). Significance of Local Taxes for Lithuanian Local Government Finance. International Journal of Economic Theory and Application, 1 (5), 60-66.
28. Davulis, G., Peleckis, K., & Slavinskaitė, N. (2013). Development of Local Municipality Taxes and Principles of Fiscal Policy in Lithuania. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3 (8), 38-50.
29. Deloitte (2016). Taxation and Investment in Luxembourg 2016. (Accessed on 06.06.2018), https://www2.deloitte.com/content/ dam/Deloitte/cn/Documents/international-business-supp ort/deloitte-cn-ibs-luxembourg-tax-invest-en-2016.pdf
30. Deloitte (2017a). Taxation and Investment in Belgium 2017. (Accessed on 06.06.2018), https://www2.deloitte.com/content/ dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Tax/dttl-tax-belgiumguide -2017.pdf
31. Deloitte (2017b). Taxation and Investment in Hungary 2017. (Accessed on 06.06.2018), https://www2.deloitte.com/content/ dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Tax/dttl-tax-hungaryguide -2017.pdf
32. Deloitte (2017c). Taxation and Investment in Ireland 2017. (Accessed on 06.06.2018), https://www2.deloitte.com/content /dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Tax/dttl-tax-irelandguide-2017.pdf
33. Deloitte (2017d). International Tax Lithuania Highlights 2017. (Accessed on 06.06.2018), https://www2.deloitte.com/content/ dam/Deloitte/cn/Documents/international-business-suppo rt/deloitte-cn-ibs-lithuania-int-tax-en-2017.pdf
34. Deloitte (2018a). International Tax Greece Highlights 2018. (Accessed on 13.08.2018), https://www2.deloitte.com/content /dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Tax/dttl-tax-greecehighli ghts-2018.pdf?nc=1
35. Deloitte (2018b). International Tax Estonia Highlights 2018. (Accessed on 13.08.2018), https://www2.deloitte.com/content/ dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Tax/dttl-tax-estoniahighli ghts-2018.pdf
36. Denmark Skatteforvaltningen (2018). Tax glossary. (Accessed on 22.03.2018), http://www.skat.dk/skat.aspx?oid=2656&lang=us
37. Department of Housing, Planning and Local Government (2018). Local Government Finance. (Accessed on 29.03.2018), http://www.housing.gov.ie/localgovernment/administration/financ e/local-government-finance
38. DEXIA & CEMR (2012). Subnational public finance in the European Union. 11th edition, Dexia - CEMR Publisher, (Accessed on 07.09.2016), http://www.ccre.org/docs/Note_ CCRE _Dexia_ EN.pdf
39. DEXIA (2006). Sub-national Governments in the European Union, Trends 2000/2005, Economic Outlook, (Accessed on 07.09.2016), http://www.ccre.org/docs/note_conjoncture_ en.pdf
40. DEXIA (2008). Sub-national Governments in the European Union: Organisation, responsibilities and finance. The book at a glance, Dexia Editions.
41. Doğan, M. (2017). Turizm ve Şehir Vergisi: Kuramsal Bir Analiz ve Türkiye Üzerine Öneriler. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 28 (2), 269-280.
42. Doing Business in Hungary (2018). Taxation. (Accessed on 05.03.2018), http://doingbusinessinhungary.com/taxation #municipal-taxes
43. Ebel, R. D., & Taliercio, R. (2004). Subnational Tax Policy Design and Administration in Transition and Developing Countries. In: International Symposium on Fiscal Decentralization in Asia, Tokyo.
44. EIPA & ECR (2012). Division of Powers between the European Union. the Member States and Regional and Local Authorities, European Committee of the Regions.
45. Erdös, E. (2009). The Local Taxation in the European Union – The Hungarian Local Business Tax (HIPA) Case. The Juridical Current, (2), 47-60.
46. ETOA (2018). Tax and tourism. (Accessed on 21.05.2018), https://www.etoa.org/events/policy/regulation-andtaxation/tourist-taxes
47. European Commission (2012). Public finances in EMU – 2012, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, European Economy 4/2012.
48. European Commission (2018). Taxes in Europe Database v3. (Accessed on 23.7.2018), http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/ tedb/splSearchForm.html
49. European Committee of the Regions (2018). Division of Powers. (Accessed on 23.7.2018), https://portal.cor.europa.eu/division powers/Pages/default.aspx
50. Federal Ministry of Finance (2016). An ABC of Taxes. (Accessed on 24.01.2018), https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/ Content/EN/Standardartikel/Press_Room/Publications/Brochures/2012-10-30-abc-on-taxespdf.pdf?blob=publication File &v=17
51. Federal Ministry Republic of Austria (2018). Fiscal Federalism. (Accessed on 23.03.2018), https://english.bmf.gv.at/budget-economic-policy/Fiscal Federalism.html
52. Federal Public Service Finance (2017). Tax Survey, Sta¬ff Service Expertise and Strategic Support, (29). (Accessed on 24.02.2018), https://finance.belgium.be/sites/default/files /downloads/TS2017_V01_ entire.pdf
53. Freire, M. E., & Garzon, H. (2014). Managing Local Revenues, In: Catherine Farvacque-Vitkovic and Mihaly Kopanyi (Ed.), Municipal Finance: A Handbook for Local Governments (p.147-214). Washington.
54. Gamper, A. (2012). Local Government in Austria. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 23-44). Spain: National Insiıtute Of Public Administration.
55. Global Property Guide (2018). Tax on property income in Sweden. (Accessed on 02.03.2018), https://www.globalpropertyguide.com/Europe/Sweden/Taxes-and-Costs
56. Governatori, M. (2012). Fiscal decentralisation in the EU – main characteristics and implications for fiscal outcomes.
57. Gözler, K. (2004). Anayasa Hukukuna Giriş. Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi
58. Grad, F. (2012). Local Government in Slovenia. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 577-599). Spain: National Insiıtute Of Public Administration.
59. Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg Statistical Portal (2018). Taxes and social benefits. (Accessed on 09.03.2018), http://www.statistiques.public.lu/stat/Table Viewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=13224&IF_Language=eng&MainTheme=5&FldrName=3&RFPath=75
60. Gündüz, İ. O. (2008). Yerel Yönetimlerin Bir Borçlanma Yöntemi Olarak Tahvil İhracı. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi.
61. Gündüzöz, İ. (2012). Belediye Ekonomisi: Belediyelerin Ekonomideki Yeri ve Önemi. Ankara: Türkiye Belediyeler Birliği.
62. Güner, A. (2006). Yönetimler Arası Gelir Bölüşümü: Temel İlke ve Uygulamalar. İçinde: A. Güner, S. Yılmaz, (Ed.), Mali Yerelleşme: Teori ve Uygulama Üzerine Yazılar (s. 61-82). İstanbul: Güncel Yayıncılık.
63. Güner, A., & Yılmaz, S. (2006). Belediye Gelirlerinin Esneklik Analizi. İçinde: A. Güner, S. Yılmaz, (Ed.), Mali Yerelleşme: Teori ve Uygulama Üzerine Yazılar (s. 83-94). İstanbul: Güncel Yayıncılık.
64. Güngör, H. (2015). Belediye Öz Gelirlerinin Tahsilatı ve Denetimi. İller ve Belediyeler Dergisi, (811), 10-20.
65. Hammar, H., & Verbeek, L. (2017). Local democracy in Estonia, CPL32(2017)04final. The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, Council of Europe.
66. Hammar, H., & Wüthrich-Pelloli, U. (2014). Local and regional democracy in Belgium, CG (27)7FINAL, Strasbourg, 27th SESSION, The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, Council of Europe.
67. Himsworth, C. (2012). Local Government in United Kingdom, In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 663-683). Spain: National Insiıtute Of Public Administration.
68. Hlepas, Nikolaos-K. (2012). Local Government in Greece, In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 257-282). Spain: National Insiıtute Of Public Administration.
69. Howarth, N. (2016). “Cyprus Property Taxes in 2017”, Cyprus Property News. (Accessed on 06.06.2018), http://www.news.cyprus-property-buyers.com/2016/12/31/property-taxes-2017/id=00151983
70. Howarth, N. (2018). “Cyprus Property Taxes in 2018”, Cyprus Property News. (Accessed on 06.06.2018) http://www.news.cyprus-property-buyers.com/2018/01/04/ cyprus-property-taxes-2018/id=00 153086
71. I Amsterdam (2018). Types of Taxes in the Netherlands. (Accessed on 11.04.2018), https://www.iamsterdam.com/en/ living/everydayessentials/finance/taxes
72. Institute of Public Finance (2018). Croatian Tax System. (Accessed on 06.06.2018), http://www.ijf.hr/upload/files/file/ ENG/taxtable.pdf
73. İpek, S. (2010). İdarelerarası Vergi Paylaşımına Farklı Bir Yaklaşım: Yerel Vergiler ve Vergi Uyumu. İçinde: F. Altuğ, Ö. Çetinkaya, S. İpek (Ed.), Mahalli İdareler Maliyesi Üzerine Yazılar (s. 31-62). Bursa: Ekin Yayınevi.
74. Kelly, R. (1998). Intergovermental Revenue Allocation Theory and Practice: Application to Nepal. UK: Harvard University, Development Discussion Papers, 624, 1-23.
75. Kitchen, H. (2004). Local and Metropolitan Finance, Prepared for a Workshop on: Strengthening Responsive and Accountable Local governance in China. China: Organized Ministry of China.
76. Koçak, Y. (2008). Karşılaştırmalı Yerel Yönetimler. Ankara: Orion Kitabevi.
77. Korlu, K., & Çetinkaya, Ö. (2015). Türkiye’deki Belediyelerin Mali Özerkliğinin Öz Gelirler Bağlamında Analizi ve Değerlendirilmesi. Siyaset, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3 (4), 95-111.
78. Kotarba, B. & Kołomycew, A. (2014). Financial independence of local government units in Poland. Journal of Universal Excellence, 3 (4), 18-35.
79. KPMG (2015). New Fiscal Code from 2016, Tax Newsflash. (Accessed on 19.06.2016), https://home.kpmg.com/content/dam /kpmg/pdf/2015/09/TNF-329-EN-RO.pdf
80. Kulesza, M., & Sześcıło, D. (2012). Local Government in Poland. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 485-504). Spain: National Institute of Public Administration.
81. Law on Financing of Municipalities (2007). Financing of Municipalities Act (ZFO-1). (Accessed on 29.02.2018), http://www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa ?id=ZAKO4615#
82. Law on Local Taxes and Fees (1991). (Accessed on 29.02.2018), https://www.finanse.mf.gov.pl/inne/baza-wiedzy-rss/-/assetpublisher/8PBe/content/id/1169436
83. Law on Revenues of Local Government Units (2003). Ustawa o dochodach jednostek samorządu terytorialnego. (Accessed on 29.02.2018), https://www.finanse.mf.gov.pl/pp/komunikaty-prawne/-/asset_publisher/qqR2/content/id/5254289
84. Law on the Promotion of Tourism Development (2004). (Accessed on 29.02.2018), http:/ /www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregled Predpisa?id=ZAKO1577
85. Legifrance (2018). Code général des impôts, CGI. (Accessed on 04.03.2018), https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichCode.do;jsessionid=58CB72AADE3CC96AC4E389DAA4E48247.tplgfr36s_1?cidTexte=LEGITEXT000006069577&dateTexte=20140101
86. Likumi.lv (2018). Taxes and Duties. (Accessed on 01.03.2018), https://likumi.lv/ta/en/en/id/33946
87. Lisboa Cámara Municipal (2015). Municipal Tourist Tax. (Accessed on 06.03.2018), http://www.cm-lisboa.pt/fileadmin/ MUNICIPIO/Camara_Municipal/Financas/Taxas_Municipais/flyerTMT_UK_web.pdf
88. Local Councils Act (1993). Chapter 363: Local Government Act. (Accessed on 13.02.2018), http://www.justiceservices.gov.mt/DownloadDocument.aspx?app=lom&itemid=8833&l=1
89. Local Taxes Act (1994). Local Taxes Act. (Accessed on 13.02.2018), https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/523052014003/consolide
90. Local Taxes Act (2016). Zakon o lokalni porezima. (Accessed on 13.02.2018), https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2016_12_115_2524.html
91. Local Taxes and Fees Act (1997). Local Taxes and Fees Act. (Accessed on 13.02.2018), http://www.nap.bg/en/document?id=107
92. Local Taxes and Local Fee for Municipal Waste and Minor Construction Waste (2004). (Accessed on 13.02.2018), https://www.finance.gov.sk/en/Components/Category Documents/s_LoadDocument.aspx?categoryId=722&documentId=730
93. Mäeltsemees, S. (2012). Local Government in Estonia. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 157-184). Spain: National Insiıtute Of Public Administration.
94. Mäeltsemees, S. (2016). Local Self-Government in Estonia. Administrative Culture, 17 (2), 79-109.
95. Mäenpää, O. (2012). Local Government in Finland. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 185-202). Spain: National Institute of Public Administration.
96. Mello, L. D. (2010). Europe, Local Government Finance: The Challenges of the 21st Century, Second Global Report on Decentralization and Local Democracy, GOLD II, Barcelona: United Cities and Local Governments, 151-186.
97. Ministerio de Hacienda (2018a). (Accessed on 04.03.2018), http://www.minhafp.gob.es/enGB/Areas%20Tematicas/Financiacion%20Autonomica/Paginas/Regimen%20foral.aspx
98. Ministerio de Hacienda (2018b). (Accessed on 04.03.2018), http://www.minhafp.gob.es/enGB/Areas%20Tematicas/Financiacion%20Autonomica/Paginas/Regimen%20comun .aspx
99. Ministerio de Hacienda (2018c). (Accessed on 04.03.2018), http://www.minhafp.gob.es/en-GB/Areas%20Tematicas/ Financiacion%20Autonomica/Paginas/tributospropiosau tonomicos.aspx
100. Ministerio de Hacienda (2018d). (Accessed on 04.03.2018), http://www.minhafp.gob.es/enGB/Areas%20Tematicas/Financiacion%20Local/paginas/Financiacion%20local.aspx
101. Ministerio Público (2018). Regime Financeiro Das Autarquias Locais E Entidades Intermunicipais. (Accessed on 06.03.2018), http://www.pgdlisboa.pt/leis/lei_mostra_articulado.php?nid=1989&tabela=leis&so_miolo=
102. Ministero Dell'economia E Delle Finanze (2018). (Accessed on 04.03.2018), www.finanze.gov.it
103. Ministry of Finance (2018a). Taxation in Slovenia. (Accessed on (12.03.2018), http://www.mf.gov.si/fileadmin/mf.gov.si/ page uploads/Davki_in_carine/Angle%C5%A1ki/Taxation _in_Slovenia_2018.pdf
104. Ministry of Finance (2018b). Real Estate Taxation. (Accessed on 22.03.2018), http://vm.fi/en/real-estate-taxation
105. Ministry of Finance (2018c). Taxation of Earned Income. (Accessed on 22.03.2018), http://vm.fi/en/taxation-of-earned-income
106. Ministry of Finance (2018d). Business Taxation. (Accessed on 22.03.2018), http://vm.fi/en/business-taxation
107. Ministry of Finance (2018e). Croatian Tax System. (Accessed on 24.03.2018), https://www.porezna-uprava.hr/en/EN_ porezni_sustav/Pages/THE-CROATIAN-TAX-SYSTEM.aspx
108. Moore Stephens Europe (2018). Doing business in Portugal 2018. (Accessed on 12.06.2018), https://www.moorestephens .com/MediaLibsAndFiles/media/MooreStephens/Documents/DBI-Portugal-2018.pdf?ext=.pdf
109. Moreno, Angel-M. (2012). Local Government in Spain. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 599-638). Spain: National Institute of Public Administration.
110. Muhasebat Genel Müdürlüğü (2019). Mahalli İdareler Bütçe İstatistikleri. (Accessed on 19.09.2019), https://muhasebat.hmb.gov.tr/mahalli-idareler-butce-istatistikleri
111. Municipalities Act (1992). (Accessed on 13.02.2018), https://www.government.nl/documents/regulations/2014/ 09/25/municipalities-act
112. Mutluer, M. K., & Öner, E. (2009). Teori ve Uygulamada Mahalli İdareler Maliyesi. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
113. Nacar, B. (2005). Yerel Vergi Düzeni: Kuramsal Temelleri ve Türkiye Uygulaması Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. İstanbul Üniversitesi İktisat Fakültesi, Maliye Araştırma Merkezi Konferansları, 47, 157-178.
114. Nadaroğlu, H. (2001). Mahalli İdareler: Teorisi-Ekonomisi-Uygulaması. İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.
115. Nenkova, P. (2014), Fiscal Decentralization and Local Finance Reforms in Bulgaria: A Review of Ten Years’ Experience. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (23), 342-352.
116. Northern Ireland Assembly Research and Information Service (2018). (Accessed on 21.06.2018), http://www.assemblyresearch matters.org/2018/03/22/what-are-rates-and-why-do-we-pay-them/
117. Northern Ireland Direct Government Services (2018). What Rates Pay For. (Accessed on 29.03.2018), https://www.nidirect.gov.uk/articles/what-rates-pay-for#toc-2
118. OECD & UCLG (2016), Subnational Governments around the world: Structure and finance, A first contribution to the Global Observatory on Local Finances, Part III, Country Profiles, (07.10.2017), https://www.uclg.org/sites/defa ult/files/global_observatory_of_local_finance-part_iii. pdf
119. OECD (2016a). Country Profile: Spain. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Spain.pdf
120. OECD (2016b). Country Profile: Italy. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Italy.pdf
121. OECD (2016ç). Country Profile: Belgium. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Belgium.pdf
122. OECD (2016c). Country Profile: Portugal. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Portugal.pdf
123. OECD (2016d). Country Profile: Latvia. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Latvia.pdf
124. OECD (2016e). Country Profile: Sweden. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Sweden.pdf
125. OECD (2016f). Country Profile: France. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-France.pdf
126. OECD (2016g). Country Profile: Czech Republic. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Czech-Republic.pdf
127. OECD (2016h). Country Profile: Finland. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Finland.pdf
128. OECD (2016ı). Country Profile: Germany. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Germany.pdf
129. OECD (2016i). Country Profile: Slovenia. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Slovenia.pdf
130. OECD (2016j). Country Profile: Croatia. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Croatia.pdf
131. OECD (2016k). Country Profile: Hungary. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Hungary.pdf
132. OECD (2016l). Country Profile: Denmark. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Denmark.pdf
133. OECD (2016m). Country Profile: Cyprus. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Cyprus.pdf
134. OECD (2016n). Country Profile: Poland. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Poland.pdf
135. OECD (2016o). Country Profile: Luxembourg. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Luxembourg.pdf
136. OECD (2016p). Country Profile: Greece. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Greece.pdf
137. OECD (2016r). Country Profile: Ireland. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Ireland.pdf
138. OECD (2016ş). Country Profile: Austria. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Austria.pdf
139. OECD (2016s). Country Profile: United Kingdom. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-United-Kingdom.pdf
140. OECD (2016t). Country Profile: Romania. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Romania.pdf
141. OECD (2016u). Country Profile: Bulgaria. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Bulgaria.pdf
142. OECD (2016ü). Country Profile: Netherlands. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Netherlands.pdf
143. OECD (2016v). Country Profile: Slovak Republic. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Slovak-Republic.pdf
144. OECD (2016x). Country Profile: Malta. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Malta.pdf
145. OECD (2016y). Country Profile: Lithuania. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Lithuania.pdf
146. OECD (2016z). Country Profile: Estonia. (Accessed on 07.02.2017), http://www.oecd.org/regional/regional-policy/profile-Estonia.pdf
147. OECD (2018). Subnational Governments in OECD Countries: Key Data 2018, (Accessed on 23.08.2018), https://www.oecd .org/regional/regional-policy/Subnational-governments-in-OECD-Countries -Key-Data-2018.pdf
148. Ökmen, M., & Koç, N. (2015). Türkiye’de Belediye Gelirleri İçinde Borçlanma ve Borçların Azaltılması İçin Öneriler. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 22 (2), 551-565.
149. Özer, M. A. (2015). Yerel Yönetim Merkezi Yönetim İlişkilerinde Gelir Bölüşümü Sorunu ve Türkiye’deki Son Durumun Değerlendirilmesi. Türk İdare Dergisi, (481), 525-558.
150. Pater, B. (2013). The Structure of Forest Tax in Poland, IV. Financial Aspects of Organizational Management, 323-334.
151. Pevcin, P. (2012). Local government in Slovenia: Structure, size, and expenditures. Croat. & Comp. Pub. Admin., 12 (3), 705-724.
152. Prud’homme, R. (1994). On the Dangers of Decentralization. Policy Research Working Paper, 1252, The World Bank, 1-38.
153. Rautava, R., & Dickson, S. (2017). Local democracy in the Republic of Malta. CPL32(2017)02final, 32nd SESSION, The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe.
154. Ruskov & Kollegen (2018). Local Taxes and Fees. (Accessed on 17.04.2018), http://www.bulgaria-tax-law.bg/local-taxes-fees.html
155. Sakınç, S. (2012). Yerel Yönetimler Maliyesi Teori-Politika-Uygulama. Ankara: Orion Kitapevi.
156. Sandford, M. (2014). English Local Government Finance: Issues and Options. Research Paper 14/43. London: House of Commons Library, 1-47.
157. Šaparnienė, D., & Lazauskienė, A. (2012). Local Government in Lithuania. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 389-410). Spain: National Institute of Public Administration.
158. Sauer, A. (2013). The System of the Local Self-Governments in Poland. Research Paper 6/2013, Association for International Affairs, 1-25.
159. Scannell, Y. (2012). Local Government in Ireland. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 309-338). Spain: National Insiıtute Of Public Administration.
160. SCB (2018). Local Taxes. (Accessed on 02.03.2018), http://www.scb.se/oe0101-en
161. Schefold, D. (2012). Local Government in Germany. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 233-256). Spain: National Institute of Public Administration.
162. SKAT (2016). Tax in Denmark. (Accessed on 11.03.2018), http://skat.dk/getfile.aspx?id=130346
163. Steiner, E. (2016). Introduction to the Hungarian Local Government System. TÖOSZ, 1-16, (Accessed on 10.03.2018). http://www.manorka.net/uploads/images/Kiadv%C3%A1n yok/Local%20Governments_boritoval.pdf
164. Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting (2018). Local Self-Government. (Accessed on 02.03.2018), https://skl.se/tjanster /englishpages/municipalitiescountycouncilsandregions/localselfgovernment.1305.html
165. Tanasescu, S. (2012). Local Government in Romania. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 533-554). Spain: National Institute of Public Administration.
166. Tekdere M. (2019). Avrupa Birliği Üyesi Ülkelerin Yerel Yönetim Yapıları. Türk & İslam Dünyası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 248-282.
167. The Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities (2018). Local Government Finances. (Accessed on 22.03.2018), https://www.localfinland.fi/expert-services/finnish-municipalities-and-regions//local-government-finances
168. The Portugal News (2018). Porto introduces tourist tax of €2 per night from March. (Accessed on 06.03.2018), http://theportugalnews.com/news/porto-introduces-tourist-tax-of-2-per-night-from-march/44260
169. Torres Pereira, A., & Mosler-Törnström, G. (2015). Local and regional democracy in Greece. CG/2015(28)8FINAL, Strasbourg, 28th Session, The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, Council of Europe.
170. Torres Pereira, A., & Van Overmeire, K. (2017). Local and regional democracy in Finland. The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, Council of Europe.
171. Tortop, N. (1996). Yerel Yönetimler Maliyesi (Görev ve Kaynak Bölüşümü), Nr. 263. Ankara: TODAİE.
172. Tortop, N. (2008). Yerel Yönetimlerin Hizmet ve Gelir Bölüşümünün Önemi ve Saydamlık. İller ve Belediyeler Dergisi, (727), 13-14.
173. Tortop, N., Aykaç, B., Yayman, H., & Özer, M. A. (2014). Mahalli İdareler. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
174. TÜİK (2019). Adrese Dayalı Nüfus Kayıt Sistemi. (Accessed on 19.09.2019), http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1059
175. Ulusoy, A., & Akdemir, T. (2009). Yerel Yönetimler ve Mali Özerklik: Türkiye ve OECD Ülkelerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12 (21), 259-287.
176. Ulusoy, A., & Akdemir, T. (2013). Yerel Yönetimlerin Finansman Sorunlarının Çözümünde Motorlu Taşıtlar Vergisi Önerisi. Sosyoekonomi,1, 87-116.
177. Ulusoy, A., & Akdemir, T. (2014). Mahalli İdareler. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
178. Ulusoy, A., & Tekdere, M. (2017). Mali Yerelleşme ve Metropolleşme İkilemi, SOBİDER, 4 (15), 436-464.
179. UN-HABITAT (2009). Guide to Municipal Finance, The Human Settlements Financing Tools and Best Practices Series, United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
180. Union of Cyprus Municipalities (2018). (Accessed on 18.03.2018), http://www.ucm.org.cy/Webcontent.aspx?Code=EN.ABOUT.LocalAuthorities&Language=English
181. Uzun, F. (2010). İngiltere’de Yerel Yönetimler. İller ve Belediyeler Dergisi, (742-743), Türkiye Belediyeler Birliği, 78-89.
182. Van Haaren-Dresens, I. (2012). Local Government in The Netherlands. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 459-484). Spain: National Institute of Public Administration.
183. Vandelli, L. (2012). Local Government in Italy. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 339-364). Spain: National Institute of Public Administration.
184. Vilka, I. (2012). Local Government in Latvia. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 365-388). Spain: National Institute of Public Administration.
185. Visma Skatteprogram (2018). (Accessed on 02.03.2018), https://www.vismaspcs.se/visma-support/visma-skatte program/content/online-help/infobanken/fastighetsskatt-avgift-inkomstaret-2018.htm
186. Vodenicharov, A. (2012). Local Government in Bulgaria. In: Angel-Manuel Moreno (Ed.), Local Government in the Member States of the European Union: a comparative legal perspective (p. 69-90). Spain: National Institute of Public Administration.
187. Wagenaar-Kroon, L., & Mosler-Törnström, G. (2014). Local and regional democracy in Sweden. (Accessed on 17.04.2017), https://rm.coe.int/168071a4fc#_Toc382224782
188. Watt, P. (2004). Financing Local Government. Local Government Studies, 30 (4), 609-623.
189. Wellisch, D. (2004). Theory of Public Finance in a Federal State. UK: Cambridge University Press.
190. Wenner, F. (2018). Sustainable urban development and land value taxation: The case of Estonia. Land Use Policy, 77, 790-800.
191. Wienen, J., & Çukur, D. (2012). Local and regional democracy in Portugal, The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, Council of Europe. (Accessed on 03.04.2018), https://rm.coe.int /1680719325# _Toc319429928
192. Wienen, J., & Dickson, S. (2017). Local and regional democracy in Italy, The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, Council of Europe. (Accessed on 02.04.2018), https://rm.coe.int/local-and-regional-democracy-in-italy-monitoring-committee-rapporteurs/1680759b3b
193. World Bank (2002). Romania Local Social Services Delivery Study, Nr. 23492-RO. (Accessed on 17.04.2017), http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTROMA/Resources /lssdmain.pdf
194. World Bank (2013). South East Europe Municipal Finance Review: Local Government Finance in the Western Balkan., Report No: 82649-ECA, Washington.
195. Yakar, S., & Gündüz, İ. O. (2014). Türkiye’de Belediyelerin Vergilendirme Yetkisi: “Var” mı “Yok” mu İşte Bütün Mesele Bu. Sayıştay Dergisi, (92), 117-141.
196. Yılmaz, H. H. (2015). Belediye Gelirlerinin Mali Özerklik Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. Türkiye Belediyeler Birliği, İller ve Belediyeler Dergisi, (807-808), 10-24.
197. Yılmaz, H. H., Emil, M. F., & Kerimoğlu, B. (2012). Yerel Yönetimler Maliyesi – Temel İlkeler ile Mevzuat ve Uygulama Açısından Türk Yerel Yönetim Yapılanmasında Mali Yönetim ve Kaynak Kullanım Sistemi. Yayın No: 10, Ankara: Mali Hizmetler Derneği.