COVID-19 DÖNEMİNDE YÖNETİM YAZININDAKİ ARAŞTIRMA TRENDLERİNİN BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ İLE İNCELENMESİ

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı COVID-19 döneminde yönetim yazının bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile analiz edilerek yönetim yazınında COVID-19’u konu alan çalışmaların araştırma eğilimlerinin tespit edilmesidir. Bu kapsamda Web of Science Core Collection veri tabanında yer alan yönetim alanında COVID-19 literatürüne ilişkin yayınlanan 440 makale bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle atıf analizi, bibliyografik eşleştirme, ortak atıf analizi, ortak varlık analizi, ortak yazar ve bibliyometrik haritalama analizleri aracılığıyla değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda Covid-19’u konu alan yönetim alanında yapılan çalışmaların liderlik, kriz yönetimi, dayanıklılık (rezilyans), iyi oluş, girişimcilik, uzaktan çalışma, iş aile dengesi, çalışma yaşamındaki cinsiyet farklılıkları, tüketici davranışları, sağlık sektörü, sürdürülebilirlik, tedarik zinciri yönetimi, performans, küreselleşme ve kurumsal sosyal sorumluk gibi konular üzerine yoğunlaştığı tespit edilmiştir. Bununla birlikte yönetim yazınında Covid-19’u konu alan ve pandeminin örgütler ve çalışanlar üzerindeki etkilerini tespit etmeye yönelik alanın gelişimine katkı sağlayan çalışmalar bulunsa da gelecekte yapılacak olan çalışmaların aile işletmeleri, küçük ve orta ölçekli işletmeler gibi pandeminin olumsuz sonuçlarından en fazla etkilenebilecek olan işletmeler üzerinde yapılması önerilmektedir.

Keywords

• Covid-19
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Yönetim
• Ortak Varlık Analizi
• Ortak Atıf Analizi

INVESTIGATION OF THE RESEARCH TRENDS IN THE MANAGEMENT IN THE COVID-19 PERIOD BY USING BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the research trends of the studies on COVID-19 in the management literature by analyzing the management literature with the bibliometric analysis method in the period of COVID-19. In this context, 440 articles published on the COVID-19 literature in the field of management in the Web of Science Core Collection database were evaluated using bibliometric analysis method, citation analysis, bibliographic matching, co-citation analysis, co-occurrence analysis, co-author and bibliometric mapping analyzes. As a result of the research, the studies conducted in the field of management on Covid-19 include leadership, crisis management, resilience, well-being, entrepreneurship, remote work, work-family balance, gender differences in working life, consumer behavior, health sector, sustainability, supply chain management, performance, globalization and corporate social responsibility. Although there are studies that focus on Covid-19 in the management literature and contribute to the development of the field to determine the effects of the pandemic on organizations and employees, it is suggested that future studies should be carried out on businesses that may be most affected by the negative consequences of the pandemic, such as family businesses, small and medium-sized businesses.

Keywords

• Covid-19
• Bibliometric Analysis
• Management
• Co-occurrence Analysis
• Co-citation Analysis

References

1. Acedo, F. J., & Casillas, J. C. (2005). Current paradigms in the international management field: An author co-citation analysis. International Business Review, 14(5), 619-639.
2. Acedo, F. J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galán, J. L. (2006). Co‐authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957-983.
3. Al, U. (2012). Avrupa Birliği ülkeleri ve Türkiye’nin yayın ve atıf performansı. Bilig, 62: 1-20.
4. Almeida-Filho, N., Kawachi, I., Filho, A. P., & Dachs, J. N. W. (2003). Research on health inequalities in Latin America and the Caribbean: bibliometric analysis (1971–2000) and descriptive content analysis (1971–1995). American Journal of Public Health, 93(12), 2037-2043.
5. Aristovnik, A., Ravšelj, D., & Umek, L. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 across science and social science research landscape. Sustainability, 12(21), 1-30.
6. Batistič, S., Černe, M., & Vogel, B. (2017). Just how multi-level is leadership research? A document co-citation analysis 1980–2013 on leadership constructs and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 86-103.
7. Baum, T., Mooney, S. K., Robinson, R. N., & Solnet, D. (2020). COVID-19’s impact on the hospitality workforce–new crisis or amplification of the norm?. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 2397-2407.
8. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows. Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.

9. Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately?. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404.
10. Chai, K. H., & Xiao, X. (2012). Understanding design research: A bibliometric analysis of Design Studies (1996–2010). Design Studies, 33(1), 24-43.
11. Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377.
12. Chesbrough, H. (2020). To recover faster from Covid-19, open up: Managerial implications from an open innovation perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 410-413.
13. Cobo, M. J., López‐Herrera, A. G., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2012). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609-1630.
14. Collins, C., Landivar, L. C., Ruppanner, L., & Scarborough, W. J. (2020). COVID‐19 and the gender gap in work hours. Gender, Work & Organization, 1-12.
15. Culnan, M. J. (1987). Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980-1985: a co-citation analysis. Mis Quarterly, 341-353.
16. Dehghanbanadaki, H., Seif, F., Vahidi, Y., Razi, F., Hashemi, E., Khoshmirsafa, M., & Aazami, H. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on Coronavirus (COVID-19). Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran (MJIRI), 34(1), 354-362.
17. Di Guardo, M. C., & Harrigan, K. R. (2012). Mapping research on strategic alliances and innovation: a co-citation analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(6), 789-811.
18. Díez-Martín, F., Blanco-González, A., & Prado-Román, C. (2020). The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals. Review of Managerial Science, 1-37.
19. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Co-citation, bibliographic coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks. Scientometrics, 55(3), 349-361.
20. Fernandez, A. A., & Shaw, G. P. (2020). Academic Leadership in a Time of Crisis: The Coronavirus and COVID‐19. Journal of Leadership Studies, 14(1), 39-45.
21. Finsterwalder, J., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2020). Equilibrating resources and challenges during crises: a framework for service ecosystem well-being. Journal of Service Management, 1107-1129.
22. García-Lillo, F., Úbeda-García, M., & Marco-Lajara, B. (2016). Organizational ambidexterity: exploring the knowledge base. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1021-1040.
23. Garfield, E. (1977). Introducing citation classics-human side of scientific reports. Current Comments, 1, 5-7.
24. Garfield, E., Pudovkin, A. I., & Istomin, V. S. (2003). Mapping the output of topical searches in the Web of Knowledge and the case of Watson-Crick. Information Technology and Libraries, 22(4), 183-188.
25. Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140, 194-220.
26. Gmür, M. (2003). Co-citation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics, 57(1), 27-57.
27. Gundolf, K., & Filser, M. (2013). Management research and religion: A citation analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 177-185.
28. Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on educational administration: science mapping the literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335-369.
29. Hammami, A., Harrabi, B., Mohr, M., & Krustrup, P. (2020). Physical activity and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): specific recommendations for home-based physical training. Managing Sport and Leisure, 1-6.
30. Hansen, N. K., & Vogel, R. (2010). The routine concept in organization theory and strategic management: A co-citation analysis. 4th International Conference on Organizational Routines “Organizational routines between change and stability: Linking empirical research to recent theoretical debates”. Nice, June, 11-12.
31. Heradio, R., De La Torre, L., Galan, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016). Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis. Computers & Education, 98, 14-38.
32. Hossain, M. M. (2020). Current status of global research on novel coronavirus disease (Covid-19): A bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping. F1000 Research, 9, 1-14.
33. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
34. Kücher, A., & Feldbauer-Durstmüller, B. (2019). Organizational failure and decline–A bibliometric study of the scientific frontend. Journal of Business Research, 98, 503-516.
35. Laato, S., Islam, A. N., Islam, M. N., & Whelan, E. (2020). What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic?. European Journal of Information Systems, 1-18.
36. Li, J., & Tsui, A. S. (2002). A citation analysis of management and organization research in the Chinese context: 1984–1999. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(1), 87-107.
37. Lou, J., Tian, S. J., Niu, S. M., Kang, X. Q., Lian, H. X., Zhang, L. X., & Zhang, J. J. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019: a bibliometric analysis and review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 24(6), 3411-3421.
38. Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega, 73, 37-48.
39. Meyers, R. A., Brashers, D., Center, C., Beck, C., & Wert‐Gray, S. (1992). A citation analysis of organizational communication research. Southern Journal of Communication, 57(3), 241-246.
40. Mo, Y., Deng, L., Zhang, L., Lang, Q., Liao, C., Wang, N., Qin, M., & Huang, H. (2020). Work stress among Chinese nurses to support Wuhan in fighting against COVID‐19 epidemic. Journal of Nursing Management, 1002-1009.
41. Nerur, S. P., Rasheed, A. A., & Natarajan, V. (2008). The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co‐citation analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29(3), 319-336.
42. Odone, A., Salvati, S., Bellini, L., Bucci, D., Capraro, M., Gaetti, G., Amerio, A. & Signorelli, C. (2020). The runaway science: a bibliometric analysis of the COVID-19 scientific literature. Acta Biomed, 91(9-S), 34-39.
43. Pilkington, A., & Chai, K. H. (2008). Research themes, concepts and relationships. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 19(1), 83-110.
44. Popadić, M., & Milohnić, I. (2016). Structure of the organizational ambidexterity field: Qualitative literature review, article co-citation analysis, and science mapping. Informatologia, 49(1-2), 47-60.
45. Ratten, V. (2020). Coronavirus and international business: An entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective. Thunderbird International Business Review, 62(5), 629-634.
46. Shiau, W. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Yang, H. S. (2017). Co-citation and cluster analyses of extant literature on social networks. International Journal of Information Management, 37(5), 390-399.
47. Singh, V., Verma, S., & Chaurasia, S. S. (2020). Mapping the themes and intellectual structure of corporate university: co-citation and cluster analyses. Scientometrics, 122(3), 1275-1302.
48. Thelwall, M. (2008). Bibliometrics to webometrics. Journal of information science, 34(4), 605-621.
49. Tuzovic, S., & Kabadayı, S. (2020). The influence of social distancing on employee well-being: a conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Service Management, 1757-5818.
50. Uysal, Ö. Ö. (2010). Business ethics research with an accounting focus: A bibliometric analysis from 1988 to 2007. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(1), 137-160.
51. Üsdiken, B., & Pasadeos, Y. (1995). Organizational analysis in North America and Europe: A comparison of co-citation networks. Organization studies, 16(3), 503-526.
52. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
53. Verma, S., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in the field of business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Business Research, 118, 253-261.
54. Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication‐level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378-2392.
55. Waltman, L., Van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629-635.
56. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2014). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.